Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 1/2012

01-06-2012

In-stent area stenosis on 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography: optimal cutoff value for minimum lumen cross-sectional area of coronary stents compared with intravascular ultrasound

Authors: Woocheol Kwon, Jiyoun Choi, Jang-Young Kim, Seong-Yoon Kim, Junghan Yoon, Kyoung-Hoon Choe, Seung Hwan Lee, Sung Gyun Ahn

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Special Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

We aimed to prospectively assess the optimal cutoff value for a minimum lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) on a 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) compared with an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). In 39 patients with 43 stents, the minimum lumen diameter, stent diameter, diameter stenosis, minimum lumen CSA, stent CSA, and area stenosis at the narrowest point were measured independently on 64-slice MDCT and IVUS images. For the assessment of diameter and CSA, 64-slice MDCT showed good correlations with IVUS (r = 0.82 for minimum lumen diameter, r = 0.66 for stent diameter, r = 0.79 for minimum lumen CSA, and r = 0.75 for stent CSA, respectively, P < 0.0001). For the assessment of diameter and area stenoses, a 64-slice MDCT showed good correlations with IVUS (r = 0.89 and 0.91, respectively, P < 0.0001). The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value to detect in-stent area restenosis (≥50 % area stenosis) of a 64-slice MDCT were 77, 100, 100, and 91 %, respectively. The cutoff value of a 64-slice MDCT, determined by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, was 5.0 mm2 with 76.5 % sensitivity and 92.3 % specificity for significant in-stent area restenosis; the area under the ROC curve was 0.902 (P < 0.0001). A good correlation was found between a 64-slice MDCT and the IVUS, regarding the assessment of diameter and area stenoses of coronary stents in selected patients implanted with stents of more than 3 mm in diameter. Optimal cutoff value for the minimum lumen CSA of coronary stents on the 64-slice MDCT is 5 mm2 to predict a CSA of 4 mm2 on IVUS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pache J, Dibra A, Mehilli J et al (2005) Drug-eluting stents compared with thin-strut bare stents for the reduction of restenosis: a prospective, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 26(13):1262–1268PubMedCrossRef Pache J, Dibra A, Mehilli J et al (2005) Drug-eluting stents compared with thin-strut bare stents for the reduction of restenosis: a prospective, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 26(13):1262–1268PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sonoda S, Morino Y, Ako J et al (2004) Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the sirius trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(11):1959–1963PubMedCrossRef Sonoda S, Morino Y, Ako J et al (2004) Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the sirius trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(11):1959–1963PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Mehran R et al (1999) Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings: importance of lumen dimensions. Circulation 100(3):256–261PubMedCrossRef Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Mehran R et al (1999) Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings: importance of lumen dimensions. Circulation 100(3):256–261PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kitagawa T, Fujii T, Tomohiro Y et al (2006) Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 109(2):188–194PubMedCrossRef Kitagawa T, Fujii T, Tomohiro Y et al (2006) Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 109(2):188–194PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kefer JM, Coche E, Vanoverschelde JL et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries. Eur Radiol 17(1):87–96PubMedCrossRef Kefer JM, Coche E, Vanoverschelde JL et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries. Eur Radiol 17(1):87–96PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Das KM, El-Menyar AA, Salam AM et al (2007) Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. Radiology 245(2):424–432PubMedCrossRef Das KM, El-Menyar AA, Salam AM et al (2007) Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. Radiology 245(2):424–432PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F et al (2007) Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(22):2204–2210PubMedCrossRef Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F et al (2007) Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(22):2204–2210PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wykrzykowska JJ, Arbab-Zadeh A, Godoy G et al (2010) Assessment of in-stent restenosis using 64-MDCT: analysis of the CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(1):85–92PubMedCrossRef Wykrzykowska JJ, Arbab-Zadeh A, Godoy G et al (2010) Assessment of in-stent restenosis using 64-MDCT: analysis of the CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(1):85–92PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hamon M, Champ-Rigot L, Morello R et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 18(2):217–225PubMedCrossRef Hamon M, Champ-Rigot L, Morello R et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 18(2):217–225PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Carrabba N, Schuijf JD, de Graaf FR et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol 17(3):470–478PubMedCrossRef Carrabba N, Schuijf JD, de Graaf FR et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol 17(3):470–478PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fujii K, Mintz GS, Kobayashi Y et al (2004) Contribution of stent underexpansion to recurrence after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis. Circulation 109(9):1085–1088PubMedCrossRef Fujii K, Mintz GS, Kobayashi Y et al (2004) Contribution of stent underexpansion to recurrence after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis. Circulation 109(9):1085–1088PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR et al (2006) Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 114(7):645–653PubMedCrossRef Van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR et al (2006) Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 114(7):645–653PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Andreini D, Pontone G, Bartorelli AL et al (2009) Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 103(10):1349–1358PubMedCrossRef Andreini D, Pontone G, Bartorelli AL et al (2009) Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 103(10):1349–1358PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD et al (2001) American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37(5):1478–1492PubMedCrossRef Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD et al (2001) American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37(5):1478–1492PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dragu R, Kerner A, Gruberg L et al (2008) Angiographically uncertain left main coronary artery narrowings: correlation with multidetector computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24(5):557–563PubMedCrossRef Dragu R, Kerner A, Gruberg L et al (2008) Angiographically uncertain left main coronary artery narrowings: correlation with multidetector computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24(5):557–563PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Caussin C, Daoud B, Ghostine S et al (2005) Comparison of lumens of intermediate coronary stenosis using 16-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 96(4):524–528PubMedCrossRef Caussin C, Daoud B, Ghostine S et al (2005) Comparison of lumens of intermediate coronary stenosis using 16-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 96(4):524–528PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Voros S, Rinehart S, Qian Z et al (2011) Prospective validation of standardized, 3-dimensional, quantitative coronary computed tomographic plaque measurements using radiofrequency backscatter intravascular ultrasound as reference standard in intermediate coronary arterial lesions: results from the ATLANTA (assessment of tissue characteristics, lesion morphology, and hemodynamics by angiography with fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology, and noninvasive computed tomography in atherosclerotic plaques) I study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4(2):198–208PubMedCrossRef Voros S, Rinehart S, Qian Z et al (2011) Prospective validation of standardized, 3-dimensional, quantitative coronary computed tomographic plaque measurements using radiofrequency backscatter intravascular ultrasound as reference standard in intermediate coronary arterial lesions: results from the ATLANTA (assessment of tissue characteristics, lesion morphology, and hemodynamics by angiography with fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology, and noninvasive computed tomography in atherosclerotic plaques) I study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4(2):198–208PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Waller BF, Pinkerton CA, Slack JD (1992) Intravascular ultrasound: a histological study of vessels during life. The new ‘gold standard’ for vascular imaging. Circulation 85(6):2305–2310PubMedCrossRef Waller BF, Pinkerton CA, Slack JD (1992) Intravascular ultrasound: a histological study of vessels during life. The new ‘gold standard’ for vascular imaging. Circulation 85(6):2305–2310PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr et al (2006) ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol 47(1):216–235PubMedCrossRef Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr et al (2006) ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol 47(1):216–235PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V et al (2004) Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 110(18):2831–2836PubMedCrossRef Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V et al (2004) Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 110(18):2831–2836PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schroeder S, Flohr T, Kopp AF et al (2001) Accuracy of density measurements within plaques located in artificial coronary arteries by X-ray multislice CT: results of a phantom study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25(6):900–906PubMedCrossRef Schroeder S, Flohr T, Kopp AF et al (2001) Accuracy of density measurements within plaques located in artificial coronary arteries by X-ray multislice CT: results of a phantom study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25(6):900–906PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2005) Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Radiol 15(7):1426–1431PubMedCrossRef Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2005) Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Radiol 15(7):1426–1431PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
In-stent area stenosis on 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography: optimal cutoff value for minimum lumen cross-sectional area of coronary stents compared with intravascular ultrasound
Authors
Woocheol Kwon
Jiyoun Choi
Jang-Young Kim
Seong-Yoon Kim
Junghan Yoon
Kyoung-Hoon Choe
Seung Hwan Lee
Sung Gyun Ahn
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue Special Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0057-x

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2012

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 1/2012 Go to the issue