Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer and Metastasis Reviews 2/2011

01-06-2011 | NON-THEMATIC REVIEW

External validation of a model to predict the survival of patients presenting with a spinal epidural metastasis

Authors: Ronald H. M. A. Bartels, Ton Feuth, Dirk Rades, Rune Hedlund, Carlos Villas, Yvette van der Linden, Wolgang Börm, Arnoud Kappelle, Richard W. M. van der Maazen, J. André Grotenhuis, André L. M. Verbeek

Published in: Cancer and Metastasis Reviews | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The surgical treatment of spinal metastases is evolving. The major problem is the selection of patients who may benefit from surgical treatment. One of the criteria is an expected survival of at least 3 months. A prediction model has been previously developed. The present study has been performed in order to validate externally the model and to demonstrate that this model can be generalized to other institutions and other countries than the Netherlands. Data of 356 patients from five centers in Germany, Spain, Sweden, and the Netherlands who were treated for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression were collected. Hazard ratios in the test population corresponded with those of the developmental population. However, the observed and the expected survival were different. Analysis revealed that the baseline hazard function was significantly different. This tempted us to combine the data and develop a new prediction model. Estimating iteratively, a baseline hazard was composed. An adapted prediction model is presented. External validation of a prediction model revealed a difference in expected survival, although the relative contribution of the specific hazard ratios was the same as in the developmental population. This study emphasized the need to check the baseline hazard function in external validation. A new model has been developed using an estimated baseline hazard.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bartels, R. H. M. A., van der Linden, Y. M., & van der Graaf, W. T. A. (2008). Spinal extradural metastasis: review of current treatment options. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 58, 245–259.CrossRef Bartels, R. H. M. A., van der Linden, Y. M., & van der Graaf, W. T. A. (2008). Spinal extradural metastasis: review of current treatment options. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 58, 245–259.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bartels, R. H. M. A., Feuth, T., van der Maazen, R., et al. (2007). A model to predict the life expectancy of patients with spinal epidural metastasis. Cancer, 110, 2042–2049.PubMedCrossRef Bartels, R. H. M. A., Feuth, T., van der Maazen, R., et al. (2007). A model to predict the life expectancy of patients with spinal epidural metastasis. Cancer, 110, 2042–2049.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Moons, K. G. M., Royston, P., Vergouwe, Y., Grobbee, D. E., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Research methods & reporting. Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how? BMJ, 338, b375.PubMedCrossRef Moons, K. G. M., Royston, P., Vergouwe, Y., Grobbee, D. E., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Research methods & reporting. Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how? BMJ, 338, b375.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Altman, D. G., & Royston, P. (2000). What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Statistics in Medicine, 19, 453–473.PubMedCrossRef Altman, D. G., & Royston, P. (2000). What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Statistics in Medicine, 19, 453–473.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Steyerberg, E. W. (2009). Validation of prediction models. 1, 299–311. Steyerberg, E. W. (2009). Validation of prediction models. 1, 299–311.
6.
go back to reference Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Cook, N. R., et al. (2010). Assessing the performance of prediction models. A framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology, 21, 128–138.PubMedCrossRef Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Cook, N. R., et al. (2010). Assessing the performance of prediction models. A framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology, 21, 128–138.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference van Houwelingen, H. C. (2010). Validation, calibration, revision and combination of prognostic survival models. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 3401–3415.CrossRef van Houwelingen, H. C. (2010). Validation, calibration, revision and combination of prognostic survival models. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 3401–3415.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference van Houwelingen, H. C., & Thorogood, J. (1995). Construction, validation and updating of a prognostic model for kidney graft survival. Statistics in Medicine, 14, 1999–2008.PubMedCrossRef van Houwelingen, H. C., & Thorogood, J. (1995). Construction, validation and updating of a prognostic model for kidney graft survival. Statistics in Medicine, 14, 1999–2008.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference White, I. R., & Royston, P. (2009). Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 1982–1998.PubMedCrossRef White, I. R., & Royston, P. (2009). Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 1982–1998.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Harrell Jr, F. E. (2001). Regression modeling strategies. With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. 1, Harrell Jr, F. E. (2001). Regression modeling strategies. With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. 1,
11.
go back to reference Chow, E., Davis, L., Panzarella, T., et al. (2005). Accuracy of survival prediction by palliative radiation oncologists. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 61, 870–873.PubMedCrossRef Chow, E., Davis, L., Panzarella, T., et al. (2005). Accuracy of survival prediction by palliative radiation oncologists. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 61, 870–873.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chow, E., Harth, T., Hruby, G., Finkelstein, J., Wu, J., & Danjoux, C. (2001). How accurate are physicians’ clinical prediction of survival and the available prognostic tools in estimating survival times in terminally ill cancer patients? A systematic review. Clinical Oncology, 13, 209–218.PubMed Chow, E., Harth, T., Hruby, G., Finkelstein, J., Wu, J., & Danjoux, C. (2001). How accurate are physicians’ clinical prediction of survival and the available prognostic tools in estimating survival times in terminally ill cancer patients? A systematic review. Clinical Oncology, 13, 209–218.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Amdur, R. J., Bennett, J., Olivier, K., et al. (2009). A prospective, phase II study demonstrating the potential value and limitation of radiosurgery for spine metastases. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32, 515–520.CrossRef Amdur, R. J., Bennett, J., Olivier, K., et al. (2009). A prospective, phase II study demonstrating the potential value and limitation of radiosurgery for spine metastases. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32, 515–520.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rades, D., Dunst, J., & Schild, S. E. (2008). The first score predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. Cancer, 112, 157–161.PubMedCrossRef Rades, D., Dunst, J., & Schild, S. E. (2008). The first score predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. Cancer, 112, 157–161.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference van Houwelingen, H. C. (2000). Validation, calibration, revision and combination of prognostic survival models. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 3401–3415.PubMedCrossRef van Houwelingen, H. C. (2000). Validation, calibration, revision and combination of prognostic survival models. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 3401–3415.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Patchell, R. A., Tibbs, P. A., Regine, W. F., et al. (2005). Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet, 366, 643–648.PubMedCrossRef Patchell, R. A., Tibbs, P. A., Regine, W. F., et al. (2005). Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet, 366, 643–648.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Metadata
Title
External validation of a model to predict the survival of patients presenting with a spinal epidural metastasis
Authors
Ronald H. M. A. Bartels
Ton Feuth
Dirk Rades
Rune Hedlund
Carlos Villas
Yvette van der Linden
Wolgang Börm
Arnoud Kappelle
Richard W. M. van der Maazen
J. André Grotenhuis
André L. M. Verbeek
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0167-7659
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-011-9271-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Cancer and Metastasis Reviews 2/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine