Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2/2013

Open Access 01-02-2013 | Original Paper

Effect of dose reduction on image quality and diagnostic performance in coronary computed tomography angiography

Authors: Noortje van der Bijl, Raoul M. S. Joemai, Bart J. A. Mertens, Albert de Roos, Wouter J. H. Veldkamp, Jeroen J. Bax, Joanne D. Schuijf, Jacob Geleijns, Lucia J. M. Kroft

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of radiation dose reduction on image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography. Coronary CT angiography studies of 40 patients with (n = 20) and without (n = 20) significant (≥50 %) stenosis were included (26 male, 14 female, 57 ± 11 years). In addition to the original clinical reconstruction (100 % dose), simulated images were created that correspond to 50, 25 and 12.5 % of the original dose. Image quality and diagnostic performance in identifying significant stenosis were determined. Receiver–operator-characteristics analysis was used to assess diagnostic accuracy at different dose levels. The identification of patients with significant stenosis decreased consistently at doses of 50, 25 and 12.5 of the regular clinical acquisition (100 %). The effect was relatively weak at 50 % dose, and was strong at dose levels of 25 and 12.5 %. At lower doses a steady increase was observed for false negative findings. The number of coronary artery segments that were rated as diagnostic decreased gradually with dose, this was most prominent for smaller segments. The area-under-the-curve (AUC) was 0.90 (p = 0.4) at 50 % dose; accuracy decreased significantly with 25 % (AUC 0.70) and 12.5 % dose (AUC 0.60) (p < 0.0001), with underestimation of patients having significant stenosis. The clinical acquisition protocol for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis with CT angiography represents a good balance between image quality and patient dose. A potential for a modest (<50 %) reduction of tube current might exist. However, more substantial reduction of tube current will reduce diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography substantially.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS et al (2008) 64-slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 94(11):1386–1393PubMedCrossRef Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS et al (2008) 64-slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 94(11):1386–1393PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359(22):2324–2336PubMedCrossRef Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359(22):2324–2336PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Meijer AB, YL O, Geleijns J, Kroft LJ (2008) Meta-analysis of 40- and 64-MDCT angiography for assessing coronary artery stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(6):1667–1675PubMedCrossRef Meijer AB, YL O, Geleijns J, Kroft LJ (2008) Meta-analysis of 40- and 64-MDCT angiography for assessing coronary artery stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(6):1667–1675PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mark DB, Berman DS, Budoff MJ et al (2010) ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(23):2663–2699PubMedCrossRef Mark DB, Berman DS, Budoff MJ et al (2010) ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(23):2663–2699PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(22):1864–1894PubMedCrossRef Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(22):1864–1894PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113(10):1305–1310PubMedCrossRef Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113(10):1305–1310PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 248(2):431–437PubMedCrossRef Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 248(2):431–437PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pflederer T, Rudofsky L, Ropers D et al (2009) Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(4):1045–1050PubMedCrossRef Pflederer T, Rudofsky L, Ropers D et al (2009) Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(4):1045–1050PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Einstein AJ, Elliston CD, Arai AE et al (2010) Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner. Radiology 254(3):698–706PubMedCrossRef Einstein AJ, Elliston CD, Arai AE et al (2010) Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner. Radiology 254(3):698–706PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F et al (2009) Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation 120(10):867–875PubMedCrossRef Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F et al (2009) Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation 120(10):867–875PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wang M, Qi HT, Wang XM, Wang T, Chen JH, Liu C (2009) Dose performance and image quality: dual source CT versus single source CT in cardiac CT angiography. Eur J Radiol 72(3):396–400PubMedCrossRef Wang M, Qi HT, Wang XM, Wang T, Chen JH, Liu C (2009) Dose performance and image quality: dual source CT versus single source CT in cardiac CT angiography. Eur J Radiol 72(3):396–400PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fei X, Du X, Li P, Liao J, Shen Y, Li K (2008) Effect of dose-reduced scan protocols on cardiac coronary image quality with 64-row MDCT: a cardiac phantom study. Eur J Radiol 67(1):85–91PubMedCrossRef Fei X, Du X, Li P, Liao J, Shen Y, Li K (2008) Effect of dose-reduced scan protocols on cardiac coronary image quality with 64-row MDCT: a cardiac phantom study. Eur J Radiol 67(1):85–91PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT et al (2008) Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 18(9):1809–1817PubMedCrossRef Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT et al (2008) Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 18(9):1809–1817PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Joemai RM, Geleijns J, Veldkamp WJ (2010) Development and validation of a low dose simulator for computed tomography. Eur Radiol 20(4):958–966PubMedCrossRef Joemai RM, Geleijns J, Veldkamp WJ (2010) Development and validation of a low dose simulator for computed tomography. Eur Radiol 20(4):958–966PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51(4 Suppl):5–40PubMedCrossRef Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51(4 Suppl):5–40PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301(5):500–507PubMedCrossRef Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301(5):500–507PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA et al (2009) Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. JAMA 301(22):2340–2348PubMedCrossRef Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA et al (2009) Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. JAMA 301(22):2340–2348PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246(3):742–753PubMedCrossRef Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246(3):742–753PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pugliese F, Hunink MG, Gruszczynska K et al (2009) Learning curve for coronary CT angiography: what constitutes sufficient training? Radiology 251(2):359–368PubMedCrossRef Pugliese F, Hunink MG, Gruszczynska K et al (2009) Learning curve for coronary CT angiography: what constitutes sufficient training? Radiology 251(2):359–368PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of dose reduction on image quality and diagnostic performance in coronary computed tomography angiography
Authors
Noortje van der Bijl
Raoul M. S. Joemai
Bart J. A. Mertens
Albert de Roos
Wouter J. H. Veldkamp
Jeroen J. Bax
Joanne D. Schuijf
Jacob Geleijns
Lucia J. M. Kroft
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0096-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2/2013 Go to the issue