Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1/2022

01-01-2022 | Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Original Article

A Prognostic Prediction Model of Transarterial Radioembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: SNAP-HCC

Authors: Joon Yeul Nam, Yun Bin Lee, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Su Jong Yu, Hyo-Cheol Kim, Jin Wook Chung, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Yoon Jun Kim

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Prognosis prediction in patient with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transarterial radioembolization (TARE) remains difficult. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model to aid in the decision to use TARE.

Methods

A total of 174 patients in Korea who underwent TARE for HCC as the initial treatment were included. We developed a prediction model for overall survival (OS) based on independent risk factors for OS and validated the model by bootstrap method.

Results

The median maximal size of the tumors was 8.2 cm, the median number of tumors was 2, and the median albumin level was 4.0 g/dL. Portal vein tumor thrombosis was found in 46.0% (Vp1–3 [39.7%] and Vp4 [6.3%]). Four independent risk factors associated with OS (maximal tumor size, tumor number, albumin, and portal vein tumor thrombosis) were used to develop the SNAP-HCC score. Bootstrap validation of the scoring index determined that the Harrell’s c-index for OS was 0.756 (95% confidence interval: 0.729–0.783). Patients grouped based on their SNAP-HCC (scores 0–5) were well discriminated, with significant differences between the groups (all P < 0.05). Patients with SNAP-HCC < 3 showed significantly longer OS than patients with SNAP-HCC ≥ 3 (P < 0.001). The respective survival probabilities at years 1 and 3 were 0.81 and 0.73 in the low-risk (SNAP-HCC < 3) and 0.32 and 0.14 in the high-risk (SNAP-HCC ≥ 3) patients.

Conclusions

The SNAP-HCC scoring system predicted the outcome of HCC patients undergoing TARE as an initial treatment. This model could be helpful for initial planning the treatment of HCC patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends—an update. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers 2016;25:16–27CrossRef Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends—an update. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers 2016;25:16–27CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Carr BI, Guerra V. A hepatocellular carcinoma aggressiveness index and its relationship to liver enzyme levels. Oncology 2016;90:215–220CrossRef Carr BI, Guerra V. A hepatocellular carcinoma aggressiveness index and its relationship to liver enzyme levels. Oncology 2016;90:215–220CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yeung YP, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong BC, Fan ST, Wong J. Natural history of untreated nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma. LWW: City; 2005.CrossRef Yeung YP, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong BC, Fan ST, Wong J. Natural history of untreated nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma. LWW: City; 2005.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hilgard P, Hamami M, Fouly AE et al. Radioembolization with yttrium-90 glass microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: European experience on safety and long-term survival. Hepatology 2010;52:1741–1749CrossRef Hilgard P, Hamami M, Fouly AE et al. Radioembolization with yttrium-90 glass microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: European experience on safety and long-term survival. Hepatology 2010;52:1741–1749CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sangro B, Carpanese L, Cianni R et al. Survival after yttrium-90 resin microsphere radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma across Barcelona clinic liver cancer stages: a European evaluation. Hepatology 2011;54:868–878CrossRef Sangro B, Carpanese L, Cianni R et al. Survival after yttrium-90 resin microsphere radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma across Barcelona clinic liver cancer stages: a European evaluation. Hepatology 2011;54:868–878CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cillo U, Vitale A, Grigoletto F et al. Prospective validation of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. J Hepatol 2006;44:723–731CrossRef Cillo U, Vitale A, Grigoletto F et al. Prospective validation of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. J Hepatol 2006;44:723–731CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kim H-C. Radioembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2017;23:109CrossRef Kim H-C. Radioembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2017;23:109CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Liver EAFTSOT. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69:182–236. Liver EAFTSOT. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69:182–236.
9.
go back to reference Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 2011;53:1020CrossRef Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 2011;53:1020CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2018;67:358–380CrossRef Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2018;67:358–380CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gaba RC, Lewandowski RJ, Hickey R et al. Transcatheter therapy for hepatic malignancy: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. J Vasc Intervent Radiol JVIR 2016;27:457CrossRef Gaba RC, Lewandowski RJ, Hickey R et al. Transcatheter therapy for hepatic malignancy: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. J Vasc Intervent Radiol JVIR 2016;27:457CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Padia SA, Lewandowski RJ, Johnson GE et al. Radioembolization of hepatic malignancies: background, quality improvement guidelines, and future directions. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR 2017;28:1CrossRef Padia SA, Lewandowski RJ, Johnson GE et al. Radioembolization of hepatic malignancies: background, quality improvement guidelines, and future directions. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR 2017;28:1CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hiraoka A, Kumada T, Michitaka K et al. Usefulness of albumin–bilirubin grade for evaluation of prognosis of 2584 Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;31:1031–1036CrossRef Hiraoka A, Kumada T, Michitaka K et al. Usefulness of albumin–bilirubin grade for evaluation of prognosis of 2584 Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;31:1031–1036CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kadalayil L, Benini R, Pallan L et al. A simple prognostic scoring system for patients receiving transarterial embolisation for hepatocellular cancer. Ann Oncol 2013;24:2565–2570CrossRef Kadalayil L, Benini R, Pallan L et al. A simple prognostic scoring system for patients receiving transarterial embolisation for hepatocellular cancer. Ann Oncol 2013;24:2565–2570CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nam JY, Choe AR, Sinn DH et al. A differential risk assessment and decision model for Transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma based on hepatic function. BMC Cancer 2020;20:1–14CrossRef Nam JY, Choe AR, Sinn DH et al. A differential risk assessment and decision model for Transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma based on hepatic function. BMC Cancer 2020;20:1–14CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yasui Y, Tsuchiya K, Kurosaki M et al. Up-to-seven criteria as a useful predictor for tumor downstaging to within Milan criteria and Child-Pugh grade deterioration after initial conventional transarterial chemoembolization. Hepatol Res 2018;48:442–450CrossRef Yasui Y, Tsuchiya K, Kurosaki M et al. Up-to-seven criteria as a useful predictor for tumor downstaging to within Milan criteria and Child-Pugh grade deterioration after initial conventional transarterial chemoembolization. Hepatol Res 2018;48:442–450CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Costentin CE, Ferrone CR, Arellano RS, Ganguli S, Hong TS, Zhu AXJLC. Hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: defining the optimal treatment strategy. Liver Cancer 2017;6:360–374CrossRef Costentin CE, Ferrone CR, Arellano RS, Ganguli S, Hong TS, Zhu AXJLC. Hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: defining the optimal treatment strategy. Liver Cancer 2017;6:360–374CrossRef
18.
go back to reference El Fouly A, Ertle J, El Dorry A et al. In intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: radioembolization with yttrium 90 or chemoembolization? Liver Int 2015;35:627–635CrossRef El Fouly A, Ertle J, El Dorry A et al. In intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: radioembolization with yttrium 90 or chemoembolization? Liver Int 2015;35:627–635CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Moreno-Luna LE, Yang JD, Sanchez W et al. Efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization versus chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 2013;36:714–723CrossRef Moreno-Luna LE, Yang JD, Sanchez W et al. Efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization versus chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 2013;36:714–723CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lobo L, Yakoub D, Picado O et al. Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: radioembolization versus chemoembolization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 2016;39:1580–1588CrossRef Lobo L, Yakoub D, Picado O et al. Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: radioembolization versus chemoembolization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 2016;39:1580–1588CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Strigari L, Sciuto R, Rea S et al. Efficacy and toxicity related to treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with 90Y-SIR spheres: radiobiologic considerations. J Nucl Med 2010;51:1377–1385CrossRef Strigari L, Sciuto R, Rea S et al. Efficacy and toxicity related to treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with 90Y-SIR spheres: radiobiologic considerations. J Nucl Med 2010;51:1377–1385CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Weng Z, Ertle J, Zheng S et al. A new model to estimate prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after Yttrium-90 radioembolization. PLoS One 2013;8:e82225CrossRef Weng Z, Ertle J, Zheng S et al. A new model to estimate prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after Yttrium-90 radioembolization. PLoS One 2013;8:e82225CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lee JS, Lee HA, Jeon MY et al. Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial radioembolization. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;32:739–747CrossRef Lee JS, Lee HA, Jeon MY et al. Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial radioembolization. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;32:739–747CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Prognostic Prediction Model of Transarterial Radioembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: SNAP-HCC
Authors
Joon Yeul Nam
Yun Bin Lee
Jeong-Hoon Lee
Su Jong Yu
Hyo-Cheol Kim
Jin Wook Chung
Jung-Hwan Yoon
Yoon Jun Kim
Publication date
01-01-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-06843-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1/2022 Go to the issue