Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2009

01-12-2009 | Clinical trial

Prospective study of breast MRI in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: effect of mutation status on cancer incidence

Authors: P. Shah, M. Rosen, J. Stopfer, J. Siegfried, R. Kaltman, B. Mason, K. Armstrong, K. L. Nathanson, M. Schnall, S. M. Domchek

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Annual MRI screening is recommended as an adjunct to mammography for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Prophylactic oophorectomy has been shown to decrease breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Here, we aimed to examine the combined effects of MRI and oophorectomy. For this purpose, 93 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were screened with yearly mammograms and yearly MRI scans. Study endpoints were defined as date of breast cancer diagnosis, date of prophylactic mastectomy, or date of most recent contact. Of 93 women, with a median age of 47, 80 (86%) had prophylactic oophorectomy. Fifty-one women (55%) had BRCA1 mutations. A total of 283 MRI scans were performed. Eleven breast cancers (9 invasive, 2 ductal carcinoma in situ) were detected in 93 women (12%) with a median follow-up of 3.2 years (incidence 40 per 1,000 person-years). Six cancers were first detected on MRI, three were first detected by mammogram, and two were “interval cancers.” All breast cancers occurred in BRCA1 mutation carriers (incidence 67 per 1,000 person-years). Apart from BRCA1 vs. BRCA2 mutation status, there were no other significant predictors of breast cancer incidence. Most invasive breast cancers were estrogen receptor negative (7 of 9) and lymph node negative (7 of 9). There have been no systemic recurrences with a median follow-up of 19 months after cancer diagnosis. Finally, it was concluded that all breast cancers occurred in BRCA1 mutation carriers, in most cases despite oophorectomy. These data suggest that surveillance and prevention strategies may have different outcomes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL et al (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72(5):1117–1130CrossRefPubMed Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL et al (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72(5):1117–1130CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB, New York Breast Cancer Study Group (2003) Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 302(5645):643–646CrossRefPubMed King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB, New York Breast Cancer Study Group (2003) Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 302(5645):643–646CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Pierce LJ, Strawderman M, Narod SA, Oliviotto I, Eisen A, Dawson L et al (2000) Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving treatment in women with breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutations. J Clin Oncol 18(19):3360–3369PubMed Pierce LJ, Strawderman M, Narod SA, Oliviotto I, Eisen A, Dawson L et al (2000) Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving treatment in women with breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutations. J Clin Oncol 18(19):3360–3369PubMed
4.
go back to reference Domchek SM, Weber BL (2006) Clinical management of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Oncogene 25(43):5825–5831CrossRefPubMed Domchek SM, Weber BL (2006) Clinical management of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Oncogene 25(43):5825–5831CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Robson M, Offit K (2007) Clinical practice. Management of an inherited predisposition to breast cancer [see comment]. N Engl J Med 357(2):154–162CrossRefPubMed Robson M, Offit K (2007) Clinical practice. Management of an inherited predisposition to breast cancer [see comment]. N Engl J Med 357(2):154–162CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, Narod SA, Van’t Veer L, Garber JE et al (2002) Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 346(21):1616–1622CrossRefPubMed Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, Narod SA, Van’t Veer L, Garber JE et al (2002) Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 346(21):1616–1622CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME, Scheuer L, Hensley M, Hudis CA et al (2002) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med 346(21):1609–1615CrossRefPubMed Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME, Scheuer L, Hensley M, Hudis CA et al (2002) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med 346(21):1609–1615CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Finch A, Beiner M, Lubinski J, Lynch HT, Moller P, Rosen B et al (2006) Salpingo-oophorectomy and the risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. JAMA 296(2):185–192CrossRefPubMed Finch A, Beiner M, Lubinski J, Lynch HT, Moller P, Rosen B et al (2006) Salpingo-oophorectomy and the risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. JAMA 296(2):185–192CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Eisen A, Lubinski J, Klijn J, Moller P, Lynch HT, Offit K et al (2005) Breast cancer risk following bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an international case-control study. J Clin Oncol 23(30):7491–7496CrossRefPubMed Eisen A, Lubinski J, Klijn J, Moller P, Lynch HT, Offit K et al (2005) Breast cancer risk following bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an international case-control study. J Clin Oncol 23(30):7491–7496CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rebbeck TR, Kauff ND, Domchek SM (2009) Meta-analysis of risk reduction estimates associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(2):80–87CrossRefPubMed Rebbeck TR, Kauff ND, Domchek SM (2009) Meta-analysis of risk reduction estimates associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(2):80–87CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Neuhausen SL, Wagner T, Evans G, Isaacs C et al (2006) Mortality after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 7(3):223–229CrossRefPubMed Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Neuhausen SL, Wagner T, Evans G, Isaacs C et al (2006) Mortality after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 7(3):223–229CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lakhani SR, Reis-Filho JS, Fulford L, Penault-Llorca F, van der Vijver M, Parry S et al (2005) Prediction of BRCA1 status in patients with breast cancer using estrogen receptor and basal phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 11(14):5175–5180CrossRefPubMed Lakhani SR, Reis-Filho JS, Fulford L, Penault-Llorca F, van der Vijver M, Parry S et al (2005) Prediction of BRCA1 status in patients with breast cancer using estrogen receptor and basal phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 11(14):5175–5180CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kramer JL, Velazquez IA, Chen BE, Rosenberg PS, Struewing JP, Greene MH (2005) Prophylactic oophorectomy reduces breast cancer penetrance during prospective, long-term follow-up of BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 23(34):8629–8635CrossRefPubMed Kramer JL, Velazquez IA, Chen BE, Rosenberg PS, Struewing JP, Greene MH (2005) Prophylactic oophorectomy reduces breast cancer penetrance during prospective, long-term follow-up of BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 23(34):8629–8635CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kauff ND, Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Robson ME, Lee J, Garber JE et al (2008) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study. J Clin Oncol 26(8):1331–1337CrossRefPubMed Kauff ND, Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Robson ME, Lee J, Garber JE et al (2008) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study. J Clin Oncol 26(8):1331–1337CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D (2008) Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 148(9):671–679PubMed Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D (2008) Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 148(9):671–679PubMed
16.
go back to reference Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD et al (2007) American cancer society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57(2):75–89CrossRefPubMed Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD et al (2007) American cancer society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57(2):75–89CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, Kempe A, Wardelmann E, Hocke A et al (2000) Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 215(1):267–279PubMed Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, Kempe A, Wardelmann E, Hocke A et al (2000) Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 215(1):267–279PubMed
18.
go back to reference Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, Easton DF, Eeles RA, Evans DG et al (2005) Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365(9473):1769–1778CrossRefPubMed Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, Easton DF, Eeles RA, Evans DG et al (2005) Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365(9473):1769–1778CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, Causer PA, Zubovits JT, Jong RA et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292(11):1317–1325CrossRefPubMed Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, Causer PA, Zubovits JT, Jong RA et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292(11):1317–1325CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lehman CD, Isaacs C, Schnall MD, Pisano ED, Ascher SM, Weatherall PT et al (2007) Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 244(2):381–388CrossRefPubMed Lehman CD, Isaacs C, Schnall MD, Pisano ED, Ascher SM, Weatherall PT et al (2007) Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 244(2):381–388CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM et al (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351(5):427–437CrossRefPubMed Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM et al (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351(5):427–437CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Laki F, Kirova YM, This P, Plancher C, Asselain B, Sastre X, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Salmon R, for the IC-BOCRSG IC-BOCRSG: Institut Curie -Breast Ovary Cancer Risk Study Group (2007) Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in a series of 89 women carrying a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation. Cancer 109(9):1784–1790CrossRefPubMed Laki F, Kirova YM, This P, Plancher C, Asselain B, Sastre X, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Salmon R, for the IC-BOCRSG IC-BOCRSG: Institut Curie -Breast Ovary Cancer Risk Study Group (2007) Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in a series of 89 women carrying a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation. Cancer 109(9):1784–1790CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Metcalfe K, Lynch HT, Ghadirian P, Tung N, Olivotto I, Warner E et al (2004) Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 22(12):2328–2335CrossRefPubMed Metcalfe K, Lynch HT, Ghadirian P, Tung N, Olivotto I, Warner E et al (2004) Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 22(12):2328–2335CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Rebbeck TR, Levin AM, Eisen A, Snyder C, Watson P, Cannon-Albright L et al (1999) Breast cancer risk after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(17):1475–1479CrossRefPubMed Rebbeck TR, Levin AM, Eisen A, Snyder C, Watson P, Cannon-Albright L et al (1999) Breast cancer risk after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(17):1475–1479CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Klaren HM, van’t Veer LJ, van Leeuwen FE, Rookus MA (2003) Potential for bias in studies on efficacy of prophylactic surgery for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation [see comment]. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(13):941–947PubMedCrossRef Klaren HM, van’t Veer LJ, van Leeuwen FE, Rookus MA (2003) Potential for bias in studies on efficacy of prophylactic surgery for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation [see comment]. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(13):941–947PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference King MC, Wieand S, Hale K, Lee M, Walsh T, Owens K et al (2001) Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project (NSABP-P1) breast cancer prevention trial. JAMA 286(18):2251–2256CrossRefPubMed King MC, Wieand S, Hale K, Lee M, Walsh T, Owens K et al (2001) Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project (NSABP-P1) breast cancer prevention trial. JAMA 286(18):2251–2256CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Narod SA, Brunet JS, Ghadirian P, Robson M, Heimdal K, Neuhausen SL et al (2000) Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a case-control study. Hereditary breast cancer clinical study group. Lancet 356(9245):1876–1881CrossRefPubMed Narod SA, Brunet JS, Ghadirian P, Robson M, Heimdal K, Neuhausen SL et al (2000) Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a case-control study. Hereditary breast cancer clinical study group. Lancet 356(9245):1876–1881CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Gronwald J, Tung N, Foulkes WD, Offit K, Gershoni R, Daly M et al (2006) Tamoxifen and contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers: an update. Int J Cancer 118(9):2281–2284CrossRefPubMed Gronwald J, Tung N, Foulkes WD, Offit K, Gershoni R, Daly M et al (2006) Tamoxifen and contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers: an update. Int J Cancer 118(9):2281–2284CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Foulkes WD, Metcalfe K, Sun P, Hanna WM, Lynch HT, Ghadirian P et al (2004) Estrogen receptor status in BRCA1- and BRCA2-related breast cancer: the influence of age, grade, and histological type. Clin Cancer Res 10(6):2029–2034CrossRefPubMed Foulkes WD, Metcalfe K, Sun P, Hanna WM, Lynch HT, Ghadirian P et al (2004) Estrogen receptor status in BRCA1- and BRCA2-related breast cancer: the influence of age, grade, and histological type. Clin Cancer Res 10(6):2029–2034CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Lakhani SR, Van De Vijver MJ, Jacquemier J, Anderson TJ, Osin PP, McGuffog L et al (2002) The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 20(9):2310–2318CrossRefPubMed Lakhani SR, Van De Vijver MJ, Jacquemier J, Anderson TJ, Osin PP, McGuffog L et al (2002) The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 20(9):2310–2318CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Clarke RB, Howell A, Potten CS, Anderson E (1997) Dissociation between steroid receptor expression and cell proliferation in the human breast. Cancer Res 57(22):4987–4991PubMed Clarke RB, Howell A, Potten CS, Anderson E (1997) Dissociation between steroid receptor expression and cell proliferation in the human breast. Cancer Res 57(22):4987–4991PubMed
32.
go back to reference Zeps N, Bentel JM, Papadimitriou JM, D’Antuono MF, Dawkins HJ (1998) Estrogen receptor-negative epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland development and growth. Differentiation 62(5):221–226CrossRefPubMed Zeps N, Bentel JM, Papadimitriou JM, D’Antuono MF, Dawkins HJ (1998) Estrogen receptor-negative epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland development and growth. Differentiation 62(5):221–226CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Evers B, Jonkers J (2006) Mouse models of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiency: past lessons, current understanding and future prospects. Oncogene 25(43):5885–5897CrossRefPubMed Evers B, Jonkers J (2006) Mouse models of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiency: past lessons, current understanding and future prospects. Oncogene 25(43):5885–5897CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Foulkes WD, Stefansson IM, Chappuis PO, Begin LR, Goffin JR, Wong N et al (2003) Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(19):1482–1485PubMed Foulkes WD, Stefansson IM, Chappuis PO, Begin LR, Goffin JR, Wong N et al (2003) Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(19):1482–1485PubMed
35.
go back to reference Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Bartels CC, Obdeijn AI, Oudkerk M (2000) Earlier detection of breast cancer by surveillance of women at familial risk. Eur J Cancer 36(4):514–519CrossRefPubMed Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Bartels CC, Obdeijn AI, Oudkerk M (2000) Earlier detection of breast cancer by surveillance of women at familial risk. Eur J Cancer 36(4):514–519CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Plevritis SK, Kurian AW, Sigal BM, Daniel BL, Ikeda DM, Stockdale FE et al (2006) Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA 295(20):2374–2384CrossRefPubMed Plevritis SK, Kurian AW, Sigal BM, Daniel BL, Ikeda DM, Stockdale FE et al (2006) Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA 295(20):2374–2384CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prospective study of breast MRI in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: effect of mutation status on cancer incidence
Authors
P. Shah
M. Rosen
J. Stopfer
J. Siegfried
R. Kaltman
B. Mason
K. Armstrong
K. L. Nathanson
M. Schnall
S. M. Domchek
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0475-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine