Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gynecological Surgery 3/2012

Open Access 01-09-2012 | Original Article

A multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for minimally invasive surgery.

Part 1: entry techniques and the pneumoperitoneum

Authors: Claire F. la Chapelle, Willem A. Bemelman, Bart M. P. Rademaker, Teus A. van Barneveld, Frank Willem Jansen, on behalf of the Dutch Multidisciplinary Guideline Development Group Minimally Invasive Surgery

Published in: Gynecological Surgery | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The Dutch Society for Endoscopic Surgery together with the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology initiated a multidisciplinary working group to develop a guideline on minimally invasive surgery to formulate multidisciplinary agreements for minimally invasive surgery aiming towards better patient care and safety. The guideline development group consisted of general surgeons, gynecologists, an anesthesiologist, and urologist authorized by their scientific professional association. Two advisors in evidence-based guideline development supported the group. The guideline was developed using the “Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation” instrument. Clinically important aspects were identified and discussed. The best available evidence on these aspects was gathered by systematic review. Recommendations for clinical practice were formulated based on the evidence and a consensus of expert opinion. The guideline was externally reviewed by members of the participating scientific associations and their feedback was integrated. Identified important topics were: laparoscopic entry techniques, intra-abdominal pressure, trocar use, electrosurgical techniques, prevention of trocar site herniation, patient positioning, anesthesiology, perioperative care, patient information, multidisciplinary user consultation, and complication registration. The text of each topic contains an introduction with an explanation of the problem and a summary of the current literature. Each topic was discussed, considerations were evaluated and recommendations were formulated. The development of a guideline on a multidisciplinary level facilitated a broad and rich discussion, which resulted in a very complete and implementable guideline.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference AGREE Collaboration (2003) Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: The AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 12:18–23CrossRef AGREE Collaboration (2003) Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: The AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 12:18–23CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Harkki-Siren P, Kurki T (1997) A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol 89(1):108–112PubMedCrossRef Harkki-Siren P, Kurki T (1997) A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol 89(1):108–112PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, Hermans J, Trimbos JB (1997) Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(5):595–600PubMedCrossRef Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, Hermans J, Trimbos JB (1997) Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(5):595–600PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Murdock CM, Wolff AJ, Van GT (2000) Risk factors for hypercarbia, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, and pneumomediastinum during laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 95(5):704–709PubMedCrossRef Murdock CM, Wolff AJ, Van GT (2000) Risk factors for hypercarbia, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, and pneumomediastinum during laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 95(5):704–709PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ko ML (2010) Pneumopericardium and severe subcutaneous emphysema after laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(4):531–533PubMedCrossRef Ko ML (2010) Pneumopericardium and severe subcutaneous emphysema after laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(4):531–533PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Perko G, Fernandes A (1997) Subcutaneous emphysema and pneumothorax during laparoscopy for ectopic pregnancy removal. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 41(6):792–794PubMedCrossRef Perko G, Fernandes A (1997) Subcutaneous emphysema and pneumothorax during laparoscopy for ectopic pregnancy removal. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 41(6):792–794PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Badawy SZ, Dalpe C, Romano DJ (2002) Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema during carbon dioxide laser laparoscopy for tuboplasty. J Gynecol Surg 18:159–163CrossRef Badawy SZ, Dalpe C, Romano DJ (2002) Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema during carbon dioxide laser laparoscopy for tuboplasty. J Gynecol Surg 18:159–163CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Garry R (1999) Towards evidence-based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas. Gynaecol Endosc 8:315–326CrossRef Garry R (1999) Towards evidence-based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas. Gynaecol Endosc 8:315–326CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ahmad G, Duffy JM, Phillips K, Watson A (2008) Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD006583 Ahmad G, Duffy JM, Phillips K, Watson A (2008) Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD006583
12.
go back to reference Merlin T, Jamieson G, Brown A, Maddern G, Hiller J, Kolbe A (2001) A systematic review of the methods used to establish laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum. ASERNIP-S report Merlin T, Jamieson G, Brown A, Maddern G, Hiller J, Kolbe A (2001) A systematic review of the methods used to establish laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum. ASERNIP-S report
13.
go back to reference Teoh B, Sen R, Abbott J (2005) An evaluation of four tests used to ascertain Veres needle placement at closed laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(2):153–158PubMedCrossRef Teoh B, Sen R, Abbott J (2005) An evaluation of four tests used to ascertain Veres needle placement at closed laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(2):153–158PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Phillips G, Garry R, Kumar C, Reich H (1999) How much gas is required for initial insufflation at laparoscopy? Gynaecol Endosc 8:369–374CrossRef Phillips G, Garry R, Kumar C, Reich H (1999) How much gas is required for initial insufflation at laparoscopy? Gynaecol Endosc 8:369–374CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Galizia G, Prizio G, Lieto E, Castellano P, Pelosio L, Imperatore V et al (2001) Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc 15(5):477–483PubMedCrossRef Galizia G, Prizio G, Lieto E, Castellano P, Pelosio L, Imperatore V et al (2001) Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc 15(5):477–483PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Henny CP, Hofland J (2005) Laparoscopic surgery: pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc 19(9):1163–1171PubMedCrossRef Henny CP, Hofland J (2005) Laparoscopic surgery: pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc 19(9):1163–1171PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Joris JL, Chiche JD, Canivet JL, Jacquet NJ, Legros JJ, Lamy ML (1998) Hemodynamic changes induced by laparoscopy and their endocrine correlates: effects of clonidine. J Am Coll Cardiol 32(5):1389–1396PubMedCrossRef Joris JL, Chiche JD, Canivet JL, Jacquet NJ, Legros JJ, Lamy ML (1998) Hemodynamic changes induced by laparoscopy and their endocrine correlates: effects of clonidine. J Am Coll Cardiol 32(5):1389–1396PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Borg IR Mertens zur, Lim A, Verbrugge SJ, IJzermans JN, Klein J (2004) Effect of intraabdominal pressure elevation and positioning on hemodynamic responses during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective controlled clinical study. Surg Endosc 18(6):919–923CrossRef Borg IR Mertens zur, Lim A, Verbrugge SJ, IJzermans JN, Klein J (2004) Effect of intraabdominal pressure elevation and positioning on hemodynamic responses during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective controlled clinical study. Surg Endosc 18(6):919–923CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Abu-Rafea B, Vilos GA, Vilos AG, Ahmad R, Hollett-Caines J, Al-Omran M (2005) High-pressure laparoscopic entry does not adversely affect cardiopulmonary function in healthy women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(6):475–479PubMedCrossRef Abu-Rafea B, Vilos GA, Vilos AG, Ahmad R, Hollett-Caines J, Al-Omran M (2005) High-pressure laparoscopic entry does not adversely affect cardiopulmonary function in healthy women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(6):475–479PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tsaltas J, Pearce S, Lawrence A, Meads A, Mezzatesta J, Nicolson S (2004) Safer laparoscopic trocar entry: it’s all about pressure. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 44(4):349–350PubMedCrossRef Tsaltas J, Pearce S, Lawrence A, Meads A, Mezzatesta J, Nicolson S (2004) Safer laparoscopic trocar entry: it’s all about pressure. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 44(4):349–350PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR (2009) Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD006930 Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR (2009) Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD006930
22.
go back to reference Dexter SP, Vucevic M, Gibson J, McMahon MJ (1999) Hemodynamic consequences of high- and low-pressure capnoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 13(4):376–381PubMedCrossRef Dexter SP, Vucevic M, Gibson J, McMahon MJ (1999) Hemodynamic consequences of high- and low-pressure capnoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 13(4):376–381PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Chok KS, Yuen WK, Lau H, Fan ST (2006) Prospective randomized trial on low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc, Endosc Percutaneous Tech 16(6):383–386CrossRef Chok KS, Yuen WK, Lau H, Fan ST (2006) Prospective randomized trial on low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc, Endosc Percutaneous Tech 16(6):383–386CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sarli L, Costi R, Sansebastiano G, Trivelli M, Roncoroni L (2000) Prospective randomized trial of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum for reduction of shoulder-tip pain following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 87(9):1161–1165PubMedCrossRef Sarli L, Costi R, Sansebastiano G, Trivelli M, Roncoroni L (2000) Prospective randomized trial of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum for reduction of shoulder-tip pain following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 87(9):1161–1165PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wallace DH, Serpell MG, Baxter JN, O’Dwyer PJ (1997) Randomized trial of different insufflation pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84(4):455–458PubMedCrossRef Wallace DH, Serpell MG, Baxter JN, O’Dwyer PJ (1997) Randomized trial of different insufflation pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84(4):455–458PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY, The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (2007) Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 29(5):433–465PubMed Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY, The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (2007) Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 29(5):433–465PubMed
27.
go back to reference Agresta F, De SP, Ciardo LF, Bedin N (2004) Direct trocar insertion vs Veress needle in nonobese patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures: a randomized prospective single-center study. Surg Endosc 18(12):1778–1781PubMedCrossRef Agresta F, De SP, Ciardo LF, Bedin N (2004) Direct trocar insertion vs Veress needle in nonobese patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures: a randomized prospective single-center study. Surg Endosc 18(12):1778–1781PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bemelman WA, Dunker MS, Busch OR, Den Boer KT, de Wit LT, Gouma DJ (2000) Efficacy of establishment of pneumoperitoneum with the Veress needle, Hasson trocar, and modified blunt trocar (TrocDoc): a randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10(6):325–330PubMedCrossRef Bemelman WA, Dunker MS, Busch OR, Den Boer KT, de Wit LT, Gouma DJ (2000) Efficacy of establishment of pneumoperitoneum with the Veress needle, Hasson trocar, and modified blunt trocar (TrocDoc): a randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10(6):325–330PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Borgatta L, Gruss L, Barad D, Kaali SG (1990) Direct trocar insertion vs. Verres needle use for laparoscopic sterilization. J Reprod Med 35(9):891–894PubMed Borgatta L, Gruss L, Barad D, Kaali SG (1990) Direct trocar insertion vs. Verres needle use for laparoscopic sterilization. J Reprod Med 35(9):891–894PubMed
30.
go back to reference Byron JW, Markenson G, Miyazawa K (1993) A randomized comparison of Verres needle and direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177(3):259–262PubMed Byron JW, Markenson G, Miyazawa K (1993) A randomized comparison of Verres needle and direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177(3):259–262PubMed
31.
go back to reference Gunec MZ, Yesildaglar N, Bingol B, Onalan G, Tabak S, Gokmen B (2005) The safety and efficacy of direct trocar insertion with elevation of the rectus sheath instead of the skin for pneumoperitoneum. Surg Laparosc, Endosc Percutaneous Tech 15(2):80–81CrossRef Gunec MZ, Yesildaglar N, Bingol B, Onalan G, Tabak S, Gokmen B (2005) The safety and efficacy of direct trocar insertion with elevation of the rectus sheath instead of the skin for pneumoperitoneum. Surg Laparosc, Endosc Percutaneous Tech 15(2):80–81CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Tansatit T, Wisawasukmongchol W, Bunyavejchevin S (2006) A randomized, prospective study comparing the use of the missile trocar and the pyramidal trocar for laparoscopy access. J Med Assoc Thai 89(7):941–947PubMed Tansatit T, Wisawasukmongchol W, Bunyavejchevin S (2006) A randomized, prospective study comparing the use of the missile trocar and the pyramidal trocar for laparoscopy access. J Med Assoc Thai 89(7):941–947PubMed
33.
go back to reference Melzer A, Riek S, Roth K, Buess G (1995) Endoscopically controlled trocar and cannula insertion. [Review] [25 refs]. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 3(1):63–68PubMed Melzer A, Riek S, Roth K, Buess G (1995) Endoscopically controlled trocar and cannula insertion. [Review] [25 refs]. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 3(1):63–68PubMed
34.
go back to reference Mettler L, Maher P (2000) Investigation of the effectiveness of the radially-expanding needle system, in contrast to the cutting trocar in enhancing patient recovery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 9(6):397–401CrossRef Mettler L, Maher P (2000) Investigation of the effectiveness of the radially-expanding needle system, in contrast to the cutting trocar in enhancing patient recovery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 9(6):397–401CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Turner DJ (1996) A new, radially expanding access system for laparoscopic procedures versus conventional cannulas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3(4):609–615PubMedCrossRef Turner DJ (1996) A new, radially expanding access system for laparoscopic procedures versus conventional cannulas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3(4):609–615PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Bhoyrul S, Payne J, Steffes B, Swanstrom L, Way LW (2000) A randomized prospective study of radially expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 4(4):392–397PubMedCrossRef Bhoyrul S, Payne J, Steffes B, Swanstrom L, Way LW (2000) A randomized prospective study of radially expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 4(4):392–397PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Feste JR, Bojahr B, Turner DJ (2000) Randomized trial comparing a radially expandable needle system with cutting trocars. JSLS 4(1):11–15PubMed Feste JR, Bojahr B, Turner DJ (2000) Randomized trial comparing a radially expandable needle system with cutting trocars. JSLS 4(1):11–15PubMed
39.
go back to reference O’Donovan PJ, McGurgan P (1999) Microlaparoscopy. Semin Laparosc Surg 6(2):51–57PubMed O’Donovan PJ, McGurgan P (1999) Microlaparoscopy. Semin Laparosc Surg 6(2):51–57PubMed
40.
go back to reference Minervini A, Davenport K, Pefanis G, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG (2008) Prospective study comparing the bladeless optical access trocar versus Hasson open trocar for the establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic renal procedures. Arch Ital Urol Androl 80(3):95–98PubMed Minervini A, Davenport K, Pefanis G, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG (2008) Prospective study comparing the bladeless optical access trocar versus Hasson open trocar for the establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic renal procedures. Arch Ital Urol Androl 80(3):95–98PubMed
41.
go back to reference Audebert AJ, Gomel V (2000) Role of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of peritoneal and visceral adhesions and in the prevention of bowel injury associated with blind trocar insertion. Fertil Steril 73(3):631–635PubMedCrossRef Audebert AJ, Gomel V (2000) Role of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of peritoneal and visceral adhesions and in the prevention of bowel injury associated with blind trocar insertion. Fertil Steril 73(3):631–635PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Sutton CJG, Philips K (2008) Preventing entry-related gynaecological laparoscopic injuries. RCOG Green-top guideline Sutton CJG, Philips K (2008) Preventing entry-related gynaecological laparoscopic injuries. RCOG Green-top guideline
43.
go back to reference Hurd WW, Amesse LS, Gruber JS, Horowitz GM, Cha GM, Hurteau JA (2003) Visualization of the epigastric vessels and bladder before laparoscopic trocar placement. Fertil Steril 80(1):209–212PubMedCrossRef Hurd WW, Amesse LS, Gruber JS, Horowitz GM, Cha GM, Hurteau JA (2003) Visualization of the epigastric vessels and bladder before laparoscopic trocar placement. Fertil Steril 80(1):209–212PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Halpern NB (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pregnancy: a review of published experiences and clinical considerations. Semin Laparosc Surg 5(2):129–134PubMed Halpern NB (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pregnancy: a review of published experiences and clinical considerations. Semin Laparosc Surg 5(2):129–134PubMed
45.
go back to reference Levy BS (1997) Perforation of large vascular structures. Complications of Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy: 2nd ed Oxford: Blackwell Science 26–9 Levy BS (1997) Perforation of large vascular structures. Complications of Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy: 2nd ed Oxford: Blackwell Science 26–9
46.
go back to reference Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) (2007) Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Use of Laparoscopy for Surgical Problems during Pregnancy. Practice/Clinical Guidelines Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) (2007) Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Use of Laparoscopy for Surgical Problems during Pregnancy. Practice/Clinical Guidelines
47.
go back to reference Diamond MP, Corfman RS, DeCherney AH (1997) Insufflation of the obese patient. Complications of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 22–25 Diamond MP, Corfman RS, DeCherney AH (1997) Insufflation of the obese patient. Complications of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 22–25
Metadata
Title
A multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for minimally invasive surgery.
Part 1: entry techniques and the pneumoperitoneum
Authors
Claire F. la Chapelle
Willem A. Bemelman
Bart M. P. Rademaker
Teus A. van Barneveld
Frank Willem Jansen
on behalf of the Dutch Multidisciplinary Guideline Development Group Minimally Invasive Surgery
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Gynecological Surgery / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1613-2076
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-012-0731-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Gynecological Surgery 3/2012 Go to the issue