Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2010

Open Access 01-05-2010 | Clinical Trial

Phase III randomized trial of sunitinib versus capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

Authors: Carlos H. Barrios, Mei-Ching Liu, Soo Chin Lee, Laurence Vanlemmens, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Toshio Tabei, Xavier Pivot, Hiroji Iwata, Kenjiro Aogi, Roberto Lugo-Quintana, Nadia Harbeck, Marla J. Brickman, Ke Zhang, Kenneth A. Kern, Miguel Martin

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase III trial (planned enrollment: 700 patients) was conducted to test the hypothesis that single-agent sunitinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine as treatment for advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients with HER2-negative ABC that recurred after anthracycline and taxane therapy were randomized (1:1) to sunitinib 37.5 mg/day or capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 (1,000 mg/m2 in patients >65 years) BID on days 1–14 q3w. The independent data-monitoring committee (DMC) determined during the first interim analysis (238 patients randomized to sunitinib, 244 to capecitabine) that the trial be terminated due to futility in reaching the primary endpoint. No statistical evidence supported the hypothesis that sunitinib improved PFS compared with capecitabine (one-sided P = 0.999). The data indicated that PFS was shorter with sunitinib than capecitabine (median 2.8 vs. 4.2 months, respectively; HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16–1.87; two-sided P = 0.002). Median overall survival (15.3 vs. 24.6 months; HR, 1.17; two-sided P = 0.350) and objective response rates (11 vs. 16%; odds ratio, 0.65; P = 0.109) were numerically inferior with sunitinib versus capecitabine. While no new or unexpected safety findings were reported, sunitinib treatment was associated with higher frequencies and greater severities of many common adverse events (AEs) compared with capecitabine, resulting in more temporary discontinuations due to AEs with sunitinib (66 vs. 51%). The relative dose intensity was lower with sunitinib than capecitabine (73 vs. 95%). Based on these efficacy and safety results, sunitinib should not be used as monotherapy for patients with ABC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S et al (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344(11):783–792CrossRefPubMed Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S et al (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344(11):783–792CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Sledge GW et al (2009) Updated survival analysis of a randomized study of lapatinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab in women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer progressing on trastuzumab therapy. In: San Antonio Breast Cancer symposium (Abstract 61) Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Sledge GW et al (2009) Updated survival analysis of a randomized study of lapatinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab in women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer progressing on trastuzumab therapy. In: San Antonio Breast Cancer symposium (Abstract 61)
3.
go back to reference Cardoso F, Di Leo A, Lohrisch C, Bernard C, Ferreira F, Piccart MJ (2002) Second and subsequent lines of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: what did we learn in the last two decades? Ann Oncol 13(2):197–207CrossRefPubMed Cardoso F, Di Leo A, Lohrisch C, Bernard C, Ferreira F, Piccart MJ (2002) Second and subsequent lines of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: what did we learn in the last two decades? Ann Oncol 13(2):197–207CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Roche Pharmaceuticals (2006) XELODA (capecitabine) prescribing information, Nutley, NJ Roche Pharmaceuticals (2006) XELODA (capecitabine) prescribing information, Nutley, NJ
5.
go back to reference Banerjee S, Dowsett M, Ashworth A, Martin LA (2007) Mechanisms of disease: angiogenesis and the management of breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4(9):536–550CrossRefPubMed Banerjee S, Dowsett M, Ashworth A, Martin LA (2007) Mechanisms of disease: angiogenesis and the management of breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4(9):536–550CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Paulsson J, Sjöblom T, Micke P et al (2009) Prognostic significance of stromal platelet-derived growth factor beta-receptor expression in human breast cancer. Am J Pathol 175(1):334–341CrossRefPubMed Paulsson J, Sjöblom T, Micke P et al (2009) Prognostic significance of stromal platelet-derived growth factor beta-receptor expression in human breast cancer. Am J Pathol 175(1):334–341CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Miller K, Wang M, Gralow J et al (2007) Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 357(26):2666–2676CrossRefPubMed Miller K, Wang M, Gralow J et al (2007) Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 357(26):2666–2676CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Miles DW, Chan A, Romieu G et al (2009) Final overall survival (OS) results from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III AVADO study of bevacizumab (BV) plus docetaxel (D) compared with placebo (PL) plus D for the first-line treatment of locally recurrent (LR) or metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Presented at the 32nd annual San Antonio Breast Cancer symposium, San Antonio, TX, USA, December 9–13 (Oral presentation; abstract 41) Miles DW, Chan A, Romieu G et al (2009) Final overall survival (OS) results from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III AVADO study of bevacizumab (BV) plus docetaxel (D) compared with placebo (PL) plus D for the first-line treatment of locally recurrent (LR) or metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Presented at the 32nd annual San Antonio Breast Cancer symposium, San Antonio, TX, USA, December 9–13 (Oral presentation; abstract 41)
9.
go back to reference Robert NJ, Dieras V, Glaspy J et al (2009) RIBBON-1: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (B) for first-line treatment of HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 27:15s (Abstr 1005) Robert NJ, Dieras V, Glaspy J et al (2009) RIBBON-1: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (B) for first-line treatment of HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 27:15s (Abstr 1005)
10.
go back to reference Cobleigh MA, Langmuir VK, Sledge GW et al (2003) A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic breast cancer. Semin Oncol 30(5 Suppl 16):117–124CrossRefPubMed Cobleigh MA, Langmuir VK, Sledge GW et al (2003) A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic breast cancer. Semin Oncol 30(5 Suppl 16):117–124CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mendel DB, Laird AD, Xin X et al (2003) In vivo antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors: determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. Clin Cancer Res 9(1):327–337PubMed Mendel DB, Laird AD, Xin X et al (2003) In vivo antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors: determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. Clin Cancer Res 9(1):327–337PubMed
12.
go back to reference Abrams TJ, Lee LB, Murray LJ, Pryer NK, Cherrington JM (2003) SU11248 inhibits KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta in preclinical models of human small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2(5):471–478PubMed Abrams TJ, Lee LB, Murray LJ, Pryer NK, Cherrington JM (2003) SU11248 inhibits KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta in preclinical models of human small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2(5):471–478PubMed
13.
go back to reference Pfizer Inc (2009) SUTENT (sunitinib) prescribing information, New York, NY Pfizer Inc (2009) SUTENT (sunitinib) prescribing information, New York, NY
14.
go back to reference Burstein HJ, Elias AD, Rugo HS et al (2008) Phase II study of sunitinib malate, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. J Clin Oncol 26(11):1810–1816CrossRefPubMed Burstein HJ, Elias AD, Rugo HS et al (2008) Phase II study of sunitinib malate, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. J Clin Oncol 26(11):1810–1816CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Escudier B, Roigas J, Gillessen S et al (2009) Phase II study of sunitinib administered in a continuous once-daily dosing regimen in patients with cytokine-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 27(25):4068–4075CrossRefPubMed Escudier B, Roigas J, Gillessen S et al (2009) Phase II study of sunitinib administered in a continuous once-daily dosing regimen in patients with cytokine-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 27(25):4068–4075CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Barrios CH, Hernandez-Barajas D, Brown MP et al (2009) Phase II trial of continuous once-daily dosing of sunitinib as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Presented at the joint 15th congress of the European CanCer Organisation and 34th congress of the European Society for Medical Oncology, Berlin, Germany, September 20–24 (Poster presentation; Abstract P-7122) Barrios CH, Hernandez-Barajas D, Brown MP et al (2009) Phase II trial of continuous once-daily dosing of sunitinib as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Presented at the joint 15th congress of the European CanCer Organisation and 34th congress of the European Society for Medical Oncology, Berlin, Germany, September 20–24 (Poster presentation; Abstract P-7122)
17.
go back to reference George S, Blay JY, Casali PG et al (2009) Clinical evaluation of continuous daily dosing of sunitinib malate in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after imatinib failure. Eur J Cancer 45(11):1959–1968CrossRefPubMed George S, Blay JY, Casali PG et al (2009) Clinical evaluation of continuous daily dosing of sunitinib malate in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after imatinib failure. Eur J Cancer 45(11):1959–1968CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216CrossRefPubMed Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Miller KD, Chap LI, Holmes FA et al (2005) Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(4):792–799CrossRefPubMed Miller KD, Chap LI, Holmes FA et al (2005) Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(4):792–799CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Jennison T, Turnbull BW (1999) Group sequential methods with applications to clinical trials, Chapman & Hall/CRC Interdisciplinary Statistics Series. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton Jennison T, Turnbull BW (1999) Group sequential methods with applications to clinical trials, Chapman & Hall/CRC Interdisciplinary Statistics Series. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton
21.
go back to reference Houk BE, Bello CL, Poland B, Rosen LS, Demetri GD, Motzer RJ (2009) Relationship between exposure to sunitinib and efficacy and tolerability endpoints in patients with cancer: results of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic meta-analysis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Dec 5 (Epub ahead of print) Houk BE, Bello CL, Poland B, Rosen LS, Demetri GD, Motzer RJ (2009) Relationship between exposure to sunitinib and efficacy and tolerability endpoints in patients with cancer: results of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic meta-analysis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Dec 5 (Epub ahead of print)
22.
go back to reference Bianchi G, Loibl S, Zamagni C et al (2009) Phase II multicenter, uncontrolled trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Anticancer Drugs 20(7):616–624CrossRefPubMed Bianchi G, Loibl S, Zamagni C et al (2009) Phase II multicenter, uncontrolled trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Anticancer Drugs 20(7):616–624CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Baselga J, Grupo Español de Estudio Tratamiento y Otras Estrategias Experimentales en Tumores Sólidos, Roché H et al (2009) SOLTI-0701: A multinational double-blind, randomized phase 2b study evaluating the efficacy and safety of sorafenib compared to placebo when administered in combination with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC). San Antonio Breast Cancer symposium (Abstract 45) Baselga J, Grupo Español de Estudio Tratamiento y Otras Estrategias Experimentales en Tumores Sólidos, Roché H et al (2009) SOLTI-0701: A multinational double-blind, randomized phase 2b study evaluating the efficacy and safety of sorafenib compared to placebo when administered in combination with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC). San Antonio Breast Cancer symposium (Abstract 45)
Metadata
Title
Phase III randomized trial of sunitinib versus capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer
Authors
Carlos H. Barrios
Mei-Ching Liu
Soo Chin Lee
Laurence Vanlemmens
Jean-Marc Ferrero
Toshio Tabei
Xavier Pivot
Hiroji Iwata
Kenjiro Aogi
Roberto Lugo-Quintana
Nadia Harbeck
Marla J. Brickman
Ke Zhang
Kenneth A. Kern
Miguel Martin
Publication date
01-05-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0788-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine