Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014

01-12-2014 | Brief Report

Breast cancer sensitivity to neoadjuvant therapy in BRCA1 and CHEK2 mutation carriers and non-carriers

Authors: Werner Pfeifer, Anna P. Sokolenko, Olga N. Potapova, Alexandr A. Bessonov, Alexandr O. Ivantsov, Sergey A. Laptiev, Olga A. Zaitseva, Olga S. Yatsuk, Dmitry E. Matsko, Tatiana Yu. Semiglazova, Alexandr V. Togo, Evgeny N. Imyanitov

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Breast carcinomas caused by inheritance of cancer-predisposing germ-line mutations have specific bioclinical features. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of conventional cytotoxic treatment in BRCA1 and CHEK2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. The study included 415 Russian breast cancer patients aged 50 years or younger, who were subjected to various standard schemes of neoadjuvant therapy. The choice of therapy was done without the knowledge of the mutations status, because DNA testing was performed retrospectively using the archival tissue samples. 19 BRCA1 (4.6 %) and 8 CHEK2 (1.9 %) heterozygous genotypes were identified. BRCA1 mutation carriers achieved pathological complete response more frequently than non-carriers [6/19 (31.6 %) vs. 46/388 (11.9 %), p = 0.024]; this effect was limited to women treated by anthracycline-based therapy without taxanes [5/9 (55.6 %) vs. 28/247 (11.3 %), p = 0.002] and was not observed in any of 7 BRCA1 carriers receiving taxane-containing regimens. CHEK2 heterozygotes did not experience pathological complete response and showed lower frequency of objective clinical responses as compared to mutation non-carriers [4/8 (50 %) vs. 333/388 (85.5 %), p = 0.020]; the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy was particularly poor in CHEK2 carriers receiving anthracyclines without taxanes. This study provides evidence for distinct sensitivity of BRCA1 and CHEK2 mutation-driven breast carcinomas to standard chemotherapeutic schemes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Narod SA (2010) BRCA mutations in the management of breast cancer: the state of the art. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7:702–707PubMedCrossRef Narod SA (2010) BRCA mutations in the management of breast cancer: the state of the art. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7:702–707PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bayraktar S, Glück S (2012) Systemic therapy options in BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 135:355–366PubMedCrossRef Bayraktar S, Glück S (2012) Systemic therapy options in BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 135:355–366PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maxwell KN, Domchek SM (2012) Cancer treatment according to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 9:520–528PubMedCrossRef Maxwell KN, Domchek SM (2012) Cancer treatment according to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 9:520–528PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bardia A, Baselga J (2013) Neoadjuvant therapy as a platform for drug development and approval in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 19:6360–6370PubMedCrossRef Bardia A, Baselga J (2013) Neoadjuvant therapy as a platform for drug development and approval in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 19:6360–6370PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Byrski T, Gronwald J, Huzarski T et al (2012) Pathologic complete response rates in young women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 28:375–379CrossRef Byrski T, Gronwald J, Huzarski T et al (2012) Pathologic complete response rates in young women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 28:375–379CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Arun B, Bayraktar S, Liu DD et al (2011) Response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers: a single-institution experience. J Clin Oncol 29:3739–3746PubMedCrossRef Arun B, Bayraktar S, Liu DD et al (2011) Response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers: a single-institution experience. J Clin Oncol 29:3739–3746PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yanus GA, Belyaeva AV, Ivantsov AO et al (2013) Pattern of clinically relevant mutations in consecutive series of Russian colorectal cancer patients. Med Oncol 30:686PubMedCrossRef Yanus GA, Belyaeva AV, Ivantsov AO et al (2013) Pattern of clinically relevant mutations in consecutive series of Russian colorectal cancer patients. Med Oncol 30:686PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sokolenko AP, Mitiushkina NV, Buslov KG et al (2006) High frequency of BRCA1 5382insC mutation in Russian breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 42:1380–1384PubMedCrossRef Sokolenko AP, Mitiushkina NV, Buslov KG et al (2006) High frequency of BRCA1 5382insC mutation in Russian breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 42:1380–1384PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chekmariova EV, Sokolenko AP, Buslov KG et al (2006) CHEK2 1100delC mutation is frequent among Russian breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 100:99–102PubMedCrossRef Chekmariova EV, Sokolenko AP, Buslov KG et al (2006) CHEK2 1100delC mutation is frequent among Russian breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 100:99–102PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sokolenko AP, Rozanov ME, Mitiushkina NV et al (2007) Founder mutations in early-onset, familial and bilateral breast cancer patients from Russia. Fam Cancer 6:281–286PubMedCrossRef Sokolenko AP, Rozanov ME, Mitiushkina NV et al (2007) Founder mutations in early-onset, familial and bilateral breast cancer patients from Russia. Fam Cancer 6:281–286PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sokolenko AP, Bogdanova N, Kluzniak W et al (2014) Double heterozygotes among breast cancer patients analyzed for BRCA1, CHEK2, ATM, NBN/NBS1, and BLM germ-line mutations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 145:553–562PubMedCrossRef Sokolenko AP, Bogdanova N, Kluzniak W et al (2014) Double heterozygotes among breast cancer patients analyzed for BRCA1, CHEK2, ATM, NBN/NBS1, and BLM germ-line mutations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 145:553–562PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Iyevleva AG, Suspitsin EN, Kroeze K et al (2010) Non-founder BRCA1 mutations in Russian breast cancer patients. Cancer Lett 298:258–263PubMedCrossRef Iyevleva AG, Suspitsin EN, Kroeze K et al (2010) Non-founder BRCA1 mutations in Russian breast cancer patients. Cancer Lett 298:258–263PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Suspitsin EN, Sokolenko AP, Voskresenskiy DA et al (2011) Mixed epithelial/mesenchymal metaplastic carcinoma (carcinosarcoma) of the breast in BRCA1 carrier. Breast Cancer 18:137–140PubMedCrossRef Suspitsin EN, Sokolenko AP, Voskresenskiy DA et al (2011) Mixed epithelial/mesenchymal metaplastic carcinoma (carcinosarcoma) of the breast in BRCA1 carrier. Breast Cancer 18:137–140PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lafarge S, Sylvain V, Ferrara M et al (2001) Inhibition of BRCA1 leads to increased chemoresistance to microtubule-interfering agents, an effect that involves the JNK pathway. Oncogene 20:6597–6606PubMedCrossRef Lafarge S, Sylvain V, Ferrara M et al (2001) Inhibition of BRCA1 leads to increased chemoresistance to microtubule-interfering agents, an effect that involves the JNK pathway. Oncogene 20:6597–6606PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Quinn JE, Kennedy RD, Mullan PB et al (2003) BRCA1 functions as a differential modulator of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res 63:6221–6228PubMed Quinn JE, Kennedy RD, Mullan PB et al (2003) BRCA1 functions as a differential modulator of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res 63:6221–6228PubMed
18.
go back to reference Fourquet A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Kirova YM et al (2009) Familial breast cancer: clinical response to induction chemotherapy or radiotherapy related to BRCA1/2 mutations status. Am J Clin Oncol 32:127–131PubMedCrossRef Fourquet A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Kirova YM et al (2009) Familial breast cancer: clinical response to induction chemotherapy or radiotherapy related to BRCA1/2 mutations status. Am J Clin Oncol 32:127–131PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wong Wong Keet A, Al-Rafae M, Chappuis PO et al (2009) Long-term outcome after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in BRCA1/2 carriers. Int J Cancer 125:2236–2238PubMedCrossRef Wong Wong Keet A, Al-Rafae M, Chappuis PO et al (2009) Long-term outcome after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in BRCA1/2 carriers. Int J Cancer 125:2236–2238PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Adams SF, Marsh EB, Elmasri W et al (2011) A high response rate to liposomal doxorubicin is seen among women with BRCA mutations treated for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 123:486–491PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Adams SF, Marsh EB, Elmasri W et al (2011) A high response rate to liposomal doxorubicin is seen among women with BRCA mutations treated for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 123:486–491PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Safra T, Borgato L, Nicoletto MO et al (2011) BRCA mutation status and determinant of outcome in women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Mol Cancer Ther 10:2000–2007PubMedCrossRef Safra T, Borgato L, Nicoletto MO et al (2011) BRCA mutation status and determinant of outcome in women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Mol Cancer Ther 10:2000–2007PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kaye SB, Lubinski J, Matulonis U et al (2012) Phase II, open-label, randomized, multicenter study comparing the efficacy and safety of olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:372–379PubMedCrossRef Kaye SB, Lubinski J, Matulonis U et al (2012) Phase II, open-label, randomized, multicenter study comparing the efficacy and safety of olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:372–379PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wysocki PJ, Korski K, Lamperska K et al (2008) Primary resistance to docetaxel-based chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients correlates with a high frequency of BRCA1 mutations. Med Sci Monit 14:SC7–SC10PubMed Wysocki PJ, Korski K, Lamperska K et al (2008) Primary resistance to docetaxel-based chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients correlates with a high frequency of BRCA1 mutations. Med Sci Monit 14:SC7–SC10PubMed
24.
go back to reference Kriege M, Jager A, Hooning MJ et al (2012) The efficacy of taxane chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer 118:899–907PubMedCrossRef Kriege M, Jager A, Hooning MJ et al (2012) The efficacy of taxane chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer 118:899–907PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tan DS, Yap TA, Hutka M et al (2013) Implications of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations for the efficacy of paclitaxel monotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 49:1246–1253PubMedCrossRef Tan DS, Yap TA, Hutka M et al (2013) Implications of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations for the efficacy of paclitaxel monotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 49:1246–1253PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Swisher EM, Sakai W, Karlan BY et al (2008) Secondary BRCA1 mutations in BRCA1-mutated ovarian carcinomas with platinum resistance. Cancer Res 68:2581–2586PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Swisher EM, Sakai W, Karlan BY et al (2008) Secondary BRCA1 mutations in BRCA1-mutated ovarian carcinomas with platinum resistance. Cancer Res 68:2581–2586PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Davis A, Tinker AV, Friedlander M (2014) “Platinum resistant” ovarian cancer: what is it, who to treat and how to measure benefit? Gynecol Oncol 133:624–631PubMedCrossRef Davis A, Tinker AV, Friedlander M (2014) “Platinum resistant” ovarian cancer: what is it, who to treat and how to measure benefit? Gynecol Oncol 133:624–631PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Byrski T, Dent R, Blecharz P et al (2012) Results of a phase II open-label, non-randomized trial of cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with BRCA1-positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 14:R110PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Byrski T, Dent R, Blecharz P et al (2012) Results of a phase II open-label, non-randomized trial of cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with BRCA1-positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 14:R110PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Byrski T, Huzarski T, Dent R et al (2014) Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant cisplatin in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 147:401–405PubMedCrossRef Byrski T, Huzarski T, Dent R et al (2014) Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant cisplatin in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 147:401–405PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Moiseyenko VM, Protsenko SA, Brezhnev NV et al (2010) High sensitivity of BRCA1-associated tumors to cisplatin monotherapy: report of two cases. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 197:91–94PubMedCrossRef Moiseyenko VM, Protsenko SA, Brezhnev NV et al (2010) High sensitivity of BRCA1-associated tumors to cisplatin monotherapy: report of two cases. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 197:91–94PubMedCrossRef
31.
32.
go back to reference Audeh MW, Carmichael J, Penson RT et al (2010) Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 376:245–251PubMedCrossRef Audeh MW, Carmichael J, Penson RT et al (2010) Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 376:245–251PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Tutt A, Robson M, Garber JE et al (2010) Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 376:235–244PubMedCrossRef Tutt A, Robson M, Garber JE et al (2010) Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 376:235–244PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lee JM, Hays JL, Annunziata CM et al (2014) Phase I/Ib study of olaparib and carboplatin in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation-associated breast or ovarian cancer with biomarker analyses. J Natl Cancer Inst 106(6):dju089PubMedCrossRef Lee JM, Hays JL, Annunziata CM et al (2014) Phase I/Ib study of olaparib and carboplatin in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation-associated breast or ovarian cancer with biomarker analyses. J Natl Cancer Inst 106(6):dju089PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C et al (2014) Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCA status in a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:852–861PubMedCrossRef Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C et al (2014) Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCA status in a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:852–861PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Moiseyenko VM, Chubenko VA, Moiseyenko FV et al (2014) Evidence for clinical efficacy of mitomycin C in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients carrying germ-line BRCA1 mutation. Med Oncol 31:199PubMedCrossRef Moiseyenko VM, Chubenko VA, Moiseyenko FV et al (2014) Evidence for clinical efficacy of mitomycin C in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients carrying germ-line BRCA1 mutation. Med Oncol 31:199PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Chrisanthar R, Knappskog S, Løkkevik E et al (2008) CHEK2 mutations affecting kinase activity together with mutations in TP53 indicate a functional pathway associated with resistance to epirubicin in primary breast cancer. PLoS One 3:e3062PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Chrisanthar R, Knappskog S, Løkkevik E et al (2008) CHEK2 mutations affecting kinase activity together with mutations in TP53 indicate a functional pathway associated with resistance to epirubicin in primary breast cancer. PLoS One 3:e3062PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Breast cancer sensitivity to neoadjuvant therapy in BRCA1 and CHEK2 mutation carriers and non-carriers
Authors
Werner Pfeifer
Anna P. Sokolenko
Olga N. Potapova
Alexandr A. Bessonov
Alexandr O. Ivantsov
Sergey A. Laptiev
Olga A. Zaitseva
Olga S. Yatsuk
Dmitry E. Matsko
Tatiana Yu. Semiglazova
Alexandr V. Togo
Evgeny N. Imyanitov
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3206-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine