Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 6/2014

01-08-2014 | Original Paper

Dose reduction for coronary calcium scoring with hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction: an ex vivo study

Authors: Annemarie M. den Harder, Martin J. Willemink, Ronald L. A. W. Bleys, Pim A. de Jong, Ricardo P. J. Budde, Arnold M. R. Schilham, Tim Leiner

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose To determine the influence of dose reduction on coronary calcium scoring using hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques. Methods Fifteen ex vivo hearts were scanned in a phantom representing an average adult person at routine dose and three levels of dose reduction; 27, 55 and 82 % reduced-dose, respectively. All images were reconstructed using filtered back-projection (FBP), hybrid IR (iDose4, levels 1, 4 and 7) as well as model-based IR iterative model reconstruction (IMR, levels 1, 2 and 3). Agatston, mass and volume scores found with iDose4 and IMR were compared to FBP reconstruction (routine dose) as well as objective image quality. Results With FBP calcium scores remained unchanged at 82 % reduced dose. With IR Agatston scores differed significantly at routine dose, using IMR level 3 and iDose4 level 7, and at 82 % reduced dose, using IMR levels 1–3 and iDose4 level 7. The maximum median difference was 5.3 %. Mass remained unchanged at reduced dose levels while volume was significantly lower at 82 % reduced dose with IMR (maximum median difference 5.0 %). Objective image quality improved with IR, at 82 % reduced dose the CNR of iDose4 level 7 was similar to the reference dose CNR, and IMR levels 1–3 resulted in an even higher CNR. Conclusion Calcium scores were not affected by radiation-dose reduction with FBP and low levels of hybrid IR. Objective image quality increased significantly using hybrid and model-based IR. Therefore low level hybrid IR has the potential to reduce radiation-dose of coronary calcium scoring with up to 82 %.
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization (2013) Cardiovascular diseases. Fact sheet no. 317 (Accessed May 2013) World Health Organization (2013) Cardiovascular diseases. Fact sheet no. 317 (Accessed May 2013)
2.
go back to reference Mohlenkamp S, Lehmann N, Greenland P et al (2011) Coronary artery calcium score improves cardiovascular risk prediction in persons without indication for statin therapy. Atherosclerosis 215(1):229–236PubMedCrossRef Mohlenkamp S, Lehmann N, Greenland P et al (2011) Coronary artery calcium score improves cardiovascular risk prediction in persons without indication for statin therapy. Atherosclerosis 215(1):229–236PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA et al (2010) 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(25):e50–e103PubMedCrossRef Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA et al (2010) 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(25):e50–e103PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee TY, Chhem RK (2010) Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT. Eur J Radiol 76(1):28–35PubMedCrossRef Lee TY, Chhem RK (2010) Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT. Eur J Radiol 76(1):28–35PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yu L, Leng S (2010) Image reconstruction techniques. American College of Radiology Yu L, Leng S (2010) Image reconstruction techniques. American College of Radiology
7.
go back to reference Nelson RC, Feuerlein S, Boll DT (2011) New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5(5):286–292PubMedCrossRef Nelson RC, Feuerlein S, Boll DT (2011) New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5(5):286–292PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Willemink MJ, de Jong PA, Leiner T et al (2013) Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography part 1: technical principles. Eur Radiol 23(6):1623–1631PubMedCrossRef Willemink MJ, de Jong PA, Leiner T et al (2013) Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography part 1: technical principles. Eur Radiol 23(6):1623–1631PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Willemink MJ, Leiner T, de Jong PA et al (2013) Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography part 2: initial results in dose reduction and image quality. Eur Radiol 23(6):1632–1642PubMedCrossRef Willemink MJ, Leiner T, de Jong PA et al (2013) Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography part 2: initial results in dose reduction and image quality. Eur Radiol 23(6):1632–1642PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Funama Y, Taguchi K, Utsunomiya D et al (2011) Combination of a low-tube-voltage technique with hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm at coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35(4):480–485PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Funama Y, Taguchi K, Utsunomiya D et al (2011) Combination of a low-tube-voltage technique with hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm at coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35(4):480–485PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mehta D, Thompson R, Morton T, Dhanantwari A, Shefer E (2013) Iterative model reconstruction: simultaneously lowered computed tomography radiation dose and improved image quality. Med Phys 1(2):147–155 Mehta D, Thompson R, Morton T, Dhanantwari A, Shefer E (2013) Iterative model reconstruction: simultaneously lowered computed tomography radiation dose and improved image quality. Med Phys 1(2):147–155
14.
go back to reference Kligerman S, Read K, Dhanantwari A et al (2011) Iterative model reconstruction (IMR) a novel method of noise reduction to improve diagnostic confidence in obese patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). In: Scientific assembly and annual meeting 2011, Radiological Society of North America (07/25) Kligerman S, Read K, Dhanantwari A et al (2011) Iterative model reconstruction (IMR) a novel method of noise reduction to improve diagnostic confidence in obese patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). In: Scientific assembly and annual meeting 2011, Radiological Society of North America (07/25)
16.
go back to reference Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15(4):827–832PubMedCrossRef Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15(4):827–832PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fuchs TA, Fiechter M, Gebhard C et al (2013) CT coronary angiography: impact of adapted statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on coronary stenosis and plaque composition analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(3):719–724PubMedCrossRef Fuchs TA, Fiechter M, Gebhard C et al (2013) CT coronary angiography: impact of adapted statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on coronary stenosis and plaque composition analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(3):719–724PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol 21(10):2130–2138PubMedCrossRef Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol 21(10):2130–2138PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Renker M, Nance JW Jr, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction. Radiology 260(2):390–399PubMedCrossRef Renker M, Nance JW Jr, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction. Radiology 260(2):390–399PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Stolzmann P, Schlett CL, Maurovich-Horvat P et al (2012) Variability and accuracy of coronary CT angiography including use of iterative reconstruction algorithms for plaque burden assessment as compared with intravascular ultrasound-an ex vivo study. Eur Radiol 22(10):2067–2075PubMedCrossRef Stolzmann P, Schlett CL, Maurovich-Horvat P et al (2012) Variability and accuracy of coronary CT angiography including use of iterative reconstruction algorithms for plaque burden assessment as compared with intravascular ultrasound-an ex vivo study. Eur Radiol 22(10):2067–2075PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pontana F, Pagniez J, Duhamel A et al (2013) Reduced-dose low-voltage chest CT angiography with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction versus standard-dose filtered back projection. Radiology 267(2):609–618PubMedCrossRef Pontana F, Pagniez J, Duhamel A et al (2013) Reduced-dose low-voltage chest CT angiography with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction versus standard-dose filtered back projection. Radiology 267(2):609–618PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kurata A, Dharampal A, Dedic A et al (2013) Impact of iterative reconstruction on CT coronary calcium quantification. Eur Radiol 23(12):3246–3252PubMedCrossRef Kurata A, Dharampal A, Dedic A et al (2013) Impact of iterative reconstruction on CT coronary calcium quantification. Eur Radiol 23(12):3246–3252PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gebhard C, Fiechter M, Fuchs TA, et al (2013) Coronary artery calcium scoring: Influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction using 64-MDCT. Int J Cardiol 167(6):2932–2937 Gebhard C, Fiechter M, Fuchs TA, et al (2013) Coronary artery calcium scoring: Influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction using 64-MDCT. Int J Cardiol 167(6):2932–2937
24.
go back to reference Murazaki H, Funama Y, Hatemura M, Fujioka C, Tomiguchi S (2011) Quantitative evaluation of calcium (content) in the coronary artery using hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm on low-dose 64-detector CT: comparison of iDose and filtered back projection. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 67(4):360–366PubMedCrossRef Murazaki H, Funama Y, Hatemura M, Fujioka C, Tomiguchi S (2011) Quantitative evaluation of calcium (content) in the coronary artery using hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm on low-dose 64-detector CT: comparison of iDose and filtered back projection. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 67(4):360–366PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Takx RA, Willemink MJ, Nathoe HM et al (2014) The effect of iterative reconstruction on quantitative computed tomography assessment of coronary plaque composition. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30(1):155–163 Takx RA, Willemink MJ, Nathoe HM et al (2014) The effect of iterative reconstruction on quantitative computed tomography assessment of coronary plaque composition. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30(1):155–163
26.
go back to reference Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Fischbach R et al (2002) Reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in repeat examinations with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT. Eur Radiol 12(6):1532–1540PubMedCrossRef Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Fischbach R et al (2002) Reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in repeat examinations with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT. Eur Radiol 12(6):1532–1540PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA (2003) Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography. Eur Radiol 13(3):484–497PubMed Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA (2003) Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography. Eur Radiol 13(3):484–497PubMed
28.
go back to reference Rutten A, Isgum I, Prokop M (2008) Coronary calcification: effect of small variation of scan starting position on Agatston, volume, and mass scores. Radiology 246(1):90–98PubMedCrossRef Rutten A, Isgum I, Prokop M (2008) Coronary calcification: effect of small variation of scan starting position on Agatston, volume, and mass scores. Radiology 246(1):90–98PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Deprez FC, Vlassenbroek A, Ghaye B, Raaijmakers R, Coche E (2013) Controversies about effects of low-kilovoltage MDCT acquisition on Agatston calcium scoring. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7(1):58–61PubMedCrossRef Deprez FC, Vlassenbroek A, Ghaye B, Raaijmakers R, Coche E (2013) Controversies about effects of low-kilovoltage MDCT acquisition on Agatston calcium scoring. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7(1):58–61PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Marwan M, Mettin C, Pflederer T et al (2013) Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7(1):32–38PubMedCrossRef Marwan M, Mettin C, Pflederer T et al (2013) Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7(1):32–38PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dose reduction for coronary calcium scoring with hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction: an ex vivo study
Authors
Annemarie M. den Harder
Martin J. Willemink
Ronald L. A. W. Bleys
Pim A. de Jong
Ricardo P. J. Budde
Arnold M. R. Schilham
Tim Leiner
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0434-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 6/2014 Go to the issue