Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2019

01-07-2019 | Clinical trial

Comparing long-term local recurrence rates of surgical and non-surgical management of close anterior margins in breast conserving surgery

Authors: George Boundouki, Joseph Ryan Wong Sik Hee, Natalie Croghan, Katie Stocking, Andrew Pieri, Adam Critchley, Cliona C. Kirwan, James R. Harvey

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

While it is known that histologically involved margins lead to a higher local recurrence rate, re-excision of anterior margins is less common than that of radial margins. However, there are minimal long-term data on the oncological safety of non-surgical management of anterior margins.

Patients and methods

A retrospective study was performed of all patients who underwent breast conserving surgery for breast cancer between 2000 and 2008 at two tertiary referral centres. A close margin was defined as disease within two mm of the resection margin (including disease at the margin).

Results

6922 patients underwent surgery for invasive or in situ breast cancer of whom 277 patients had a close anterior margin alone after breast conserving surgery. Two hundred and twenty patients had non-surgical management of their margins, while 57 had re-excision surgery. Overall, there were 4/57 local recurrences in the surgical management group and 12/220 in the non-surgical management group. The local recurrence-free survival rate at 5 years was 98.2% (1 recurrence, 95% CI 87.8–99.7) in the surgical management group and 97.2% (6 recurrences, 95% CI 93.8–98.7) in the non-surgical management group. At 10 years, the rates were 92.2% (4 recurrences, 95% CI 80.3–97.0) in the surgical management group and 93.9% (12 recurrences, 95% CI 89.4–96.5) in the non-surgical management group. There was no significant difference found in the local recurrence rate between management groups (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.40, 3.85; p = 0.71).

Conclusions

Local recurrence rates are acceptable and similar in both the surgically and non-surgically managed groups. Non-surgical management of close anterior margins appears oncologically safe when combined with appropriate adjuvant therapy.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Arriagada R, Le MG, Rochard F, Contesso G (1996) Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. Institut Gustave-Roussy Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 14(5):1558–1564CrossRefPubMed Arriagada R, Le MG, Rochard F, Contesso G (1996) Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. Institut Gustave-Roussy Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 14(5):1558–1564CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1233–1241. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022152 CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1233–1241. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa022152 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference van Dongen JA, Bartelink H, Fentiman IS, Lerut T, Mignolet F, Olthuis G, van der Schueren E, Sylvester R, Tong D, Winter J et al (1992) Factors influencing local relapse and survival and results of salvage treatment after breast-conserving therapy in operable breast cancer: EORTC trial 10801, breast conservation compared with mastectomy in TNM stage I and II breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 28A(4–5):801–805CrossRefPubMed van Dongen JA, Bartelink H, Fentiman IS, Lerut T, Mignolet F, Olthuis G, van der Schueren E, Sylvester R, Tong D, Winter J et al (1992) Factors influencing local relapse and survival and results of salvage treatment after breast-conserving therapy in operable breast cancer: EORTC trial 10801, breast conservation compared with mastectomy in TNM stage I and II breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 28A(4–5):801–805CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans E, Godwin J, Gray R, Hicks C, James S, MacKinnon E, McGale P, McHugh T, Peto R, Taylor C, Wang Y, Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366(9503):2087–2106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7 CrossRefPubMed Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans E, Godwin J, Gray R, Hicks C, James S, MacKinnon E, McGale P, McHugh T, Peto R, Taylor C, Wang Y, Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366(9503):2087–2106. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(05)67887-7 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Smitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, Jeffrey SS (2003) Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57(4):979–985CrossRefPubMed Smitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, Jeffrey SS (2003) Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57(4):979–985CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yoon TI, Lee JW, Lee SB, Sohn G, Kim J, Chung IY, Kim HJ, Ko BS, Son BH, Gong G, Kim SB, Kim SS, Ahn SD, Chung M, Ahn SH (2018) No association of positive superficial and/or deep margins with local recurrence in invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery. Cancer Res Treat 50(1):275–282. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.041 CrossRefPubMed Yoon TI, Lee JW, Lee SB, Sohn G, Kim J, Chung IY, Kim HJ, Ko BS, Son BH, Gong G, Kim SB, Kim SS, Ahn SD, Chung M, Ahn SH (2018) No association of positive superficial and/or deep margins with local recurrence in invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery. Cancer Res Treat 50(1):275–282. https://​doi.​org/​10.​4143/​crt.​2017.​041 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A, Nicolaou N, Fein D, Hoffman J, Sigurdson E, Boraas M, Goldstein L (1999) Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44(5):1005–1015CrossRefPubMed Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A, Nicolaou N, Fein D, Hoffman J, Sigurdson E, Boraas M, Goldstein L (1999) Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44(5):1005–1015CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, Recht A, Connolly J, Gelman R, Silver B, Hetelekidis S, Abner A, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ (2000) Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol 18(8):1668–1675CrossRefPubMed Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, Recht A, Connolly J, Gelman R, Silver B, Hetelekidis S, Abner A, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ (2000) Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol 18(8):1668–1675CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ, Jeffrey S, Carlson RW, Stockdale FE, Goffinet DR (1995) The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer 76(2):259–267CrossRefPubMed Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ, Jeffrey S, Carlson RW, Stockdale FE, Goffinet DR (1995) The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer 76(2):259–267CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kestin LL, Goldstein NS, Lacerna MD, Balasubramaniam M, Martinez AA, Rebner M, Pettinga J, Frazier RC, Vicini FA (2000) Factors associated with local recurrence of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ in patients given breast-conserving therapy. Cancer 88(3):596–607CrossRefPubMed Kestin LL, Goldstein NS, Lacerna MD, Balasubramaniam M, Martinez AA, Rebner M, Pettinga J, Frazier RC, Vicini FA (2000) Factors associated with local recurrence of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ in patients given breast-conserving therapy. Cancer 88(3):596–607CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Vicini FA, Kestin LL, Goldstein NS, Baglan KL, Pettinga JE, Martinez AA (2001) Relationship between excision volume, margin status, and tumor size with the development of local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma-in situ treated with breast-conserving therapy. J Surg Oncol 76(4):245–254CrossRefPubMed Vicini FA, Kestin LL, Goldstein NS, Baglan KL, Pettinga JE, Martinez AA (2001) Relationship between excision volume, margin status, and tumor size with the development of local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma-in situ treated with breast-conserving therapy. J Surg Oncol 76(4):245–254CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, Klimberg S, Chavez-MacGregor M, Freedman G, Houssami N, Johnson PL, Morrow M (2014) Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):704–716. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3481-4 CrossRefPubMed Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, Klimberg S, Chavez-MacGregor M, Freedman G, Houssami N, Johnson PL, Morrow M (2014) Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):704–716. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-014-3481-4 CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, Houssami N, Chavez-MacGregor M, Harris JR, Horton J, Hwang S, Johnson PL, Marinovich ML, Schnitt SJ, Wapnir I, Moran MS (2016) Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 23(12):3801–3810. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5449-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, Houssami N, Chavez-MacGregor M, Harris JR, Horton J, Hwang S, Johnson PL, Marinovich ML, Schnitt SJ, Wapnir I, Moran MS (2016) Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 23(12):3801–3810. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-016-5449-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Surgery AoB (2015) margin width in breast conservation surgery Surgery AoB (2015) margin width in breast conservation surgery
31.
go back to reference NICE (2002) Improving outcomes in breast cancer NICE (2002) Improving outcomes in breast cancer
34.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G, Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Pan HC, Clarke M, Cutter D, Darby S, McGale P, Taylor C, Wang YC, Bergh J, Di Leo A, Albain K, Swain S, Piccart M, Pritchard K (2012) Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 379(9814):432–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61625-5 CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G, Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Pan HC, Clarke M, Cutter D, Darby S, McGale P, Taylor C, Wang YC, Bergh J, Di Leo A, Albain K, Swain S, Piccart M, Pritchard K (2012) Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 379(9814):432–444. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​s0140-6736(11)61625-5 CrossRef
35.
Metadata
Title
Comparing long-term local recurrence rates of surgical and non-surgical management of close anterior margins in breast conserving surgery
Authors
George Boundouki
Joseph Ryan Wong Sik Hee
Natalie Croghan
Katie Stocking
Andrew Pieri
Adam Critchley
Cliona C. Kirwan
James R. Harvey
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05242-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine