Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 9/2022

16-11-2021 | Pancreatic Cyst | Original Article

Utility of Cyst Fluid Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Differentiating Mucinous and Non-mucinous Pancreatic Cysts: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Authors: Imadh Khan, Muhammad Baig, Thrisha Bandepalle, Srinivas R. Puli

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 9/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mucinous pancreatic cysts are considered premalignant and managed differently compared to benign pancreatic cystic lesions. The aim of this updated meta-analysis is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cyst carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in differentiating between mucinous and non-mucinous pancreatic cysts.

Methods

Studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of CEA (cutoff level of 192 ng/mL) in differentiating between mucinous and non-mucinous pancreatic cysts were searched in Medline, Ovid journals, Medline nonindexed citations, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews. Pooled estimates of diagnostic precision were calculated using random and fixed effects models.

Results

Initial search identified 526 reference articles, of these 34 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Data were extracted from 15 studies (n = 2063) which met the inclusion criteria. The pancreatic cystic fluid CEA level at a 192 ng/mL cutoff value had pooled specificity of 88.6% (95% CI 85.9–90.9) and pooled sensitivity was found to be 60.4% (95% CI 57.7–62.9). The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 4.5 (95% CI 2.9–6.9) and the pooled negative likelihood ratio was 0.45 (95% CI 0.38–0.52). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio, the odds of having mucinous cyst with elevated CEA, was 11.4 (95% CI 6.9–18.7). The P for chi-squared heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was > 0.10.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that the cyst fluid CEA level at a 192 ng/mL cutoff value is highly specific in the diagnosis of mucinous cystic lesions with reasonable sensitivity.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Khalid A, Brugge W. ACG practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2339–2349.CrossRef Khalid A, Brugge W. ACG practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2339–2349.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Thiruvengadam N, Park WG. Systematic review of pancreatic cyst fluid biomarkers: the path forward. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015;6:e88.CrossRef Thiruvengadam N, Park WG. Systematic review of pancreatic cyst fluid biomarkers: the path forward. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015;6:e88.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Allen PJ, D’Angelica M, Gonen M, et al. A selective approach to the resection of cystic lesions of the pancreas: results from 539 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2006;244:572–582.PubMedPubMedCentral Allen PJ, D’Angelica M, Gonen M, et al. A selective approach to the resection of cystic lesions of the pancreas: results from 539 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2006;244:572–582.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Wang Q-X, Xiao J, Orange M, Zhang H, Zhu Y-Q. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: a meta-analysis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36:1197–1209.CrossRef Wang Q-X, Xiao J, Orange M, Zhang H, Zhu Y-Q. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: a meta-analysis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36:1197–1209.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Al-Haddad M, El Hajj II, Eloubeidi MA. Endoscopic ultrasound for the evaluation of cystic lesions of the pancreas. J Pancreas. 2010;11:299–309. Al-Haddad M, El Hajj II, Eloubeidi MA. Endoscopic ultrasound for the evaluation of cystic lesions of the pancreas. J Pancreas. 2010;11:299–309.
8.
go back to reference Rockacya M, Khalida A. Update on pancreatic cyst fluid analysis. Ann Gastroenterol. 2012;26:1–6. Rockacya M, Khalida A. Update on pancreatic cyst fluid analysis. Ann Gastroenterol. 2012;26:1–6.
9.
go back to reference Bhutani MS. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and treatment of cystic tumors of the pancreas. J Pancreas. 2004;5:266–272. Bhutani MS. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and treatment of cystic tumors of the pancreas. J Pancreas. 2004;5:266–272.
10.
go back to reference Brugge WR, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandowski E, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1330–1336.CrossRef Brugge WR, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandowski E, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1330–1336.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. New York: Wiley; 2008.CrossRef Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. New York: Wiley; 2008.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Leemis LM, Trivedi KS. A comparison of approximate interval estimators for the Bernoulli parameter. Am Stat. 1996;50:63–68. Leemis LM, Trivedi KS. A comparison of approximate interval estimators for the Bernoulli parameter. Am Stat. 1996;50:63–68.
15.
go back to reference Cox DR. The Analysis of Binary Data. London: Methuen; 1970. Cox DR. The Analysis of Binary Data. London: Methuen; 1970.
16.
go back to reference Agresti A. Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. New York: Wiley; 1984. Agresti A. Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. New York: Wiley; 1984.
17.
go back to reference Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context. London: BMJ Books; 2001. Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context. London: BMJ Books; 2001.
19.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–269.CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–269.CrossRef
21.
30.
go back to reference Nagula S, Kennedy T, Schattner MA, et al. Evaluation of cyst fluid CEA analysis in the diagnosis of mucinous cysts of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1997–2003.CrossRef Nagula S, Kennedy T, Schattner MA, et al. Evaluation of cyst fluid CEA analysis in the diagnosis of mucinous cysts of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1997–2003.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Khalid A, Zahid M, Finkelstein SD, et al. Pancreatic cyst fluid DNA analysis in evaluating pancreatic cysts: a report of the PANDA study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1095–1102.CrossRef Khalid A, Zahid M, Finkelstein SD, et al. Pancreatic cyst fluid DNA analysis in evaluating pancreatic cysts: a report of the PANDA study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1095–1102.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Reddy RP, Smyrk TC, Zapiach M, et al. Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm defined by ovarian stroma: demographics, clinical features, and prevalence of cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:1026–1031.CrossRef Reddy RP, Smyrk TC, Zapiach M, et al. Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm defined by ovarian stroma: demographics, clinical features, and prevalence of cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:1026–1031.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Minami M, Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Yoshida H, Yoshikawa K, Iio M. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: comparison of MR imaging with CT. Radiology. 1989;171:53–56.CrossRef Minami M, Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Yoshida H, Yoshikawa K, Iio M. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: comparison of MR imaging with CT. Radiology. 1989;171:53–56.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference van der Waaij LA, van Dullemen HM, Porte RJ. Cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: a pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:383–389.CrossRef van der Waaij LA, van Dullemen HM, Porte RJ. Cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: a pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:383–389.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Thornton GD, McPhail MJ, Nayagam S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2013;13:48–57.CrossRef Thornton GD, McPhail MJ, Nayagam S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2013;13:48–57.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Majumder S, Taylor WR, Yab TC, et al. Novel methylated DNA markers discriminate advanced neoplasia in pancreatic cysts: marker discovery, tissue validation, and cyst fluid testing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:1539–1549.CrossRef Majumder S, Taylor WR, Yab TC, et al. Novel methylated DNA markers discriminate advanced neoplasia in pancreatic cysts: marker discovery, tissue validation, and cyst fluid testing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:1539–1549.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Singhi AD, McGrath K, Brand RE, et al. Preoperative next-generation sequencing of pancreatic cyst fluid is highly accurate in cyst classification and detection of advanced neoplasia. Gut. 2018;67:2131–2141.CrossRef Singhi AD, McGrath K, Brand RE, et al. Preoperative next-generation sequencing of pancreatic cyst fluid is highly accurate in cyst classification and detection of advanced neoplasia. Gut. 2018;67:2131–2141.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Utility of Cyst Fluid Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Differentiating Mucinous and Non-mucinous Pancreatic Cysts: An Updated Meta-Analysis
Authors
Imadh Khan
Muhammad Baig
Thrisha Bandepalle
Srinivas R. Puli
Publication date
16-11-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 9/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07315-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 9/2022 Go to the issue