Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2009

01-07-2009 | Clinical Trial

The 76-gene signature defines high-risk patients that benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy

Authors: Yi Zhang, Anieta M. Sieuwerts, Michelle McGreevy, Graham Casey, Tanja Cufer, Angelo Paradiso, Nadia Harbeck, Paul N. Span, David G. Hicks, Joseph Crowe, Raymond R. Tubbs, G. Thomas Budd, Joanne Lyons, Fred C. G. J. Sweep, Manfred Schmitt, Francesco Schittulli, Rastko Golouh, Dmitri Talantov, Yixin Wang, John A. Foekens

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose To assess the benefit from adjuvant systemic tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer risk groups identified by the previously established prognostic 76-gene signature. Methods In 300 lymph node-negative (LNN), estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer patients (136 treated with adjuvant tamoxifen, 164 having received no systemic adjuvant therapy), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) as a function of the 76-gene signature was determined in a multicenter fashion. Results In 136 tamoxifen-treated patients, the 76-gene signature identified a group of patients with a poor prognosis [hazard ratio (HR), 4.62; P = 0.0248]. These patients showed a 12.3% absolute benefit of tamoxifen in 10-year DMFS (HR, 0.52; P = 0.0318) compared with untreated high-risk patients. This represented a 71% increase in relative benefit compared with the 7.2% absolute benefit observed for all 300 patients without using the gene signature. In the low-risk group there was no significant 10-year DMFS benefit of tamoxifen. Conclusions The 76-gene signature defines high-risk patients who benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Although we did not study the value of chemotherapy in this study, low-risk patients identified by the 76-gene signature have a prognosis good enough that chemotherapy would be difficult to justify. The prognosis of these patients is sufficiently good, in fact, that a disease-free benefit for tamoxifen therapy is difficult to prove, though benefits in terms of loco-regional relapse and a reduction in risk for contralateral breast cancer might justify hormonal therapy in these patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Osborne CK, Yochmowitz MG, Knight WAIII, McGuire WL (1980) The value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the treatment of breast cancer. Cancer 46:2884–2888. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19801215)46:12+<2884::AID-CNCR2820461429>3.0.CO;2-UPubMedCrossRef Osborne CK, Yochmowitz MG, Knight WAIII, McGuire WL (1980) The value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the treatment of breast cancer. Cancer 46:2884–2888. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19801215)46:12+<2884::AID-CNCR2820461429>3.0.CO;2-UPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fisher B, Dignam J, Bryant J, DeCillis A, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N et al (1996) Five versus more than five years of tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes and estrogen receptor-positive tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:1529–1542. doi:10.1093/jnci/88.21.1529 PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Dignam J, Bryant J, DeCillis A, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N et al (1996) Five versus more than five years of tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes and estrogen receptor-positive tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:1529–1542. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​88.​21.​1529 PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fisher B, Jeong JH, Bryant J, Anderson S, Dignam J, Fisher ER et al (2004) Treatment of lymph-node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: long-term findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomised clinical trials. Lancet 364:858–868. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16981-X PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Jeong JH, Bryant J, Anderson S, Dignam J, Fisher ER et al (2004) Treatment of lymph-node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: long-term findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomised clinical trials. Lancet 364:858–868. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(04)16981-X PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874. doi:10.1073/pnas.191367098 PubMedCrossRef Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874. doi:10.​1073/​pnas.​191367098 PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gruvberger S, Ringner M, Chen Y, Panavally S, Saal LH, Borg A et al (2001) Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns. Cancer Res 61:5979–5984PubMed Gruvberger S, Ringner M, Chen Y, Panavally S, Saal LH, Borg A et al (2001) Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns. Cancer Res 61:5979–5984PubMed
8.
go back to reference Van ‘t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AA, Mao M et al (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415:530–536. doi:10.1038/415530a PubMedCrossRef Van ‘t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AA, Mao M et al (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415:530–536. doi:10.​1038/​415530a PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wang Y, Klijn JG, Zhang Y, Sieuwerts AM, Look MP, Yang F et al (2005) Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet 365:671–679PubMed Wang Y, Klijn JG, Zhang Y, Sieuwerts AM, Look MP, Yang F et al (2005) Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet 365:671–679PubMed
11.
go back to reference Sotiriou C, Wirapati P, Loi S, Harris A, Fox S, Smeds J et al (2006) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:262–272PubMedCrossRef Sotiriou C, Wirapati P, Loi S, Harris A, Fox S, Smeds J et al (2006) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:262–272PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jansen MP, Foekens JA, van Staveren IL, Dirkzwager-Kiel MM, Ritstier K, Look MP et al (2005) Molecular classification of tamoxifen-resistant breast carcinomas by gene expression profiling. J Clin Oncol 23:732–740. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.145 PubMedCrossRef Jansen MP, Foekens JA, van Staveren IL, Dirkzwager-Kiel MM, Ritstier K, Look MP et al (2005) Molecular classification of tamoxifen-resistant breast carcinomas by gene expression profiling. J Clin Oncol 23:732–740. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​05.​145 PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hess KR, Anderson K, Symmans WF, Valero V, Ibrahim N, Mejia JA et al (2006) Pharmacogenomic predictor of sensitivity to preoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:4236–4244. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.05.6861 PubMedCrossRef Hess KR, Anderson K, Symmans WF, Valero V, Ibrahim N, Mejia JA et al (2006) Pharmacogenomic predictor of sensitivity to preoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:4236–4244. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2006.​05.​6861 PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
17.
go back to reference Foekens JA, Atkins D, Zhang Y, Sweep FC, Harbeck N, Paradiso A et al (2006) Multicenter validation of a gene expression-based prognostic signature in lymph node-negative primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:1665–1671. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.03.9115 PubMedCrossRef Foekens JA, Atkins D, Zhang Y, Sweep FC, Harbeck N, Paradiso A et al (2006) Multicenter validation of a gene expression-based prognostic signature in lymph node-negative primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:1665–1671. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​03.​9115 PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Desmedt C, Piette F, Loi S, Wang Y, Lallemand F, Haibe-Kains B et al (2007) Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series. Clin Cancer Res 13:3207–3214. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2765 PubMedCrossRef Desmedt C, Piette F, Loi S, Wang Y, Lallemand F, Haibe-Kains B et al (2007) Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series. Clin Cancer Res 13:3207–3214. doi:10.​1158/​1078-0432.​CCR-06-2765 PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Harvell D, Spoelstra N, Singh M, McManaman J, Finlayson C, Phang T, et al (2008) Molecular signatures of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: characteristics of response or intrinsic resistance. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9897-4 press) Harvell D, Spoelstra N, Singh M, McManaman J, Finlayson C, Phang T, et al (2008) Molecular signatures of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: characteristics of response or intrinsic resistance. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi: 10.​1007/​s10549-008-9897-4 press)
23.
go back to reference Loi S, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Wirapati P, Lallemand F, Tutt AM et al (2008) Predicting prognosis using molecular profiling in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. BMC Genomics 9:239PubMedCrossRef Loi S, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Wirapati P, Lallemand F, Tutt AM et al (2008) Predicting prognosis using molecular profiling in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. BMC Genomics 9:239PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Harbeck N, Kates RE, Look MP, Meijer-Van Gelder ME, Klijn JG, Kruger A et al (2002) Enhanced benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients classified high-risk according to urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (n = 3424). Cancer Res 62:4617–4622PubMed Harbeck N, Kates RE, Look MP, Meijer-Van Gelder ME, Klijn JG, Kruger A et al (2002) Enhanced benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients classified high-risk according to urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (n = 3424). Cancer Res 62:4617–4622PubMed
Metadata
Title
The 76-gene signature defines high-risk patients that benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy
Authors
Yi Zhang
Anieta M. Sieuwerts
Michelle McGreevy
Graham Casey
Tanja Cufer
Angelo Paradiso
Nadia Harbeck
Paul N. Span
David G. Hicks
Joseph Crowe
Raymond R. Tubbs
G. Thomas Budd
Joanne Lyons
Fred C. G. J. Sweep
Manfred Schmitt
Francesco Schittulli
Rastko Golouh
Dmitri Talantov
Yixin Wang
John A. Foekens
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0183-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine