Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-06-2019 | Mastectomy | Clinical trial

Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction

Authors: E. Bijkerk, S. M. J. van Kuijk, J. Beugels, A. J. M. Cornelissen, E. M. Heuts, R. R. W. J. van der Hulst, S. M. H. Tuinder

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2019

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study is to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). In addition, factors influencing breast sensibility were evaluated.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was performed in Maastricht University Medical Center between July 2016 and August 2018. Women with unilateral mastectomy with or without IBBR were included. Objective sensory measurements were performed using Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. Their healthy breast served as control, using a paired t test. Differences between mastectomy with and without IBBR were evaluated using the independent t test. Linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between patient characteristics on breast sensibility. The paired t test was used to evaluate in which part of the breast the sensibility is best preserved.

Results

Fifty-one patients were eligible for inclusion. Sixteen patients underwent IBBR after mastectomy. Twenty-three patients received radiotherapy and 35 patients received chemotherapy. Monofilament values were significantly higher in the operated group compared to the reference group (p < 0.001). Linear regression showed a statistically significant association between IBBR and objectively measured impaired sensation (p = 0.008). After mastectomy, the cutaneous protective sensation is only diminished. After IBBR, it is lost in the majority of the breast. The medial part of the breast was significantly more sensitive than the lateral part in all operated breasts (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

IBBR has a significantly negative impact on the breast sensibility compared to mastectomy alone. This study shows that the protective sensation of the skin in the breast is lost after IBBR. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or IBBR. More research is necessary to confirm these results.

Available only for authorised users

Schreuder K, van Bommel ACM, de Ligt KM, Maduro JH, Vrancken Peeters M, Mureau MAM, Siesling S (2017) Hospital organizational factors affect the use of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer in the Netherlands. Breast 34:96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.05.011 CrossRefPubMed

Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing (DICA). Jaarrapportage 2017 - Registraties.

Cornelissen AJM, Beugels J, van Kuijk SMJ, Heuts EM, Rozen SM, Spiegel AJ, van der Hulst R, Tuinder SMH (2017) Sensation of the autologous reconstructed breast improves quality of life: a pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4547-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zimmerman A, Bai L, Ginty DD (2014) The gentle touch receptors of mammalian skin. Science 346(6212):950–954. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254229 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S (2008) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61(4):344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 CrossRef

World Medical A (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310(20):2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 CrossRef

Manual: Baseline® Tactile™ Semmes-Weinstein type monofilaments. Fabrication Enterprises Inc. Authorized CE representative: RMS UK Ltd. 28 Trinity Road. Nailsea, Somerset BS48 4NU (UK). ©2017, all rights reserved. Baseline and Tactile are trademarks of Goldberg

Marchac D, de Olarte G (1982) Reduction mammaplasty and correction of ptosis with a short inframammary scar. Plast Reconstr Surg 69(1):45–55CrossRefPubMed

Rabin RC (2017) After Mastectomies, an Unexpected Blow: Numb New Breasts. The New York Times

10.

Hallowell N, Baylock B, Heiniger L, Butow PN, Patel D, Meiser B, Saunders C, kConFab Psychosocial Group on behalf of the kConFab I, Price MA (2012) Looking different, feeling different: women’s reactions to risk-reducing breast and ovarian surgery. Fam Cancer 11(2):215–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-011-9504-4 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Peltoniemi H, Asko-Seljavaara S, Harma M, Sundell B (1993) Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Long term results and return of sensibility. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 27(2):127–131CrossRefPubMed

12.

Isenberg JS (2002) Sense and sensibility: breast reconstruction with innervated TRAM flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 18(1):23–28CrossRefPubMed

13.

Isenberg JS, Spinelli H (2004) Further experience with innervated autologous flaps in postoncologic breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 52(5):448–451; discussion 451CrossRefPubMed

14.

Shaw WW, Orringer JS, Ko CY, Ratto LL, Mersmann CA (1997) The spontaneous return of sensibility in breasts reconstructed with autologous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg 99(2):394–399CrossRefPubMed

15.

Temple CL, Ross DC, Kim S, Tse R, Bettger-Hahn M, Gan BS, MacDermid J (2009) Sensibility following innervated free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction: Part II. Innervation improves patient-rated quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(5):1419–1425. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b98963 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Temple CL, Tse R, Bettger-Hahn M, MacDermid J, Gan BS, Ross DC (2006) Sensibility following innervated free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(7):2119–2127. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000218268.59024.cc; discussion 2128–2130.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Bresser PJ, Seynaeve C, Van Gool AR, Brekelmans CT, Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel AN, Menke-Pluijmers MB, Duivenvoorden HJ, Klijn JG, Tibben A (2006) Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(6):1675–1682. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000217383.99038.f5 discussion 1683 –1674.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Temple CL, Hurst LN (1999) Reduction mammaplasty improves breast sensibility. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(1):72–76CrossRefPubMed

19.

Craig RD, Sykes PA (1970) Nipple sensitivity following reduction mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 23(2):165–172CrossRefPubMed

20.

Ferreira MC, Costa MP, Cunha MS, Sakae E, Fels KW (2003) Sensibility of the breast after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SAP.0000054190.76311.1A CrossRefPubMed

21.

Hamdi M, Greuse M, De Mey A, Webster MH (2001) A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 54(1):39–42. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2000.3456 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Chiari A Jr, Nunes TA, Grotting JC, Cotta FB, Gomes RC (2012) Breast sensitivity before and after the L short-scar mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(1):105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9756-2 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Chiummariello S, Angelisanti M, Arleo S, Alfano C (2013) Evaluation of the sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty. Our experience and review of the literature. Ann Ital Chir 84(4):385–388PubMed

24.

Dikmans RE, Negenborn VL, Bouman MB, Winters HA, Twisk JW, Ruhe PQ, Mureau MA, Smit JM, Tuinder S, Eltahir Y, Posch NA, van Steveninck-Barends JM, Meesters-Caberg MA, van der Hulst RR, Ritt MJ, Mullender MG (2017) Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 18(2):251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30668-4 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Brzezinski K (2012) Chemotherapy-induced polyneuropathy. Part I. Pathophysiology. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 16(1):72–78. https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2012.27341 CrossRef

26.

Lagergren J, Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M, Hansson P (2007) Long-term sensibility following nonautologous, immediate breast reconstruction. Breast J 13(4):346–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00441.x CrossRefPubMed

27.

Farina MA, Newby BG, Alani HM (1980) Innervation of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 66(4):497–501CrossRefPubMed

28.

Jaspars JJ, Posma AN, van Immerseel AA, Gittenberger-de Groot AC (1997) The cutaneous innervation of the female breast and nipple-areola complex: implications for surgery. Br J Plast Surg 50(4):249–259CrossRefPubMed

29.

le Roux CM, Pan WR, Matousek SA, Ashton MW (2011) Preventing venous congestion of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomical guide to preserving essential venous drainage networks. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(3):1073–1079. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182044bb2 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Sarhadi NS, Shaw Dunn J, Lee FD, Soutar DS (1996) An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola. Br J Plast Surg 49(3):156–164CrossRef

31.

Cooper A (1840) The anatomy of the breast. Longman, London, pp 91–97

32.

Riccio CA, Zeiderman MR, Chowdhry S, Brooks RM, Kelishadi SS, Tutela JP, Choo J, Yonick DV, Wilhelmi BJ (2015) Plastic surgery of the breast: keeping the nipple sensitive. Eplasty 15:e28PubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Schulz S, Zeiderman MR, Gunn JS, Riccio CA, Chowdhry S, Brooks R, Choo JH, Wilhelmi BJ (2017) Safe plastic surgery of the breast II. Saving Nipple Sensation Eplasty 17:e33PubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Davison JA, Mercer DM (1998) Accidental burns following subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction with a prosthesis. Br J Plast Surg 51(6):486CrossRefPubMed

35.

Gandolfi S, Vaysse C, Garrido I, Joly-Fradin N, Grolleau JL, Chaput B (2014) Burn injury to a reconstructed breast via a cigarette causing implant exposure. The importance of the patient’s education. Breast J 20(5):543–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12314 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Seth R, Lamyman MJ, Athanassopoulos A, Tyler M (2008) Too close for comfort: accidental burn following subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate implant reconstruction. J R Soc Med 101(1):39–40. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2007.070032 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Howard-McNatt MM (2013) Patients opting for breast reconstruction following mastectomy: an analysis of uptake rates and benefit. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 5:9–15. https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S29142 CrossRef

Title: Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
Authors: E. Bijkerk
S. M. J. van Kuijk
J. Beugels
A. J. M. Cornelissen
E. M. Heuts
R. R. W. J. van der Hulst
S. M. H. Tuinder
Publication date: 01-06-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Keywords: Mastectomy
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05137-8

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras

Prof. Fabrice Barlesi

Developed by: Springer Medicine

ACC 2024 Congress

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Health-related quality of life in long-term disease-free breast cancer survivors versus female population controls in Germany

Clinical implementation of pre-treatment DPYD genotyping in capecitabine-treated metastatic breast cancer patients

Germline TP53 mutation spectrum in Sudanese premenopausal breast cancer patients: correlations with reproductive factors

Corneal features in trastuzumab emtansine treatment: not a rare occurrence

Extent of resection and role of adjuvant treatment in resected localized breast angiosarcoma

Trends in utilization of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): a national cancer database (NCDB) analysis

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer