Top

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Published in:

Open Access 01-03-2012 | Review

Cardiovascular imaging 2011 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Authors: Ricardo A. Costa, Hiram G. Bezerra, Johan H. C. Reiber, Frank J. Rybicki, Paul Schoenhagen, Arthur A. Stillman, Johan De Sutter, Nico R. L. Van de Veire, Ernst E. van der Wall

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 3/2012

Excerpt

Similarly as we did in 2010, please, find below our annual overview of the published papers in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging in the year 2011. We believe that we have received again very interesting papers over the last year, which we have subdivided over the well-known areas, i.e. X-ray angiography, intravascular imaging, echocardiography, nuclear cardiology, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography. In 2011 we published two Topical issues, one on QCA, IVUS and OCT in interventional cardiology (Guest Editors HG Bezerra, RA Costa and HM Garcia-Garcia, Vol. 27, no. 2), and one on Transcatheter Valvular Interventions (Guest Editors JJ Bax and P Schoenhagen, Vol. 27, no. 8). In addition, the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging published two ASCI Special issues with Adjunct Editor YH Choe and Guest Editors BW Choi, H Sakuma and J Lee, the first one being Vol. 27, no. 5 the second one Vol. 27, Suppl 1. …

Ng VG, Lansky AJ (2011) Novel QCA methodologies and angiographic scores. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:157–165PubMedCrossRef

Tuinenburg JC, Koning G, Rares A, Janssen JP, Lansky AJ, Reiber JHC (2011) Dedicated bifurcation analysis: basic principles. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:167–174PubMedCrossRef

Holm NR, Højdahl H, Lassen JF, Thuesen L, Maeng M (2011) Quantitative coronary analysis in the Nordic bifurcation studies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:175–180PubMedCrossRef

Collet C, Costa RA, Abizaid A (2011) Dedicated bifurcation analysis: dedicated devices. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:181–188PubMedCrossRef

Costa RA, Costa MA, Moussa ID (2011) Bifurcation lesion morphology and intravascular ultrasound assessment. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:189–196PubMedCrossRef

Tu S, Holm NR, Koning G, Huang Z, Reiber JH (2011) Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:197–207PubMedCrossRef

Al-Hay AAAH, Shaban LA, Al-Qbandi MA, Anbaei MA (2011) Occlusion of Fontan fenestrations using Amplatzer septal occluder. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:483–490PubMedCrossRef

Hsieh M-C, Chang P-Y, Hsu W-H, Yang S-H, Chan WP (2011) Role of three-dimensional rotational venography in evaluation of the left iliac vein in patients with chronic lower limb edema. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:923–929PubMedCrossRef

Chamié D, Abizaid A, Costa JR Jr et al (2011) Serial angiographic and intravascular ultrasound evaluation to interrogate the presence of late “catch-up” phenomenon after Cypher^® sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:867–874PubMedCrossRef

10.

Brugaletta S, Garcia–Garcia HM, Garg S et al (2011) Temporal changes of coronary artery plaque located behind the struts of the everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:859–866PubMedCrossRef

11.

Shin ES, Garcia–Garcia HM, Garg S et al (2011) Assessment of the serial changes of vessel wall contents in atherosclerotic coronary lesion with bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffolds using shin’s method: an IVUS study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:931–937PubMedCrossRef

12.

Tahara S, Chamié D, Baibars M, Alraies C, Costa M (2011) Optical coherence tomography endpoints in stent clinical investigations: strut coverage. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:271–287PubMedCrossRef

13.

Kim TH, Kim JS, Kim BK et al (2011) Long-term (>/=2 years) follow-up optical coherence tomographic study after sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: Comparison to 9-month follow-up results. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:875–881PubMedCrossRef

14.

Mehanna EA, Attizzani GF, Kyono H, Hake M, Bezerra HG (2011) Assessment of coronary stent by optical coherence tomography, methodology and definitions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:259–269PubMedCrossRef

15.

Garcia–Garcia HM, Gogas BD, Serruys PW, Bruining N (2011) IVUS-based imaging modalities for tissue characterization: similarities and differences. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:215–224PubMedCrossRef

16.

Shin ES, Garcia–Garcia HM, Garg S, Serruys PW (2011) A comparison between plaque-based and vessel-based measurement for plaque component using volumetric intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:491–497PubMedCrossRef

17.

Zhang PF, Su HJ, Zhang M et al (2011) Atherosclerotic plaque components characterization and macrophage infiltration identification by intravascular ultrasound elastography based on b-mode analysis: validation in vivo. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:39–49PubMedCrossRef

18.

Kubo T, Xu C, Wang Z, van Ditzhuijzen NS, Bezerra HG (2011) Plaque and thrombus evaluation by optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:289–298PubMedCrossRef

19.

Shin ES, Garcia–Garcia HM, Garg S, Park J, Kim SJ, Serruys PW (2011) The assessment of Shin’s method for the prediction of creatinine kinase-MB elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention: an intravascular ultrasound study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:883–892PubMedCrossRef

20.

Stefano GT, Bezerra HG, Attizzani G et al (2011) Utilization of frequency domain optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve to assess intermediate coronary artery stenoses: conciliating anatomic and physiologic information. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:299–308PubMedCrossRef

21.

Costa RA, Reiber JHC, Rybicki FJ et al (2011) Cardiovascular Imaging 2010 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:309–320PubMedCrossRef

22.

Mocumbi AO (2011) Echocardiography: a tool to foster research into neglected cardiovascular diseases in Africa. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:321–323PubMedCrossRef

23.

Mocumbi AO, Carrilho C, Saratchchandra P, Ferreira MB, Yacoub M, Burke M (2011) Echocardiography accurately assesses the pathological abnormalities of chronic endomyocardial fibrosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:955–964PubMedCrossRef

24.

Vitarelli A, Capotosto L (2011) Role of echocardiography in the assessment and management of adult congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:843–857PubMedCrossRef

25.

Innocenti F, Totti A, Baroncini C, Fattirolli F, Burgisser C, Pini R (2011) Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in octogenarians. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:65–74PubMedCrossRef

26.

Sachdeva R, Malik S, Seib PM, Frazier EA, Cleves MA (2011) Doppler tissue imaging and catheter-derived measures are not independent predictors of rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:947–954PubMedCrossRef

27.

Butz T, van Buuren F, Mellwig KP et al (2011) Two-dimensional strain analysis of the global and regional myocardial function for the differentiation of pathologic and physiologic left ventricular hypertrophy: a study in athletes and in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:207–215CrossRef

28.

Simsek Z, Gundogdu F, Alpaydin S et al (2011) Analysis of athletes’ heart by tissue Doppler and strain/strain rate imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:105–111PubMedCrossRef

29.

Reckefuss N, Butz T, Horstkotte D, Faber L (2011) Evaluation of longitudinal and radial left ventricular function by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in a large cohort of normal probands. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:515–526PubMedCrossRef

30.

Faber L, Prinz C, Welge D et al (2011) Peak systolic longitudinal strain of the lateral left ventricular wall improves after septal ablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a follow-up study using speckle tracking echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:325–333PubMedCrossRef

31.

Chen G-Z, Sun K (2011) Multi-factorial analytical study on real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic cardiac image display quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:499–504PubMedCrossRef

32.

Wu J, Mukerji R, Xie G-Y (2011) Relationship of myocardial mechanics and regional volume change in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:825–831PubMedCrossRef

33.

Gogas BD, Farooq V, Serruys PW, Garcia–Garcia HM (2011) Assessment of coronary atherosclerosis by IVUS and IVUS-based imaging modalities: progression and regression studies, tissue composition and beyond. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:225–238PubMedCrossRef

34.

Brugaletta S, Costa JR, Garcia–Garcia HM (2011) Assessment of drug-eluting stents and bioresorbable stents by grayscale IVUS and IVUS-based imaging modalities. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:239–248PubMedCrossRef

35.

Maisano F, Godino C, Giacomini A et al (2011) Clinical trial experience with the MitraClip catheter based mitral valve repair system. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1155–1164PubMedCrossRef

36.

Siegel F, Luo H, Biner S (2011) Transcatheter valve repair/implantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1165–1177PubMedCrossRef

37.

Van der Spoel TIG, Lee JC et al (2011) Non-surgical stem cell delivery strategies and in vivo cell tracking to injured myocardium. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:367–383PubMedCrossRef

38.

Nkoulou R, Pazhenkottil AP, Buechel RR et al (2011) Impact of CT attenuation correction on the viability pattern assessed by 99mTc-Tetrofosming SPECT/18F-FDG PET. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:913–921PubMedCrossRef

39.

Sipola P, Peuhkurinen K, Vanninen E (2011) Comparison of gated SPECT with MRI for evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:629–634PubMedCrossRef

40.

Van der Wall EE, Scholte AJH, Siebelink HM, Bax JJ (2011) Assessment of left ventricular volumes; reliable by gated SPECT? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:635–638CrossRef

41.

Al-Mallah MH, Arida M, Garcia-Sayan E et al (2011) Safety of adenosine pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging in orthotopic cardiac transplant recipients: a single center experience of 102 transplant patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1105–1111PubMedCrossRef

42.

Nucifora G, Schuijf JD, Van Werkhoven J et al (2011) Relationship between obstructive coronary artery disease and abnormal stress testing in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. In J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:777–785CrossRef

43.

Skala T, Hutyra M, Vaclavik J et al (2011) Prediction of long-term reverse left ventricular remodeling after revascularization or medical treatment in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: a comparative study between SPECT and MRI. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:343–353PubMedCrossRef

44.

Lubbers DD, Kuijpers D, Bodewes R et al (2011) Inter-observer variability of visual analysis of “stress”-only adenosine first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging in relation to clinical experience and reading criteria. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:557–562PubMedCrossRef

45.

Manka R, Jahnke C, Gebker R, Schnackenburg B, Paetsch I (2011) Head-to-head comparison of first-pass MR perfusion imaging during adenosine and high-dose dobutamine/atropine stress. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:995–1002PubMedCrossRef

46.

Stolzmann P, Alkadhi H, Scheffel H et al (2011) Combining cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography coronary calcium scoring: added value for the assessment of morphological coronary disease? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:969–977PubMedCrossRef

47.

Lubbers DD, Rijlaarsdam-Hermsen D, Kuijpers D et al (2011) Performance of adenosine “stress-only” perfusion MRI in patients without a history of myocardial infarction: a clinical outcome study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:109–115PubMedCrossRef

48.

Krittayaphong R, Chaithiraphan V, Maneesai A, Udompanturak S (2011) Prognostic value of combined magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging and late gadolinium enhancement. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:705–714PubMedCrossRef

49.

Pilz G, Patel PA, Fell U et al (2011) Adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in suspected coronary artery disease: a net cost analysis and reimbursement implications. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:113–121PubMedCrossRef

50.

Stensaeth KH, Fossum E, Hoffmann P, Mangschau A, Klow NE (2011) Clinical characteristics and role of early cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction and normal coronary arteries. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:355–365PubMedCrossRef

51.

Bernhardt P, Stiller S, Kottmair E et al (2011) Myocardial scar extent evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in ICD patients: relationship to spontaneous VT during long-term follow-up. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:893–900PubMedCrossRef

52.

Kino A, Keeling AN, Farrelly CT et al (2011) Assessment of left ventricular myocardial scar in infiltrative and non-ischemic cardiac diseases by free breathing three dimensional phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) TurboFLASH. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:527–537PubMedCrossRef

53.

Hong YJ, Hur J, Kim YJ et al (2011) The usefulness of delayed contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating cardiac tumors from thrombi in stroke patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(Suppl 1):89–95PubMedCrossRef

54.

Stensaeth KH, Hoffmann P, Fossum E, Mangschau A, Sandvik L, Klow NE (2012) Cardiac magnetic resonance visualizes acute and chronic myocardial injuries in myocarditis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:327–337PubMedCrossRef

55.

Cheng H, Zhao S, Jiang S et al (2011) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of isolated left ventricular noncompaction in a Chinese adult Han population. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:979–987PubMedCrossRef

56.

Kim SS, Ko SM, Song MG (2011) Fat streak in the middle layer of the left ventricular myocardium in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy: findings of multidetector CT and MR imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:745–748PubMedCrossRef

57.

Fernandez-Golfin C, De Agustin A et al (2011) Cardiac magnetic resonance determinants of functional mitral regurgitation in ischemic and non ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:539–546PubMedCrossRef

58.

Holloway CJ, Edwards LM, Rider OJ et al (2011) A comparison of visual and quantitative assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:563–569PubMedCrossRef

59.

Ma H, Tang Q, Yang Q et al (2011) Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary MRA at 3.0T for the evaluation of cardiac venous anatomy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1003–1009PubMedCrossRef

60.

Knobel Z, Kellenberger CJ, Kaiser T, Albisetti M, Bergstrasser E, Buechel ER (2011) Geometry and dimensions of the pulmonary artery bifurcation in children and adolescents: assessment in vivo by contrast-enhanced MR-angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:385–396PubMedCrossRef

61.

Prompona M, Muehling O, Naebauer M, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M, Huber A (2011) MRI for detection of anomalous pulmonary venous drainage in patients with sinus venosus atrial septal defects. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:403–412PubMedCrossRef

62.

Metz S, Beer AJ, Settles M et al (2011) Characterization of carotid artery plaques with USPIO-enhanced MRI: assessment of inflammation and vascularity as in vivo imaging biomarkers for plaque vulnerability. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:901–912PubMedCrossRef

63.

Wang Q, Zeng Y, Wang Y et al (2011) Comparison of carotid arterial morphology and plaque composition between patients with acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:715–726PubMedCrossRef

64.

Sadat U, Teng Z, Young VE et al (2011) Impact of plaque haemorrhage and its age on structural stresses in atherosclerotic plaques of patients with carotid artery disease: an MR imaging-based finite element simulation study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:397–402PubMedCrossRef

65.

Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Rybicki FJ (2009) The “post-64” era of coronary CT angiography: understanding new technology from physical principles. Radiol Clin North Am 47:79–90PubMedCrossRef

66.

Wang R, Yu W, Wang Y et al (2011) Incremental value of dual-energy CT to coronary CT angiography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:647–656PubMedCrossRef

67.

Steigner ML, Mitsouras D, Whitmore AG et al (2010) Iodinated contrast opacification gradients in normal coronary arteries imaged with prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3:179–186PubMedCrossRef

68.

Dalager MG, Bottcher M, Andersen G et al (2011) Impact of luminal density on plaque classification by CT coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:593–600PubMedCrossRef

69.

Lackner K, Bovenschulte H, Stutzer H, Just T, Al-Hassani H, Krug B (2011) In vitro measurements of flow using multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:795–804PubMedCrossRef

70.

Nagao M, Kido T, Watanabe K et al (2011) Functional assessment of coronary artery flow using adenosine stress dual-energy CT: a preliminary study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:471–481PubMedCrossRef

71.

Lee BC, Lee WJ, Hsu HC, Chien KL, Shih TT, Chen MF (2011) Using clinical cardiovascular risk scores to predict coronary artery plaque severity and stenosis detected by CT coronary angiography in asymptomatic Chinese subjects. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:669–678PubMedCrossRef

72.

Chan RH, Javali S, Ellins ML, Montgomery A, Sheth T (2011) Utility of 64 detector coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients with and without prior equivocal stress tests. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:135–141PubMedCrossRef

73.

Ergun E, Kosar P, Ozturk C, Basbay E, Koc F, Kosar U (2011) Prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice CTA in patients with zero coronary calcium score. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:451–458PubMedCrossRef

74.

Uretsky S, Rozanski A, Singh P et al (2011) The presence, characterization and prognosis of coronary plaques among patients with zero coronary calcium scores. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:805–812PubMedCrossRef

75.

Rybicki FJ (2009) Lower radiation dose coronary CT angiography with new imaging technologies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(Suppl 2):149–151CrossRef

76.

Ramkumar PG, Mitsouras D, Feldman CL, Stone PH, Rybicki FJ (2009) New advances in cardiac computed tomography. Curr Opin Cardiol 24:596–603PubMedCrossRef

77.

Hong YJ, Kim SJ, Lee SM et al (2011) Low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography using prospective ECG-triggering compared to invasive coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:425–431PubMedCrossRef

78.

Blankstein R, Bolen MA, Pale R et al (2011) Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in cardiac dual source computed tomography: effect on radiation dose and image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:579–586PubMedCrossRef

79.

Zhang C, Zhang Z, Yan Z, Xu L, Yu W, Wang R (2011) 320-row CT coronary angiography: effect of 100-kV tube voltages on image quality, contrast volume, and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1059–1068PubMedCrossRef

80.

Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24(5):535–546PubMedCrossRef

81.

Steigner ML, Otero HJ, Cai T et al (2009) Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:85–90PubMedCrossRef

82.

Bittencourt MS, Schmidt B, Seltmann M et al (2011) Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1081–1087PubMedCrossRef

83.

Lee JH, Chun EJ, Choi SI et al (2011) Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography for evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency: comparison of image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:657–667PubMedCrossRef

84.

Abdulla J, Asferg C, Kofoed KF (2011) Prognostic value of absence or presence of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:413–420PubMedCrossRef

85.

Guo SL, Guo YM, Zhai YN, Ma B, Wang P, Yang KH (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of first generation dual-source computed tomography in the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis from 24 studies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:755–771PubMedCrossRef

86.

Hwang J, Choe YH (2011) Cardiovascular sources of systemic embolism: detection and characterization using multidetector CT and MR imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:727–744PubMedCrossRef

87.

Sohn GH, Jang SY, Moon JR et al (2011) The usefulness of multidetector computed tomographic angiography for the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome by Ghent criteria. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:679–688PubMedCrossRef

88.

Lee CK, Kim YM, Shim DJ, Na C-Y, Oh S–S (2011) The detection of pulmonary embolism after a coronary artery bypass graft surgery by the use of 64-slice multidetector CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:639–645PubMedCrossRef

89.

Schoenhagen P, Bax J (2011) Transcatheter repair of valvular heart disease and periprocedural imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1113PubMedCrossRef

90.

Vahanian A, Iung B, Himbert D, Nataf P (2011) Changing demographics of valvular heart disease and impact on surgical and transcatheter valve therapies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1115–1122PubMedCrossRef

91.

Willson A, Webb J (2011) Transcatheter treatment approaches for aortic valve disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1123–1132PubMedCrossRef

92.

Kenny D, Hijazi ZM (2011) Transcatheter approaches to non-valvar structural heart disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1133–1141PubMedCrossRef

93.

Helton TJ, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM (2011) Clinical trial experience with transcatheter aortic valve insertion. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1143–1154PubMedCrossRef

94.

Ewe SH, Klautz RJ, Schalij MJ, Delgado V (2011) Role of computed tomography imaging for transcatheter valvular repair/insertion. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1179–1193PubMedCrossRef

95.

de Heer LM, Budde RP, Mali WP, de Vos AM, van Herwerden LA, Kluin J (2011) Aortic root dimension changes during systole and diastole: evaluation with ECG-gated multidetector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1195–1204PubMedCrossRef

96.

Schwartz JG, Neubauer AM, Fagan TE, Noordhoek NJ, Grass M, Carroll JD (2011) Potential role of three-dimensional rotational angiography and C-arm CT for valvular repair and implantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1205–1222PubMedCrossRef

97.

Bateman MG, Iaizzo PA (2011) Comparative imaging of cardiac structures and function for the optimization of transcatheter approaches for valvular and structural heart disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1223–1234PubMedCrossRef

98.

da Gama RibeiroV, Vouga L, Markowitz A et al (2011) Vascular access in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1235–1243CrossRef

Title: Cardiovascular imaging 2011 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Authors: Ricardo A. Costa
Hiram G. Bezerra
Johan H. C. Reiber
Frank J. Rybicki
Paul Schoenhagen
Arthur A. Stillman
Johan De Sutter
Nico R. L. Van de Veire
Ernst E. van der Wall
Publication date: 01-03-2012
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0040-6

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Watch now

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Cardiovascular imaging 2011 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Excerpt

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Excerpt

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Diagnostic performance of exercise bicycle testing and single-photon emission computed tomography: comparison with 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography

A minimally-invasive closed chest myocardial occlusion-reperfusion model in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): monitoring by contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging

Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients with arterial hypertension

Impact of analyzing fewer image frames per segment during offline volumetric radiofrequency-based intravascular ultrasound measurements of target lesions prior to percutaneous coronary interventions

Aortic stiffness in type-1 diabetes mellitus; beware of hypertension

Immediate computed tomography coronary angiography versus delayed outpatient stress testing for detecting coronary artery disease in emergency department patients with chest pain

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page