Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 2/2020

01-04-2020 | Prostate Cancer | Research Paper

Exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis of 68Gallium-PSMA PET/MRI-based imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer

Authors: Louisa G. Gordon, Thomas M. Elliott, Andre Joshi, Elizabeth D. Williams, Ian Vela

Published in: Clinical & Experimental Metastasis | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Men treated for prostate cancer with curative intent face a recurrence rate of up to 53% at 10 years. 68Ga-PSMA imaging is a new technique that can more accurately stage cancer recurrences and facilitate personalised treatment. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI for staging men with prostate cancer biochemical recurrence. A cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision-analytic model with Markov chains was constructed. 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI was compared with usual care in staging of men with suspected prostate cancer recurrence. Men with biochemical recurrence from a study in Brisbane, Australia (n = 30) provided key estimates for the model. The primary outcomes were health system costs and years of life (survival) over 10 years. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken to address uncertainty in model estimates. On average, a strategy of 68Ga-PSMA was expected to cost AU$56 961(US$39 426) and produce 7.48 life years compared with AU$64 499 (US$44 667) and 7.41 life years in usual care. Therefore, 68Ga-PSMA was potentially cost saving (− AU$7 592 95% UI − $24 846, $7 825) (− US$5 258) and slightly more effective 0.07 life years (95% UI − 0.01, 0.16). The likelihood that 68Ga-PSMA strategy was cost-effective at acceptable thresholds was 87%. The findings were sensitive to the lesion detection rate of the 68Ga-PSMA strategy (52–75%) and the cost of follow up in usual care (AU$1 947 to $2 635). In this exploratory economic evaluation, using 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI to detect prostate cancer recurrence appears to be cost-effective relative to usual care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Taitt HE (2018) Global trends and prostate cancer: a review of incidence, detection, and mortality as influenced by race, ethnicity, and geographic location. Am J Men's Health 12(6):1807–1823CrossRef Taitt HE (2018) Global trends and prostate cancer: a review of incidence, detection, and mortality as influenced by race, ethnicity, and geographic location. Am J Men's Health 12(6):1807–1823CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pisansky TM et al (2019) Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: ASTRO/AUA guideline amendment 2018–2019. J Urol 202(3):533–538CrossRef Pisansky TM et al (2019) Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: ASTRO/AUA guideline amendment 2018–2019. J Urol 202(3):533–538CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lenzo NP, Meyrick D, Turner JH (2018) Review of gallium-68 PSMA PET/CT imaging in the management of prostate cancer. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 8(1):16 Lenzo NP, Meyrick D, Turner JH (2018) Review of gallium-68 PSMA PET/CT imaging in the management of prostate cancer. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 8(1):16
5.
go back to reference Hofman MS et al (2018) A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol. BJU Int 122(5):783–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14374 CrossRefPubMed Hofman MS et al (2018) A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol. BJU Int 122(5):783–793. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​bju.​14374 CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fendler WP et al (2019) Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 5(6):856–863CrossRef Fendler WP et al (2019) Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 5(6):856–863CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sathianathen NJ, Butaney M, Konety BR (2018) The utility of PET-based imaging for prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 37(7):1239–1249CrossRef Sathianathen NJ, Butaney M, Konety BR (2018) The utility of PET-based imaging for prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 37(7):1239–1249CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Husereau D et al (2013) Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 29(2):117–122CrossRef Husereau D et al (2013) Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 29(2):117–122CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Weinstein MC et al (2003) Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices-Modeling Studies. Value Health 6(1):9–17CrossRef Weinstein MC et al (2003) Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices-Modeling Studies. Value Health 6(1):9–17CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Michalski JM et al (2018) Effect of standard vs dose-escalated radiation therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: the NRG oncology RTOG 0126 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 4(6):e180039CrossRef Michalski JM et al (2018) Effect of standard vs dose-escalated radiation therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: the NRG oncology RTOG 0126 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 4(6):e180039CrossRef
12.
go back to reference James ND et al (2016) Failure-free survival and radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic prostate cancer: data from patients in the control arm of the STAMPEDE trial. JAMA Oncol 2(3):348–357CrossRef James ND et al (2016) Failure-free survival and radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic prostate cancer: data from patients in the control arm of the STAMPEDE trial. JAMA Oncol 2(3):348–357CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pommier P et al (2016) Is there a role for pelvic irradiation in localized prostate adenocarcinoma? Update of the long-term survival results of the GETUG-01 randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96(4):759–769CrossRef Pommier P et al (2016) Is there a role for pelvic irradiation in localized prostate adenocarcinoma? Update of the long-term survival results of the GETUG-01 randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96(4):759–769CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shipley WU et al (2017) Radiation with or without antiandrogen therapy in recurrent prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 376(5):417–428CrossRef Shipley WU et al (2017) Radiation with or without antiandrogen therapy in recurrent prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 376(5):417–428CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Klotz L et al (2015) Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin 33(3):272–277CrossRef Klotz L et al (2015) Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin 33(3):272–277CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Messing EM et al (2006) Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Lancet Oncol 7(6):472–479CrossRef Messing EM et al (2006) Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Lancet Oncol 7(6):472–479CrossRef
19.
go back to reference (MSAC) MSAC (2012) MSAC application 1158: final decision analytic protocol (DAP) to guide the assessment of robotic image-guided stereotactic precise beam radiosurgery and radiotherapy for prostate cancer. MSAC. vol 01/09/2018, pp 25–26 (MSAC) MSAC (2012) MSAC application 1158: final decision analytic protocol (DAP) to guide the assessment of robotic image-guided stereotactic precise beam radiosurgery and radiotherapy for prostate cancer. MSAC. vol 01/09/2018, pp 25–26
21.
go back to reference Rowe SP et al (2016) PSMA-based [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT is superior to conventional imaging for lesion detection in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol 18(3):411–419CrossRef Rowe SP et al (2016) PSMA-based [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT is superior to conventional imaging for lesion detection in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol 18(3):411–419CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis of 68Gallium-PSMA PET/MRI-based imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer
Authors
Louisa G. Gordon
Thomas M. Elliott
Andre Joshi
Elizabeth D. Williams
Ian Vela
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0262-0898
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-020-10027-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 2/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine