Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2013

01-04-2013 | Original Research Article

Sensitivity and specificity of the step VEP in suspected functional visual acuity loss

Authors: Ruth Hamilton, Michael S. Bradnam, Gordon N. Dutton, Anna L. Lai Chooi Yan, Tim E. Lavy, I. Livingstone, Alison M. Mackay, Jane R. Mackinnon

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background/aim

Early and accurate diagnosis of functional visual loss (FVL) allows optimum management. Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) offer a means of objectively estimating acuity and therefore could assist with early and accurate diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the step VEP in diagnosing FVL.

Methods

A retrospective audit was conducted in 36 school-aged children presenting with reduced visual acuity and clinical suspicion of FVL. All had undergone step VEP testing as part of their investigation. Medical notes were reviewed, and where necessary, referring centres, general practitioners or electronic clinical portals were consulted to obtain longer-term outcome data.

Results

Twenty-seven of the 36 patients (75 %) were classified as having had FVL: all had a normal step VEP spatial threshold. Nine patients (25 %) had an organic cause for their acuity loss, of whom seven had abnormal step VEP spatial thresholds: the other two patients had some functional overlay to their organic disease. The step VEP sensitivity was 78 % (95 % confidence interval 40–96 %), and specificity was 100 % (95 % confidence interval 84–100 %).

Conclusion

The high specificity of the step VEP for FVL warrants increased suspicion of an organic cause should the step VEP spatial threshold be abnormal.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chen CS, Lee AW, Karagiannis A, Crompton JL, Selva D (2007) Practical clinical approaches to functional visual loss. J Clin Neurosci 14:1–7 Chen CS, Lee AW, Karagiannis A, Crompton JL, Selva D (2007) Practical clinical approaches to functional visual loss. J Clin Neurosci 14:1–7
2.
3.
go back to reference Mace CJ, Trimble MR (1991) ‘Hysteria’, ‘functional’ or ‘psychogenic’? A survey of British neurologists’ preferences. J R Soc Med 84:471–475 Mace CJ, Trimble MR (1991) ‘Hysteria’, ‘functional’ or ‘psychogenic’? A survey of British neurologists’ preferences. J R Soc Med 84:471–475
4.
go back to reference Taylor D (1997) Non-organic visual disorders. In: Taylor D (ed) Paediatric ophthalmology. Blackwell Science Ltd, London, pp 765–771 Taylor D (1997) Non-organic visual disorders. In: Taylor D (ed) Paediatric ophthalmology. Blackwell Science Ltd, London, pp 765–771
5.
go back to reference Behrman J (1969) The visual evoked response in hysterical amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 53:839–845 Behrman J (1969) The visual evoked response in hysterical amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 53:839–845
6.
go back to reference Potts AM, Nagaya T (1969) Studies on the visual evoked response: III. Strabismus amblyopia and hysterical amblyopia. Doc Ophthalmol 26:394–402PubMedCrossRef Potts AM, Nagaya T (1969) Studies on the visual evoked response: III. Strabismus amblyopia and hysterical amblyopia. Doc Ophthalmol 26:394–402PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Berman MS, Levi DM (1975) Hysterical amblyopia: electrodiagnostic and clinical evaluation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 52:267–274PubMedCrossRef Berman MS, Levi DM (1975) Hysterical amblyopia: electrodiagnostic and clinical evaluation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 52:267–274PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kramer KK, La Piana FG, Appleton B (1979) Ocular malingering and hysteria: diagnosis and management. Surv Ophthalmol 24:89–96PubMedCrossRef Kramer KK, La Piana FG, Appleton B (1979) Ocular malingering and hysteria: diagnosis and management. Surv Ophthalmol 24:89–96PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Röver J, Bach M (1987) Pattern electroretinogram plus visual evoked potential: a decisive test in patients suspected of malingering. Doc Ophthalmol 66:245–251PubMedCrossRef Röver J, Bach M (1987) Pattern electroretinogram plus visual evoked potential: a decisive test in patients suspected of malingering. Doc Ophthalmol 66:245–251PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bobak P, Khanna P, Goodwin J, Brigell M (1993) Pattern visual evoked potentials in cases of ambiguous acuity loss. Doc Ophthalmol 85:185–192PubMedCrossRef Bobak P, Khanna P, Goodwin J, Brigell M (1993) Pattern visual evoked potentials in cases of ambiguous acuity loss. Doc Ophthalmol 85:185–192PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Saitoh E, Adachi-Usami E, Mizota A, Fujimoto N (2001) Comparison of visual evoked potentials in patients with psychogenic visual disturbance and malingering. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 38:21–26PubMed Saitoh E, Adachi-Usami E, Mizota A, Fujimoto N (2001) Comparison of visual evoked potentials in patients with psychogenic visual disturbance and malingering. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 38:21–26PubMed
12.
go back to reference Nakamura A, Tabuchi A, Matsuda E, Yamaguchi W (2000) Dynamic topography of pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) in psychogenic visual loss patients. Doc Ophthalmol 101:95–113PubMedCrossRef Nakamura A, Tabuchi A, Matsuda E, Yamaguchi W (2000) Dynamic topography of pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) in psychogenic visual loss patients. Doc Ophthalmol 101:95–113PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nakamura A, Akio T, Matsuda E, Wakami Y (2001) Pattern visual evoked potentials in malingering. J Neuro-Ophthalmol 21:42–45CrossRef Nakamura A, Akio T, Matsuda E, Wakami Y (2001) Pattern visual evoked potentials in malingering. J Neuro-Ophthalmol 21:42–45CrossRef
14.
go back to reference McBain VA, Robson AG, Hogg CR, Holder GE (2007) Assessment of patients with suspected non-organic visual loss using pattern appearance visual evoked potentials. Graefes Arch Clin Exp 245:502–510 McBain VA, Robson AG, Hogg CR, Holder GE (2007) Assessment of patients with suspected non-organic visual loss using pattern appearance visual evoked potentials. Graefes Arch Clin Exp 245:502–510
15.
go back to reference Xu S, Meyer D, Yoser S, Mathews D, Elfervig JL (2001) Pattern visual evoked potential in the diagnosis of functional visual loss. Ophthalmology 108:76–81PubMedCrossRef Xu S, Meyer D, Yoser S, Mathews D, Elfervig JL (2001) Pattern visual evoked potential in the diagnosis of functional visual loss. Ophthalmology 108:76–81PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Steele M, Seiple WH, Carr RE, Klug R (1989) The clinical utility of visual-evoked potential acuity testing. Am J Ophthalmol 108:572–577PubMed Steele M, Seiple WH, Carr RE, Klug R (1989) The clinical utility of visual-evoked potential acuity testing. Am J Ophthalmol 108:572–577PubMed
17.
go back to reference Tyler CW, Apkarian P, Levi DM, Nakayama K (1979) Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:703–713 Tyler CW, Apkarian P, Levi DM, Nakayama K (1979) Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:703–713
18.
go back to reference Mackay AM, Bradnam MS, Hamilton R, Elliot AT, Dutton GN (2008) Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:438–441 Mackay AM, Bradnam MS, Hamilton R, Elliot AT, Dutton GN (2008) Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:438–441
19.
go back to reference Colenbrander A (2003) Aspects of vision loss-visual functions and functional vision. Vis Impair Res 5:115–136CrossRef Colenbrander A (2003) Aspects of vision loss-visual functions and functional vision. Vis Impair Res 5:115–136CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Brown B, Lovie-Kitchin J (1993) Repeated visual acuity measurement: establishing the patient’s own criterion for change. Optom Vis Sci 70(1):45–53 Brown B, Lovie-Kitchin J (1993) Repeated visual acuity measurement: establishing the patient’s own criterion for change. Optom Vis Sci 70(1):45–53
21.
go back to reference Mackay AM, Hamilton R, Bradnam MS (2003) Faster and more sensitive VEP recording in children. Doc Ophthalmol 107:251–259 Mackay AM, Hamilton R, Bradnam MS (2003) Faster and more sensitive VEP recording in children. Doc Ophthalmol 107:251–259
22.
go back to reference Mackay AM, Bradnam MS, Hamilton R (2003) Rapid detection of threshold VEPs. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1009–1020PubMedCrossRef Mackay AM, Bradnam MS, Hamilton R (2003) Rapid detection of threshold VEPs. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1009–1020PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Victor JD, Mast J (1991) A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroencephalog Clin Neurophysiol 78:378–388 Victor JD, Mast J (1991) A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroencephalog Clin Neurophysiol 78:378–388
24.
go back to reference Meigen T, Bach M (2000) On the statistical significance of electrophysiological steady-state responses. Doc Ophthalmol 98:207–232 Meigen T, Bach M (2000) On the statistical significance of electrophysiological steady-state responses. Doc Ophthalmol 98:207–232
25.
go back to reference Mackay AM (2003) Assessing children’s visual acuity using steady-state evoked potentials. University of Glasgow. PhD Thesis Mackay AM (2003) Assessing children’s visual acuity using steady-state evoked potentials. University of Glasgow. PhD Thesis
26.
go back to reference Williams C, Northstone K, Sabates R, Feinstein L, Emond A, Dutton GN (2011) Visual perceptual difficulties and under-achievement at school in a large community-based sample of children. PLoS ONE 6:e14772PubMedCrossRef Williams C, Northstone K, Sabates R, Feinstein L, Emond A, Dutton GN (2011) Visual perceptual difficulties and under-achievement at school in a large community-based sample of children. PLoS ONE 6:e14772PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Sensitivity and specificity of the step VEP in suspected functional visual acuity loss
Authors
Ruth Hamilton
Michael S. Bradnam
Gordon N. Dutton
Anna L. Lai Chooi Yan
Tim E. Lavy
I. Livingstone
Alison M. Mackay
Jane R. Mackinnon
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-012-9362-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2013 Go to the issue