Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gynecological Surgery 2/2016

01-05-2016 | Review Article

Gynaecological laparoscopic injuries: a 10-year retrospective review at a District General Hospital NHS Trust

Authors: K. L. Moores, B. Bentick

Published in: Gynecological Surgery | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Worldwide, increasingly complex surgery is being performed laparoscopically; thus, laparoscopic complication rates may be increasing. Reported risks from all complications of laparoscopic surgery are between 1 and 12.5/1000 cases and serious complications in 1/1000 cases. Accurate complication rates of surgery are difficult to obtain as most data are from retrospective studies and may be incomplete. This paper is a 10-year retrospective review of gynaecological laparoscopic complications from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2012. Data sources are SEMAHELIX Hospital Database, Gynaecology Complications Register, Clinical Governance Records, Complaints and Legal Cases. Recorded complications were classified as diagnostic, sterilisations and therapeutic laparoscopies. Further classifications are as follows: major complications and type of injury (bowel, urological, vascular, other), minor complications and failed sterilisations. Twenty-nine complications were identified from 5128 laparoscopies; total complication rate is 5.7/1000 procedures. Major complication rates are as follows: diagnostic, 2.2/1000; sterilisations, 3.3/1000; and therapeutic, 3.1/1000, subcategorised into bowel 1.4/1000, urological 0.2/1000 and vascular 1.2/1000. Our total complication rate lies within published national rates. Compared to published standards of major complications, diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic sterilisation rates were comparable. Conversely, our therapeutic laparoscopy complication rate was much lower. The highest complication rate was in the failed sterilisation group; however, this rate is within published sterilisation failure rates. Bowel and vascular complications were comparable; minor complication rates were low in all groups.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rock JA, Warshaw JR (1994) The history and future of operative laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 170:7–11CrossRef Rock JA, Warshaw JR (1994) The history and future of operative laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 170:7–11CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hulka J, Peterson H, Phillips J, Surrey M (1995) Operative laparoscopy: American Association of Gynaecologic Laparoscopists’ 1993 membership survey. J AM Assoc Gynaecol Laparosc 2:133–136CrossRef Hulka J, Peterson H, Phillips J, Surrey M (1995) Operative laparoscopy: American Association of Gynaecologic Laparoscopists’ 1993 membership survey. J AM Assoc Gynaecol Laparosc 2:133–136CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Grimes DA (1992) Frontiers of operative laparoscopy: a review and critique of the evidence. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 166:1062–1071CrossRef Grimes DA (1992) Frontiers of operative laparoscopy: a review and critique of the evidence. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 166:1062–1071CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Querleu D, Chapron C (1995) Complications of gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynaecol 7:257–261CrossRef Querleu D, Chapron C (1995) Complications of gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynaecol 7:257–261CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jansen FW, Kapitayn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, Herman J, Trimbos JB (1997) Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multi-center observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:595–600CrossRefPubMed Jansen FW, Kapitayn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, Herman J, Trimbos JB (1997) Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multi-center observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:595–600CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 49. Preventing entry-related gynaecological laparoscopic injuries. May 2008. RCOG, London. RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 49. Preventing entry-related gynaecological laparoscopic injuries. May 2008. RCOG, London.
7.
go back to reference Munro MG (2002) Laparoscopic access:complications, technologies and techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynaecol 14(4):365–374CrossRef Munro MG (2002) Laparoscopic access:complications, technologies and techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynaecol 14(4):365–374CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Leape LL, Berwick DM (2005) Five years after to err is human what have we learned? JAMA 293(19):2384–2390CrossRefPubMed Leape LL, Berwick DM (2005) Five years after to err is human what have we learned? JAMA 293(19):2384–2390CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Etchells E, O’Neill BM (2003) Patient safety in surgery: error detection and prevention. World J Surg 27(8):936–941CrossRefPubMed Etchells E, O’Neill BM (2003) Patient safety in surgery: error detection and prevention. World J Surg 27(8):936–941CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Harkki-Siren P, Kurki TA (1997) A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynaecol 89(1):108–112CrossRef Harkki-Siren P, Kurki TA (1997) A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynaecol 89(1):108–112CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Harkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Kurki T (1999) Major complications of laparoscopy: a follow-up Finnish study. Obstet Gynaecol 94(1):94–98 Harkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Kurki T (1999) Major complications of laparoscopy: a follow-up Finnish study. Obstet Gynaecol 94(1):94–98
12.
go back to reference Querleu D, Chapron C, Chevallier L, Bruhat MA (1993) Complications of gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. A French multicentre collaborative study. N Engl J Med 328:1355CrossRefPubMed Querleu D, Chapron C, Chevallier L, Bruhat MA (1993) Complications of gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. A French multicentre collaborative study. N Engl J Med 328:1355CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pierre F, Chapron CA (1998) French survey on gynaecological laparoscopy. Hum Reprod 13(7):1761–1763CrossRefPubMed Pierre F, Chapron CA (1998) French survey on gynaecological laparoscopy. Hum Reprod 13(7):1761–1763CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference La Chapelle CF, Bemelman WA, Rademaker BMP, Van Barneveld TA, Jansen FW (2012) A multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for minimally invasive surgery. Part 1: entry techniques and the pneumoperitoneum. Gynaecol Surg 9:271–282CrossRef La Chapelle CF, Bemelman WA, Rademaker BMP, Van Barneveld TA, Jansen FW (2012) A multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for minimally invasive surgery. Part 1: entry techniques and the pneumoperitoneum. Gynaecol Surg 9:271–282CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hill DJ (1994) Complications of the laparoscopic approach. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 8:865–879CrossRefPubMed Hill DJ (1994) Complications of the laparoscopic approach. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 8:865–879CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Penfield AJ (1985) How to prevent complications of open laparoscopy. J Repro Med 30:660–663 Penfield AJ (1985) How to prevent complications of open laparoscopy. J Repro Med 30:660–663
17.
go back to reference Garry R (1999) Towards evidence-based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas. Gynaecol Endosc 8:315–326CrossRef Garry R (1999) Towards evidence-based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas. Gynaecol Endosc 8:315–326CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mäkinen J, Sjöberg J (1994) First experiences from laparoscopically-assisted hysterectomy in Finland 1994. Ann Chir Gynaecol 83:59–61 Mäkinen J, Sjöberg J (1994) First experiences from laparoscopically-assisted hysterectomy in Finland 1994. Ann Chir Gynaecol 83:59–61
20.
go back to reference Feste JR, Winkel CA (2009) Is the standard of care what we think it is? JSLS 3(4):331–334 Feste JR, Winkel CA (2009) Is the standard of care what we think it is? JSLS 3(4):331–334
21.
go back to reference Kreckler S, Catchpole K, McCulloch P, Handa A (2009) Factors influencing incident reporting in surgical care. Qual Saf Health Care 18:116–120CrossRefPubMed Kreckler S, Catchpole K, McCulloch P, Handa A (2009) Factors influencing incident reporting in surgical care. Qual Saf Health Care 18:116–120CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kachalia A, Kaufman SR, Boothman R, Anderson S, Welch K, Saint S, Rogers MAM (2010) Liability claims and costs before and after implementation of a medical error disclosure program. Ann Intern Med 153(4):213–221CrossRefPubMed Kachalia A, Kaufman SR, Boothman R, Anderson S, Welch K, Saint S, Rogers MAM (2010) Liability claims and costs before and after implementation of a medical error disclosure program. Ann Intern Med 153(4):213–221CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Gynaecological laparoscopic injuries: a 10-year retrospective review at a District General Hospital NHS Trust
Authors
K. L. Moores
B. Bentick
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Gynecological Surgery / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1613-2076
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-016-0942-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Gynecological Surgery 2/2016 Go to the issue