Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2022

29-05-2021 | Endoscopy | Original Article

Endoscopy Is Not Associated with Infectious Adverse Events After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Authors: Abraham Segura, Rahul S. Dalal, Meghana Golla, James N. Gerson, Nadim Mahmud, James D. Lewis, Ravy K. Vajravelu

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 6/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with recent hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are considered high risk for gastrointestinal endoscopy due to the potential for procedural bacterial translocation. Prior studies investigating these risks do not account for the higher baseline rate of infectious complications among those who are immunocompromised. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with recent HCT who underwent endoscopy and their matched controls who did not undergo endoscopy.

Methods

We identified patients who underwent HCT followed by upper and/or lower endoscopy at the University of Pennsylvania from 2000 to 2018. Individuals were matched 1:1 by age, sex, and type of HCT to controls who underwent HCT without subsequent endoscopy. Infectious adverse events were assessed by Sepsis-3 and Sepsis-2 criteria. Factors associated with infectious adverse events after endoscopy/index date were assessed using multivariable conditional logistic regression.

Results

We identified 149 patients who underwent HCT and endoscopy and 149 matched controls who underwent HCT without endoscopy. Sepsis-3 infectious adverse events occurred in 3.4% of patients in each group. Sepsis-2 infectious adverse events occurred in 20.1% of patients who underwent endoscopy compared to 19.5% of controls. There was no association between endoscopy and Sepsis-2 infectious adverse events in the multivariable regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio 1.65, 95% CI 0.51–5.26).

Conclusions

When compared to controls with similar immune statuses, patients who underwent endoscopy after HCT did not have a higher risk of infectious adverse events. These results may inform clinical decision making regarding the risks and benefits of endoscopic management after HCT.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schulenburg A, Turetschek K, Wrba F et al. Early and late gastrointestinal complications after myeloablative and nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Ann Hematol 2004;83:101–106.CrossRef Schulenburg A, Turetschek K, Wrba F et al. Early and late gastrointestinal complications after myeloablative and nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Ann Hematol 2004;83:101–106.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fallows G, Rubinger M, Bernstein CN. Does gastroenterology consultation change management of patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation? Bone Marrow Transplant 2001;28:289–294.CrossRef Fallows G, Rubinger M, Bernstein CN. Does gastroenterology consultation change management of patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation? Bone Marrow Transplant 2001;28:289–294.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bianco JA, Pepe MS, Higano C et al. Prevalence of clinically relevant bacteremia after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in bone marrow transplant recipients. Am J Med 1990;89:134–136.CrossRef Bianco JA, Pepe MS, Higano C et al. Prevalence of clinically relevant bacteremia after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in bone marrow transplant recipients. Am J Med 1990;89:134–136.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Abu-Sbeih H, Ali FS, Coronel E et al. Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients with thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2019;89:937-949.e932.CrossRef Abu-Sbeih H, Ali FS, Coronel E et al. Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients with thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2019;89:937-949.e932.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wingard JR, Hsu J, Hiemenz JW. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an overview of infection risks and epidemiology. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2010;24:257–272.CrossRef Wingard JR, Hsu J, Hiemenz JW. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an overview of infection risks and epidemiology. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2010;24:257–272.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kumar G, Ahmad S, Taneja A et al. Severe sepsis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Crit Care Med 2015;43:411–421.CrossRef Kumar G, Ahmad S, Taneja A et al. Severe sepsis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Crit Care Med 2015;43:411–421.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Allison MC, Sandoe JAT, Tighe R, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2009;869–880. Allison MC, Sandoe JAT, Tighe R, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2009;869–880.
8.
go back to reference Khashab MA, Chithadi KV, Acosta RD et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2015;81:81–89.CrossRef Khashab MA, Chithadi KV, Acosta RD et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2015;81:81–89.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference D’Souza A, Lee S, Zhu X, Pasquini M. Current use and trends in hematopoietic cell transplantation in the United States. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017;23:1417–1421.CrossRef D’Souza A, Lee S, Zhu X, Pasquini M. Current use and trends in hematopoietic cell transplantation in the United States. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017;23:1417–1421.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Golla M, Segura A, Gerson JN, Mahmud N, Vajravelu RK. 967 National trends of gastrointestinal endoscopy after hematopoietic cell transplantation in The United States, 2012–2016. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2020;91:AB84–AB84.CrossRef Golla M, Segura A, Gerson JN, Mahmud N, Vajravelu RK. 967 National trends of gastrointestinal endoscopy after hematopoietic cell transplantation in The United States, 2012–2016. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2020;91:AB84–AB84.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L et al. Incidence and trends of sepsis in US hospitals using clinical vs claims data, 2009–2014. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 2017;318:1241–1249.CrossRef Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L et al. Incidence and trends of sepsis in US hospitals using clinical vs claims data, 2009–2014. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 2017;318:1241–1249.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour C et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3), New York: American Medical Association; 2016; 801–810. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour C et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3), New York: American Medical Association; 2016; 801–810.
13.
go back to reference Calderwood AH, Day LW, Raman Muthusamy V, et al. Communication from the ASGE quality assurance in endoscopy committee guideline infection control during GI endoscopy prepared by: ASGE Quality Assurance in Endoscopy Committee. 2017. Calderwood AH, Day LW, Raman Muthusamy V, et al. Communication from the ASGE quality assurance in endoscopy committee guideline infection control during GI endoscopy prepared by: ASGE Quality Assurance in Endoscopy Committee. 2017.
14.
go back to reference Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. City; Elsevier: pp. 1644–1655. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. City; Elsevier: pp. 1644–1655.
15.
go back to reference Sartelli M, Kluger Y, Ansaloni L et al. Raising concerns about the Sepsis-3 definitions. New York: BioMed Central Ltd; 2018.CrossRef Sartelli M, Kluger Y, Ansaloni L et al. Raising concerns about the Sepsis-3 definitions. New York: BioMed Central Ltd; 2018.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–383.CrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–383.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:613–619.CrossRef Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:613–619.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Boxer LA. How to approach neutropenia, New York: American Society of Hematology; 2012; 174–182. Boxer LA. How to approach neutropenia, New York: American Society of Hematology; 2012; 174–182.
19.
go back to reference Yang H, Zhou W, Lv H et al. The association between CMV viremia or endoscopic features and histopathological characteristics of CMV colitis in patients with underlying ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2017;23:814–821.CrossRef Yang H, Zhou W, Lv H et al. The association between CMV viremia or endoscopic features and histopathological characteristics of CMV colitis in patients with underlying ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2017;23:814–821.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983;70:41–55.CrossRef Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983;70:41–55.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ross WA, Ghosh S, Dekovich AA et al. Endoscopic biopsy diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: rectosigmoid biopsies are more sensitive than upper gastrointestinal biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:982–989.CrossRef Ross WA, Ghosh S, Dekovich AA et al. Endoscopic biopsy diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: rectosigmoid biopsies are more sensitive than upper gastrointestinal biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:982–989.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Carnevale-Schianca F, Leisenring W, Martin PJ et al. Longitudinal assessment of morbidity and acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: retrospective analysis of a multicenter phase III study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009;15:749–756.CrossRef Carnevale-Schianca F, Leisenring W, Martin PJ et al. Longitudinal assessment of morbidity and acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: retrospective analysis of a multicenter phase III study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009;15:749–756.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Naymagon S, Naymagon L, Wong SY et al. Acute graft-versus-host disease of the gut: considerations for the gastroenterologist, New York: Nature Publishing Group; 2017; 711–726. Naymagon S, Naymagon L, Wong SY et al. Acute graft-versus-host disease of the gut: considerations for the gastroenterologist, New York: Nature Publishing Group; 2017; 711–726.
24.
go back to reference Majhail NS, Mau LW, Chitphakdithai P et al. Transplant center characteristics and survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults. Bone Marrow Transplant 2020;55:906–917.CrossRef Majhail NS, Mau LW, Chitphakdithai P et al. Transplant center characteristics and survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults. Bone Marrow Transplant 2020;55:906–917.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Endoscopy Is Not Associated with Infectious Adverse Events After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Authors
Abraham Segura
Rahul S. Dalal
Meghana Golla
James N. Gerson
Nadim Mahmud
James D. Lewis
Ravy K. Vajravelu
Publication date
29-05-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07062-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2022 Go to the issue