Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2017

01-02-2017 | Clinical trial

Efficacy and safety of low-dose capecitabine plus docetaxel versus single-agent docetaxel in patients with anthracycline-pretreated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III JO21095 trial

Authors: Daigo Yamamoto, Nobuaki Sato, Yoshiaki Rai, Yutaka Yamamoto, Mitsue Saito, Hiroji Iwata, Norikazu Masuda, Shoji Oura, Junichiro Watanabe, Satoshi Hattori, Yoshimasa Matsuura, Katsumasa Kuroi

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The randomized phase III JO21095 trial compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy (XT) versus single-agent administration of docetaxel in anthracycline-pretreated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

Patients were randomized to either low-dose XT (capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1–14; docetaxel 60 mg/m2, day 1 every 3 weeks) or docetaxel (70 mg/m2, day 1 every 3 weeks). The primary objective was to demonstrate superior progression-free survival (PFS) with low-dose XT versus single-agent docetaxel. Overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary endpoints.

Results

In total, 162 patients were treated. Median PFS was 10.5 months with low-dose XT and 9.8 months with single-agent docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40–0.97]; p = 0.03). The OS HR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.52–1.53; p = 0.68). Grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities occurred in 74% of XT-treated patients and 76% of docetaxel-treated patients. The main differences in grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities were hand-foot syndrome (7.3% of XT-treated patients vs 0% receiving docetaxel), fatigue/malaise (2.4 vs 10.0%), and peripheral edema (1.2 vs 7.5%). Dose modifications were required in 100% of low-dose XT and 49% of docetaxel patients. Toxicity-related treatment discontinuations occurred in 18 and 33%, respectively.

Conclusion

The improved PFS with low-dose XT versus docetaxel alone is consistent with higher-dose XT phase III experience, but the safety profile was more favorable and manageable.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, EUROCARE-5 Working Group et al (2014) Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 15:23–34CrossRefPubMed De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, EUROCARE-5 Working Group et al (2014) Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 15:23–34CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Verma S, McLeod D, Batist G, Robidoux A, Martins IR, Mackey JR (2011) In the end what matters most? A review of clinical endpoints in advanced breast cancer. Oncologist 16:25–35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Verma S, McLeod D, Batist G, Robidoux A, Martins IR, Mackey JR (2011) In the end what matters most? A review of clinical endpoints in advanced breast cancer. Oncologist 16:25–35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S et al (2002) Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. J Clin Oncol 20:2812–2823CrossRefPubMed O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S et al (2002) Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. J Clin Oncol 20:2812–2823CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Beslija S, Obralic N, Basic H et al (2006) Randomized trial of sequence vs. combination of capecitabine (X) and docetaxel (T): XT vs. T followed by X after progression as first-line therapy for patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 24(18 suppl):571 (Abstract) Beslija S, Obralic N, Basic H et al (2006) Randomized trial of sequence vs. combination of capecitabine (X) and docetaxel (T): XT vs. T followed by X after progression as first-line therapy for patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 24(18 suppl):571 (Abstract)
6.
go back to reference Leonard R, O’Shaughnessy J, Vukelja S et al (2006) Detailed analysis of a randomized phase III trial: can the tolerability of capecitabine plus docetaxel be improved without compromising its survival advantage? Ann Oncol 17:1379–1385CrossRefPubMed Leonard R, O’Shaughnessy J, Vukelja S et al (2006) Detailed analysis of a randomized phase III trial: can the tolerability of capecitabine plus docetaxel be improved without compromising its survival advantage? Ann Oncol 17:1379–1385CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Leonard R, Hennessy BT, Blum JL, O’Shaughnessy J (2011) Dose-adjusting capecitabine minimizes adverse effects while maintaining efficacy: a retrospective review of capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 11:349–356CrossRefPubMed Leonard R, Hennessy BT, Blum JL, O’Shaughnessy J (2011) Dose-adjusting capecitabine minimizes adverse effects while maintaining efficacy: a retrospective review of capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 11:349–356CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hennessy BT, Gauthier AM, Michaud LB, Hortobagyi G, Valero V (2005) Lower dose capecitabine has a more favorable therapeutic index in metastatic breast cancer: retrospective analysis of patients treated at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and a review of capecitabine toxicity in the literature. Ann Oncol 16:1289–1296CrossRefPubMed Hennessy BT, Gauthier AM, Michaud LB, Hortobagyi G, Valero V (2005) Lower dose capecitabine has a more favorable therapeutic index in metastatic breast cancer: retrospective analysis of patients treated at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and a review of capecitabine toxicity in the literature. Ann Oncol 16:1289–1296CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Barrios CH, Liu MC, Lee SC et al (2010) Phase III randomized trial of sunitinib versus capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 121:121–131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barrios CH, Liu MC, Lee SC et al (2010) Phase III randomized trial of sunitinib versus capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 121:121–131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Robert NJ, Dieras V, Glaspy J et al (2011) RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:1252–1260CrossRefPubMed Robert NJ, Dieras V, Glaspy J et al (2011) RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:1252–1260CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Stockler MR, Harvey VJ, Francis PA et al (2011) Capecitabine versus classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:4498–4504CrossRefPubMed Stockler MR, Harvey VJ, Francis PA et al (2011) Capecitabine versus classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:4498–4504CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Thomas ES, Gomez HL, Li RK et al (2007) Ixabepilone plus capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer progressing after anthracycline and taxane treatment. J Clin Oncol 25:5210–5217CrossRefPubMed Thomas ES, Gomez HL, Li RK et al (2007) Ixabepilone plus capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer progressing after anthracycline and taxane treatment. J Clin Oncol 25:5210–5217CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Zielinski C, Gralow J, Martin M (2010) Optimising the dose of capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer: confused, clarified or confirmed? Ann Oncol 21:2145–2152CrossRefPubMed Zielinski C, Gralow J, Martin M (2010) Optimising the dose of capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer: confused, clarified or confirmed? Ann Oncol 21:2145–2152CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Buzdar AU, Xu B, Digumarti R et al (2012) Randomized phase II non-inferiority study (NO16853) of two different doses of capecitabine in combination with docetaxel for locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23:589–597CrossRefPubMed Buzdar AU, Xu B, Digumarti R et al (2012) Randomized phase II non-inferiority study (NO16853) of two different doses of capecitabine in combination with docetaxel for locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23:589–597CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Aogi K, Saeki T, Minami H et al (2007) The Japanese Breast Cancer Society (Abstract O-268) Aogi K, Saeki T, Minami H et al (2007) The Japanese Breast Cancer Society (Abstract O-268)
16.
go back to reference Brookmeyer R, Crowley JJ (1982) A confidence interval for the median survival time. Biometrics 38:29–41CrossRef Brookmeyer R, Crowley JJ (1982) A confidence interval for the median survival time. Biometrics 38:29–41CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bachelot T, Bajard A, Ray-Coquard I et al (2011) Final results of ERASME-4: a randomized trial of first-line docetaxel plus either capecitabine or epirubicin for metastatic breast cancer. Oncology 80:262–268CrossRefPubMed Bachelot T, Bajard A, Ray-Coquard I et al (2011) Final results of ERASME-4: a randomized trial of first-line docetaxel plus either capecitabine or epirubicin for metastatic breast cancer. Oncology 80:262–268CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mavroudis D, Papakotoulas P, Ardavanis A et al (2010) Randomized phase III trial comparing docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 21:48–54CrossRefPubMed Mavroudis D, Papakotoulas P, Ardavanis A et al (2010) Randomized phase III trial comparing docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 21:48–54CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and safety of low-dose capecitabine plus docetaxel versus single-agent docetaxel in patients with anthracycline-pretreated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III JO21095 trial
Authors
Daigo Yamamoto
Nobuaki Sato
Yoshiaki Rai
Yutaka Yamamoto
Mitsue Saito
Hiroji Iwata
Norikazu Masuda
Shoji Oura
Junichiro Watanabe
Satoshi Hattori
Yoshimasa Matsuura
Katsumasa Kuroi
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4075-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine