Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Original Scientific Report

Geographic Variation Immediate and Delayed Breast Reconstruction Utilization in Ontario, Canada and Plastic Surgeon Availability: A Population-Based Observational Study

Authors: Jennica Platt, Toni Zhong, Rahim Moineddin, Gillian L. Booth, Alexandra M. Easson, Kimberly Fernandes, Peter Gozdyra, Nancy N. Baxter

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Utilization of breast reconstruction (BR) is low in many jurisdictions. We studied the geographical and surgical workforce factors that contribute to access and use of BR using a small area analysis approach with a geographical unit of analysis.

Methods

We linked administrative data from Ontario Canada to calculate the age-standardized rates for immediate BR (IBR) (same time as mastectomy) between 2002 and 2011, and delayed BR (DBR) (within 3 years of mastectomy) for each county. The influence of plastic surgeon access on variation in county rates of BR was examined using Poisson random effects models.

Results

12,663 women underwent mastectomy in Ontario; 2,948 had BR within 3 years (23.3 %). Over 50 % of the counties had no access to any plastic surgeon. County IBR rates ranged from 0 to 21.5 %; plastic surgeon access explained 46 % of geographic variation (p < 0.0001). IBR rates in counties with very low, low, and moderate access to plastic surgeons were significantly less than counties with high access (relative rate [RR] 0.48 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.35–0.66], RR 0.61 [CI 0.43–0.87] and RR 0.70 [CI 0.52–0.96], respectively) after adjusting for age and county socioeconomic characteristics. For DBR, while there was less geographic variation, very low access counties demonstrated reduced rates (RR 0.60 [CI 0.47–0.76]).

Interpretation

Geographic access to a plastic surgeon is a major determinant of BR. Targeted interventions for regions without high access to plastic surgeons may improve overall rates and reduce geographic disparities in care, particularly for IBR.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Your rights after a mastectomy… Women’s health and cancer rights act of 1998. In: Labor USDo (edr) US Department of Labor Your rights after a mastectomy… Women’s health and cancer rights act of 1998. In: Labor USDo (edr) US Department of Labor
2.
go back to reference Hartocollis A (2010) Before breast is removed, a discussion on options, New York City, The New York Times (Internet), 2010 Aug 18; NY/Region:A23 Hartocollis A (2010) Before breast is removed, a discussion on options, New York City, The New York Times (Internet), 2010 Aug 18; NY/Region:A23
3.
go back to reference Guidance on cancer services (2002) Improving outcomes in breast cancer—manual update. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, England Guidance on cancer services (2002) Improving outcomes in breast cancer—manual update. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, England
4.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Waljee J et al (2007) Correlates of referral practices of general surgeons to plastic surgeons for mastectomy reconstruction. Cancer 109:1715–1720PubMedCrossRef Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Waljee J et al (2007) Correlates of referral practices of general surgeons to plastic surgeons for mastectomy reconstruction. Cancer 109:1715–1720PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Morrow M, Scott SK, Menck HR et al (2001) Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a national cancer database study. J Am Coll Surg 192(1):1–8PubMedCrossRef Morrow M, Scott SK, Menck HR et al (2001) Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a national cancer database study. J Am Coll Surg 192(1):1–8PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Christian CK, Niland J, Edge SB et al (2006) A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction. Ann Surg 243(241–24):9 Christian CK, Niland J, Edge SB et al (2006) A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction. Ann Surg 243(241–24):9
7.
go back to reference Greenberg CC, Schneider EC, Lipsitz SR et al (2008) Do variations in provider discussions explain socioeconomic disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction? J Am Coll Surg 206(4):605–615PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Greenberg CC, Schneider EC, Lipsitz SR et al (2008) Do variations in provider discussions explain socioeconomic disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction? J Am Coll Surg 206(4):605–615PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Polednak AP (2000) Geographic variation in postmastectomy breast reconstruction rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(2):298–301PubMedCrossRef Polednak AP (2000) Geographic variation in postmastectomy breast reconstruction rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(2):298–301PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sisco M, Du H, Warner JP et al (2012) Have we expanded the equitable delivery of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the new millennium? Evidence from the national cancer data base. J Am Coll Surg 215:658–666; discussion 666PubMedCrossRef Sisco M, Du H, Warner JP et al (2012) Have we expanded the equitable delivery of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the new millennium? Evidence from the national cancer data base. J Am Coll Surg 215:658–666; discussion 666PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Browne JP et al (2010) Regional variation in use of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer in England. Eur J Surg Oncol 36(8):750–755PubMedCrossRef Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Browne JP et al (2010) Regional variation in use of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer in England. Eur J Surg Oncol 36(8):750–755PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hvilsom GB, Holmich LR, Frederiksen K et al (2011) Socioeconomic position and breast reconstruction in Danish women. Acta Oncol 50(2):265–273PubMedCrossRef Hvilsom GB, Holmich LR, Frederiksen K et al (2011) Socioeconomic position and breast reconstruction in Danish women. Acta Oncol 50(2):265–273PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Greenberg CC, Lipsitz SR, Hughes ME et al (2011) Institutional variation in the surgical treatment of breast cancer: a study of the NCCN. Ann Surg 254(339–34):5 Greenberg CC, Lipsitz SR, Hughes ME et al (2011) Institutional variation in the surgical treatment of breast cancer: a study of the NCCN. Ann Surg 254(339–34):5
15.
go back to reference Glazier RH, Gozdyra P, Yeritsyan N (2011) Geographic access to primary care and hospital services for rural and northern communities: report to the Ontario ministry of health and long-term care. Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, Toronto Glazier RH, Gozdyra P, Yeritsyan N (2011) Geographic access to primary care and hospital services for rural and northern communities: report to the Ontario ministry of health and long-term care. Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, Toronto
16.
go back to reference Elder E, Brandberg Y, Bjorklund T et al (2005) Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. The Breast 14(201–20):8 Elder E, Brandberg Y, Bjorklund T et al (2005) Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. The Breast 14(201–20):8
17.
go back to reference Atisha D, Alderman AK, Lowery JC et al (2008) Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan breast reconstruction outcomes study. Ann Surg 247(1019–102):8 Atisha D, Alderman AK, Lowery JC et al (2008) Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan breast reconstruction outcomes study. Ann Surg 247(1019–102):8
18.
go back to reference Chan B (1999) Atlas reports: supply of physicians’ services in Ontario 1. Atlas reports, Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, Toronto Chan B (1999) Atlas reports: supply of physicians’ services in Ontario 1. Atlas reports, Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, Toronto
19.
go back to reference Standard Geographic Classification (SGC) (2011) Catalogue No. 12-571-X, OT Canada, Statistics Canada, 2011 (Date Modified: 12-12-20), 1-590 Standard Geographic Classification (SGC) (2011) Catalogue No. 12-571-X, OT Canada, Statistics Canada, 2011 (Date Modified: 12-12-20), 1-590
20.
go back to reference Ng E, Wilkins R, Perras A (1993) How far is it to the nearest hospital? Calculating distances using the statistics Canada postal code conversion file. Health Rep 5:179–188PubMed Ng E, Wilkins R, Perras A (1993) How far is it to the nearest hospital? Calculating distances using the statistics Canada postal code conversion file. Health Rep 5:179–188PubMed
21.
go back to reference Nattinger AB, Kneusel RT, Hoffmann RG et al (2001) Relationship of distance from a radiotherapy facility and initial breast cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(1344–134):6 Nattinger AB, Kneusel RT, Hoffmann RG et al (2001) Relationship of distance from a radiotherapy facility and initial breast cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(1344–134):6
22.
go back to reference Schroen AT, Brenin DR, Kelly MD et al (2005) Impact of patient distance to radiation therapy on mastectomy use in early-stage breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 23:7074–7080PubMedCrossRef Schroen AT, Brenin DR, Kelly MD et al (2005) Impact of patient distance to radiation therapy on mastectomy use in early-stage breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 23:7074–7080PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Boscoe FP, Johnson CJ, Henry KA et al (2011) Geographic proximity to treatment for early stage breast cancer and likelihood of mastectomy. Breast 20:324–328PubMedCrossRef Boscoe FP, Johnson CJ, Henry KA et al (2011) Geographic proximity to treatment for early stage breast cancer and likelihood of mastectomy. Breast 20:324–328PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference 2006 Census of population: data products—topic-based tabulations, statistics, Canada 2006 Census of population: data products—topic-based tabulations, statistics, Canada
25.
go back to reference Christiansen CL, Morris CN (1997) Improving the statistical approach to health care provider profiling. Ann Intern Med 127(764–76):8 Christiansen CL, Morris CN (1997) Improving the statistical approach to health care provider profiling. Ann Intern Med 127(764–76):8
26.
go back to reference Breslow NE, Clayton DG (1993) Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 88(9–2):5 Breslow NE, Clayton DG (1993) Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 88(9–2):5
27.
go back to reference Spiegelhalter DJ (2005) Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance. Stat Med 24:1185–1202PubMedCrossRef Spiegelhalter DJ (2005) Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance. Stat Med 24:1185–1202PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Atisha D, Streu R et al (2011) Patterns and correlates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction by U.S. Plastic surgeons: results from a national survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:1796–1803PubMedCrossRef Alderman AK, Atisha D, Streu R et al (2011) Patterns and correlates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction by U.S. Plastic surgeons: results from a national survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:1796–1803PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Storey AF, Nair NS et al (2009) Financial impact of breast reconstruction on an academic surgical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(1408–141):3 Alderman AK, Storey AF, Nair NS et al (2009) Financial impact of breast reconstruction on an academic surgical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(1408–141):3
30.
go back to reference Jeevan R, Cromwell D, Browne J et al (2009) National mastectomy and breast reconstruction audit 2nd annual report. A national audit of provision and outcomes of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery for women in England. The NHS Information Centre, England Jeevan R, Cromwell D, Browne J et al (2009) National mastectomy and breast reconstruction audit 2nd annual report. A national audit of provision and outcomes of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery for women in England. The NHS Information Centre, England
31.
go back to reference Wanzel KR, Brown MH, Anastakis DJ et al (2002) Reconstructive breast surgery: referring physician knowledge and learning needs. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1441–1450 discussion 1451-1444PubMedCrossRef Wanzel KR, Brown MH, Anastakis DJ et al (2002) Reconstructive breast surgery: referring physician knowledge and learning needs. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1441–1450 discussion 1451-1444PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD (2006) Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women’s health and cancer rights act. J Am Med Assoc 295(387–38):8 Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD (2006) Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women’s health and cancer rights act. J Am Med Assoc 295(387–38):8
33.
go back to reference Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Pusic AL et al (2012) The influence of sociodemographic factors and hospital characteristics on the method of breast reconstruction, including microsurgery: a U.S. population-based study. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:1071–1079PubMedCrossRef Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Pusic AL et al (2012) The influence of sociodemographic factors and hospital characteristics on the method of breast reconstruction, including microsurgery: a U.S. population-based study. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:1071–1079PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference NICE Early and locally advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and treatment. National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. Cardiff, Wales. 2009 NICE Early and locally advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and treatment. National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. Cardiff, Wales. 2009
36.
go back to reference Platt J, Baxter N, Zhong T (2011) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. Can Med Assoc J 183(2109–211):6 Platt J, Baxter N, Zhong T (2011) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. Can Med Assoc J 183(2109–211):6
37.
go back to reference Kryzanowska MA, Barbera L, Elit L et al (eds) (2009) Chapter 4: Cancer. Toronto Kryzanowska MA, Barbera L, Elit L et al (eds) (2009) Chapter 4: Cancer. Toronto
38.
go back to reference Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ et al (2013) A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:320e–326ePubMedCrossRef Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ et al (2013) A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:320e–326ePubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Geographic Variation Immediate and Delayed Breast Reconstruction Utilization in Ontario, Canada and Plastic Surgeon Availability: A Population-Based Observational Study
Authors
Jennica Platt
Toni Zhong
Rahim Moineddin
Gillian L. Booth
Alexandra M. Easson
Kimberly Fernandes
Peter Gozdyra
Nancy N. Baxter
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3060-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

World Journal of Surgery 8/2015 Go to the issue