Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2020

01-07-2020 | Breast Cancer | Clinical trial

ABREAST: a prospective, real-world study on the effect of nab-paclitaxel treatment on clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients with metastatic breast cancer

Authors: A. Koumarianou, P. Makrantonakis, F. Zagouri, C. Papadimitriou, A. Christopoulou, E. Samantas, C. Christodoulou, A. Psyrri, D. Bafaloukos, G. Aravantinos, P. Papakotoulas, S. Baka, C. Andreadis, A. Alexopoulos, I. Bompolaki, Κ. Kampoli, S. Liori, K. Karvounis, A. Ardavanis

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The efficacy of nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. However, real-world evidence on effectiveness remains limited.

Patients and methods

The primary objective of this multicenter prospective study was to assess the overall response rate (ORR) of patients with MBC treated with nab-paclitaxel. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and quality of life, assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) instrument.

Results

Eligible patients (N = 150; 36% with de novo MBC presentation) with a median age of 64.5 years were enrolled (86% were ER+, 33.3% (50/150) were ≥ 70 years of age and 53% were treated in the third or later line of treatment). A median of 6 cycles were administered but 26% of patients required dose reduction due to toxicity. The ORR was 26.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.6–33.7], the median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI 5.2–7.3), and the median OS 21.1 months (95% CI 17.2-not estimable). There was no statistical significant difference in the median PFS of patients < and ≥ 70 years of age. The patients’ baseline FACT-B total score remained unchanged. The serious and non-serious adverse event incidence rates were 13% and 48%, respectively.

Conclusions

This prospective study provides further evidence on quality of life, efficacy, and safety of nab-paclitaxel in patients with MBC and sheds more light in special subpopulations such as the elderly and those treated beyond the second line.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I et al (2018) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur J Cancer 103:356–387CrossRef Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I et al (2018) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur J Cancer 103:356–387CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cardoso F, Harbeck N, Fallowfield L et al (2012) Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: esmo clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 7):11–19CrossRef Cardoso F, Harbeck N, Fallowfield L et al (2012) Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: esmo clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 7):11–19CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cardoso F, Senkus E, Costa A et al (2018) 4th eso-esmo international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (abc 4)+. Ann Oncol 29:1634–1657CrossRef Cardoso F, Senkus E, Costa A et al (2018) 4th eso-esmo international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (abc 4)+. Ann Oncol 29:1634–1657CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gradishar WJ (2012) Taxanes for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 6:159–171 Gradishar WJ (2012) Taxanes for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 6:159–171
6.
go back to reference Gradishar WJ, Tjulandin S, Davidson N et al (2005) Phase iii trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7794–7803CrossRef Gradishar WJ, Tjulandin S, Davidson N et al (2005) Phase iii trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7794–7803CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Palumbo R, Sottotetti F, Trifiro G et al (2015) Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) as second-line chemotherapy in her2-negative, taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients: prospective evaluation of activity, safety, and quality of life. Drug Des Devel Ther 9:2189–2199CrossRef Palumbo R, Sottotetti F, Trifiro G et al (2015) Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) as second-line chemotherapy in her2-negative, taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients: prospective evaluation of activity, safety, and quality of life. Drug Des Devel Ther 9:2189–2199CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F et al (1997) Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol 15:974–986CrossRef Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F et al (1997) Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol 15:974–986CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Marschner N, Salat C, Soling U et al (2018) Final effectiveness and safety results of nabucco: Real-world data from a noninterventional, prospective, multicenter study in 697 patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with nab-paclitaxel. Clin Breast Cancer 18:e1323–e1337CrossRef Marschner N, Salat C, Soling U et al (2018) Final effectiveness and safety results of nabucco: Real-world data from a noninterventional, prospective, multicenter study in 697 patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with nab-paclitaxel. Clin Breast Cancer 18:e1323–e1337CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Steger G, Petru E, Haslbauer F et al (2016) Safety and effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel in young and elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer: a prospective, multicenter non-interventional study. Ann Oncol 27:74CrossRef Steger G, Petru E, Haslbauer F et al (2016) Safety and effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel in young and elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer: a prospective, multicenter non-interventional study. Ann Oncol 27:74CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fabi A, Giannarelli D, Malaguti P et al (2015) Prospective study on nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer: clinical results and biological observations in taxane-pretreated patients. Drug Des Devel Ther 9:6177–6183CrossRef Fabi A, Giannarelli D, Malaguti P et al (2015) Prospective study on nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer: clinical results and biological observations in taxane-pretreated patients. Drug Des Devel Ther 9:6177–6183CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Blum JL, Jones SE, Buzdar AU et al (1999) Multicenter phase ii study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:485–493CrossRef Blum JL, Jones SE, Buzdar AU et al (1999) Multicenter phase ii study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:485–493CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cortes J, O'Shaughnessy J, Loesch D et al (2011) Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (embrace): a phase 3 open-label randomised study. Lancet 377:914–923CrossRef Cortes J, O'Shaughnessy J, Loesch D et al (2011) Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (embrace): a phase 3 open-label randomised study. Lancet 377:914–923CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jones S, Winer E, Vogel C et al (1995) Randomized comparison of vinorelbine and melphalan in anthracycline-refractory advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 13:2567–2574CrossRef Jones S, Winer E, Vogel C et al (1995) Randomized comparison of vinorelbine and melphalan in anthracycline-refractory advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 13:2567–2574CrossRef
15.
go back to reference DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM et al (2019) Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69:438–451CrossRef DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM et al (2019) Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69:438–451CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rosenberg PS, Barker KA, Anderson WF (2015) Estrogen receptor status and the future burden of invasive and in situ breast cancers in the united states. J Natl Cancer Inst 107:10CrossRef Rosenberg PS, Barker KA, Anderson WF (2015) Estrogen receptor status and the future burden of invasive and in situ breast cancers in the united states. J Natl Cancer Inst 107:10CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Extermann M, Albrand G, Chen H et al (2003) Are older french patients as willing as older american patients to undertake chemotherapy? J Clin Oncol 21:3214–3219CrossRef Extermann M, Albrand G, Chen H et al (2003) Are older french patients as willing as older american patients to undertake chemotherapy? J Clin Oncol 21:3214–3219CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Li X, Kwon H (2019) Efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Clin Med 8:1689CrossRef Li X, Kwon H (2019) Efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Clin Med 8:1689CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752CrossRef Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Masuda H, Baggerly KA, Wang Y et al (2013) Differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among 7 triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 19:5533–5540CrossRef Masuda H, Baggerly KA, Wang Y et al (2013) Differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among 7 triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 19:5533–5540CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cortes J, Perez-Garcia J, Whiting S et al (2018) Quality-adjusted survival with nab-paclitaxel versus standard paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: a q-twist analysis. Clin Breast Cancer 18:e919–e926CrossRef Cortes J, Perez-Garcia J, Whiting S et al (2018) Quality-adjusted survival with nab-paclitaxel versus standard paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: a q-twist analysis. Clin Breast Cancer 18:e919–e926CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ABREAST: a prospective, real-world study on the effect of nab-paclitaxel treatment on clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients with metastatic breast cancer
Authors
A. Koumarianou
P. Makrantonakis
F. Zagouri
C. Papadimitriou
A. Christopoulou
E. Samantas
C. Christodoulou
A. Psyrri
D. Bafaloukos
G. Aravantinos
P. Papakotoulas
S. Baka
C. Andreadis
A. Alexopoulos
I. Bompolaki
Κ. Kampoli
S. Liori
K. Karvounis
A. Ardavanis
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05677-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine