Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 5/2017

Open Access 01-10-2017 | Research Article

Spatial Selectivity in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Asymmetric Waveforms and Development of a Single-Point Measure

Authors: Robert P. Carlyon, John M. Deeks, Jaime Undurraga, Olivier Macherey, Astrid van Wieringen

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Three experiments studied the extent to which cochlear implant users’ spatial selectivity can be manipulated using asymmetric waveforms and tested an efficient method for comparing spatial selectivity produced by different stimuli. Experiment 1 measured forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) for a partial tripolar (pTP) probe. Maskers were presented on bipolar pairs separated by one unused electrode; waveforms were either symmetric biphasic (“SYM”) or pseudomonophasic with the short high-amplitude phase being either anodic (“PSA”) or cathodic (“PSC”) on the more apical electrode. For the SYM masker, several subjects showed PTCs consistent with a bimodal excitation pattern, with discrete excitation peaks on each electrode of the bipolar masker pair. Most subjects showed significant differences between the PSA and PSC maskers consistent with greater masking by the electrode where the high-amplitude phase was anodic, but the pattern differed markedly across subjects. Experiment 2 measured masked excitation patterns for a pTP probe and either a monopolar symmetric biphasic masker (“MP_SYM”) or pTP pseudomonophasic maskers where the short high-amplitude phase was either anodic (“TP_PSA”) or cathodic (“TP_PSC”) on the masker’s central electrode. Four of the five subjects showed significant differences between the masker types, but again the pattern varied markedly across subjects. Because the levels of the maskers were chosen to produce the same masking of a probe on the same channel as the masker, it was correctly predicted that maskers that produce broader masking patterns would sound louder. Experiment 3 exploited this finding by using a single-point measure of spread of excitation to reveal significantly better spatial selectivity for TP_PSA compared to TP_PSC maskers.
Literature
go back to reference Bierer JA, Faulkner KF (2010) Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves. Ear Hearing 31:247–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bierer JA, Faulkner KF (2010) Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves. Ear Hearing 31:247–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Carlyon RP, Long CJ, Deeks JM, McKay CM (2007) Concurrent sound segregation in electric and acoustic hearing. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 8:119–133CrossRefPubMedCentral Carlyon RP, Long CJ, Deeks JM, McKay CM (2007) Concurrent sound segregation in electric and acoustic hearing. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 8:119–133CrossRefPubMedCentral
go back to reference Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Frijns JHM, Axon PR, Kalkman RK, Boyle P, Baguley DM, Briggs J, Deeks JM, Briaire JJ, Barreau X, Dauman R (2011) Pitch comparisons between electrical stimulation of a cochlear implant and acoustic stimuli presented to a normal-hearing contralateral ear. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 11:625–640CrossRef Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Frijns JHM, Axon PR, Kalkman RK, Boyle P, Baguley DM, Briggs J, Deeks JM, Briaire JJ, Barreau X, Dauman R (2011) Pitch comparisons between electrical stimulation of a cochlear implant and acoustic stimuli presented to a normal-hearing contralateral ear. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 11:625–640CrossRef
go back to reference Chatterjee M, Shannon RV (1998) Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 103:2565–2572CrossRefPubMed Chatterjee M, Shannon RV (1998) Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 103:2565–2572CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Chatterjee M, Galvin JJ, Fu QJ, Shannon RV (2006) Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 7:15–25CrossRefPubMed Chatterjee M, Galvin JJ, Fu QJ, Shannon RV (2006) Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 7:15–25CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cosentino S, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP (2015) Procedural factors that affect measures of spatial selectivity in cochlear implant users. Trends in Hearing 19:1–16CrossRef Cosentino S, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP (2015) Procedural factors that affect measures of spatial selectivity in cochlear implant users. Trends in Hearing 19:1–16CrossRef
go back to reference Fielden CA, Kluk K, McKay CM (2013) Place specificity of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implants: the influence of residual masking. J Acoust Soc Am 133:4109–4123CrossRefPubMed Fielden CA, Kluk K, McKay CM (2013) Place specificity of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implants: the influence of residual masking. J Acoust Soc Am 133:4109–4123CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fielden CA, Kluk K, McKay CM (2014) Interpulse interval discrimination within and across channels: comparison of monopolar and tripolar mode of stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 135:2913–2922CrossRefPubMed Fielden CA, Kluk K, McKay CM (2014) Interpulse interval discrimination within and across channels: comparison of monopolar and tripolar mode of stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 135:2913–2922CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X (2001) Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 110:1150–1163CrossRefPubMed Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X (2001) Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 110:1150–1163CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Goldwyn JH, Bierer SM, Bierer JA (2010) Modeling the electrode-neuron interface of cochlear implants: effects of neural survival, electrode placement, and the partial tripolar configuration. Hear Res 268:93–104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goldwyn JH, Bierer SM, Bierer JA (2010) Modeling the electrode-neuron interface of cochlear implants: effects of neural survival, electrode placement, and the partial tripolar configuration. Hear Res 268:93–104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Ihlefeld A, Carlyon RP, Kan A, Churchill TH, Litovsky R (2015) Limitations on monaural and binaural temporal processing in bilateral cochlear implant listeners. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 16:641–652CrossRefPubMedCentral Ihlefeld A, Carlyon RP, Kan A, Churchill TH, Litovsky R (2015) Limitations on monaural and binaural temporal processing in bilateral cochlear implant listeners. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 16:641–652CrossRefPubMedCentral
go back to reference Kalkman RK, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM (2015) Current focussing in cochlear implants: an analysis of neural recruitment in a computational model. Hear Res 322:89–98CrossRefPubMed Kalkman RK, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM (2015) Current focussing in cochlear implants: an analysis of neural recruitment in a computational model. Hear Res 322:89–98CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kong Y-Y, Deeks JM, Axon PR, Carlyon RP (2009) Limits of temporal pitch in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 125:1649–1657CrossRefPubMed Kong Y-Y, Deeks JM, Axon PR, Carlyon RP (2009) Limits of temporal pitch in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 125:1649–1657CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kral A, Hartmann R, Mortazavi D, Klinke R (1998) Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents. Hear Res 121:11–28CrossRefPubMed Kral A, Hartmann R, Mortazavi D, Klinke R (1998) Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents. Hear Res 121:11–28CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kwon BJ, van den Honert C (2006) Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 119:2994–3002CrossRefPubMed Kwon BJ, van den Honert C (2006) Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 119:2994–3002CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Landsberger DM, McKay CM (2005) Perceptual differences between low and high rates of stimulation on single electrodes for cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 117:319–327CrossRefPubMed Landsberger DM, McKay CM (2005) Perceptual differences between low and high rates of stimulation on single electrodes for cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 117:319–327CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Levitt H (1971) Transformed up-down methods in psychophysics. J Acoust Soc Am 49:467–477CrossRef Levitt H (1971) Transformed up-down methods in psychophysics. J Acoust Soc Am 49:467–477CrossRef
go back to reference Lim HH, Tong YC, Clark GM (1998) Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 86:971–980CrossRef Lim HH, Tong YC, Clark GM (1998) Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 86:971–980CrossRef
go back to reference Litvak LM, Spahr AJ, Emadi G (2007) Loudness growth observed under partially tripolar stimulation: model and data from cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 122:967–981CrossRefPubMed Litvak LM, Spahr AJ, Emadi G (2007) Loudness growth observed under partially tripolar stimulation: model and data from cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 122:967–981CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Macherey O, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP (2011) Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:233–251CrossRefPubMed Macherey O, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP (2011) Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:233–251CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Macherey O, Carlyon RP, Chatron J, Roman S (2017) Effect of pulse polarity on thresholds and on non-monotonic loudness growth in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. doi:10.1007/s10162-016-0614-4 Macherey O, Carlyon RP, Chatron J, Roman S (2017) Effect of pulse polarity on thresholds and on non-monotonic loudness growth in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. doi:10.​1007/​s10162-016-0614-4
go back to reference Macherey O, Av W, Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Wouters J (2006) Asymmetric pulses in cochlear implants: effects of pulse shape, polarity and rate. Jaro 7:253–266CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Macherey O, Av W, Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Wouters J (2006) Asymmetric pulses in cochlear implants: effects of pulse shape, polarity and rate. Jaro 7:253–266CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Macherey O, Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, van Wieringen A, Wouters J (2008) Higher sensitivity of human auditory nerve fibers to positive electrical currents. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 9:241–251CrossRefPubMedCentral Macherey O, Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, van Wieringen A, Wouters J (2008) Higher sensitivity of human auditory nerve fibers to positive electrical currents. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 9:241–251CrossRefPubMedCentral
go back to reference Macherey O, van Wieringen A, Carlyon RP, Dhooge I, Wouters J (2010) Forward-masking patterns produced by symmetric and asymmetric pulse shapes in electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 127:326–338CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Macherey O, van Wieringen A, Carlyon RP, Dhooge I, Wouters J (2010) Forward-masking patterns produced by symmetric and asymmetric pulse shapes in electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 127:326–338CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Marozeau J, McDermott HJ, Swanson BA, McKay CM (2015) Perceptual interactions between electrodes using focused and monopolar cochlear stimulation. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 16:401–412CrossRefPubMedCentral Marozeau J, McDermott HJ, Swanson BA, McKay CM (2015) Perceptual interactions between electrodes using focused and monopolar cochlear stimulation. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 16:401–412CrossRefPubMedCentral
go back to reference Matsuoka AJ, Abbas PJ, Rubinstein JT, Miller CA (2000) The neuronal response to electrical constant-amplitude pulse train stimulation: evoked compound action potential recordings. Hear Res 149:115–128CrossRefPubMed Matsuoka AJ, Abbas PJ, Rubinstein JT, Miller CA (2000) The neuronal response to electrical constant-amplitude pulse train stimulation: evoked compound action potential recordings. Hear Res 149:115–128CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McKay CM (2012) Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation. J Acoust Soc Am 131:2209–2224CrossRefPubMed McKay CM (2012) Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation. J Acoust Soc Am 131:2209–2224CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mesnildrey Q, Macherey O (2015) Simulating the dual-peak excitation pattern produced by bipolar stimulation of a cochlear implant: effects on speech intelligibility. Hear Res 319:32–47CrossRefPubMed Mesnildrey Q, Macherey O (2015) Simulating the dual-peak excitation pattern produced by bipolar stimulation of a cochlear implant: effects on speech intelligibility. Hear Res 319:32–47CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Neff DL (1985) Stimulus parameters governing confusion effects in forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 78:1966–1976CrossRefPubMed Neff DL (1985) Stimulus parameters governing confusion effects in forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 78:1966–1976CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nelson DA, Schmitz JL, Donaldson GS, Viemeister NF, Javel E (1996) Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 100:2393–2414CrossRefPubMed Nelson DA, Schmitz JL, Donaldson GS, Viemeister NF, Javel E (1996) Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 100:2393–2414CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Padilla M, Landsberger DM (2016) Reduction in spread of excitation from current focusing at multiple cochlear locations in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 333:98–107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Padilla M, Landsberger DM (2016) Reduction in spread of excitation from current focusing at multiple cochlear locations in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 333:98–107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Saoji AA, Litvak LM, ” 902 (2010) Use of ‘phantom electrode’ technique to extend the range of pitches available through a cochlear implant. Ear Hear 31:693–701. Saoji AA, Litvak LM, ” 902 (2010) Use of ‘phantom electrode’ technique to extend the range of pitches available through a cochlear implant. Ear Hear 31:693–701.
go back to reference Saoji AA, Landsberger DM, Padilla M, Litvak LM (2013) Masking patterns for monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation in cochlear implants. Hear Res 298:109–116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saoji AA, Landsberger DM, Padilla M, Litvak LM (2013) Masking patterns for monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation in cochlear implants. Hear Res 298:109–116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Shannon RV (1983) Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear Res 11:157–189CrossRefPubMed Shannon RV (1983) Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear Res 11:157–189CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Srinivasan AG, Landsberger DM, Shannon RV (2010) Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation. Hear Res 270:89–100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Srinivasan AG, Landsberger DM, Shannon RV (2010) Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation. Hear Res 270:89–100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Townshend B, Cotter N, van Compernolle D, White RL (1987) Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 82:106–115CrossRefPubMed Townshend B, Cotter N, van Compernolle D, White RL (1987) Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 82:106–115CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Undurraga JA, Carlyon RP, Wouters J, Av W (2012) Spread of excitation varies for different electrical pulse shapes and stimulation modes in cochlear implants. Hear Res 290:21–36CrossRefPubMed Undurraga JA, Carlyon RP, Wouters J, Av W (2012) Spread of excitation varies for different electrical pulse shapes and stimulation modes in cochlear implants. Hear Res 290:21–36CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Undurraga JA, Av W, Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Wouters J (2010) Polarity effects on neural responses of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve at different cochlear sites. Hear Res 269:146–161CrossRefPubMed Undurraga JA, Av W, Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Wouters J (2010) Polarity effects on neural responses of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve at different cochlear sites. Hear Res 269:146–161CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Wieringen A, Macherey O, Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Wouters J (2008) Alternative pulse shapes in electrical hearing. Hear Res 242:154–163CrossRefPubMed van Wieringen A, Macherey O, Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Wouters J (2008) Alternative pulse shapes in electrical hearing. Hear Res 242:154–163CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Zhu Z, Tang Q, Zeng F-G, Guan T, Ye D (2012) Cochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulation. Hear Res 283:45–58CrossRefPubMed Zhu Z, Tang Q, Zeng F-G, Guan T, Ye D (2012) Cochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulation. Hear Res 283:45–58CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Spatial Selectivity in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Asymmetric Waveforms and Development of a Single-Point Measure
Authors
Robert P. Carlyon
John M. Deeks
Jaime Undurraga
Olivier Macherey
Astrid van Wieringen
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-017-0625-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 5/2017 Go to the issue