Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2008

01-10-2008 | Preclinical Study

JAG1 expression is associated with a basal phenotype and recurrence in lymph node-negative breast cancer

Authors: Michael Reedijk, Dushanthi Pinnaduwage, Brendan C. Dickson, Anna Marie Mulligan, Hui Zhang, Shelley B. Bull, Frances P. O’Malley, Sean E. Egan, Irene L. Andrulis

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Expression of the JAG1 Notch ligand has previously been shown to correlate with poor overall survival in women with advanced breast cancer. We undertook to test whether expression of JAG1 is associated with reduced disease free survival (DFS) in 887 samples from a prospectively accrued LNN cohort with a median follow-up greater than 8 years. Moderate to high JAG1 mRNA expression was associated with reduced DFS in univariate analysis (hazard ratio of 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–2.40; P = 0.034) and correlated with large tumor size, ER and PgR negativity, high tumor grade, and p53 antibody reactivity. Although elevated risk of reduced DFS in patients with high JAG1 mRNA did not persist with adjustment for other prognostic factors, it did in combination with HER2. JAG1 mRNA was positively associated with expression of basal breast cancer markers, however, in contrast to the finding that basal gene expression is most strongly associated with reduced DFS in the first 36 months of follow-up, JAG1 mRNA expression was associated with reduced DFS through the full follow-up period. Also, tumors expressing high levels of both mRNA and protein showed reduced DFS as compared to all other groups in univariate analysis (hazard ratio of 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–2.74; P = 0.020). Thus, JAG1 expression is associated with poor DFS in LNN breast cancer. As JAG1 is a target of several oncogenic signaling pathways, and is a ligand for Notch, these data provide novel insights into signaling that may contribute to progression of early stage breast cancer.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fan C, Oh DS, Wessels L et al (2006) Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 355(6):560–569PubMedCrossRef Fan C, Oh DS, Wessels L et al (2006) Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 355(6):560–569PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10869–10874PubMedCrossRef Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10869–10874PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J et al (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8418–8423PubMedCrossRef Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J et al (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8418–8423PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bull SB, Ozcelik H, Pinnaduwage D et al (2004) The combination of p53 mutation and neu/erbB-2 amplification is associated with poor survival in node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22(1):86–96PubMedCrossRef Bull SB, Ozcelik H, Pinnaduwage D et al (2004) The combination of p53 mutation and neu/erbB-2 amplification is associated with poor survival in node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22(1):86–96PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rakha EA, El-Rehim DA, Paish C et al (2006) Basal phenotype identifies a poor prognostic subgroup of breast cancer of clinical importance. Eur J Cancer 42(18):3149–3156PubMedCrossRef Rakha EA, El-Rehim DA, Paish C et al (2006) Basal phenotype identifies a poor prognostic subgroup of breast cancer of clinical importance. Eur J Cancer 42(18):3149–3156PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR et al (2007) Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer 109(1):25–32PubMedCrossRef Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR et al (2007) Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer 109(1):25–32PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Callahan R, Raafat A (2001) Notch signaling in mammary gland tumorigenesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 6(1):23–36PubMedCrossRef Callahan R, Raafat A (2001) Notch signaling in mammary gland tumorigenesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 6(1):23–36PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Callahan R, Egan SE (2004) Notch signaling in mammary development and oncogenesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 9(2):145–163PubMedCrossRef Callahan R, Egan SE (2004) Notch signaling in mammary development and oncogenesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 9(2):145–163PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Robbins J, Blondel BJ, Gallahan D et al (1992) Mouse mammary tumor gene int-3: a member of the notch gene family transforms mammary epithelial cells. J Virol 66(4):2594–2599PubMed Robbins J, Blondel BJ, Gallahan D et al (1992) Mouse mammary tumor gene int-3: a member of the notch gene family transforms mammary epithelial cells. J Virol 66(4):2594–2599PubMed
10.
go back to reference Dievart A, Beaulieu N, Jolicoeur P (1999) Involvement of Notch1 in the development of mouse mammary tumors. Oncogene 18(44):5973–5981PubMedCrossRef Dievart A, Beaulieu N, Jolicoeur P (1999) Involvement of Notch1 in the development of mouse mammary tumors. Oncogene 18(44):5973–5981PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Parr C, Watkins G, Jiang WG (2004) The possible correlation of Notch-1 and Notch-2 with clinical outcome and tumour clinicopathological parameters in human breast cancer. Int J Mol Med 14(5):779–786PubMed Parr C, Watkins G, Jiang WG (2004) The possible correlation of Notch-1 and Notch-2 with clinical outcome and tumour clinicopathological parameters in human breast cancer. Int J Mol Med 14(5):779–786PubMed
12.
go back to reference Pece S, Serresi M, Santolini E et al (2004) Loss of negative regulation by Numb over Notch is relevant to human breast carcinogenesis. J Cell Biol 167(2):215–221PubMedCrossRef Pece S, Serresi M, Santolini E et al (2004) Loss of negative regulation by Numb over Notch is relevant to human breast carcinogenesis. J Cell Biol 167(2):215–221PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stylianou S, Clarke RB, Brennan K (2006) Aberrant activation of notch signaling in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 66(3):1517–1525PubMedCrossRef Stylianou S, Clarke RB, Brennan K (2006) Aberrant activation of notch signaling in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 66(3):1517–1525PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Reedijk M, Odorcic S, Chang L et al (2005) High-level coexpression of JAG1 and NOTCH1 is observed in human breast cancer and is associated with poor overall survival. Cancer Res 65(18):8530–8537PubMedCrossRef Reedijk M, Odorcic S, Chang L et al (2005) High-level coexpression of JAG1 and NOTCH1 is observed in human breast cancer and is associated with poor overall survival. Cancer Res 65(18):8530–8537PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dickson BC, Mulligan AM, Zhang H et al (2007) High-level JAG1 mRNA and protein predict poor outcome in breast cancer. Mod Pathol 20(6):685–693PubMedCrossRef Dickson BC, Mulligan AM, Zhang H et al (2007) High-level JAG1 mRNA and protein predict poor outcome in breast cancer. Mod Pathol 20(6):685–693PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Andrulis IL, Bull SB, Blackstein ME et al (1998) neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer. Toronto Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 16(4):1340–1349PubMed Andrulis IL, Bull SB, Blackstein ME et al (1998) neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer. Toronto Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 16(4):1340–1349PubMed
17.
go back to reference Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
18.
go back to reference Therneau T, Grambsch P (2000) Modelling survival data: extending the cox model Therneau T, Grambsch P (2000) Modelling survival data: extending the cox model
19.
go back to reference Holland EC, Hively WP, DePinho RA et al (1998) A constitutively active epidermal growth factor receptor cooperates with disruption of G1 cell-cycle arrest pathways to induce glioma-like lesions in mice. Genes Dev 12(23):3675–3685PubMedCrossRef Holland EC, Hively WP, DePinho RA et al (1998) A constitutively active epidermal growth factor receptor cooperates with disruption of G1 cell-cycle arrest pathways to induce glioma-like lesions in mice. Genes Dev 12(23):3675–3685PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
go back to reference Callahan R, Smith GH (2000) MMTV-induced mammary tumorigenesis: gene discovery, progression to malignancy and cellular pathways. Oncogene 19(8):992–1001PubMedCrossRef Callahan R, Smith GH (2000) MMTV-induced mammary tumorigenesis: gene discovery, progression to malignancy and cellular pathways. Oncogene 19(8):992–1001PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Roy M, Pear WS, Aster JC (2007) The multifaceted role of Notch in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17(1):52–59PubMedCrossRef Roy M, Pear WS, Aster JC (2007) The multifaceted role of Notch in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17(1):52–59PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Dontu G, Jackson KW, McNicholas E et al (2004) Role of Notch signaling in cell-fate determination of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Breast Cancer Res 6(6):R605–R615PubMedCrossRef Dontu G, Jackson KW, McNicholas E et al (2004) Role of Notch signaling in cell-fate determination of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Breast Cancer Res 6(6):R605–R615PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sansone P, Storci G, Giovannini C et al (2007) p66Shc/Notch-3 interplay controls self-renewal and hypoxia survival in human stem/progenitor cells of the mammary gland expanded in vitro as mammospheres. Stem Cells 25(3):807–815PubMedCrossRef Sansone P, Storci G, Giovannini C et al (2007) p66Shc/Notch-3 interplay controls self-renewal and hypoxia survival in human stem/progenitor cells of the mammary gland expanded in vitro as mammospheres. Stem Cells 25(3):807–815PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Farnie G, Clarke RB, Spence K et al (2007) Novel cell culture technique for primary ductal carcinoma in situ: role of Notch and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(8):616–627PubMedCrossRef Farnie G, Clarke RB, Spence K et al (2007) Novel cell culture technique for primary ductal carcinoma in situ: role of Notch and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(8):616–627PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Thurston G, Noguera-Troise I, Yancopoulos GD (2007) The Delta paradox: DLL4 blockade leads to more tumour vessels but less tumour growth. Nat Rev Cancer 7(5):327–331PubMedCrossRef Thurston G, Noguera-Troise I, Yancopoulos GD (2007) The Delta paradox: DLL4 blockade leads to more tumour vessels but less tumour growth. Nat Rev Cancer 7(5):327–331PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Zeng Q, Li S, Chepeha DB et al (2005) Crosstalk between tumor and endothelial cells promotes tumor angiogenesis by MAPK activation of Notch signaling. Cancer Cell 8(1):13–23PubMedCrossRef Zeng Q, Li S, Chepeha DB et al (2005) Crosstalk between tumor and endothelial cells promotes tumor angiogenesis by MAPK activation of Notch signaling. Cancer Cell 8(1):13–23PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ikeuchi T, Sisodia SS (2003) The Notch ligands, Delta1 and Jagged2, are substrates for presenilin-dependent “gamma-secretase” cleavage. J Biol Chem 278(10):7751–7754PubMedCrossRef Ikeuchi T, Sisodia SS (2003) The Notch ligands, Delta1 and Jagged2, are substrates for presenilin-dependent “gamma-secretase” cleavage. J Biol Chem 278(10):7751–7754PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bash J, Zong WX, Banga S et al (1999) Rel/NF-kappaB can trigger the Notch signaling pathway by inducing the expression of Jagged1, a ligand for Notch receptors. Embo J 18(10):2803–2811PubMedCrossRef Bash J, Zong WX, Banga S et al (1999) Rel/NF-kappaB can trigger the Notch signaling pathway by inducing the expression of Jagged1, a ligand for Notch receptors. Embo J 18(10):2803–2811PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Katoh M, Katoh M (2006) Notch ligand, JAG1, is evolutionarily conserved target of canonical WNT signaling pathway in progenitor cells. Int J Mol Med 17(4):681–685PubMed Katoh M, Katoh M (2006) Notch ligand, JAG1, is evolutionarily conserved target of canonical WNT signaling pathway in progenitor cells. Int J Mol Med 17(4):681–685PubMed
32.
go back to reference Ambler CA, Watt FM (2007) Expression of Notch pathway genes in mammalian epidermis and modulation by beta-Catenin. Dev Dyn Ambler CA, Watt FM (2007) Expression of Notch pathway genes in mammalian epidermis and modulation by beta-Catenin. Dev Dyn
33.
go back to reference Estrach S, Ambler CA, Lo Celso C et al (2006) Jagged 1 is a beta-catenin target gene required for ectopic hair follicle formation in adult epidermis. Development 133(22):4427–4438PubMedCrossRef Estrach S, Ambler CA, Lo Celso C et al (2006) Jagged 1 is a beta-catenin target gene required for ectopic hair follicle formation in adult epidermis. Development 133(22):4427–4438PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Sasaki Y, Ishida S, Morimoto I et al (2002) The p53 family member genes are involved in the Notch signal pathway. J Biol Chem 277(1):719–724PubMedCrossRef Sasaki Y, Ishida S, Morimoto I et al (2002) The p53 family member genes are involved in the Notch signal pathway. J Biol Chem 277(1):719–724PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Laurikkala J, Mikkola ML, James M et al (2006) p63 regulates multiple signalling pathways required for ectodermal organogenesis and differentiation. Development 133(8):1553–1563PubMedCrossRef Laurikkala J, Mikkola ML, James M et al (2006) p63 regulates multiple signalling pathways required for ectodermal organogenesis and differentiation. Development 133(8):1553–1563PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference McGlinn E, van Bueren KL, Fiorenza S et al (2005) Pax9 and Jagged1 act downstream of Gli3 in vertebrate limb development. Mech Dev 122(11):1218–1233PubMedCrossRef McGlinn E, van Bueren KL, Fiorenza S et al (2005) Pax9 and Jagged1 act downstream of Gli3 in vertebrate limb development. Mech Dev 122(11):1218–1233PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hallikas O, Palin K, Sinjushina N et al (2006) Genome-wide prediction of mammalian enhancers based on analysis of transcription-factor binding affinity. Cell 124(1):47–59PubMedCrossRef Hallikas O, Palin K, Sinjushina N et al (2006) Genome-wide prediction of mammalian enhancers based on analysis of transcription-factor binding affinity. Cell 124(1):47–59PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
JAG1 expression is associated with a basal phenotype and recurrence in lymph node-negative breast cancer
Authors
Michael Reedijk
Dushanthi Pinnaduwage
Brendan C. Dickson
Anna Marie Mulligan
Hui Zhang
Shelley B. Bull
Frances P. O’Malley
Sean E. Egan
Irene L. Andrulis
Publication date
01-10-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9805-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine