Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Esophagus 1/2019

Open Access 01-01-2019 | Original Article

Appropriateness of the institute certification system for esophageal surgeries by the Japan Esophageal Society: evaluation of survival outcomes using data from the National Database of Hospital-Based Cancer Registries in Japan

Authors: Satoru Motoyama, Eri Maeda, Masahiko Yano, Takushi Yasuda, Masaichi Ohira, Yuichiro Doki, Yasushi Toh, Takahiro Higashi, Hisahiro Matsubara, The Japan Esophageal Society

Published in: Esophagus | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Since 2013, The Japan Esophageal Society has been certifying “Authorized Institute for Board Certified Esophageal Surgeon (AIBCES)” to contribute to improving national medical care by enhancing the professional knowledge and skills of esophageal surgeons. However, the appropriateness on this certification system has not yet been verified. Our aim was to assess the appropriateness of the institute certification system for esophageal surgeries used by the medical society.

Methods

Using data from the National Database of Hospital-based Cancer Registries, we analyzed the 5-year overall survival rates among 2135 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent an esophagectomy at 53 AIBCES or 141 non-AIBCES.

Results

There were 1343 (63%) patients who underwent surgery at an AIBCES and 792 (37%) who underwent surgery at a non-AIBCES. Registered patients were followed up for a median of 53 (range 1–88) months. Over the followed-up period examined, 670 (50%) patients treated at an AIBCES died and 455 (57%) treated at a non-AIBCES died. Comparison of the Kaplan–Meier survival curves indicated that patients with cStage II or cStage III disease treated at an AIBCES had significantly better 5-year survival rates than those treated at a non-AIBCES (55.4% vs. 44.9% and 38.0% vs. 30.3%, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses stratified based on stages and adjuvant therapies revealed that institute certification (AIBCES vs. non-AIBCES) is a significant independent factor for 5-year survival.

Conclusions

The institute certification system used by the Japan Esophageal Society may be appropriate, as indicated by improved 5-year survival outcomes. The institute certification system has the potential to contribute to a more appropriate medical delivery system in the future.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Registration Committee for Esophageal Cancer of the Japan Esophageal Society. Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan, 2010. Esophagus. 2017;14:189–214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Registration Committee for Esophageal Cancer of the Japan Esophageal Society. Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan, 2010. Esophagus. 2017;14:189–214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Chen MF, Yang YH, Lai CH, et al. Outcome of patients with esophageal cancer: a nationwide analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3023–30.CrossRefPubMed Chen MF, Yang YH, Lai CH, et al. Outcome of patients with esophageal cancer: a nationwide analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3023–30.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Efficacy of lymph node dissection by node zones according to tumor location for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Esophagus. 2016;13:1–7.CrossRef Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Efficacy of lymph node dissection by node zones according to tumor location for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Esophagus. 2016;13:1–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:68–74.CrossRef Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:68–74.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.CrossRef van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Higashi T, Nakamura F, Shibata A, et al. The national database of hospital-based cancer registries: a nationwide infrastructure to support evidence-based cancer care and cancer control policy in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44:2–8.CrossRefPubMed Higashi T, Nakamura F, Shibata A, et al. The national database of hospital-based cancer registries: a nationwide infrastructure to support evidence-based cancer care and cancer control policy in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44:2–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.CrossRef Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kunisaki C, Miyata H, Konno H, et al. Modeling preoperative risk factors for potentially lethal morbidities using a nationwide Japanese web-based database of patients undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:496–507.CrossRefPubMed Kunisaki C, Miyata H, Konno H, et al. Modeling preoperative risk factors for potentially lethal morbidities using a nationwide Japanese web-based database of patients undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:496–507.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Konno H, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic major hepatectomy with propensity score matched open cases from the National Clinical Database in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23:721–34.CrossRefPubMed Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Konno H, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic major hepatectomy with propensity score matched open cases from the National Clinical Database in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23:721–34.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001.
11.
go back to reference Wouters MW, Gooiker GA, van Sandick JW, et al. The volume–outcome relation in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer. 2012;118:1754–63.CrossRefPubMed Wouters MW, Gooiker GA, van Sandick JW, et al. The volume–outcome relation in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer. 2012;118:1754–63.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nishigori T, Miyata H, Okabe H, et al. Impact of hospital volume on risk-adjusted mortality following oesophagectomy in Japan. Br J Surg. 2016;103:1880–6.CrossRefPubMed Nishigori T, Miyata H, Okabe H, et al. Impact of hospital volume on risk-adjusted mortality following oesophagectomy in Japan. Br J Surg. 2016;103:1880–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fuchs HF, Harnsberger CR, Broderick RC, et al. Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:2491–7.CrossRefPubMed Fuchs HF, Harnsberger CR, Broderick RC, et al. Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:2491–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Markar SR, Mackenzie H, Askari A, et al. Effect of esophageal cancer surgeon volume on management and mortality from emergency upper gastrointestinal conditions: population-based cohort study. Ann Surg. 2017;266:847–53.CrossRef Markar SR, Mackenzie H, Askari A, et al. Effect of esophageal cancer surgeon volume on management and mortality from emergency upper gastrointestinal conditions: population-based cohort study. Ann Surg. 2017;266:847–53.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chang AC. Centralizing esophagectomy to improve outcomes and enhance clinical research: invited expert review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106:916–23.CrossRefPubMed Chang AC. Centralizing esophagectomy to improve outcomes and enhance clinical research: invited expert review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106:916–23.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Munasinghe A, Markar SR, Mamidanna R, et al. Is it time to centralize high-risk cancer care in the United States? Comparison of outcomes of esophagectomy between England and the United States. Ann Surg. 2015;262:79–85.CrossRefPubMed Munasinghe A, Markar SR, Mamidanna R, et al. Is it time to centralize high-risk cancer care in the United States? Comparison of outcomes of esophagectomy between England and the United States. Ann Surg. 2015;262:79–85.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Fujita H, Ozawa S, Kuwano H, et al. Committee for Scientific Affairs, Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Esophagectomy for cancer: clinical concerns support centralizing operations within the larger hospitals. Dis Esophagus. 2010;23:145–52.CrossRefPubMed Fujita H, Ozawa S, Kuwano H, et al. Committee for Scientific Affairs, Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Esophagectomy for cancer: clinical concerns support centralizing operations within the larger hospitals. Dis Esophagus. 2010;23:145–52.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and failure to rescue with high-risk surgery. Med Care. 2011;49:1076–81.CrossRefPubMed Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and failure to rescue with high-risk surgery. Med Care. 2011;49:1076–81.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, McHugh MD, et al. Comparison of the value of nursing work environments in hospitals across different levels of patient risk. JAMA surgery. 2016;151:527–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, McHugh MD, et al. Comparison of the value of nursing work environments in hospitals across different levels of patient risk. JAMA surgery. 2016;151:527–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44:166–206.CrossRef Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44:166–206.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tsukada Y, Higashi T, Shimada H, et al. The use of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in an analysis of 5016 patients from 305 designated cancer care hospitals in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23:81–91.CrossRefPubMed Tsukada Y, Higashi T, Shimada H, et al. The use of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in an analysis of 5016 patients from 305 designated cancer care hospitals in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23:81–91.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Appropriateness of the institute certification system for esophageal surgeries by the Japan Esophageal Society: evaluation of survival outcomes using data from the National Database of Hospital-Based Cancer Registries in Japan
Authors
Satoru Motoyama
Eri Maeda
Masahiko Yano
Takushi Yasuda
Masaichi Ohira
Yuichiro Doki
Yasushi Toh
Takahiro Higashi
Hisahiro Matsubara
The Japan Esophageal Society
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Esophagus / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Electronic ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-018-0646-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Esophagus 1/2019 Go to the issue