Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 1/2009

01-01-2009 | Original Paper

Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography

Authors: Michael L. Steigner, Hansel J. Otero, Tianxi Cai, Dimitrios Mitsouras, Leelakrishna Nallamshetty, Amanda G. Whitmore, Hale Ersoy, Noah A. Levit, Marcelo F. Di Carli, Frank J. Rybicki

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the relationship between the phase window width and image quality in prospectively ECG-gated 320-detector row coronary CTA, and to evaluate the relationship between heart rate and the number of cardiac phases with diagnostic quality images. Methods Thirty-six phases (60–95% R-R, 1% increments) were reconstructed in 41 consecutive prospectively gated single R-R 320 × 0.5 mm detector row coronary CTA patients. For each phase, two cardiovascular imagers retrospectively documented the phases considered diagnostic for the left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCx), and right coronary artery (RCA). The smallest phase window width including at least one diagnostic phase for 95% of coronary arteries was determined, and after accounting for sampling variation, the same smallest window width was estimated for the general population. Inter-rater agreement was determined. A linear regression model evaluated the relationship between heart rate and width of diagnostic phase windows. Results Widening the phase window width increases the proportion of coronary arteries with at least one diagnostic phase. Among the 41 patients, 95% of vessels had a diagnostic phase in the 72–77% phase window. Accounting for sampling variation, the 72–81% phase window has a 0.95 probability of including a diagnostic phase for 95% of coronary arteries in the general population. Interobserver agreement was 0.959 with 0.95 confidence interval [0.908, 0.987]. Patients with a lower heart rate had significantly more diagnostic phases. Conclusions For prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat coronary CTA, a phase window width of 10% will reduce patient radiation and yield diagnostic images in >90% of patients. Heart rate control is an important component of 320-detector row prospectively gated CT dose reduction.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246:742–753. doi:10.1148/radiol.2463070989 PubMedCrossRef Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246:742–753. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2463070989 PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology (in press) Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology (in press)
5.
go back to reference Wang Y, Vidan E, Bergman GW (1999) Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography. Radiology 213:751–758PubMed Wang Y, Vidan E, Bergman GW (1999) Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography. Radiology 213:751–758PubMed
Metadata
Title
Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography
Authors
Michael L. Steigner
Hansel J. Otero
Tianxi Cai
Dimitrios Mitsouras
Leelakrishna Nallamshetty
Amanda G. Whitmore
Hale Ersoy
Noah A. Levit
Marcelo F. Di Carli
Frank J. Rybicki
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-008-9347-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 1/2009 Go to the issue

Editorial Comment

E/E′: a prime number?