Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019

01-05-2019 | Breast Surgery | Clinical trial

Microchipping the breast: an effective new technology for localizing non-palpable breast lesions for surgery

Authors: Maggie L. DiNome, Amy M. Kusske, Deanna J. Attai, Cheryce P. Fischer, Anne C. Hoyt

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Use of a wire to localize a non-palpable breast lesion for surgery is standard but archaic. We sought to evaluate a new radiofrequency localization system (RFLS) as an effective, non-radioactive alternative to the wire.

Methods

Patients who required surgical excision of a non-palpable breast lesion were consented for the study. Patients underwent localization with a radiofrequency Tag and surgical removal guided by the handheld LOCalizer probe. The primary study endpoint was successful placement and retrieval of the Tag, and secondary endpoints included marker migration; days prior to surgery of Tag insertion; patient, radiologist, and surgeon experience; distance of Tag from skin; and positive margin and re-excision rates for cancer.

Results

Fifty patients had successful placement and retrieval of the radiofrequency Tag. Likert questionnaire data revealed that most patients thought the procedure went smoothly and was easier than expected. Radiologists and surgeons thought that the Tag was as reliable as the wire. Of the 33 patients who had surgery for in situ or invasive cancer, one had a positive margin on final pathology (3%) and two underwent re-excision (6%).

Conclusions

Data from this pilot study suggest that the RFLS is an effective localization system for non-palpable breast lesions intended for surgical removal. Unlike most other technologies, the LOCalizer probe detects distance from the Tag, and this unique feature may have contributed to the low positive margin rate seen in this study. The RFLS appears to offer advantages over current localization procedures and should be explored as an alternative to wire. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03202472.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leeming R, Madden M, Levy L (1993) An improved technique for needle localized biopsies of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177:84–86PubMed Leeming R, Madden M, Levy L (1993) An improved technique for needle localized biopsies of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177:84–86PubMed
2.
go back to reference Greenlee JA, Gubler KD, Goepfert CJ, Ragland JJ (1995) Surgical margins after needle-localization breast biopsy. Am J Surg 170(6):643–645CrossRefPubMed Greenlee JA, Gubler KD, Goepfert CJ, Ragland JJ (1995) Surgical margins after needle-localization breast biopsy. Am J Surg 170(6):643–645CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jones MK, Vetto JT, Pommier RF, Thurmond AS, Woltering EA (1994) An improved method of needle localized biopsy of nonpalpable lesions of the breast. J Am Coll Surg 178:548–552PubMed Jones MK, Vetto JT, Pommier RF, Thurmond AS, Woltering EA (1994) An improved method of needle localized biopsy of nonpalpable lesions of the breast. J Am Coll Surg 178:548–552PubMed
5.
go back to reference Jackman RJ, Marzoni FJ (1997) Needle localized breast biopsy. Why do we fail?. Radiology 204(3):677–684CrossRefPubMed Jackman RJ, Marzoni FJ (1997) Needle localized breast biopsy. Why do we fail?. Radiology 204(3):677–684CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Abrahamson PE, Dunlap LA, Amarnoo MA, Schell MJ, Braeuning MP, Pisano ED (2003) Factors predicting successful needle-localized breast biopsy. Acad Radiol 10(6):601–606CrossRefPubMed Abrahamson PE, Dunlap LA, Amarnoo MA, Schell MJ, Braeuning MP, Pisano ED (2003) Factors predicting successful needle-localized breast biopsy. Acad Radiol 10(6):601–606CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Davis PS, Wechsler RJ, Feig SA, March DE (1988) Migration of breast biopsy localization wire. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150:787–788CrossRefPubMed Davis PS, Wechsler RJ, Feig SA, March DE (1988) Migration of breast biopsy localization wire. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150:787–788CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gray RJ, Salud C, Nguyen K, Dauway E, Friedland J, Berman C, Peltz E, Whitehead G, Cox CE (2001) Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol 8(9):711–715CrossRefPubMed Gray RJ, Salud C, Nguyen K, Dauway E, Friedland J, Berman C, Peltz E, Whitehead G, Cox CE (2001) Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol 8(9):711–715CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference McGhan LJ, McKeever SC, Pockaj BA, Wasif N, Giurescu ME, Walton HA, Gray RJ (2011) Radioactive seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: review of 1,000 consecutive procedures at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol 18:3096–3101CrossRefPubMed McGhan LJ, McKeever SC, Pockaj BA, Wasif N, Giurescu ME, Walton HA, Gray RJ (2011) Radioactive seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: review of 1,000 consecutive procedures at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol 18:3096–3101CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Karstaedt PJ, Roarke MC (2004) Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions is better than wire localization. Am J Surg 188(4):377–380CrossRefPubMed Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Karstaedt PJ, Roarke MC (2004) Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions is better than wire localization. Am J Surg 188(4):377–380CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dryden MJ, Dogan BE, Fox P, Wang C, Black DM, Hunt K, Yang WT (2016) Imaging factors that influence surgical margins after preoperative 125I radioactive seed localization of breast lesions: comparison with wire localization. AJR 206(5):1112–1118CrossRefPubMed Dryden MJ, Dogan BE, Fox P, Wang C, Black DM, Hunt K, Yang WT (2016) Imaging factors that influence surgical margins after preoperative 125I radioactive seed localization of breast lesions: comparison with wire localization. AJR 206(5):1112–1118CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hughes JH, Mason MC, Gray RJ et al (2008) A multi-site validation trial of radioactive seed localization as an alternative to wire localization. Breast J 14(2):153–157CrossRefPubMed Hughes JH, Mason MC, Gray RJ et al (2008) A multi-site validation trial of radioactive seed localization as an alternative to wire localization. Breast J 14(2):153–157CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Price ER, Khoury AL, Esserman LJ, Joe BN, Alvarado MD (2018) Initial clinical experience with an inducible magnetic seed system for preoperative breast lesion localization. AJR 210(4):913–917CrossRefPubMed Price ER, Khoury AL, Esserman LJ, Joe BN, Alvarado MD (2018) Initial clinical experience with an inducible magnetic seed system for preoperative breast lesion localization. AJR 210(4):913–917CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Harvey JR, Lim Y, Murphy J, Howe M, Morris J, Goyal A, Maxwell AJ (2018) Safety and feasibility of breast lesion localization using magnetic seeds (Magseed): a multi-centre, open-label cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 169(3):531–536CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harvey JR, Lim Y, Murphy J, Howe M, Morris J, Goyal A, Maxwell AJ (2018) Safety and feasibility of breast lesion localization using magnetic seeds (Magseed): a multi-centre, open-label cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 169(3):531–536CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Mango VL, Wynn RT, Feldman S et al (2017) Beyond wires and seeds: reflector-guided breast lesion localization and excision. Radiology 284(2):365–371CrossRefPubMed Mango VL, Wynn RT, Feldman S et al (2017) Beyond wires and seeds: reflector-guided breast lesion localization and excision. Radiology 284(2):365–371CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jadeja PH, Mango V, Patel S, Friedlander L, Desperito E, Ayala-Bustamante E, Wynn R, Chen-Seetoo M, Taback B, Feldman S, Ha R (2018) Utilization of multiple SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system reflectors in the same breast: a single-institution feasibility study. Breast J 24(4):531–534CrossRefPubMed Jadeja PH, Mango V, Patel S, Friedlander L, Desperito E, Ayala-Bustamante E, Wynn R, Chen-Seetoo M, Taback B, Feldman S, Ha R (2018) Utilization of multiple SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system reflectors in the same breast: a single-institution feasibility study. Breast J 24(4):531–534CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Patel SN, Mango VL, Jadeja P, Friedlander L, Desperito E, Wynn R, Feldman S, Ha R (2018) Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Clin Imaging 47:14–17CrossRefPubMed Patel SN, Mango VL, Jadeja P, Friedlander L, Desperito E, Wynn R, Feldman S, Ha R (2018) Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Clin Imaging 47:14–17CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cox CE, Russell S, Prowler V, Carter E, Beard A, Mehindru A, Blumencranz P, Allen K, Portillo M, Whitworth P, Funk K, Barone J, Norton D, Schroeder J, Police A, Lin E, Combs F, Schnabel F, Toth H, Lee J, Anglin B, Nguyen M, Canavan L, Laidley A, Warden MJ, Prati R, King J, Shivers SC (2016) A prospective, single arm, multi-site, clinical evaluation of a nonradioactive surgical guidance technology for the location of nonpalpable breast lesions during excision. Ann Surg Oncol 23(10):3168–3174CrossRefPubMed Cox CE, Russell S, Prowler V, Carter E, Beard A, Mehindru A, Blumencranz P, Allen K, Portillo M, Whitworth P, Funk K, Barone J, Norton D, Schroeder J, Police A, Lin E, Combs F, Schnabel F, Toth H, Lee J, Anglin B, Nguyen M, Canavan L, Laidley A, Warden MJ, Prati R, King J, Shivers SC (2016) A prospective, single arm, multi-site, clinical evaluation of a nonradioactive surgical guidance technology for the location of nonpalpable breast lesions during excision. Ann Surg Oncol 23(10):3168–3174CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mango V, Ha R, Gomberawalla A, Wynn R, Feldman S (2016) Evaluation of the SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system for localization and excision of nonpalpable breast lesions: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207(4):W69–W72CrossRefPubMed Mango V, Ha R, Gomberawalla A, Wynn R, Feldman S (2016) Evaluation of the SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system for localization and excision of nonpalpable breast lesions: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207(4):W69–W72CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Cox CE, Garcia-Henriquez N, Glancy MJ, Whitworth P, Cox JM, Themar-Geck M, Prati R, Jung M, Russell S, Appleton K, King J, Shivers SC (2016 Jun) Pilot study of a new nonradioactive surgical guidance technology for locating nonpalpable breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 23(6):1824–1830CrossRefPubMed Cox CE, Garcia-Henriquez N, Glancy MJ, Whitworth P, Cox JM, Themar-Geck M, Prati R, Jung M, Russell S, Appleton K, King J, Shivers SC (2016 Jun) Pilot study of a new nonradioactive surgical guidance technology for locating nonpalpable breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 23(6):1824–1830CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Microchipping the breast: an effective new technology for localizing non-palpable breast lesions for surgery
Authors
Maggie L. DiNome
Amy M. Kusske
Deanna J. Attai
Cheryce P. Fischer
Anne C. Hoyt
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05143-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine