Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2019

01-06-2019 | Breast Cancer | Epidemiology

Body mass index impacts infection rates in immediate autogenous breast reconstruction

Authors: Lauren I. Willoughby, Josephine A. D’Abbondanza, Healther L. Baltzer, James L. Mahoney, Melinda A. Musgrave

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Risk of postoperative infection following breast cancer reconstruction warrants consideration of both classic and procedure-specific risk factors. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with breast cancer over a 10-year period that underwent reconstructive surgery to identify factors that increase risk of postoperative infection.

Methods

Rates of postoperative infection were assessed in primary (immediate or delayed, alloplastic or autogenous) and secondary reconstructive procedures. Patient characteristics, surgical details, and cancer features were analyzed using two-sample t test and Fisher’s exact test for continuous and categorical data, respectively.

Results

456 procedures were performed on 264 patients with 29 cases of postoperative infection (6%). Infection was more likely to occur in earlier reconstructive procedures (p < 0.03). Overall, primary reconstructive procedures were associated with a higher infection rate (p = 0.005). Other associated risk factors included: autogenous reconstruction (p < 0.018), length of admission (p < 0.001) and immediate reconstruction (p = 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed increased risk of infection with immediate autogenous reconstruction (p < 0.03). Furthermore, patients with greater body mass index (BMI) receiving immediate autogenous reconstruction had a greater risk of infection (p < 0.003). Factors unrelated to risk of infection included history of irradiation, smoking, cancer stage, tumor type and tumor size.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that risk of infection is higher in immediate autogenous reconstructions particularly when patients are overweight (BMI > 30). Our data do not support a relationship between infection and irradiation, features of cancer, or repeated reconstructive procedures. Prospective studies may be required to further validate these findings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baxter N, Goel V, Semple JL (2005) Utilization and regional variation of breast reconstruction in Canada. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(1):338–339PubMed Baxter N, Goel V, Semple JL (2005) Utilization and regional variation of breast reconstruction in Canada. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(1):338–339PubMed
2.
go back to reference Barnsley GP, Sigurdson L, Kirkland S (2008) Barriers to breast reconstruction after mastectomy in Nova Scotia. Can J Surg 51(6):447–452PubMedPubMedCentral Barnsley GP, Sigurdson L, Kirkland S (2008) Barriers to breast reconstruction after mastectomy in Nova Scotia. Can J Surg 51(6):447–452PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Gieni M, Avram R, Dickson L et al (2012) Local breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast 21(3):230–236CrossRefPubMed Gieni M, Avram R, Dickson L et al (2012) Local breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast 21(3):230–236CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Platt J, Baxter NN, McLaughlin J, Semple JL (2015) Does breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer affect overall survival? Long-term follow-up of a retrospective population-based cohort. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(3):468e–476eCrossRefPubMed Platt J, Baxter NN, McLaughlin J, Semple JL (2015) Does breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer affect overall survival? Long-term follow-up of a retrospective population-based cohort. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(3):468e–476eCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Morrow M, Li Y, Alderman AK et al (2014) Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making. JAMA Surg 149(10):1015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morrow M, Li Y, Alderman AK et al (2014) Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making. JAMA Surg 149(10):1015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Platt J, Zhong T, Moineddin R et al (2015) Geographic variation immediate and delayed breast reconstruction utilization in Ontario, Canada and plastic surgeon availability: a population-based observational study. World J Surg 39(8):1909–1921CrossRefPubMed Platt J, Zhong T, Moineddin R et al (2015) Geographic variation immediate and delayed breast reconstruction utilization in Ontario, Canada and plastic surgeon availability: a population-based observational study. World J Surg 39(8):1909–1921CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gabriel SE, Woods JE, O’Fallon WM, Beard CM, Kurland LT, Melton LJ (1997) Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N Engl J Med 336(10):677–682CrossRefPubMed Gabriel SE, Woods JE, O’Fallon WM, Beard CM, Kurland LT, Melton LJ (1997) Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N Engl J Med 336(10):677–682CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Nelson JA, Chung CU, Fischer JP, Kanchwala SK, Serletti JM, Wu LC (2015) Wound healing complications after autologous breast reconstruction: a model to predict risk. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(4):531–539CrossRefPubMed Nelson JA, Chung CU, Fischer JP, Kanchwala SK, Serletti JM, Wu LC (2015) Wound healing complications after autologous breast reconstruction: a model to predict risk. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(4):531–539CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Huo J, Smith BD, Giordano SH, Reece GP, Shih YCT (2016) Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction and its subsequent complications: a comparison between obese and non-obese women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157(2):373–383CrossRefPubMed Huo J, Smith BD, Giordano SH, Reece GP, Shih YCT (2016) Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction and its subsequent complications: a comparison between obese and non-obese women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157(2):373–383CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Francis SH, Ruberg RL, Stevenson KB et al (2009) Independent risk factors for infection in tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):1790–1796CrossRefPubMed Francis SH, Ruberg RL, Stevenson KB et al (2009) Independent risk factors for infection in tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):1790–1796CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Armstrong RW, Berkowitz RL, Bolding F (1989) Infection following breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 23(4):284–288CrossRefPubMed Armstrong RW, Berkowitz RL, Bolding F (1989) Infection following breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 23(4):284–288CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lefebvre D, Penel N, Deberles MF, Fournier C (2000) Incidence and surgical wound infection risk factors in breast cancer surgery. Press Med. 29(35):1927–1932 Lefebvre D, Penel N, Deberles MF, Fournier C (2000) Incidence and surgical wound infection risk factors in breast cancer surgery. Press Med. 29(35):1927–1932
15.
go back to reference Mortenson MM, Schneider PD, Khatri VP et al (2004) Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy increases wound complications: however, initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is not delayed. Arch Surg 139(9):988–991CrossRefPubMed Mortenson MM, Schneider PD, Khatri VP et al (2004) Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy increases wound complications: however, initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is not delayed. Arch Surg 139(9):988–991CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Costerton JW, Montanaro L, Arciola CR (2005) Biofilm in implant infections: its production and regulation. Int J Artif Organs 28:1062–1068CrossRefPubMed Costerton JW, Montanaro L, Arciola CR (2005) Biofilm in implant infections: its production and regulation. Int J Artif Organs 28:1062–1068CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Costa MA, Rommer E, Peric M et al (2013) Incidence of surgical-site infection is not affected by method of immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 132(1):20e–29eCrossRefPubMed Costa MA, Rommer E, Peric M et al (2013) Incidence of surgical-site infection is not affected by method of immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 132(1):20e–29eCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ilonzo N, Tsang A, Tsantes S, Estabrook A, Thu Ma AM (2017) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. Breast 32:7–12CrossRefPubMed Ilonzo N, Tsang A, Tsantes S, Estabrook A, Thu Ma AM (2017) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. Breast 32:7–12CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bertin ML, Crowe J, Gordon SM (1998) Determinants of surgical site infection after breast surgery. Am J Infect Control 26(1):61–65CrossRefPubMed Bertin ML, Crowe J, Gordon SM (1998) Determinants of surgical site infection after breast surgery. Am J Infect Control 26(1):61–65CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Vilar-Compte D, Jacquemin B, Robles-Vidal C, Volkow P (2004) Surgical site infections in breast surgery: case–control study. World J Surg 28(3):242–246CrossRefPubMed Vilar-Compte D, Jacquemin B, Robles-Vidal C, Volkow P (2004) Surgical site infections in breast surgery: case–control study. World J Surg 28(3):242–246CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Vilar-Compte D, Rosales S, Hernandez-Mello N, Maafs E, Volkow P (2009) Surveillance, control, and prevention of surgical site infections in breast cancer surgery: a 5-year experience. Am J Infect Control 37(8):674–679CrossRefPubMed Vilar-Compte D, Rosales S, Hernandez-Mello N, Maafs E, Volkow P (2009) Surveillance, control, and prevention of surgical site infections in breast cancer surgery: a 5-year experience. Am J Infect Control 37(8):674–679CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tong W, Baumann D, Villa M et al (2016) Obese women experience fewer complications after oncoplastic breast repair following partial mastectomy than after immediate total breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(3):777–791CrossRefPubMed Tong W, Baumann D, Villa M et al (2016) Obese women experience fewer complications after oncoplastic breast repair following partial mastectomy than after immediate total breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(3):777–791CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Pinsolle V, Grinfeder C, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Faucher A (2006) Complications analysis of 266 immediate breast reconstructions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 59(10):1017–1024CrossRef Pinsolle V, Grinfeder C, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Faucher A (2006) Complications analysis of 266 immediate breast reconstructions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 59(10):1017–1024CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Body mass index impacts infection rates in immediate autogenous breast reconstruction
Authors
Lauren I. Willoughby
Josephine A. D’Abbondanza
Healther L. Baltzer
James L. Mahoney
Melinda A. Musgrave
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05215-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine