Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2020

01-07-2020 | Breast Cancer | Epidemiology

Racial/ethnic differences in supplemental imaging for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts

Authors: Charlotte Ezratty, Suzanne Vang, Jordonna Brown, Laurie R. Margolies, Lina Jandorf, Jenny J. Lin

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mammography is limited when analyzing dense breasts for 2 reasons: (1) breast density masks underlying cancers and (2) breast density is an independent risk factor for cancer. We undertook this study to assess whether there is a racial/ethnic difference in supplemental image ordering for women with dense breasts.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study of women aged 50–75 from an academic medical center who had completed a screening mammogram between 2014 and 2016 that was read as BI-RADS 1 with heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts or BI-RADS 2 with extremely dense breasts. Data were abstracted on type, timing and frequency of supplemental imaging tests ordered within two years of an initial screening mammogram. Patient characteristics (age, race/ethnicity, insurance, and comorbidities) were also abstracted. We used bivariate and multivariate logistic regression to assess for differences in supplemental imaging ordered by race/ethnicity.

Results

Three hundred twenty-six women met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 58 years: 25% were non-Hispanic white, 30% were non-Hispanic black, 27% were Hispanic, 6% were Asian and 14% unknown. Seventy-nine (24%) women were ordered a supplemental breast ultrasound after the initial screening mammogram. Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women were less likely to have supplemental imaging ordered compared to non-Hispanic white women (15% and 10%, respectively, vs. 45%, p < 0.0001). After controlling for patient age, ordering physician specialty, insurance, BI-RADS score, breast density, and family history of breast cancer, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women remained less likely to be ordered supplemental imaging (OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.17–0.85] and OR 0.24 [95% CI 0.10–0.61], respectively, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Minority women with dense breasts are less likely to be ordered supplemental breast imaging. Further research should investigate physician and patient behaviors to determine barriers in supplemental imaging. Understanding these differences may help reduce disparities in breast cancer care and mortality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ahmed AT, Welch BT, Brinjikji W et al (2017) Racial disparities in screening mammography in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Radiol 14(2):157–165.e159CrossRef Ahmed AT, Welch BT, Brinjikji W et al (2017) Racial disparities in screening mammography in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Radiol 14(2):157–165.e159CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Davis C, Cadet TJ, Moore M, Darby K (2017) A comparison of compliance and noncompliance in breast cancer screening among African American women. Health Soc Work 42(3):159–166CrossRef Davis C, Cadet TJ, Moore M, Darby K (2017) A comparison of compliance and noncompliance in breast cancer screening among African American women. Health Soc Work 42(3):159–166CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bhargava S, Moen K, Qureshi SA, Hofvind S (2018) Mammographic screening attendance among immigrant and minority women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Radiol 59(11):1285–1291CrossRef Bhargava S, Moen K, Qureshi SA, Hofvind S (2018) Mammographic screening attendance among immigrant and minority women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Radiol 59(11):1285–1291CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Freer PE (2015) Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening. Radiographics 35(2):302–315CrossRef Freer PE (2015) Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening. Radiographics 35(2):302–315CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Berg WA (2016) Current status of supplemental screening in dense breasts. Journal Clin Oncol 34(16):1840–1843CrossRef Berg WA (2016) Current status of supplemental screening in dense breasts. Journal Clin Oncol 34(16):1840–1843CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL et al (2000) Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(13):1081–1087CrossRef Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL et al (2000) Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(13):1081–1087CrossRef
8.
go back to reference El-Bastawissi AY, White E, Mandelson MT, Taplin S (2001) Variation in mammographic breast density by race. Ann Epidemiol 11(4):257–263CrossRef El-Bastawissi AY, White E, Mandelson MT, Taplin S (2001) Variation in mammographic breast density by race. Ann Epidemiol 11(4):257–263CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hitlin S, Brown JS, Elder JGH (2007) Measuring Latinos: racial vs ethnic classification and self-understandings. Soc Forces 86(2):587–611CrossRef Hitlin S, Brown JS, Elder JGH (2007) Measuring Latinos: racial vs ethnic classification and self-understandings. Soc Forces 86(2):587–611CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Linden HM, Reisch LM, Ayanian JZ, Larson EB (2005) Racial inequities in the timing of breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and initiation of treatment. Med Care 43(2):141–148CrossRef Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Linden HM, Reisch LM, Ayanian JZ, Larson EB (2005) Racial inequities in the timing of breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and initiation of treatment. Med Care 43(2):141–148CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hoppe EJ, Hussain LR, Grannan KJ, Dunki-Jacobs EM, Lee DY, Wexelman BA (2018) Racial disparities in breast cancer persist despite early detection: analysis of treatment of stage 1 breast cancer and effect of insurance status on disparities. Breast Cancer Res Treat Hoppe EJ, Hussain LR, Grannan KJ, Dunki-Jacobs EM, Lee DY, Wexelman BA (2018) Racial disparities in breast cancer persist despite early detection: analysis of treatment of stage 1 breast cancer and effect of insurance status on disparities. Breast Cancer Res Treat
12.
go back to reference Coughlin SS (2014) Intervention approaches for addressing breast cancer disparities among African American Women. Ann Trans Med Epidemiol 1(1). Coughlin SS (2014) Intervention approaches for addressing breast cancer disparities among African American Women. Ann Trans Med Epidemiol 1(1).
13.
go back to reference Livaudais JC, Coronado GD, Espinoza N, Islas I, Ibarra G, Thompson B (2010) Educating Hispanic Women about breast cancer prevention: evaluation of a home-based promotora-led intervention. J Women's Health 19(11):2049–2056CrossRef Livaudais JC, Coronado GD, Espinoza N, Islas I, Ibarra G, Thompson B (2010) Educating Hispanic Women about breast cancer prevention: evaluation of a home-based promotora-led intervention. J Women's Health 19(11):2049–2056CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Berg WA (2016) Supplemental breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts should be offered with simultaneous collection of outcomes data. Ann Intern Med 164(4):299–300CrossRef Berg WA (2016) Supplemental breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts should be offered with simultaneous collection of outcomes data. Ann Intern Med 164(4):299–300CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al (2008) Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 299(18):2151–2163CrossRef Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al (2008) Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 299(18):2151–2163CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D et al (2012) Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307(13):1394–1404CrossRef Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D et al (2012) Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307(13):1394–1404CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tagliafico AS, Mariscotti G, Valdora F et al (2018) A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2). Eur J Cancer. 104:39–46CrossRef Tagliafico AS, Mariscotti G, Valdora F et al (2018) A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2). Eur J Cancer. 104:39–46CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Alexandraki I, Mooradian AD (2010) Barriers related to mammography use for breast cancer screening among minority women. J Natl Med Assoc 102(3):206–218CrossRef Alexandraki I, Mooradian AD (2010) Barriers related to mammography use for breast cancer screening among minority women. J Natl Med Assoc 102(3):206–218CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Racial/ethnic differences in supplemental imaging for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts
Authors
Charlotte Ezratty
Suzanne Vang
Jordonna Brown
Laurie R. Margolies
Lina Jandorf
Jenny J. Lin
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05652-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine