Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2022

19-05-2022 | Systemic Therapy | Epidemiology

Association of markers of tumor aggressivity and cognition in women with breast cancer before adjuvant treatment: The Thinking and Living with Cancer Study

Authors: James C. Root, Xingtao Zhou, Jaeil Ahn, Brent J. Small, Wanting Zhai, Traci Bethea, Judith E. Carroll, Harvey Jay Cohen, Asma Dilawari, Martine Extermann, Deena Graham, Claudine Isaacs, Paul B. Jacobsen, Heather Jim, Brenna C. McDonald, Zev M. Nakamura, Sunita K. Patel, Kelly Rentscher, Andrew J. Saykin, Kathleen Van Dyk, Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Tim A. Ahles

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Tumor features associated with aggressive cancers may affect cognition prior to systemic therapy. We evaluated associations of cognition prior to adjuvant therapy and tumor aggressivity in older breast cancer patients.

Methods

Women diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer (n = 705) ages 60–98 were enrolled from August 2010-March 2020. Cognition was measured post-surgery, pre-systemic therapy using self-reported (FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment [PCI]) and objective tests of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE domain) and learning and memory [LM domain]. Linear regression tested associations of pre-treatment tumor features and cognition, adjusting for age, race, and study site. HER2 positivity and higher stage (II/III vs. 0/I) were a priori predictors of cognition; in secondary analyses we explored associations of other tumor features and cognitive impairment (i.e., PCI score < 54 or having 2 tests < 1.5 SD or 1 test < 2 SD from the mean APE or LM domain score).

Results

HER2 positivity and the hormone receptor negative/HER2 + molecular subtype were associated with lower adjusted mean self-reported cognition scores and higher impairment rates (p values < .05). Higher stage of disease was associated with lower objective performance in APE. Other tumor features were associated with cognition in unadjusted and adjusted models, including larger tumor size and lower PCI scores (p = 0.02). Tumor features were not related to LM.

Conclusions

Pre-adjuvant therapy cognition was associated with HER2 positivity and higher stage of disease and other features of aggressive tumors. Additional research is needed to confirm these results and assess potential mechanisms and clinical management strategies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
7.
go back to reference Ahles TA, Saykin AJ, McDonald BC, Furstenberg CT, Cole BF, Hanscom BS et al (2008) Cognitive function in breast cancer patients prior to adjuvant treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 110(1):143–152CrossRef Ahles TA, Saykin AJ, McDonald BC, Furstenberg CT, Cole BF, Hanscom BS et al (2008) Cognitive function in breast cancer patients prior to adjuvant treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 110(1):143–152CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Andreotti C, Root J, Ahles T, McEwen B, Compas B (2014) Cancer, coping, and cognition: a model for the role of stress reactivity in cancer-related cognitive decline. Psycho-Oncology 24:617–623CrossRef Andreotti C, Root J, Ahles T, McEwen B, Compas B (2014) Cancer, coping, and cognition: a model for the role of stress reactivity in cancer-related cognitive decline. Psycho-Oncology 24:617–623CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ahles TA, Saykin AJ (2007) Candidate mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes. Nat Rev Cancer 7(3):192–201CrossRef Ahles TA, Saykin AJ (2007) Candidate mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes. Nat Rev Cancer 7(3):192–201CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatric Res 12(3):189–198CrossRef Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatric Res 12(3):189–198CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ (2006) WRAT4: wide range achievement test. Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz, FL Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ (2006) WRAT4: wide range achievement test. Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz, FL
26.
go back to reference Wagner LI, Lai JS, Cella D, Sweet J, Forrestal S (2004) Chemotherapy-related cognitive deficits: development of the FACT-Cog instrument. Ann Behav Med 27:S10 Wagner LI, Lai JS, Cella D, Sweet J, Forrestal S (2004) Chemotherapy-related cognitive deficits: development of the FACT-Cog instrument. Ann Behav Med 27:S10
28.
go back to reference Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE (1970) Manual for the stait-trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE (1970) Manual for the stait-trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA
29.
go back to reference Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1(3):385–401CrossRef Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1(3):385–401CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Association of markers of tumor aggressivity and cognition in women with breast cancer before adjuvant treatment: The Thinking and Living with Cancer Study
Authors
James C. Root
Xingtao Zhou
Jaeil Ahn
Brent J. Small
Wanting Zhai
Traci Bethea
Judith E. Carroll
Harvey Jay Cohen
Asma Dilawari
Martine Extermann
Deena Graham
Claudine Isaacs
Paul B. Jacobsen
Heather Jim
Brenna C. McDonald
Zev M. Nakamura
Sunita K. Patel
Kelly Rentscher
Andrew J. Saykin
Kathleen Van Dyk
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
Tim A. Ahles
Publication date
19-05-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06623-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2022 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine