Top

BMC Public Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

The role of theory-driven graphic warning labels in motivation to quit: a qualitative study on perceptions from low-income, urban smokers

Authors: Erin L Mead, Joanna E Cohen, Caitlin E Kennedy, Joseph Gallo, Carl A Latkin

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Abstract

Background

Use of communication theories in the development of pictorial health warning labels (graphic warning labels) for cigarette packaging might enhance labels’ impact on motivation to quit, but research has been limited, particularly among low socioeconomic status (SES) populations in the U.S. This qualitative study explored perceptions of theory-based graphic warning labels and their role in motivation to quit among low-income smokers.

Methods

A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted with 25 low-income adult smokers in Baltimore, Maryland, who were purposively sampled from a community-based source population. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted from January to February 2014. Participants were asked about the motivational impact of 12 labels falling into four content categories: negative depictions of the health effects of smoking to smokers and others, and positive depictions of the benefits of quitting to smokers and others. Data were coded using a combined inductive/deductive approach and analyzed thematically through framework analysis.

Results

Labels depicting negative health effects to smokers were identified as most motivational, followed by labels depicting negative health effects to others. Reasons included perceived severity of and susceptibility to the effects, negative emotional reactions (such as fear), and concern for children. Labels about the benefits of quitting were described as motivational because of their hopefulness, characters as role models, and desire to improve family health. Reasons why labels were described as not motivational included lack of impact on perceived severity/susceptibility, low credibility, and fatalistic attitudes regarding the inevitability of disease.

Conclusions

Labels designed to increase risk perceptions from smoking might be significant sources of motivation for low SES smokers. Findings suggest innovative theory-driven approaches for the design of labels, such as using former smokers as role models, contrasting healthy and unhealthy characters, and socially-oriented labels, might motivate low SES smokers to quit.

Central Intelligence Agency. The World Factbook, 2013–14. Washington, DC: Central Intelligance Agency; 2013.

OECD. An overview of growing income inequalities in OECD countries: Main findings. In: Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2011. p. 21–45.CrossRef

Nandi A, Glymour MM, Subramanian SV. Association among socioeconomic status, health behaviors, and all-cause mortality in the United States. Epidemiology. 2014;25(2):170–7.CrossRefPubMed

Shaw BA, McGeever K, Vasquez E, Agahi N, Fors S. Socioeconomic inequalities in health after age 50: are health risk behaviors to blame? Soc Sci Med. 2014;101:52–60.CrossRefPubMed

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Quitting smoking among adults---United States, 2001–2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(44):1513–9.

Barbeau EM, Krieger N, Soobader MJ. Working class matters: socioeconomic disadvantage, race/ethnicity, gender, and smoking in NHIS 2000. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(2):269–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hackbarth DP, Silvestri B, Cosper W. Tobacco and alcohol billboards in 50 Chicago neighborhoods: market segmentation to sell dangerous products to the poor. J Public Health Policy. 1995;16(2):213–30.CrossRefPubMed

Brown-Johnson CG, England LJ, Glantz SA, Ling PM. Tobacco industry marketing to low socioeconomic status women in the USA. Tob Control. 2014;23(e2):e139–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Seidenberg AB, Caughey RW, Rees VW, Connolly GN. Storefront cigarette advertising differs by community demographic profile. Am J Health Promot. 2010;24(6):e26–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Dragano N, Bobak M, Wege N, Peasey A, Verde PE, Kubinova R, et al. Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and cardiovascular risk factors: a multilevel analysis of nine cities in the Czech Republic and Germany. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:255.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Stead M, MacAskill S, MacKintosh A-M, Reece J, Eadie D. “It’s as if you’re locked in”: qualitative explanations for area effects on smoking in disadvantaged communities. Health Place. 2001;7(4):333–43.CrossRefPubMed

12.

LaVeist T, Thorpe Jr R, Mance G, Jackson J. Overcoming confounding of race with socio-economic status and segregation to explore race disparities in smoking. Addiction. 2007;102 Suppl 2:65–70.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Gallus S, Ghislandi S, Muttarak R. Effects of the economic crisis on smoking prevalence and number of smokers in the USA. Tob Control. 2015;24(1):82–8.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Borland R, Yong HH, Balmford J, Cooper J, Cummings KM, O’Connor RJ, et al. Motivational factors predict quit attempts but not maintenance of smoking cessation: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country project. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12 suppl 1:S4–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Clark MA, Kviz FJ, Crittenden KS, Warnecke RB. Psychosocial factors and smoking cessation behaviors among smokers who have and have not ever tried to quit. Health Educ Res. 1998;13(1):145–53.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Lee HS, Catley D, Harris KJ. Improving understanding of the quitting process: psychological predictors of quit attempts versus smoking cessation maintenance among college students. Subst Use Misuse. 2014;49(10):1332–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Curry SJ, Grothaus L, McBride C. Reasons for quitting: intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for smoking cessation in a population-based sample of smokers. Addict Behav. 1997;22(6):727–39.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Witte K, Allen M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27(5):591–615.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hammond D. Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tob Control. 2011;20(5):327–37.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Azagba S, Sharaf MF. The effect of graphic cigarette warning labels on smoking behavior: evidence from the Canadian experience. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(3):708–17.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Hammond D, Thrasher JF, Reid JL, Driezen P, Boudreau C, Santillan EA. Perceived effectiveness of pictorial health warnings among Mexican youth and adults: a population-level intervention with potential to reduce tobacco-related inequities. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23 suppl 1:57–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

McCaul KD, Hockemeyer JR, Johnson RJ, Zetocha K, Quinlan K, Glasgow RE. Motivation to quit using cigarettes: a review. Addict Behav. 2006;31(1):42–56.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Cismaru M, Lavack AM. Tobacco warning labels and the protection motivation model: implications for Canadian tobacco control policy. Can Public Pol. 2007;33(4):477–86.CrossRef

25.

Schneider S, Gadinger M, Fischer A. Does the effect go up in smoke? A randomized controlled trial of pictorial warnings on cigarette packaging. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(1):77–83.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Romer D, Peters E, Strasser AA, Langleben D. Desire versus efficacy in smokers’ paradoxical reactions to pictorial health warnings for cigarettes. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54937.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Beacom AM, Newman SJ. Communicating health information to disadvantaged populations. Fam Community Health. 2010;33(2):152–62.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Viswanath K, Finnegan Jr JR. The knowledge gap hypothesis: twenty-five years later. In: Burleson BR, Kunkel A, editors. Communication Yearbook. Volume 19, edn. Thousand Oaks, CA US: Sage Publications, Inc; 1996. p. 187–227.

29.

Viswanath K, Breen N, Meissner H, Moser RP, Hesse B, Steele WR, et al. Cancer knowledge and disparities in the information age. J Health Commun. 2006;11 suppl 1:1–17.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Cantrell J, Vallone DM, Thrasher JF, Nagler RH, Feirman SP, Muenz LR, et al. Impact of tobacco-related health warning labels across socioeconomic, race and ethnic groups: results from a randomized web-based experiment. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Thrasher JF, Arillo-Santillan E, Villalobos V, Perez-Hernandez R, Hammond D, Carter J, et al. Can pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages address smoking-related health disparities? Field experiments in Mexico to assess pictorial warning label content. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23 suppl 1:69–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Thrasher JF, Villalobos V, Szklo A, Fong GT, Perez C, Sebrie E, et al. Assessing the impact of cigarette package health warning labels: a cross-country comparison in Brazil, Uruguay and Mexico. Salud Publica Mex. 2010;52(suppl2):S206–215.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Tobin KE, Kuramoto SJ, Davey-Rothwell MA, Latkin CA. The STEP into Action study: a peer-based, personal risk network-focused HIV prevention intervention with injection drug users in Baltimore, Maryland. Addiction. 2011;106(2):366–75.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Instituto Nacional de Câncer (Brazil): Brazil: Health warnings on tobacco products, 2009. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Ministério da Saúde, Instituto Nacional de Câncer; 2008. [http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Brazil-2008-Health-Warnings-on-Tobacco-Products-Report-English.pdf]

35.

Decima Research. Testing of health warning messages and health information messages for tobacco products. Decima Research Inc.: Canada; 2009. [http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Canada-2009-Testing-of-Health-Warning-Messages-and-Health-Information-Messages-for-Tobacco-Products-Government-Report.pdf]

36.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Experimental study of graphic cigarette warning Labels, final results report, December 2010 - [required warnings for cigarette packages and advertisements; research report] re FDA-2010-N-0568– 0006. 2011(6/27). Rockville, MD: Center for Tobacco Products, FDA; 2010 [http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/USA-2010-Experimental-Study-of-Graphic-Cigarette-Warning-Labels-Final-Results-Report-FDA.pdf]

37.

Parr V, Ell P, Gagg K. Market testing of new health warnings and information messages for tobacco product packaging: phase 3 refinement of health warnings. Qualitative formative research report. Australia: GfK Blue Moon; 2011. [http://www.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/gmtp3]

38.

Bandura A. On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. J Manage. 2012;38(1):9–44.

39.

Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Weinstein ND, Marcus SE, Moser RP. Smokers’ unrealistic optimism about their risk. Tob Control. 2005;14(1):55–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Copeland AL, Brandon TH. Testing the causal role of expectancies in smoking motivation and behavior. Addict Behav. 2000;25(3):445–9.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Kreuter MW, Green MC, Cappella JN, Slater MD, Wise ME, Storey D, et al. Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33(3):221–35.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers KE. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 97–121.

Title: The role of theory-driven graphic warning labels in motivation to quit: a qualitative study on perceptions from low-income, urban smokers
Authors: Erin L Mead
Joanna E Cohen
Caitlin E Kennedy
Joseph Gallo
Carl A Latkin
Publication date: 01-12-2015
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1438-6

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

The role of theory-driven graphic warning labels in motivation to quit: a qualitative study on perceptions from low-income, urban smokers

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Health and health behaviours before and during the Great Recession, overall and by socioeconomic status, using data from four repeated cross-sectional health surveys in Spain (2001–2012)

Assessment of training and technical assistance needs of Colorectal Cancer Control Program Grantees in the U.S.

The changing trends of HIV-1 prevalence and incidence from sentinel surveillance of five sub-populations in Yunnan, China, 2001–2010

Reviewer acknowledgement 2014

Do school crossing guards make crossing roads safer? A quasi-experimental study of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in Toronto, Canada

Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in university students: a qualitative study using focus group discussions