Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2012

01-02-2012 | Original Article

Breast Sensitivity Before and After the L Short-Scar Mammaplasty

Authors: Armando Chiari Jr., Tarcizo A. Nunes, James C. Grotting, Fernando B. Cotta, Rafael C. B. Gomes

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Breast sensitivity preservation is among the aims of modern breast surgery. Large-volume resection, extensive undermining, and resections at the breast base have been associated with breast sensitivity alterations. The L short-scar mammaplasty technique is designed to preserve breast sensitivity by resection of tissue in the middle and inferior portions of the breast, but specifically dissection and preservation of the breast lateral neurovascular pedicle. Using this technique, a prospective study was designed for measurement of breast sensitivity quantitatively and subjectively to determine whether different resection volumes of the breast correlate with alteration of sensitivity postoperatively.

Methods

This study compared the sensitivity of 125 breasts of 64 consecutive patients who underwent mastopexy or breast reduction with the L short-scar mammaplasty technique. Nine points were tested with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: the nipple and cardinal points on the areola and skin. The tests were performed by the same examiner 1 day before surgery and then 6 and 12 months after surgery. The breasts were divided into three groups according to the resected volume as follows: group A (≤200 g), group B (201–400 g), and group C (>400 g). The patients also were asked to complete written surveys 12 months postoperatively, and the response rate was 100%.

Results

Before surgery, larger breasts were observed to have less sensitivity in the areola (groups B and C, P < 0.001) and skin (group C, P < 0.001). After 12 months, no correlation was found between larger resected volumes and less breast sensitivity. The sensitivity of the nipple–areola complex in all the groups reached levels equal to the preoperative measurement within 12 months after surgery. After 6 and 12 months, significant improvement in skin breast sensitivity with resections greater than 200 g (group B, P = 0.002; group C, P < 0.001) was observed. After 12 months, 66.4% of the patients and 94.4% of the group C patients (average resection, 499 g) reported equal or better nipple–areolar sensitivity compared with preoperative sensibility. No patient reported areas of areola or nipple insensitivity.

Conclusion

After the L short-scar mammaplasty, breast sensitivity to pressure in most cases returns to preoperative levels or improves primarily in those with larger breasts. The data of this prospective study contradict the misconception that mammaplasty techniques with resections at the breast base leave the patient with reduced breast sensitivity because the fundamental neural pathways, such as the lateral neurovascular pedicle, are preserved.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM (1976) Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery. Plast Reconst Surg 58:1–12PubMedCrossRef Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM (1976) Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery. Plast Reconst Surg 58:1–12PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gonzalez F, Brown FE, Gold ME, Walton RL, Shafer B (1993) Preoperative and postoperative nipple–areola sensibility in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconst Surg 92:809–814PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez F, Brown FE, Gold ME, Walton RL, Shafer B (1993) Preoperative and postoperative nipple–areola sensibility in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconst Surg 92:809–814PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Greuse M, Hamdi M, De Mey A (2001) Breast sensitivity after vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconst Surg 107:970–976PubMedCrossRef Greuse M, Hamdi M, De Mey A (2001) Breast sensitivity after vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconst Surg 107:970–976PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pitanguy I, Vaena M, Radwanski HN, Nunes D, Vargas AF (2007) Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:238–243PubMedCrossRef Pitanguy I, Vaena M, Radwanski HN, Nunes D, Vargas AF (2007) Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:238–243PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Temple CLF, Hurst LN (1999) Reduction mammaplasty improves breast sensibility. Plast Reconst Surg 104:72–76PubMedCrossRef Temple CLF, Hurst LN (1999) Reduction mammaplasty improves breast sensibility. Plast Reconst Surg 104:72–76PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper M, Kuzbari R (2005) Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconst Surg 115:743–751PubMedCrossRef Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper M, Kuzbari R (2005) Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconst Surg 115:743–751PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hamdi M, Greuse M, De Mey A, Webster MHC (2001) A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 54:39–42PubMedCrossRef Hamdi M, Greuse M, De Mey A, Webster MHC (2001) A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 54:39–42PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chiari A Jr (1992) The L short-scar mammaplasty: a new approach. Plast Reconst Surg 90:233–246 Chiari A Jr (1992) The L short-scar mammaplasty: a new approach. Plast Reconst Surg 90:233–246
9.
go back to reference Würinger E, Mader N, Posch E, Holle J (1998) Nerve and vessel supplying ligamentous suspension of the mammary gland. Plast Reconst Surg 101:1486–1493PubMedCrossRef Würinger E, Mader N, Posch E, Holle J (1998) Nerve and vessel supplying ligamentous suspension of the mammary gland. Plast Reconst Surg 101:1486–1493PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3:193–203PubMed Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3:193–203PubMed
11.
go back to reference Bell-Krotoski J, Tomancik E (1987) The repeatability of testing with Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Surg 12A:155–161 Bell-Krotoski J, Tomancik E (1987) The repeatability of testing with Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Surg 12A:155–161
12.
go back to reference Lehman LF, Orsini MB, Nicholl AR (1993) The development and adaptation of the Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments in Brazil. J Hand Ther 6:290–297PubMed Lehman LF, Orsini MB, Nicholl AR (1993) The development and adaptation of the Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments in Brazil. J Hand Ther 6:290–297PubMed
13.
go back to reference Weinstein S (1993) Fifty years of somatosensory research: from the Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments to the Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test. J Hand Ther 6:11–22PubMed Weinstein S (1993) Fifty years of somatosensory research: from the Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments to the Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test. J Hand Ther 6:11–22PubMed
14.
go back to reference Levin S, Pearsall G, Ruderman RJ (1978) von Frey’s method of measuring pressure sensibility in the hand: an engineering analysis of the Weinstein–Semmes pressure aesthesiometer. J Hand Surg 3:211–216 Levin S, Pearsall G, Ruderman RJ (1978) von Frey’s method of measuring pressure sensibility in the hand: an engineering analysis of the Weinstein–Semmes pressure aesthesiometer. J Hand Surg 3:211–216
15.
go back to reference Ahmed OA, Kolhe PS (2000) Comparison of nipple and areolar sensation after breast reduction by free nipple graft and inferior pedicle techniques. Br J Plast Surg 53:126–129PubMedCrossRef Ahmed OA, Kolhe PS (2000) Comparison of nipple and areolar sensation after breast reduction by free nipple graft and inferior pedicle techniques. Br J Plast Surg 53:126–129PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Godwin Y, Valassiadou K, Lewis S, Denley H (2004) Investigation into the possible cause of subjective decreased sensory perception in the nipple–areola complex of women with macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1598–1606PubMedCrossRef Godwin Y, Valassiadou K, Lewis S, Denley H (2004) Investigation into the possible cause of subjective decreased sensory perception in the nipple–areola complex of women with macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1598–1606PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Harbo SO, Jorum E, Roald HE (2003) Reduction mammaplasty: a prospective study of symptom relief and alterations of skin sensibility. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:103–110PubMedCrossRef Harbo SO, Jorum E, Roald HE (2003) Reduction mammaplasty: a prospective study of symptom relief and alterations of skin sensibility. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:103–110PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hefter W, Elvenes OP, Lindholm PA (2003) Retrospective quantitative assessment of breast sensation after lateral pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 56:667–673PubMedCrossRef Hefter W, Elvenes OP, Lindholm PA (2003) Retrospective quantitative assessment of breast sensation after lateral pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 56:667–673PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mitrofanoff M, Dalassera M, Boukriss T, Baruch J (1997) Clinical study of breast sensitivity before and after reduction. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 42:314–323PubMed Mitrofanoff M, Dalassera M, Boukriss T, Baruch J (1997) Clinical study of breast sensitivity before and after reduction. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 42:314–323PubMed
20.
go back to reference Slezak S, Dellon AL (1993) Quantitation of sensibility in gigantomastia and alteration following reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconst Surg 91:1265–1269PubMedCrossRef Slezak S, Dellon AL (1993) Quantitation of sensibility in gigantomastia and alteration following reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconst Surg 91:1265–1269PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tairych G, Kuzbari R, Rigel S, Todoroff BP, Schneider B, Deutinger M (1998) Normal cutaneous sensibility of the breast. Plast Reconst Surg 102:701–704PubMedCrossRef Tairych G, Kuzbari R, Rigel S, Todoroff BP, Schneider B, Deutinger M (1998) Normal cutaneous sensibility of the breast. Plast Reconst Surg 102:701–704PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Terzis JK, Vincent MP, Wilkins LM, Rutledge K, Deane LM (1987) Breast sensibility: a neurophysiological appraisal in the normal breast. Ann Plast Surg 19:318–322PubMedCrossRef Terzis JK, Vincent MP, Wilkins LM, Rutledge K, Deane LM (1987) Breast sensibility: a neurophysiological appraisal in the normal breast. Ann Plast Surg 19:318–322PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wechselberger G, Stob S, Schoeller T, Oehlbauer M, Piza-Katzer H (2001) An analysis of breast sensation following inferior pedicle mammaplasty and the effect of the volume of resected tissue. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25:443–446PubMedCrossRef Wechselberger G, Stob S, Schoeller T, Oehlbauer M, Piza-Katzer H (2001) An analysis of breast sensation following inferior pedicle mammaplasty and the effect of the volume of resected tissue. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25:443–446PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hamdi M, Blondeel PN, Van de Sijpe K, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S (2003) Evaluation of nipple–areola complex sensitivity after the latero-central glandular pedicle technique in breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56:360–364PubMedCrossRef Hamdi M, Blondeel PN, Van de Sijpe K, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S (2003) Evaluation of nipple–areola complex sensitivity after the latero-central glandular pedicle technique in breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56:360–364PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Franco T, Silva CC (1994) Sensibilidad areolomamilar. In: Coiffman F (ed) Cirugia Plastica: Reconstructiva y Estetica, 2nd edn. Masson-Salvat Medicina, Barcelona, pp 3428–3432 Franco T, Silva CC (1994) Sensibilidad areolomamilar. In: Coiffman F (ed) Cirugia Plastica: Reconstructiva y Estetica, 2nd edn. Masson-Salvat Medicina, Barcelona, pp 3428–3432
26.
go back to reference Mofid MM, Dellon AL, Elias JJ, Nahabedian MY (2002) Quantitation of breast sensibility following reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of inferior and medial pedicle techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2283–2288PubMedCrossRef Mofid MM, Dellon AL, Elias JJ, Nahabedian MY (2002) Quantitation of breast sensibility following reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of inferior and medial pedicle techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2283–2288PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ferreira MC, Costa MP, Cunha MS, Sakae E, Fels KW (2003) Sensibility of the breast after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:1–5PubMedCrossRef Ferreira MC, Costa MP, Cunha MS, Sakae E, Fels KW (2003) Sensibility of the breast after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:1–5PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Dellon AL (2003) Invited discussion: sensibility of the breast following reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:6–9PubMedCrossRef Dellon AL (2003) Invited discussion: sensibility of the breast following reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:6–9PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Nahabedian MY, Mofid MM (2002) Viability and sensation of the nipple–areolar complex after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 49:24–31PubMedCrossRef Nahabedian MY, Mofid MM (2002) Viability and sensation of the nipple–areolar complex after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 49:24–31PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference McCulley SJ, Rousseau TE (1999) A modified Chiari L short-scar mammaplasty: the technique and results. Br J Plast Surg 52:112–117PubMedCrossRef McCulley SJ, Rousseau TE (1999) A modified Chiari L short-scar mammaplasty: the technique and results. Br J Plast Surg 52:112–117PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Würinger E (1999) Refinement of the central pedicle breast reduction by application of the ligamentous suspension. Plast Reconst Surg 103:1400–1410PubMedCrossRef Würinger E (1999) Refinement of the central pedicle breast reduction by application of the ligamentous suspension. Plast Reconst Surg 103:1400–1410PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Cárdenas-Camarena L, Vergara R (2001) Reduction mammaplasty with superior-lateral dermoglandular pedicle: another alternative. Plast Reconst Surg 107:693–699PubMedCrossRef Cárdenas-Camarena L, Vergara R (2001) Reduction mammaplasty with superior-lateral dermoglandular pedicle: another alternative. Plast Reconst Surg 107:693–699PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Blondeel PN, Hamdi M, Van de Sijpe KA, Van Landuyt KHI, Thiessen FEF, Monstrey SJM (2003) The latero-central glandular pedicle technique for breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56:348–359PubMedCrossRef Blondeel PN, Hamdi M, Van de Sijpe KA, Van Landuyt KHI, Thiessen FEF, Monstrey SJM (2003) The latero-central glandular pedicle technique for breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56:348–359PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Nahabedian MY (2005) Invited discussion: alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconst Surg 115:752–754CrossRef Nahabedian MY (2005) Invited discussion: alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconst Surg 115:752–754CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Hamdi M, Greuse M, Nemec E, Deprez C, De Mey A (2001) Breast sensation after superior pedicle versus inferior pedicle mammaplasty: anatomical and histological evaluation. Br J Plast Surg 54:43–46PubMedCrossRef Hamdi M, Greuse M, Nemec E, Deprez C, De Mey A (2001) Breast sensation after superior pedicle versus inferior pedicle mammaplasty: anatomical and histological evaluation. Br J Plast Surg 54:43–46PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Breast Sensitivity Before and After the L Short-Scar Mammaplasty
Authors
Armando Chiari Jr.
Tarcizo A. Nunes
James C. Grotting
Fernando B. Cotta
Rafael C. B. Gomes
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9756-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2012 Go to the issue