Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 11/2018

01-11-2018 | Original Article

Prolonged Cecal Insertion Time Is Not Associated with Decreased Adenoma Detection When a Longer Withdrawal Time Is Achieved

Authors: Cassandra D. L. Fritz, Zachary L. Smith, Jeffrey Elsner, Thomas Hollander, Dayna Early, Vladimir Kushnir

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The association between withdrawal time and adenoma detection has been established; however, the effect of cecal insertion time on adenoma detection remains unclear.

Aim

To determine the association between cecal insertion time and adenoma detection.

Methods

This study completed a retrospective analysis of data collected in 4 prospective randomized-controlled trials related to screening and surveillance colonoscopy at a single tertiary care from 2010 to 2016. The primary outcome was cecal insertion time and its association with mean number of adenomas per patient and adenoma detection rate (ADR).

Results

1303 patients met inclusion criteria (average age 59.7 ± 8.7 years; 759 females (58.3%), and 763 Caucasians (58.6%). Mean cecal insertion time was significantly longer in patients who were female (p < 0.001), received moderate sedation (p = 0.001), had fellow involvement (p < 0.001), older (p = 0.002), and lower Boston bowel preparation scale (p < 0.001). Withdrawal time was found to increase as mean cecal insertion time increased (p < 0.001). The mean cecal insertion time was not different in patients with or without adenomas (p = 0.94). Cecal insertion time did not correlate with the mean number of adenomas or advanced adenomas per patient (p > 0.05), which was also true on Poisson regression analysis. Adenomas and advanced adenomas per patient were found to decrease when cecal insertion to withdrawal time ratios were greater than 1 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Prolonged cecal insertion time was not associated with a decrease in ADR, mean number of adenomas or advanced adenomas per patient. When withdrawal times were longer than cecal insertion times, the number of adenomas and advanced adenomas detected per patient was significantly improved.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Levin B, Lieberman D, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130–160.CrossRef Levin B, Lieberman D, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130–160.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cohen J, Pike IM. Defining and measuring quality in endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1–2.CrossRef Cohen J, Pike IM. Defining and measuring quality in endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1–2.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Barclay RL, Vicari J, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–2541.CrossRef Barclay RL, Vicari J, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–2541.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kaminski M, Wieszczy P, Rupinski M, et al. Increased rate of adenoma detection associates with reduced risk of colorectal cancer and death. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:98–105.CrossRef Kaminski M, Wieszczy P, Rupinski M, et al. Increased rate of adenoma detection associates with reduced risk of colorectal cancer and death. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:98–105.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1298–1306.CrossRef Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1298–1306.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lee HL, Eun CS, Lee OY, et al. Significance of colonoscope length in cecal insertion time. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:503–508.CrossRef Lee HL, Eun CS, Lee OY, et al. Significance of colonoscope length in cecal insertion time. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:503–508.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yang M, Cho J, Rampal S, et al. The association between cecal insertion time and colorectal neoplasm detection. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:124.CrossRef Yang M, Cho J, Rampal S, et al. The association between cecal insertion time and colorectal neoplasm detection. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:124.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference von Renteln D, Robertson DJ, Bensen S, Pohl H. Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:574–580.CrossRef von Renteln D, Robertson DJ, Bensen S, Pohl H. Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:574–580.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pohl H, Bensen SP, Toor A, et al. Cap-assisted colonoscopy and detection of Adenomatous Polyps (CAP) study: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2015;47:891–897.CrossRef Pohl H, Bensen SP, Toor A, et al. Cap-assisted colonoscopy and detection of Adenomatous Polyps (CAP) study: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2015;47:891–897.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vu H, Sayuk GS, Hollander T, et al. Resect and discard approach to colon polyps: real-world applicability among academic and community gastroenterologists. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:502–508.CrossRef Vu H, Sayuk GS, Hollander T, et al. Resect and discard approach to colon polyps: real-world applicability among academic and community gastroenterologists. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:502–508.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kushnir VM, Oh YS, Hollander T, et al. Impact of retroflexion vs. second forward view examination of the right colon on adeonma detection: a comparison study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:415–422.CrossRef Kushnir VM, Oh YS, Hollander T, et al. Impact of retroflexion vs. second forward view examination of the right colon on adeonma detection: a comparison study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:415–422.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wang HS, Pisegna J, Modi R, et al. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:71–78.CrossRef Wang HS, Pisegna J, Modi R, et al. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:71–78.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Millan MS, et al. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1217–1220.CrossRef Millan MS, et al. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1217–1220.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Benson ME, Reichelderfer M, Said A, et al. Variation in colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:166–171.CrossRef Benson ME, Reichelderfer M, Said A, et al. Variation in colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:166–171.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gurudu SR, Ratuapli SK, Leighton JA, Heigh RI, Crowell MD. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1466–1471.CrossRef Gurudu SR, Ratuapli SK, Leighton JA, Heigh RI, Crowell MD. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1466–1471.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lee A, Iskander JM, Gupta N, et al. Queue position in the endoscopic schedule impacts effectiveness of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1457–1465.CrossRef Lee A, Iskander JM, Gupta N, et al. Queue position in the endoscopic schedule impacts effectiveness of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1457–1465.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lee A, Jensen CD, Marks A, et al. Endoscopist fatigue estimates and colonoscopic adenoma detection in a large community-based setting. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:601–610.CrossRef Lee A, Jensen CD, Marks A, et al. Endoscopist fatigue estimates and colonoscopic adenoma detection in a large community-based setting. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:601–610.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Franke RH, Kaul JD. The Hawthorne experiments: first statistical interpretation. Am Sociol Rev. 1978;43:623–643.CrossRef Franke RH, Kaul JD. The Hawthorne experiments: first statistical interpretation. Am Sociol Rev. 1978;43:623–643.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prolonged Cecal Insertion Time Is Not Associated with Decreased Adenoma Detection When a Longer Withdrawal Time Is Achieved
Authors
Cassandra D. L. Fritz
Zachary L. Smith
Jeffrey Elsner
Thomas Hollander
Dayna Early
Vladimir Kushnir
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5100-x

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 11/2018 Go to the issue