Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Cancer Causes & Control
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 3/2013

01-03-2013 | Review article

Behavior theory for dietary interventions for cancer prevention: a systematic review of utilization and effectiveness in creating behavior change

Authors: Kerry N. L. Avery, Jenny L. Donovan, Jeremy Horwood, J. Athene Lane

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Theory-based approaches are now recommended to design and enact dietary interventions, but their use in cancer trials is unknown. This systematic review examined application of behavior theory to dietary interventions aimed at preventing cancer to improve the design and interpretation of trials.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched (inception-July 2011). Data were synthesized and a theory coding scheme (TCS) used to describe and assess how behavior theory informed interventions. Studies not reporting a dietary behavior intervention informed by a specified behavior change model(s) were excluded.

Results

Of 237 potentially eligible studies, only 40 (16.9 %) were relevant, mostly RCTs (34, 85.0 %). Twenty-one interventions targeted diet alone (52.5 %) or integrated diet into a lifestyle intervention (19, 47.5 %). Most (24, 60.0 %) invoked several behavior change models, but only 10 (25.0 %) interventions were reported as explicitly theory-informed and none comprehensively targeted or measured theoretical constructs or tested theoretical assumptions. The 10 theory-informed interventions were more effective at improving diet.

Conclusions

Dietary interventions for cancer prevention improved diet more effectively if they were informed by behavior theory. While behavior theory was often applied to these dietary interventions, they were rarely implemented or described thoroughly. Accurate intervention reporting is essential to assess theoretical quality and facilitate implementation effective behavior change techniques. Guidelines regarding the application and reporting of behavior theory for complex interventions, for example, proposed by the National Institutes of Health and Medical Research Council, should be revised accordingly. Failure to adequately ground dietary interventions in behavior theory may hinder establishing their effectiveness and relationships between diet and cancer.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. AICR, Washington, DC
2.
Davies AA, Davey Smith G, Harbord R, Bekkering GE, Sterne JAC, Beynon R et al (2006) Nutritional interventions and outcome in patients with cancer or preinvasive lesions: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(14):961–973PubMedCrossRef
3.
Gibson TM, Ferrucci LM, Tangrea JA, Schatzkin A (2010) Epidemiological and clinical studies of nutrition. Semin Oncol 37(3):282–296PubMedCrossRef
4.
Ammerman A, Lindquist C, Hersey J, Jackman AM, Gavin NI, Garces C et al (2000) Efficacy of interventions to modify dietary behavior related to cancer risk. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 25:1–4
5.
Glanz K, Rimer B, National Cancer Institute (2005) Theory at a glance: a guide for health promotion practice. US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda
6.
Abraham C, Kelly MP, West R, Michie S (2009) The UK National Institute for health and Clinical Excellence public health guidance on behaviour change: a brief introduction. Psych Health Med 14(1):1–8CrossRef
7.
Medical Research Council, Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, et al. (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Medical Research Council
8.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new. Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 337
9.
Michie S, Abraham C (2004) Inteventions to change health behaviours: evidence-based or evidence-inspired? Psychol Health 19(1):29–49CrossRef
10.
Abraham C, Sheeran P (2000) Understanding and changing health behaviour: from health beliefs to self-regulation. In: Norman P, Abraham C, Conner M (eds) Understanding and changing health behaviour: from health beliefs to self-regulation, 2nd edn. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 3–24
11.
12.
Sahay TB, Ashbury FD, Roberts M, Rootman I (2006) Effective components for nutrition interventions: a review and application of the literature. Health Promot Pract 7(4):418–427PubMedCrossRef
13.
Lanza E, Schatzkin A, Ballard-Barbash R, Corle D, Clifford C, Paskett E et al (1996) The polyp prevention trial II: dietary intervention program and participant baseline dietary characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 5(5):385–392PubMed
14.
Bowen DJ, Beresford SAA (2002) Dietary interventions to prevent disease. Annu Rev Public Health 23(1):255–286PubMedCrossRef
15.
Pekmezi DW, Demark-Wahnefried W (2010) Updated evidence in support of diet and exercise interventions in cancer survivors. Acta Oncol 1–12
16.
Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S (2009) Effective techniques in health eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol 28(6):690–701PubMedCrossRef
17.
Michie S, Prestwich A (2010) Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol 29(1):1–8PubMedCrossRef
18.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 21(339):332–336
19.
Emmons KM, Stoddard AM, Fletcher R, Gutheil C, Suarez EG, Lobb R et al (2005) Cancer prevention among working class, multiethnic adults: results of the Healthy Directions-Health Centers Study. Am J Public Health 95(7):1200–1205PubMedCrossRef
20.
Smith-Warner SA, Elmer PJ, Tharp TM, Fosdick L, Randall B, Gross M et al (2000) Increasing vegetable and fruit intake: randomized intervention and monitoring in an at-risk population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9:307–317PubMed
21.
Chlebowski RT, Blackburn GL, Buzzard IM, Rose DP, Martino S, Khandekar JD et al (1993) Adherence to a dietary fat intake reduction program in postmenopausal women receiving therapy for early breast cancer. The Women’s Intervention Nutrition Study. J Clin Oncol 11:2072–2080PubMed
22.
Cartmel B, Bowen D, Ross D, Johnson E, Mayne ST (2005) A randomized trial of an intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake in curatively treated patients with early-stage head and neck cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2848–2854PubMedCrossRef
23.
Sorensen G, Stoddard A, Peterson K, Cohen N, Hunt MK, Stein E et al (1999) Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksites and families in the treat well 5-a-day study. Am J Public Health 89(1):54–60PubMedCrossRef
24.
Fries E, Edinboro P, McClish D, Manion L, Bowen D, Beresford SAA et al (2005) Randomized trial of a low-intensity dietary intervention in rural residents: The Rural Physician Cancer Prevention Project. Am J Prev Med 28(2):162–168PubMedCrossRef
25.
Demark-Wahnefried W, Clipp EC, Lipkus IM, Lobach D, Snyder DC, Sloane R et al (2007) Main outcomes of the FRESH START trial: a sequentially tailored, diet and exercise mailed print intervention among breast and prostate cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 25(19):2709–2718PubMedCrossRef
26.
Havas S, Anliker J, Greenberg D, Block G, Block T, Blik C et al (2003) Final results of the Maryland WIC food for life program. Prev Med 37(5):406–416PubMedCrossRef
27.
Wolf RL, Lepore SJ, Vandergrift JL, Basch CE, Yaroch AL (2009) Tailored telephone education to promote awareness and adoption of fruit and vegetable recommendations among urban and mostly immigrant black men: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 48(1):32–38PubMedCrossRef
28.
Campbell MK, Carr C, DeVellis B, Switzer B, Biddle A, Amamoo MA et al (2009) A randomized trial of tailoring and motivational interviewing to promote fruit and vegetable consumption for cancer prevention and control [References]. Ann Behav Med 2:71–85CrossRef
29.
Campbell MK, Demark-Wahnefried W, Symons M, Kalsbeek WD, Dodds J, Cowan A et al (1999) Fruit and vegetable consumption and prevention of cancer: the black churches united for better health project. Am J Public Health 89(9):1390–1396PubMedCrossRef
30.
Anderson AS, Caswell S, Wells M, Steele RJ, Macaskill S (2010) “It makes you feel so full of life” LiveWell, a feasibility study of a personalised lifestyle programme for colorectal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 18(4):409–415PubMedCrossRef
31.
Campbell MK, Tessaro I, DeVellis B, Benedict S, Kelsey K, Belton L et al (2002) Effects of a tailored health promotion program for female blue-collar workers: health works for women. Prev Med 34(3):313–323PubMedCrossRef
32.
Abood DA, Black DR, Feral D (2003) Nutrition education worksite intervention for university staff: application of the health belief model. J Nutr Educ Behav 35(5):260–267PubMedCrossRef
33.
McCarthy WJ, Yancey AK, Harrison GG, Leslie J, Siegel JM (2007) Fighting cancer with fitness: dietary outcomes of a randomized, controlled lifestyle change intervention in healthy African-American women. Prev Med 44(3):246–253PubMedCrossRef
34.
Sorensen G, Barbeau E, Hunt MK, Kaphingst K, Wallace L, Stoddard AM (2005) Promoting behavior change among working-class, multiethnic workers: results of the healthy directions-small business study. Am J Public Health 95(8):1389–1395PubMedCrossRef
35.
Bloom JR, Stewart SL, D’Onofrio CN, Luce J, Banks PJ (2008) Addressing the needs of young breast cancer survivors at the 5 year milestone: can a short-term, low intensity intervention produce change? J Cancer Surviv 2(3):190–204PubMedCrossRef
36.
Sorensen G, Stoddard AM, LaMontagne AD, Emmons K, Hunt MK, Youngstrom R et al (2002) A comprehensive worksite cancer prevention intervention: behavior change results from a randomized controlled trial (United States). Cancer Causes Control 13(6):493–502PubMedCrossRef
37.
White SC, Agurto I, Araguas N (2006) Promoting healthy behaviors to prevent chronic disease in Panama and Trinidad & Tobago: results of the women as agents of change project. J Community Health 31(5):413–429PubMedCrossRef
38.
von Gruenigen VE, Courneya KS, Gibbons HE, Kavanagh MB, Waggoner SE, Lerner E (2008) Feasibility and effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention program in obese endometrial cancer patients: a randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 109(1):19–26CrossRef
39.
Noar SM, Zimmerman RS (2005) Health behaviour theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviours: are we moving in hte right direction? Health Educ Res 20(3):275–290PubMedCrossRef
40.
Conner M, Norman P (2005) Predicting health behaviour: a social cognition approach. In: Conner M, Norman P (eds) Predicting health behaviour: research and practice with social cognition models, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Maidenhead, pp 1–27
41.
Hardeman W, Johnston M, Johnston D, Bonetti D, Wareham N, Kinmonth AL (2002) Application of the theory of planned behaviour in behaviour change interventions: a systematic review. Psychol Health 17(2):123–158CrossRef
42.
Hardeman W, Griffin S, Johnson M, Kinmonth AL, Wareham N (2000) Interventions to prevent weight gain: a systematic review of psychological models and behaviour change methods. Int J Obes 24:131–143CrossRef
43.
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R (2011) The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 6(42). doi:10.​1186/​1748-5908-6-42
44.
Blanchard CM, Courneya KS, Stein K (2008) Cancer Survivors’ Adherence to Lifestyle Behavior recommendations and associations with health-related quality of life: results from the American Cancer Society’s SCS-II. J Clin Oncol 26(13):2198–2204PubMedCrossRef
45.
Mosher CE, Sloane R, Morey MC, Snyder DC, Cohen HJ, Miller PE et al (2009) Associations between lifestyle factors and quality of life among older long-term breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors. Cancer 115(17):4001–4009PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Behavior theory for dietary interventions for cancer prevention: a systematic review of utilization and effectiveness in creating behavior change
Authors
Kerry N. L. Avery
Jenny L. Donovan
Jeremy Horwood
J. Athene Lane
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-012-9995-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Cancer Causes & Control 3/2013 Go to the issue

Original paper

Racial disparities in advanced-stage colorectal cancer survival

Original paper

An examination of sexual orientation group patterns in mammographic and colorectal screening in a cohort of U.S. women

Original paper

HBV infection increases the risk of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis

Original paper

How can we make cancer survival statistics more useful for patients and clinicians: An illustration using localized prostate cancer in Sweden

Original Paper

Baseline E2 levels are higher in BRCA2 mutation carriers: a potential target for prevention?

Original Paper

The modifying effect of patient location on stage-specific survival following colorectal cancer using geosurvival models
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits