Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 11/2016

01-11-2016 | Editorial

Seeking the Cecum: Assessing Metrics in Fellow Procedural Training

Authors: Michael Greenspan, Joshua Melson

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 11/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

The ability to independently perform colonoscopy is a fundamental milestone of gastroenterology fellowship training due to the need to learn the many technical and cognitive elements required to master the procedure [13]. Although the field has historically relied heavily on the important metric of cecal intubation as a marker of proficiency in the assessment of trainees [3], there are limitations specific to this metric. First, the ability to intubate the cecum may not correlate with multiple other important procedural skills needed for competency, such as polyp identification and resection, in addition to cognitive skills such as those required to achieve safe sedation and ensure patient comfort and safety [4]. Second, there is wide variation in the number of procedures needed for trainees to perform in order to achieve technical proficiency in cecal intubation, as defined by the metric of ≥90 % success [1, 2, 5]. Furthermore, the numerical threshold for competence is the completion of 140 colonoscopies, a figure based on a single study of 35 trainees, which has since been shown to be a gross underestimate of the number of procedures for colonoscopy proficiency. Thus, proposing a “one-size-fits-all” number of procedures for trainees is puzzling. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, et al. Competence measurement during colonoscopy training: the use of self-assessment of performance measures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:971–975.CrossRefPubMed Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, et al. Competence measurement during colonoscopy training: the use of self-assessment of performance measures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:971–975.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR, et al. Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:319–324.CrossRefPubMed Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR, et al. Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:319–324.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference ASGE Training Committee, Adler DG, Bakis G, et al. Principles of training in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75: 231–235. ASGE Training Committee, Adler DG, Bakis G, et al. Principles of training in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75: 231–235.
4.
go back to reference Training Committee 2010–2011, Sedlack RE, Shami VM, et al. Colonoscopy core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76: 482–490. Training Committee 2010–2011, Sedlack RE, Shami VM, et al. Colonoscopy core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76: 482–490.
5.
go back to reference Ward ST, Mohammed MA, Walt R, et al. An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut. 2014;63:1746–1754.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ward ST, Mohammed MA, Walt R, et al. An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut. 2014;63:1746–1754.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference McCarthy S, Jorgensen J, Elta G, et al. Early splenic flexure intubation competency predicts early cecal intubation competency in gastroenterology fellows. Dig Dis Sci. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s10620-016-4265-4. McCarthy S, Jorgensen J, Elta G, et al. Early splenic flexure intubation competency predicts early cecal intubation competency in gastroenterology fellows. Dig Dis Sci. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.​1007/​s10620-016-4265-4.
7.
go back to reference Bourke MJ, Rex DK. Tips for better colonoscopy from two experts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1467–1472.CrossRefPubMed Bourke MJ, Rex DK. Tips for better colonoscopy from two experts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1467–1472.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ristikankare M, Hartikainen J, Heikkinen M, et al. The effects of gender and age on the colonoscopic examination. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;32:69–75.CrossRefPubMed Ristikankare M, Hartikainen J, Heikkinen M, et al. The effects of gender and age on the colonoscopic examination. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;32:69–75.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference van Doorn SC, Klanderman RB, Hazewinkel Y, et al. Adenoma detection rate varies greatly during colonoscopy training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:122–129.CrossRefPubMed van Doorn SC, Klanderman RB, Hazewinkel Y, et al. Adenoma detection rate varies greatly during colonoscopy training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:122–129.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Seeking the Cecum: Assessing Metrics in Fellow Procedural Training
Authors
Michael Greenspan
Joshua Melson
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4300-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2016

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 11/2016 Go to the issue