Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2016

Open Access 01-09-2016 | Epidemiology

21-Gene recurrence score decreases receipt of chemotherapy in ER+ early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of the NCDB 2010–2013

Authors: Benjamin M. Parsons, Jeffrey Landercasper, Angela L. Smith, Ronald S. Go, Andrew J. Borgert, Leah L. Dietrich

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if receipt of chemotherapy was associated with utilization of the 21-gene recurrence score assay (RS assay) or with recurrence score (RS) in eligible patients. Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we identified female patients eligible for RS assay based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines: age 18–70, ER-positive and HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer diagnosed during 2010–2013. We excluded patients not meeting testing guidelines. Inclusion required result of RS in patients who underwent RS assay and status for receipt of chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression models and propensity matched analysis were used to determine associations between RS assay and RS with receipt of chemotherapy. Among 129,765 patients who were eligible, 74,778 underwent RS assay and had results available. Of these, 59.5 % (44,505) had low-risk, 32.0 % (23,920) had intermediate-risk, and 8.5 % (6353) had high-risk RS. Patients with intermediate- and high-risk RS were more likely to receive chemotherapy [OR 12.9 (CI 12.2–13.6), p <0.001 and OR 87.2 (CI 79.6–95.6), p <0.0001], respectively. In both low- and intermediate-risk groups, increasing RS score was significantly associated with increasing odds of receiving chemotherapy [OR 1.10 (CI 1.09–1.12), p <0.0001 and OR 1.26 (CI 1.25–1.27), p <0.0001, respectively, for each point increase in RS]. Receipt of chemotherapy was more likely in patients who did not undergo RS assay compared to those who did, OR 1.21 (CI 1.175–1.249) p <0.0001. The utilization of RS assay and the RS were both strongly associated with chemotherapy receipt. Patients eligible for chemotherapy, based on NCCN criteria, were more likely to receive chemotherapy if they did not undergo RS assay or they had a high RS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dinan MA, Mi X, Reed SD, Hirsch BR, Lyman GH, Curtis LH (2015) Initial trends in the use of the 21-gene recurrence score assay for patients with breast cancer in the medicare population, 2005–2009. JAMA Oncol 1(2):158CrossRefPubMed Dinan MA, Mi X, Reed SD, Hirsch BR, Lyman GH, Curtis LH (2015) Initial trends in the use of the 21-gene recurrence score assay for patients with breast cancer in the medicare population, 2005–2009. JAMA Oncol 1(2):158CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M et al (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351(27):2817–2826CrossRefPubMed Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M et al (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351(27):2817–2826CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dowsett Mitch, Cuzick Jack, Wale Christopher, Forbes John, Mallon Elizabeth A, Salter Janine et al (2010) Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1829–1834CrossRefPubMed Dowsett Mitch, Cuzick Jack, Wale Christopher, Forbes John, Mallon Elizabeth A, Salter Janine et al (2010) Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1829–1834CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF et al (2015) Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373(21):2005–2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF et al (2015) Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373(21):2005–2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Potosky AL, O’Neill SC, Isaacs C, Tsai H, Chao C, Liu C et al (2015) Population-based study of the effect of gene expression profiling on adjuvant chemotherapy use in breast cancer patients under the age of 65 years. Cancer 121:4062–4070CrossRefPubMed Potosky AL, O’Neill SC, Isaacs C, Tsai H, Chao C, Liu C et al (2015) Population-based study of the effect of gene expression profiling on adjuvant chemotherapy use in breast cancer patients under the age of 65 years. Cancer 121:4062–4070CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dinan MA, Mi X, Reed SD, Lyman GH, Curtis LH (2015) Association between use of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and receipt of chemotherapy among medicare beneficiaries with early-stage breast cancer, 2005–2009. JAMA Oncol 1(8):1098CrossRefPubMed Dinan MA, Mi X, Reed SD, Lyman GH, Curtis LH (2015) Association between use of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and receipt of chemotherapy among medicare beneficiaries with early-stage breast cancer, 2005–2009. JAMA Oncol 1(8):1098CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Levine MN, Julian JA, Bedard PL, Eisen A, Trudeau ME, Higgins B et al (2016) Prospective evaluation of the 21-gene recurrence score assay for breast cancer decision-making in Ontario. J Clin Oncol 34(10):1065CrossRefPubMed Levine MN, Julian JA, Bedard PL, Eisen A, Trudeau ME, Higgins B et al (2016) Prospective evaluation of the 21-gene recurrence score assay for breast cancer decision-making in Ontario. J Clin Oncol 34(10):1065CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619CrossRefPubMed Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Edge SB (2010) AJCC cancer staging handbook, 7th edn. Springer, NewYork Edge SB (2010) AJCC cancer staging handbook, 7th edn. Springer, NewYork
12.
go back to reference Jasem J, Amini A, Rabinovitch R, Borges VF, Elias A, Fisher CM, Kabos P (2016) 21-Gene recurrence score assay as a predictor of adjuvant. J Clin Oncol 34:1995–2002CrossRefPubMed Jasem J, Amini A, Rabinovitch R, Borges VF, Elias A, Fisher CM, Kabos P (2016) 21-Gene recurrence score assay as a predictor of adjuvant. J Clin Oncol 34:1995–2002CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference George WD, Litton A, Yamashita J, Tengrup V, Arriagada R, Colozza A et al (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717CrossRef George WD, Litton A, Yamashita J, Tengrup V, Arriagada R, Colozza A et al (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Paik Soonmyung, Tang Gong, Shak Steven, Kim Chungyeul, Baker Joffre, Kim Wanseop et al (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(23):3726–3734CrossRefPubMed Paik Soonmyung, Tang Gong, Shak Steven, Kim Chungyeul, Baker Joffre, Kim Wanseop et al (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(23):3726–3734CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Carlson J, Roth J (2013) The impact of the oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141(1):13–22CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carlson J, Roth J (2013) The impact of the oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141(1):13–22CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Ademuyiwa F, Miller A, O’Connor T, Edge S, Thorat M, Sledge G et al (2011) The effects of oncotype DX recurrence scores on chemotherapy utilization in a multi-institutional breast cancer cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(3):797–802CrossRefPubMed Ademuyiwa F, Miller A, O’Connor T, Edge S, Thorat M, Sledge G et al (2011) The effects of oncotype DX recurrence scores on chemotherapy utilization in a multi-institutional breast cancer cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(3):797–802CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Eiermann W, Rezai M, Kümmel S, Kühn T, Warm M, Friedrichs K et al (2013) The 21-gene recurrence score assay impacts adjuvant therapy recommendations for ER-positive, node-negative and node-positive early breast cancer resulting in a risk-adapted change in chemotherapy use. Ann Oncol 24(3):618–624CrossRefPubMed Eiermann W, Rezai M, Kümmel S, Kühn T, Warm M, Friedrichs K et al (2013) The 21-gene recurrence score assay impacts adjuvant therapy recommendations for ER-positive, node-negative and node-positive early breast cancer resulting in a risk-adapted change in chemotherapy use. Ann Oncol 24(3):618–624CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lo Shelly S, Mumby Patricia B, Norton John, Rychlik Karen, Smerage Jeffrey, Kash Joseph et al (2010) Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1671–1676CrossRefPubMed Lo Shelly S, Mumby Patricia B, Norton John, Rychlik Karen, Smerage Jeffrey, Kash Joseph et al (2010) Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1671–1676CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Geffen DB, Abu-Ghanem S, Sion-Vardy N, Braunstein R, Tokar M, Ariad S et al (2011) The impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on decision making about adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer in an oncology practice with a unified treatment policy. Ann Oncol 22(11):2381–2386CrossRefPubMed Geffen DB, Abu-Ghanem S, Sion-Vardy N, Braunstein R, Tokar M, Ariad S et al (2011) The impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on decision making about adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer in an oncology practice with a unified treatment policy. Ann Oncol 22(11):2381–2386CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Davidson JA, Cromwell I, Ellard SL, Lohrisch C, Gelmon KA, Shenkier T et al (2013) A prospective clinical utility and pharmacoeconomic study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score® assay in oestrogen receptor positive node negative breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 49(11):2469–2475CrossRefPubMed Davidson JA, Cromwell I, Ellard SL, Lohrisch C, Gelmon KA, Shenkier T et al (2013) A prospective clinical utility and pharmacoeconomic study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score® assay in oestrogen receptor positive node negative breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 49(11):2469–2475CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Oratz R, Paul D, Cohn AL, Sedlacek SM (2007) Impact of a commercial reference laboratory test recurrence score on decision making in early-stage breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 3(4):182–186CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oratz R, Paul D, Cohn AL, Sedlacek SM (2007) Impact of a commercial reference laboratory test recurrence score on decision making in early-stage breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 3(4):182–186CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Asad J (2008) Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer? Am J Surg 196(4):527–529CrossRefPubMed Asad J (2008) Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer? Am J Surg 196(4):527–529CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Henry LR, Stojadinovic A, Swain SM, Prindiville S, Cordes R, Soballe PW (2009) The influence of a gene expression profile on breast cancer decisions. J Surg Oncol 99(6):319–323CrossRefPubMed Henry LR, Stojadinovic A, Swain SM, Prindiville S, Cordes R, Soballe PW (2009) The influence of a gene expression profile on breast cancer decisions. J Surg Oncol 99(6):319–323CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Hornberger J, Chien R, Krebs K, Hochheiser L (2011) US insurance program’s experience with a multigene assay for early-stage breast cancer. Am J Manag Care 17(5):e194–e202PubMed Hornberger J, Chien R, Krebs K, Hochheiser L (2011) US insurance program’s experience with a multigene assay for early-stage breast cancer. Am J Manag Care 17(5):e194–e202PubMed
Metadata
Title
21-Gene recurrence score decreases receipt of chemotherapy in ER+ early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of the NCDB 2010–2013
Authors
Benjamin M. Parsons
Jeffrey Landercasper
Angela L. Smith
Ronald S. Go
Andrew J. Borgert
Leah L. Dietrich
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3926-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine