Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 7/2013

01-10-2013 | Original Paper

Coronary CT angiography using the second-generation 320-detector row CT: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in various heart rates compared with the first-generation scanner

Authors: Nobuo Tomizawa, Eriko Maeda, Masaaki Akahane, Rumiko Torigoe, Shigeru Kiryu, Kuni Ohtomo

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 7/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

To assess the image quality and radiation dose reduction in various heart rates in coronary CT angiography using the second-generation 320-detector row CT compared with the first-generation CT. Ninety-six patients were retrospectively included. The first 48 patients underwent coronary CT angiography with the first-generation 320-detector row CT, while the last 48 patients underwent with the second-generation CT. Subjective image quality was graded using a 4-point scale (4, excellent; 1, unable to evaluate). Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio were also analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the heart rate. The mean effective dose was derived from the dose length product multiplied by a conversion coefficient for the chest (κ = 0.014 mSv × mGy−1 × cm−1). The overall subjective image quality score showed no significant difference (3.66 vs 3.69, respectively, p = 0.25). The image quality score of the second-generation group tended to be higher than that of the first-generation group in the 66- to 75-bpm subgroup (3.36 vs 3.53, respectively, p = 0.07). No significant difference was observed in image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio. The overall radiation dose reduced by 24 % (3.3 vs 2.5 mSv, respectively, p = 0.03), and the reduction was substantial in patients with higher heart rate (66- to 75-bpm, 4.3 vs 2.2 mSv, respectively, p = 0.009; >75 bpm, 8.2 vs 3.7 mSv, respectively, p = 0.005). The second-generation 320-detector row CT could maintain the image quality while reducing the radiation dose in coronary CT angiography. The dose reduction was larger in patients with higher heart rate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference West AM, Beller GA (2010) 256- and 320-row coronary CTA: is more better? Eur Heart J 31:1823–1825PubMedCrossRef West AM, Beller GA (2010) 256- and 320-row coronary CTA: is more better? Eur Heart J 31:1823–1825PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 31:1908–1915PubMedCrossRef de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 31:1908–1915PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Einstein AJ, Elliston CD, Arai AE et al (2010) Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320–detector row volume scanner. Radiology 254:698–706PubMedCrossRef Einstein AJ, Elliston CD, Arai AE et al (2010) Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320–detector row volume scanner. Radiology 254:698–706PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535–546PubMedCrossRef Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535–546PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Steigner ML, Otero HJ, Cai T et al (2009) Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:85–90PubMedCrossRef Steigner ML, Otero HJ, Cai T et al (2009) Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:85–90PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lee AB, Nandurkar D, Schneider-Kolsky ME et al (2011) Coronary image quality of 320-MDCT in patients with heart rates above 65 beats per minute: preliminary experience. Am J Roentgenol 196:729–735CrossRef Lee AB, Nandurkar D, Schneider-Kolsky ME et al (2011) Coronary image quality of 320-MDCT in patients with heart rates above 65 beats per minute: preliminary experience. Am J Roentgenol 196:729–735CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chen MY, Shanbhag SM, Arai AE (2013) Submillisievert median radiation dose for coronary angiography with a second-generation 320-detector row CT scanner in 107 consecutive patients. Radiology 267:76–85PubMedCrossRef Chen MY, Shanbhag SM, Arai AE (2013) Submillisievert median radiation dose for coronary angiography with a second-generation 320-detector row CT scanner in 107 consecutive patients. Radiology 267:76–85PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301:500–507PubMedCrossRef Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301:500–507PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chen MY, Steigner ML, Leung SW, et al (2013) Simulated 50% radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using adaptive iterative dose reduction in three-dimensions (AIDR3D). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.1007/s10554-013-0190-1 Chen MY, Steigner ML, Leung SW, et al (2013) Simulated 50% radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using adaptive iterative dose reduction in three-dimensions (AIDR3D). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.​1007/​s10554-013-0190-1
10.
go back to reference Bedayat A, Rybicki FJ, Kumamaru KK et al (2012) Reduced exposure using asymmetric cone beam processing for wide area detector cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:381–388PubMedCrossRef Bedayat A, Rybicki FJ, Kumamaru KK et al (2012) Reduced exposure using asymmetric cone beam processing for wide area detector cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:381–388PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:122–136PubMedCrossRef Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:122–136PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tomizawa N, Komatsu S, Akahane M et al (2012) Relationship between beat to beat coronary artery motion and image quality in prospectively ECG-gated two heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:139–146PubMedCrossRef Tomizawa N, Komatsu S, Akahane M et al (2012) Relationship between beat to beat coronary artery motion and image quality in prospectively ECG-gated two heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:139–146PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tomizawa N, Nojo T, Akahane M et al (2012) Adaptive iterative dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using 320-row CT: assessment of radiation dose reduction and image quality. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:318–324PubMedCrossRef Tomizawa N, Nojo T, Akahane M et al (2012) Adaptive iterative dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using 320-row CT: assessment of radiation dose reduction and image quality. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:318–324PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46CrossRef Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Shapiro BP, Young PM, Kantor B et al (2010) Radiation dose reduction in CT coronary angiography. Curr Cardiol Rep 12:59–67PubMedCrossRef Shapiro BP, Young PM, Kantor B et al (2010) Radiation dose reduction in CT coronary angiography. Curr Cardiol Rep 12:59–67PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY et al (2011) SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:198–224PubMedCrossRef Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY et al (2011) SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:198–224PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Leipsic J, LaBounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. Am J Roentgenol 195:655–660CrossRef Leipsic J, LaBounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. Am J Roentgenol 195:655–660CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bittencourt MS, Schmidt B, Seltmann M et al (2011) Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1081–1087PubMedCrossRef Bittencourt MS, Schmidt B, Seltmann M et al (2011) Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1081–1087PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique—comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol 21:2130–2138PubMedCrossRef Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique—comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol 21:2130–2138PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Leipsic J, LaBounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. Am J Roentgenol 195:649–654CrossRef Leipsic J, LaBounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. Am J Roentgenol 195:649–654CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P et al (2010) A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography. Heart 96:922–926PubMedCrossRef Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P et al (2010) A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography. Heart 96:922–926PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mahabadi AA, Achenbach S, Burgstahler C et al (2010) Safety, efficacy, and indications of β-adrenergic receptor blockade to reduce heart rate prior to coronary CT angiography. Radiology 257:614–623PubMedCrossRef Mahabadi AA, Achenbach S, Burgstahler C et al (2010) Safety, efficacy, and indications of β-adrenergic receptor blockade to reduce heart rate prior to coronary CT angiography. Radiology 257:614–623PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jensen CJ, Jochims M, Hunold P et al (2010) Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Influence of beta-blockers on left ventricular function: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 74:484–491PubMedCrossRef Jensen CJ, Jochims M, Hunold P et al (2010) Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Influence of beta-blockers on left ventricular function: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 74:484–491PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al (2010) Evaluation of contraindications and efficacy of oral beta blockade before computed tomographic coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 105:767–772PubMedCrossRef de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al (2010) Evaluation of contraindications and efficacy of oral beta blockade before computed tomographic coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 105:767–772PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sun G, Li M, Li L et al (2011) Optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary CT angiography using 320-detector rows dynamic volume CT. Clin Radiol 66:614–620PubMedCrossRef Sun G, Li M, Li L et al (2011) Optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary CT angiography using 320-detector rows dynamic volume CT. Clin Radiol 66:614–620PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tomizawa N, Yamamoto K, Akahane M, et al (2012) The feasibility of halfcycle reconstruction in high heart rates in coronary CT angiography using 320-row CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.1007/s10554-012-0151-0 Tomizawa N, Yamamoto K, Akahane M, et al (2012) The feasibility of halfcycle reconstruction in high heart rates in coronary CT angiography using 320-row CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.​1007/​s10554-012-0151-0
27.
go back to reference Herzog C, Nguyen SA, Savino G et al (2007) Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy? Radiology 244:121–129PubMedCrossRef Herzog C, Nguyen SA, Savino G et al (2007) Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy? Radiology 244:121–129PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tomizawa N, Nojo T, Akahane M et al (2013) Shorter delay time reduces interpatient variability in coronary enhancement in coronary CT angiography using the bolus tracking method with 320-row CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:185–190PubMedCrossRef Tomizawa N, Nojo T, Akahane M et al (2013) Shorter delay time reduces interpatient variability in coronary enhancement in coronary CT angiography using the bolus tracking method with 320-row CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:185–190PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Coronary CT angiography using the second-generation 320-detector row CT: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in various heart rates compared with the first-generation scanner
Authors
Nobuo Tomizawa
Eriko Maeda
Masaaki Akahane
Rumiko Torigoe
Shigeru Kiryu
Kuni Ohtomo
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-013-0238-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 7/2013 Go to the issue