Top

Published in:

01-08-2012 | Original Paper

In the Heart or in the Head: Relationship and Cognitive Influences on Sexual Risk Among Young Couples

Authors: Trace Kershaw, Anna Arnold, Derrick Gordon, Urania Magriples, Linda Niccolai

Published in: AIDS and Behavior | Issue 6/2012

Abstract

Few studies examine how relationship factors influence sexual risk. We investigated gender differences of the influence of relationship functioning on sexual risk behavior and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among 296 young pregnant couples. Compared to women, men were twice as likely to have a concurrent partner, were less likely to intend to be monogamous in the future, had less HIV/STI knowledge and more perceived risk for HIV/STI, negative attitudes and efficacy toward condom use (all P < 0.05). For men, poor relationship functioning related to less intentions to be monogamous, more partner concurrency, worse sexual communication, and more condom use. For women, poor relationship functioning related to worse sexual communication and less condom use. In addition, women who had good relationship functioning and women who had partners with poor relationship functioning were more likely to have an STI. These results demonstrate the need to include heterosexual men and relationship factors in HIV prevention.

Furman W. The emerging field of adolescent romantic relationships. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2002;11(5):177–81.CrossRef

Furman W, Shaffer L. The role of romantic relationships in adolescent development. In: Florsheim P, editor. Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003. p. 3–22.

Misovich SJ, et al. Close relationships and elevated HIV risk behavior: Evidence and possible underlying psychological processes. Rev Gen Psychol. 1997;1(1):72–107.CrossRef

Malow RM, et al. HIV preventive interventions for adolescents: A look back and ahead. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2007;4(4):173–80.PubMedCrossRef

El-Bassel N, et al. HIV prevention for intimate couples: a relationship-based model. Fam Syst Health. 2001;19(4):379–95.CrossRef

Kershaw T, et al. Let’s stay together: relationship dissolution among parenting and non-parenting adolescents. J Behav Med. 2010;33(6):454–65.PubMedCrossRef

Kershaw TS, et al. Avoidance, anxiety, and sex: the influence of romantic attachment on HIV-risk among pregnant women. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(2):299–311.PubMedCrossRef

Aalsma MC, et al. Adolescent romantic partnerships and health-risk behaviors: a comparison of dyad members. J Adolesc Health. 2004;34(2):151–2.

Choi KH, et al. Extramarital sex and HIV risk behavior among US adults: results from the national AIDS behavioral survey. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(12):2003–7.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Gee CB, Rhodes JE. Postpartum transitions in adolescent mothers’ romantic and maternal relationships. Merrill-Palmer Q. 1999;45(3):512–32.

11.

Ott MA, et al. Longitudinal associations among relationship factors, partner change, and sexually transmitted infection acquisition in adolescent women. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(3):153–7.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Niccolai LM, et al. New sex partner acquisition and sexually transmitted disease risk among adolescent females. J Adolesc Health. 2004;34(3):216–23.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Foxman B, et al. Measures of sexual partnerships: lengths, gaps, overlaps, and sexually transmitted infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(4):209–14.PubMed

14.

Kalichman SC, Grebler T. Reducing numbers of sex partners: do we really need special interventions for sexual concurrency? AIDS Behav. 2010;14(5):987–90.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Kretzschmar M, Dietz K. The effect of pair formation and variable infectivity on the spread of an infection without recovery. Math Biosci. 1998;148(1):83–113.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Wilson SR, et al. Correlates of sexual risk for HIV infection in female members of heterosexual California Latino couples: An application of a Bernoulli process model. AIDS Behav. 2003;7(i):273–90.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Seal DW, Ehrhardt AA. HIV-prevention-related sexual health promotion for heterosexual men in the United States: pitfalls and recommendations. Arch Sex Behav. 2004;33(3):211–22.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Strathdee SA, et al. Sex differences in risk factors for HIV seroconversion among injection drug users: a 10-year perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(10):1281–8.PubMedCrossRef

19.

CDC. HIV/AIDS surveillance report 2002. Rockville, Maryland: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002.

20.

Kaiser Family Foundation. What teens know and don’t (but should) about sexually transmitted diseases. Menlo Park: Kaiser Family Foundation, 1998.

21.

Grunbaum J, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States 2003. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53(SS02):1–96.

22.

Fortenberry JD. Health behaviors and reproductive health risk within adolescent sexual dyads. In: Florsheim P, editor. Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior. Mahwah: Lawurence Erlbaum Publishers; 2003. p. 279–96.

23.

Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in large social networks over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(4):370–9.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(21):2249–58.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Dulude D, et al. High-risk pregnancies, psychological distress, and dyadic adjustment. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2002;20(2):101–24.CrossRef

26.

Cox MJ, et al. The transition to parenthood: marital conflict and withdrawal and parent-infant interactions. In: Cox MJ, Brooks-Gunn J, editors. Conflict and cohesion in families. Mahwah: Laurence Erlbaum Associates; 1999. p. 87–104.

27.

Ketterlinus RD, et al. Development and ecological sources of stress among adolescent parents. Fam Relat Interdiscip J Appl Fam Stud. 1991;40(4):435–41.

28.

Bost KK, et al. Structural and supportive changes in couples’ family and friendship networks across the transition to parenthood. J Marriage Fam. 2002;64(2):517–31.CrossRef

29.

Florsheim P, et al. The transition to parenthood among young African American and Latino couples: relational predictors of risk for parental dysfunction. J Fam Psychol. 2003;17(1):65–79.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Abma JC. Adolescent pregnancy and childbirth: United States, 1991–2008. In: CDC, editor. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Atlanta: CDC; 2011.

31.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS surveillance in adolescents and young adults (through 2007), 2009.

32.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fact Sheet: HIV in the United States. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2010.

33.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in reportable sexually transmitted diseases in the United States, national surveillance data for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Syphilis. Atlanta: CDC; 2009.

34.

Chesson HW, et al. The estimated direct medical cost of sexually transmitted diseases among American youth. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36(1):11–9.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Hein K, et al. Comparison of HIV+ and HIV− adolescents: risk factors and psychosocial determinants. Pediatrics. 1995;95(1):96–104.PubMed

36.

Laga M et al. Non ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases (STD) as risk factors for HIV infection. In: Sixth international AIDS conference, San Francisco; 1990.

37.

Plummer F. Co-factors in male-female sexual transmission of HIV type I. J Infect Dis. 1991;163(2):233–9.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Wasserheit J. Epidemiological synergy: Interrelationships between human immunodeficiency virus infection and other sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis. 1992;19(2):95–102.

39.

Ickovics, et al. High postpartum rates of sexually transmitted infections among teens: Pregnancy as a window of opportunity for prevention. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79:469–73.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Meade CS, Ickovics JR. Systematic review of sexual risk among pregnant and mothering teens in the USA: pregnancy as an opportunity for integrated prevention of STD and repeat pregnancy. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(4):661–78.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Donenberg GR, Pao M. Youths and HIV/AIDS: psychiatry’s role in a changing epidemic. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44(8):728–47.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scale for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam. 1976;38(1):15–28.CrossRef

43.

Helweg-Larsen M, Collins BE. The UCLA multidimensional condom attitudes scale: documenting the complex determinants of condom use in college students. Health Psychol. 1994;13(3):224–37.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Brafford LJ, Beck KH. Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students. J Am Coll Health. 1991;39(5):219–25.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Kershaw TS, et al. Pregnancy as a window of opportunity for HIV prevention: effects of an HIV intervention delivered within prenatal care. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(11):2079–86.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Sikkema KJ, et al. HIV risk behaviors among women living in low-income, inner-city housing developments. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(8):1123–8.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Kenny DA, et al. Dyadic data analysis. New York: The Guilford Press; 2006.

48.

Cohen S. Social relationships and health. Am Psychol. 2004;59(8):676–84.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Hamilton BE et al. Births: preliminary data for 2009. National vital statistics reports. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2010, 59(3).

50.

Bowleg L, et al. What does it take to be a man? What is a real man?: ideologies of masculinity and HIV sexual risk among black heterosexual men. Cult Health Sex. 2011;13(5):545–59.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Coley RL. (In)visible men. Emerging research on low-income, unmarried, and minority fathers. Am Psychol. 2001;56(9):743–53.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Coley RL, Morris JE. Comparing father and mother reports of father involvement among low-income minority families. J Marriage Fam. 2002;64(4):982–97.CrossRef

53.

Bowleg L. Love, sex, and masculinity in sociocultural context. Men Masc. 2004;7(2):166–86.CrossRef

54.

Logan TK, et al. Women, sex, and HIV: social and contextual factors, meta-analysis of published interventions, and implications for practice and research. Psychol Bull. 2002;128(6):851–85.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Garnett GP, et al. Fewer partners or more condoms? Modeling the effectiveness of STI prevention interventions. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(Suppl 2):4–11.CrossRef

56.

Pinkerton SD, Abramson PR. Evaluating the risks: a Bernoulli process model of HIV infection and risk reduction. Eval Rev. 1993;17(5):504–28.CrossRef

57.

Johnson BT, et al. Behavioral interventions for African Americans to reduce sexual risk of HIV: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;51(4):492–501.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Noar SM. Behavioral interventions to reduce HIV-related sexual risk behavior: review and synthesis of meta-analytic evidence. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(3):335–53.PubMedCrossRef

59.

El-Bassel N, et al. The efficacy of a relationship-based HIV/STD prevention program for heterosexual couples. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):963–9.PubMedCrossRef

60.

El-Bassel N, et al. Long-term effects of an HIV/STI sexual risk reduction intervention for heterosexual couples. AIDS Behav. 2005;9(1):1–13.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Milan S, et al. Prevalence, course, and predictors of emotional distress in pregnant and parenting adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(2):328–40.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Frosch CA, et al. Marital behavior and the security of preschooler-parent attachment relationships. J Fam Psychol. 2000;14(1):144–61.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Cutrona CE, et al. Predictors and correlates of continuing involvement with the baby’s father among adolescent mothers. J Fam Psychol. 1998;12(3):369–87.CrossRef

64.

Coyne JC, et al. Prognostic importance of marital quality for survival of congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(5):526–9.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Holt-Lunstad J, et al. Influence of a “warm touch” support enhancement intervention among married couples on ambulatory blood pressure, oxytocin, alpha amylase, and cortisol. Psychosom Med. 2008;70(9):976–85.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Holt-Lunstad J, et al. The influence of close relationships on nocturnal blood pressure dipping. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009;71(3):211–7.PubMedCrossRef

Title: In the Heart or in the Head: Relationship and Cognitive Influences on Sexual Risk Among Young Couples
Authors: Trace Kershaw
Anna Arnold
Derrick Gordon
Urania Magriples
Linda Niccolai
Publication date: 01-08-2012
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: AIDS and Behavior / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 1090-7165
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3254
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-0049-1

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

In the Heart or in the Head: Relationship and Cognitive Influences on Sexual Risk Among Young Couples

Abstract

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

Predicting Discordance Between Self-reports of Sexual Behavior and Incident Sexually Transmitted Infections with African American Female Adolescents: Results from a 4-city Study

A Two-Way Road: Rates of HIV Infection and Behavioral Risk Factors Among Deported Mexican Labor Migrants

A Binational Study of Patient-Initiated Changes to Antiretroviral Therapy Regimen Among HIV-positive Latinos Living in the Mexico–U.S. Border Region

Labor Migration and HIV Risk: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Are We Missing the Importance of Missing Values in HIV Prevention Randomized Clinical Trials? Review and Recommendations

A Commentary on the Role of Sexually Explicit Media (SEM) in the Transmission and Prevention of HIV among Men who have Sex with Men (MSM)

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page