Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Original Paper

Cardiac cine CT approaching 1 mSv: implementation and assessment of a 58-ms temporal resolution protocol

Authors: Younhee J. Choi, Mark A. Ahlman, Marissa Mallek, Tyler E. Cork, Marcus Y. Chen, David A. Bluemke, Veit Sandfort

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Clinical use of cardiac cine CT imaging is limited by high radiation dose and low temporal resolution. To evaluate a low radiation dose, high temporal resolution cardiac cine CT protocol in human cardiac CT and phantom scans. CT scans of a circulating iodine target were reconstructed using the conventional single heartbeat half-scan (HS, approx. 175 ms temporal resolution) and the 3-heartbeat multi-segment (MS, approx. 58 ms) algorithms. Motion artifacts were quantified by the root-mean-square error (RMSE). Low-dose cardiac cine CT scans were performed in 55 subjects at a tube potential of 80 kVp and current of 80 mA. Image quality of HS and MS scans was assessed by blinded reader quality assessment, left ventricular (LV) free wall motion, and LV ejection rate. Motion artifacts in phantom scans were higher in HS than in MS reconstructions (RSME 188 and 117 HU, respectively; p = 0.001). Median radiation dose in human scans was 1.2 mSv. LV late diastolic filling was observed more frequently in MS than in HS images (42 vs. 26 subjects, respectively; p < 0.001). LV free wall systolic motion was more physiologic and had less error in MS than in HS reconstructions (sum-of-squared errors 34 vs. 45 mm2, respectively; p < 0.001), and LV peak ejection rate was higher in MS than in HS reconstructions (166 vs. 152 mL/s, respectively; p < 0.001). Cardiac cine CT imaging is feasible at a low radiation dose of 1.2 mSv. MS reconstruction showed improved imaging of rapid motion in phantom studies and human cardiac CTs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amzulescu MS, De Craene M, Langet H, Pasquet A, Vancraeynest D, Pouleur AC, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL (2019) Myocardial strain imaging: review of general principles, validation, and sources of discrepancies. Eur Hear J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:605–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez041 CrossRef Amzulescu MS, De Craene M, Langet H, Pasquet A, Vancraeynest D, Pouleur AC, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL (2019) Myocardial strain imaging: review of general principles, validation, and sources of discrepancies. Eur Hear J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:605–619. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​ehjci/​jez041 CrossRef
6.
15.
go back to reference Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675CrossRef Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Smiseth OA, Torp H, Opdahl A, Haugaa KH, Urheim S (1207b) Myocardial strain imaging: how useful is it in clinical decision making? Eur Heart J 37:1196–1207bCrossRef Smiseth OA, Torp H, Opdahl A, Haugaa KH, Urheim S (1207b) Myocardial strain imaging: how useful is it in clinical decision making? Eur Heart J 37:1196–1207bCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cardiac cine CT approaching 1 mSv: implementation and assessment of a 58-ms temporal resolution protocol
Authors
Younhee J. Choi
Mark A. Ahlman
Marissa Mallek
Tyler E. Cork
Marcus Y. Chen
David A. Bluemke
Veit Sandfort
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01863-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 8/2020 Go to the issue