Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Original paper

Comparing perceived effectiveness of FDA-proposed cigarette packaging graphic health warnings between sexual and gender minorities and heterosexual adults

Authors: Andy S. L. Tan, Cabral A. Bigman, Rebekah H. Nagler, Sara Minsky, Kasisomayajula Viswanath

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration proposed nine graphic health warnings (GHWs) on cigarette packaging that were rated equally effective across racial/ethnic, education, or income groups of adult smokers. However, data on GHW effectiveness among sexual and gender minority (SGM) adults, who have higher smoking prevalence, are currently lacking. This study analyzed whether perceived effectiveness of GHWs differed by gender and sexual orientation.

Methods

Data came from a randomized experiment among 1,200 adults with an oversample from low socioeconomic status groups, conducted between 2013 and 2014 in three Massachusetts communities. Participants viewed and rated the effectiveness of nine GHWs. Mixed effects regression models predicted perceived effectiveness with gender and sexual orientation, adjusting for repeated measurements, GHWs viewed, age, race, ethnicity, smoking status, and health status.

Results

Female heterosexuals rated GHWs as more effective than male heterosexual, lesbian, and transgender and other gender respondents. There was no significant difference between female and male heterosexuals versus gay, male bisexual, or female bisexual respondents. Differences by gender and sexual orientation were consistent across all nine GHWs. Significant correlates of higher perceived effectiveness included certain GHWs, older age, being African-American (vs white), being Hispanic (vs non-Hispanic), having less than high school education (vs associate degree or higher), and being current smokers (vs non-smokers).

Conclusions

Perceived effectiveness of GHWs was lower in certain SGM groups. We recommend further studies to understand the underlying mechanisms for these findings and investments in research and policy to communicate anti-smoking messages more effectively to SGM populations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
9.
10.
go back to reference American Lung Association (2010) Smoking out a deadly threat: tobacco use in the LGBT community. Washington, DC American Lung Association (2010) Smoking out a deadly threat: tobacco use in the LGBT community. Washington, DC
14.
go back to reference Stevens P, Carlson LM, Hinman JM (2004) An analysis of tobacco industry marketing to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) populations: strategies for mainstream tobacco control and prevention. Health Promot Pract 5:129S–134S. doi:10.1177/1524839904264617 CrossRefPubMed Stevens P, Carlson LM, Hinman JM (2004) An analysis of tobacco industry marketing to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) populations: strategies for mainstream tobacco control and prevention. Health Promot Pract 5:129S–134S. doi:10.​1177/​1524839904264617​ CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Clarke T, Ward B, Freeman G, Schiller J (2015) Early release of selected estimates based on data from the January-March 2015 National Health Interview Survey. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics, Atlanta Clarke T, Ward B, Freeman G, Schiller J (2015) Early release of selected estimates based on data from the January-March 2015 National Health Interview Survey. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics, Atlanta
19.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA
26.
go back to reference Canadian Cancer Society (2016) Cigarette package health warnings: international status report, 5th edn. Canada Canadian Cancer Society (2016) Cigarette package health warnings: international status report, 5th edn. Canada
29.
go back to reference Tobacco Control Legal Consortium (2013) Cigarette graphic warnings and the divided federal courts. Tobacco Control Legal Consortium, St Paul, MN Tobacco Control Legal Consortium (2013) Cigarette graphic warnings and the divided federal courts. Tobacco Control Legal Consortium, St Paul, MN
35.
go back to reference Kontos EZ, Viswanath K (2011) Cancer-related direct-to-consumer advertising: a critical review. Nat Rev Cancer 11:142–150CrossRefPubMed Kontos EZ, Viswanath K (2011) Cancer-related direct-to-consumer advertising: a critical review. Nat Rev Cancer 11:142–150CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Viswanath K, Ramanadhan S, Kontos EZ (2007) Mass media. Macrosocial determinants population health. Springer, New York, pp 275–294CrossRef Viswanath K, Ramanadhan S, Kontos EZ (2007) Mass media. Macrosocial determinants population health. Springer, New York, pp 275–294CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Sierra JJ, Hyman MR, Heiser RS (2010) A review of ethnic identity in advertising. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing Sierra JJ, Hyman MR, Heiser RS (2010) A review of ethnic identity in advertising. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing
39.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute (2008) The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD National Cancer Institute (2008) The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
42.
44.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities (2011) The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: building a foundation for better understanding. National Academies Press (US), Washington (DC) Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities (2011) The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: building a foundation for better understanding. National Academies Press (US), Washington (DC)
47.
53.
go back to reference Mahalik JR, Burns SM, Syzdek M (2007) Masculinity and perceived normative health behaviors as predictors of men’s health behaviors. Soc Sci Med 64:2201–2209CrossRefPubMed Mahalik JR, Burns SM, Syzdek M (2007) Masculinity and perceived normative health behaviors as predictors of men’s health behaviors. Soc Sci Med 64:2201–2209CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Thrasher JF, Arillo-Santillán E, Villalobos V et al (2012) Can pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages address smoking-related health disparities? Field experiments in Mexico to assess pictorial warning label content. Cancer Causes Control 23:69–80. doi:10.1007/s10552-012-9899-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thrasher JF, Arillo-Santillán E, Villalobos V et al (2012) Can pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages address smoking-related health disparities? Field experiments in Mexico to assess pictorial warning label content. Cancer Causes Control 23:69–80. doi:10.​1007/​s10552-012-9899-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Comparing perceived effectiveness of FDA-proposed cigarette packaging graphic health warnings between sexual and gender minorities and heterosexual adults
Authors
Andy S. L. Tan
Cabral A. Bigman
Rebekah H. Nagler
Sara Minsky
Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0954-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Cancer Causes & Control 10/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine