Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2014

01-02-2014 | Epidemiology

Analyzing factors associated with women’s attitudes and behaviors toward screening mammography using design-based logistic regression

Authors: Mahboubeh Madadi, Shengfan Zhang, Karen H. Kim Yeary, Louise M. Henderson

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

We examined the factors associated with screening mammography adherence behaviors and influencing factors on women’s attitudes toward mammography in non-adherent women. Design-based logistic regression models were developed to characterize the influencing factors, including socio-demographic, health related, behavioral characteristics, and knowledge of breast cancer/mammography, on women’s compliance with and attitudes toward mammography using the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey data. Findings indicate significant associations among adherence to mammography and marital status, income, health coverage, being advised by a doctor to have a mammogram, having had Pap smear before, perception of chance of getting breast cancer, and knowledge of mammography (frequency of doing mammogram) in both women younger than 65 and women aged 65 and older. However, number of visits to a healthcare provider per year and lifetime number of smoked cigarettes are only significant for women younger than 65. Factors significantly associated with attitudes toward mammography in non-adherent women are age, being advised by a doctor to have a mammogram, and seeking cancer information. To enhance adherence to mammography programs, physicians need to continue to advise their patients to obtain mammograms. In addition, increasing women’s knowledge about the frequency and starting age for screening mammography may improve women’s adherence. Financially related factors such as income and insurance are also shown to be significant factors. Hence, healthcare policies aimed at providing breast cancer screening services to underserved women will likely enhance mammography participation.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M (2009) Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:1 Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M (2009) Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:1
6.
go back to reference Isaacs C, Peshkin BN, Schwartz M, DeMarco TA, Main D, Lerman C (2002) Breast and ovarian cancer screening practices in healthy women with a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 71(2):103–112PubMedCrossRef Isaacs C, Peshkin BN, Schwartz M, DeMarco TA, Main D, Lerman C (2002) Breast and ovarian cancer screening practices in healthy women with a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 71(2):103–112PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Becker MH, Maiman LA (1975) Socio-behavioral determinants of compliance with health and medical care recommendations. Med Care 13:10–24PubMedCrossRef Becker MH, Maiman LA (1975) Socio-behavioral determinants of compliance with health and medical care recommendations. Med Care 13:10–24PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nelson D, Kreps G, Hesse B, Robert C, Gordon W, Neeraj A, Barbara R, Vishwanath vK, Neil W, Sara A (2004) The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination. J Health Commun 9:443–460PubMedCrossRef Nelson D, Kreps G, Hesse B, Robert C, Gordon W, Neeraj A, Barbara R, Vishwanath vK, Neil W, Sara A (2004) The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination. J Health Commun 9:443–460PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Roberts G, Rao JNK, Kumar S (1987) Logistic regression analysis of sample survey data. Biometrika 74(1):1–12CrossRef Roberts G, Rao JNK, Kumar S (1987) Logistic regression analysis of sample survey data. Biometrika 74(1):1–12CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Andridg RR, Little RJA (2010) A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non-response. Int Stat Rev 78(1):40–64CrossRef Andridg RR, Little RJA (2010) A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non-response. Int Stat Rev 78(1):40–64CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zapka JG, Hosmer D, Costanza ME (1992) Changes in mammography use: economic, need, and service factors. Am J Public Health 82(10):1345–1351PubMedCrossRef Zapka JG, Hosmer D, Costanza ME (1992) Changes in mammography use: economic, need, and service factors. Am J Public Health 82(10):1345–1351PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wu H, Zhu K, Jatoi I, Shah M, Shriver CD, Potter J (2007) Factors associated with the incompliance with mammogram screening among individuals with a family history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101(3):317–324PubMedCrossRef Wu H, Zhu K, Jatoi I, Shah M, Shriver CD, Potter J (2007) Factors associated with the incompliance with mammogram screening among individuals with a family history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101(3):317–324PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Maxwell CJ, Bancej CM, Snider J (2001) Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50–69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey. Can Med Assoc J 164(3):329–334 Maxwell CJ, Bancej CM, Snider J (2001) Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50–69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey. Can Med Assoc J 164(3):329–334
16.
go back to reference Murabito JM, Evans JC, Larson MG, Kreger BE, Splansky GL, Freund KM, Mark AM, Wilson PW (2001) Family breast cancer history and mammography Framingham offspring study. Am J Epidemiol 154(10):916–923PubMedCrossRef Murabito JM, Evans JC, Larson MG, Kreger BE, Splansky GL, Freund KM, Mark AM, Wilson PW (2001) Family breast cancer history and mammography Framingham offspring study. Am J Epidemiol 154(10):916–923PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tejeda S, Thompson B, Coronado GD, Martin DP, Heagerty PJ (2009) Predisposing and enabling factors associated with mammography use among hispanic and non-hispanic white women living in a rural area. J Rural Health 25(1):85–92PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tejeda S, Thompson B, Coronado GD, Martin DP, Heagerty PJ (2009) Predisposing and enabling factors associated with mammography use among hispanic and non-hispanic white women living in a rural area. J Rural Health 25(1):85–92PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schonberg MA, McCarthy EP, York M, Davis RB, Marcantonio ER (2007) Factors influencing elderly women’s mammography screening decisions: implications for counseling. BMC Geriatr 7(1):26PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schonberg MA, McCarthy EP, York M, Davis RB, Marcantonio ER (2007) Factors influencing elderly women’s mammography screening decisions: implications for counseling. BMC Geriatr 7(1):26PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vyas A, Madhavan S, LeMasters T et al (2011) Factors influencing adherence to mammography screening guidelines in appalachian women participating in a mobile mammography program. J Community Health 37(3):632–646CrossRef Vyas A, Madhavan S, LeMasters T et al (2011) Factors influencing adherence to mammography screening guidelines in appalachian women participating in a mobile mammography program. J Community Health 37(3):632–646CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Meissner HI, Breen N, Taubman ML, Vernon SW, Graubard BI (2007) Which women aren’t getting mammograms and why? (United States). Cancer Causes Control 18(1):61–70PubMedCrossRef Meissner HI, Breen N, Taubman ML, Vernon SW, Graubard BI (2007) Which women aren’t getting mammograms and why? (United States). Cancer Causes Control 18(1):61–70PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Van Harrison R, Janz NK, Wolfe RA, Tedeschi PJ, Huang X, McMahon LF (2003) 5-Year mammography rates and associated factors for older women. Cancer 97(5):1147–1155PubMedCrossRef Van Harrison R, Janz NK, Wolfe RA, Tedeschi PJ, Huang X, McMahon LF (2003) 5-Year mammography rates and associated factors for older women. Cancer 97(5):1147–1155PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Carney PA, Harwood BG, Weiss JE et al (2002) Factors associated with interval adherence to mammography screening in a population-based sample of new hampshire women. Cancer 95(2):219–227PubMedCrossRef Carney PA, Harwood BG, Weiss JE et al (2002) Factors associated with interval adherence to mammography screening in a population-based sample of new hampshire women. Cancer 95(2):219–227PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Allen JD, Sorensen G, Stoddard AM (1999) The relationship between social network characteristics and breast cancer screening practices among employed women. Ann Behav Med 21(3):193–200PubMedCrossRef Allen JD, Sorensen G, Stoddard AM (1999) The relationship between social network characteristics and breast cancer screening practices among employed women. Ann Behav Med 21(3):193–200PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rakowski W, Meissner H, Vernon SW et al (2006) Correlates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45–75 in the 2002–2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(11):2093–2101PubMedCrossRef Rakowski W, Meissner H, Vernon SW et al (2006) Correlates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45–75 in the 2002–2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(11):2093–2101PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Schueler KM, Chu PW, Smith-Bindman R (2008) Factors associated with mammography utilization: a systematic quantitative review of the literature. J Women’s Health 17(9):1477–1498CrossRef Schueler KM, Chu PW, Smith-Bindman R (2008) Factors associated with mammography utilization: a systematic quantitative review of the literature. J Women’s Health 17(9):1477–1498CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Phillips CE, Rothstein JD, Beaver K et al (2011) Patient navigation to increase mammography screening among inner city women. J Gen Intern Med 26(2):123–129PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Phillips CE, Rothstein JD, Beaver K et al (2011) Patient navigation to increase mammography screening among inner city women. J Gen Intern Med 26(2):123–129PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Blechman EA, Brownell KD (1998) Behavioural medicine and women: a comprehensive handbook. Guilford Press, New York Blechman EA, Brownell KD (1998) Behavioural medicine and women: a comprehensive handbook. Guilford Press, New York
30.
go back to reference O’Malley MS, Earp JA, Hawley ST et al (2001) The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening? Am J Public Health 91(1):49PubMedCrossRef O’Malley MS, Earp JA, Hawley ST et al (2001) The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening? Am J Public Health 91(1):49PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Augustson EM, Vadaparampil ST, Paltoo DN et al (2003) Association between CBE, FOBT, and Pap smear adherence and mammography adherence among older low-income women. Prev Med 36(6):734–739PubMedCrossRef Augustson EM, Vadaparampil ST, Paltoo DN et al (2003) Association between CBE, FOBT, and Pap smear adherence and mammography adherence among older low-income women. Prev Med 36(6):734–739PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference McCaul KD, Reid PA, Rathge RW et al (1996) Does concern about breast cancer inhibit or promote breast cancer screening? Basic Appl Soc Psychol 18(2):183–194CrossRef McCaul KD, Reid PA, Rathge RW et al (1996) Does concern about breast cancer inhibit or promote breast cancer screening? Basic Appl Soc Psychol 18(2):183–194CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Giordano L, von Karsa L, Tomatis M et al (2012) Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organization, coverage and participation. J Med Screen 19(suppl 1):72–82PubMedCrossRef Giordano L, von Karsa L, Tomatis M et al (2012) Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organization, coverage and participation. J Med Screen 19(suppl 1):72–82PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Duport N (2012) Characteristics of women using organized or opportunistic breast cancer screening in France. Analysis of the 2006 French Health, Health Care and Insurance Survey. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 60(6):421–430PubMedCrossRef Duport N (2012) Characteristics of women using organized or opportunistic breast cancer screening in France. Analysis of the 2006 French Health, Health Care and Insurance Survey. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 60(6):421–430PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Zackrisson S, Lindström M, Moghaddassi M et al (2007) Social predictors of non-attendance in an urban mammographic screening programme: a multilevel analysis. Scand J Public health 35(5):548–554PubMedCrossRef Zackrisson S, Lindström M, Moghaddassi M et al (2007) Social predictors of non-attendance in an urban mammographic screening programme: a multilevel analysis. Scand J Public health 35(5):548–554PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Lagerlund M, Maxwell AE, Bastani R (2002) Sociodemographic predictors of non-attendance at invitational mammography screening—a population-based register study (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control 13(1):73–82PubMedCrossRef Lagerlund M, Maxwell AE, Bastani R (2002) Sociodemographic predictors of non-attendance at invitational mammography screening—a population-based register study (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control 13(1):73–82PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Lagerlund M, Widmark C, Lambe M et al (2001) Rationales for attending or not attending mammography screening-a focus group study among women in Sweden. Eur J Cancer Prev 10(5):429–442PubMedCrossRef Lagerlund M, Widmark C, Lambe M et al (2001) Rationales for attending or not attending mammography screening-a focus group study among women in Sweden. Eur J Cancer Prev 10(5):429–442PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Aro AR, de Koning HJ, Absetz P et al (1999) Psychosocial predictors of first attendance for organised mammography screening. J Med Screen 6(2):82–88PubMedCrossRef Aro AR, de Koning HJ, Absetz P et al (1999) Psychosocial predictors of first attendance for organised mammography screening. J Med Screen 6(2):82–88PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Lidbrink E, Frisell J, Brandberg Y, Rosendahl I, Rutqvist LE (1995) Nonattendance in the Stockholm mammography screening trial: relative mortality and reasons for nonattendance. Breast Cancer Res Treat 35(3):267–275PubMedCrossRef Lidbrink E, Frisell J, Brandberg Y, Rosendahl I, Rutqvist LE (1995) Nonattendance in the Stockholm mammography screening trial: relative mortality and reasons for nonattendance. Breast Cancer Res Treat 35(3):267–275PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Analyzing factors associated with women’s attitudes and behaviors toward screening mammography using design-based logistic regression
Authors
Mahboubeh Madadi
Shengfan Zhang
Karen H. Kim Yeary
Louise M. Henderson
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2850-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine