Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 5/2015

Open Access 01-10-2015 | Research Article

Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners

Authors: Antje Ihlefeld, Robert P. Carlyon, Alan Kan, Tyler H. Churchill, Ruth Y. Litovsky

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Monaural rate discrimination and binaural interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination were studied as functions of pulse rate in a group of bilaterally implanted cochlear implant users. Stimuli for the rate discrimination task were pulse trains presented to one electrode, which could be in the apical, middle, or basal part of the array, and in either the left or the right ear. In each two-interval trial, the standard stimulus had a rate of 100, 200, 300, or 500 pulses per second and the signal stimulus had a rate 35 % higher. ITD discrimination between pitch-matched electrode pairs was measured for the same standard rates as in the rate discrimination task and with an ITD of +/− 500 μs. Sensitivity (d′) on both tasks decreased with increasing rate, as has been reported previously. This study tested the hypothesis that deterioration in performance at high rates occurs for the two tasks due to a common neural basis, specific to the stimulation of each electrode. Results show that ITD scores for different pairs of electrodes correlated with the lower rate discrimination scores for those two electrodes. Statistical analysis, which partialed out overall differences between listeners, electrodes, and rates, supports the hypothesis that monaural and binaural temporal processing limitations are at least partly due to a common mechanism.
Literature
go back to reference Bahmer A, Baumann U (2013) New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int 14:142–149CrossRefPubMed Bahmer A, Baumann U (2013) New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int 14:142–149CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Baumann U, Nobbe A (2004) Pulse rate discrimination with deeply inserted electrode arrays. Hear Res 196:49–57CrossRefPubMed Baumann U, Nobbe A (2004) Pulse rate discrimination with deeply inserted electrode arrays. Hear Res 196:49–57CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Best V, Laback B, Majdak P (2011) Binaural interference in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 130(5):2939–2950CrossRefPubMed Best V, Laback B, Majdak P (2011) Binaural interference in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 130(5):2939–2950CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: part 1—correlation within subjects. Br Med J 310:446CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: part 1—correlation within subjects. Br Med J 310:446CrossRef
go back to reference Brungart DS, Simpson BD (2002) The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal. J Acoust Soc Am 112(2):664–676CrossRefPubMed Brungart DS, Simpson BD (2002) The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal. J Acoust Soc Am 112(2):664–676CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Carlyon RP, Deeks JM (2013) Relationships between auditory nerve activity and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. In: Basic aspects of hearing Springer, New York, pp 363–371 Carlyon RP, Deeks JM (2013) Relationships between auditory nerve activity and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. In: Basic aspects of hearing Springer, New York, pp 363–371
go back to reference Carlyon RP, Long CJ, Deeks JM (2008) Pulse-rate discrimination by cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners with and without binaural cues. J Acoust Soc Am 123(4):2276–2286PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Carlyon RP, Long CJ, Deeks JM (2008) Pulse-rate discrimination by cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners with and without binaural cues. J Acoust Soc Am 123(4):2276–2286PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, McKay CM (2010a) The upper limit of temporal pitch for cochlear-implant listeners: stimulus duration, conditioner pulses, and the number of electrodes stimulated. J Acoust Soc Am 127(3):1469–1478CrossRefPubMed Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, McKay CM (2010a) The upper limit of temporal pitch for cochlear-implant listeners: stimulus duration, conditioner pulses, and the number of electrodes stimulated. J Acoust Soc Am 127(3):1469–1478CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Frijns JH, Axon PR, Kalkman RK, Boyle P, Dauman R (2010b) Pitch comparisons between electrical stimulation of a cochlear implant and acoustic stimuli presented to a normal-hearing contralateral ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 11(4):625–640PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Frijns JH, Axon PR, Kalkman RK, Boyle P, Dauman R (2010b) Pitch comparisons between electrical stimulation of a cochlear implant and acoustic stimuli presented to a normal-hearing contralateral ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 11(4):625–640PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Chung Y, Delgutte B, Colburn HS (2015). Modeling binaural responses in the auditory brainstem to electric stimulation of the auditory nerve. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:135–158 Chung Y, Delgutte B, Colburn HS (2015). Modeling binaural responses in the auditory brainstem to electric stimulation of the auditory nerve. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:135–158
go back to reference Chung Y, Hancock KE, Nam SI, Delgutte B (2014) Coding of electric pulse trains presented through cochlear implants in the auditory midbrain of awake rabbit: comparison with anesthetized preparations. J Neurosci 34:218–231PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Chung Y, Hancock KE, Nam SI, Delgutte B (2014) Coding of electric pulse trains presented through cochlear implants in the auditory midbrain of awake rabbit: comparison with anesthetized preparations. J Neurosci 34:218–231PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Churchill TH, Kan A, Goupell MJ, Litovsky RY (2014) Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 136(3):1246–1256PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Churchill TH, Kan A, Goupell MJ, Litovsky RY (2014) Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 136(3):1246–1256PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Darwin CJ, Hukin RW (2000) Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention. J Acoust Soc Am 107(2):970–977CrossRefPubMed Darwin CJ, Hukin RW (2000) Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention. J Acoust Soc Am 107(2):970–977CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Donaldson GS, Kreft HA, Litvak L (2005) Place-pitch discrimination of single-versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 118(2):623–626CrossRefPubMed Donaldson GS, Kreft HA, Litvak L (2005) Place-pitch discrimination of single-versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 118(2):623–626CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dynes SBC, Delgutte B (1992) Phase locking of auditory-nerve discharges to sinusoidal electric stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 58:79–90CrossRefPubMed Dynes SBC, Delgutte B (1992) Phase locking of auditory-nerve discharges to sinusoidal electric stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 58:79–90CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Freyman R, Helfer K, Balakrishnan U (2005) Spatial and spectral factors in release from informational masking in speech recognition. Acta Acust 91:537–545 Freyman R, Helfer K, Balakrishnan U (2005) Spatial and spectral factors in release from informational masking in speech recognition. Acta Acust 91:537–545
go back to reference Hancock KE, Noel V, Ryugo DK, Delgutte B (2010) Neural coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants: effects of congenital deafness. J Neurosci 30(42):14068–14079PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hancock KE, Noel V, Ryugo DK, Delgutte B (2010) Neural coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants: effects of congenital deafness. J Neurosci 30(42):14068–14079PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hancock KE, Chung Y, Delgutte B (2012) Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter. J Neurophysiol 108(3):714–728PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hancock KE, Chung Y, Delgutte B (2012) Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter. J Neurophysiol 108(3):714–728PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ihlefeld A, Litovsky RY (2012) Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening. PLoS One 7(9):e45296PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ihlefeld A, Litovsky RY (2012) Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening. PLoS One 7(9):e45296PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ihlefeld A, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2008) Disentangling the effects of spatial cues on selection and formation of auditory objects. J Acoust Soc Am 124:2224–2235CrossRefPubMed Ihlefeld A, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2008) Disentangling the effects of spatial cues on selection and formation of auditory objects. J Acoust Soc Am 124:2224–2235CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ihlefeld A, Kan A, Litovsky RY (2014) Across-frequency combination of interaural time difference in bilateral cochlear implant listeners. Front Syst Neurosci 8:22. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00022 Ihlefeld A, Kan A, Litovsky RY (2014) Across-frequency combination of interaural time difference in bilateral cochlear implant listeners. Front Syst Neurosci 8:22. doi:10.​3389/​fnsys.​2014.​00022
go back to reference Javel E, Viemeister NF (2000) Stochastic properties of cat auditory nerve responses to electric and acoustic stimuli and application to intensity discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 107(2):908–921CrossRefPubMed Javel E, Viemeister NF (2000) Stochastic properties of cat auditory nerve responses to electric and acoustic stimuli and application to intensity discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 107(2):908–921CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kidd G Jr, Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Gallun FJ (2005) The advantage of knowing where to listen. J Acoust Soc Am 118(6):3804–3815CrossRefPubMed Kidd G Jr, Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Gallun FJ (2005) The advantage of knowing where to listen. J Acoust Soc Am 118(6):3804–3815CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Klein SA (2001) Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary. Percept Psychophys 63:1421–1455CrossRefPubMed Klein SA (2001) Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary. Percept Psychophys 63:1421–1455CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kong YY, Deeks JM, Axon PR, Carlyon RP (2009) Limits of temporal pitch in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 125:1649–1657CrossRefPubMed Kong YY, Deeks JM, Axon PR, Carlyon RP (2009) Limits of temporal pitch in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 125:1649–1657CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Laback B, Majdak P (2008) Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(2):814–817PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Laback B, Majdak P (2008) Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(2):814–817PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Laback B, Pok SM, Baumgartner WD, Deutsch WA, Schmid K (2004) Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors. Ear Hear 25(5):488–500CrossRefPubMed Laback B, Pok SM, Baumgartner WD, Deutsch WA, Schmid K (2004) Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors. Ear Hear 25(5):488–500CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Laback B, Majdak P, Baumgartner WD (2007) Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 121:2182–2191CrossRefPubMed Laback B, Majdak P, Baumgartner WD (2007) Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 121:2182–2191CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Laback B, Egger K, Majdak P (2015) Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res 322:138–150 Laback B, Egger K, Majdak P (2015) Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res 322:138–150
go back to reference Landsberger DM, McKay CM (2005) Perceptual differences between low and high rates of stimulation on single electrodes for cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 117:319–327CrossRefPubMed Landsberger DM, McKay CM (2005) Perceptual differences between low and high rates of stimulation on single electrodes for cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 117:319–327CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Litovsky RY, Jones GL, Agrawal S, van Hoesel R (2010) Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 127:400–414PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Litovsky RY, Jones GL, Agrawal S, van Hoesel R (2010) Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 127:400–414PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Litvak LM, Delgutte B, Eddington DK (2001) Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains. J Acoust Soc Am 110:368–379PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Litvak LM, Delgutte B, Eddington DK (2001) Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains. J Acoust Soc Am 110:368–379PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Loizou PC, Hu Y, Litovsky RY, Yu G, Peters R, Lake J, Roland P (2009) Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting. J Acoust Soc Am 125(1):372–383PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Loizou PC, Hu Y, Litovsky RY, Yu G, Peters R, Lake J, Roland P (2009) Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting. J Acoust Soc Am 125(1):372–383PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Macherey O, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP (2011) Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:233–251PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Macherey O, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP (2011) Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:233–251PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Maddox RK, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2012) Influence of task-relevant and task-irrelevant feature continuity on selective auditory attention. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 13(1):119–129PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Maddox RK, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2012) Influence of task-relevant and task-irrelevant feature continuity on selective auditory attention. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 13(1):119–129PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Majdak P, Laback B, Baumgartner WD (2006) Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 120(4):2190–2201CrossRefPubMed Majdak P, Laback B, Baumgartner WD (2006) Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 120(4):2190–2201CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McDermott HJ, McKay CM (1997) Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 101(3):1622–1631CrossRefPubMed McDermott HJ, McKay CM (1997) Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 101(3):1622–1631CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Carlyon RP (2000) Place and temporal cues in pitch perception: are they truly independent? Acoust Res Lett Online 1(1):25–30CrossRef McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Carlyon RP (2000) Place and temporal cues in pitch perception: are they truly independent? Acoust Res Lett Online 1(1):25–30CrossRef
go back to reference Rakerd B, Hartmann WM (2004) Localization of noise in a reverberant environment. In: Pressnitzer D, de Cheveigne A, McAdams S, Collet L (eds) Auditory signal processing: physiology, psychoacoustics, and models. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 414–422 Rakerd B, Hartmann WM (2004) Localization of noise in a reverberant environment. In: Pressnitzer D, de Cheveigne A, McAdams S, Collet L (eds) Auditory signal processing: physiology, psychoacoustics, and models. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 414–422
go back to reference Rakerd B, Aaronson NL, Hartmann WM (2006) Release from speech-on-speech masking by adding a delayed masker at a different location. J Acoust Soc Am 119(3):1597–1605CrossRefPubMed Rakerd B, Aaronson NL, Hartmann WM (2006) Release from speech-on-speech masking by adding a delayed masker at a different location. J Acoust Soc Am 119(3):1597–1605CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Seeber BU, Fastl H (2008) Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 123(2):1030–1042CrossRefPubMed Seeber BU, Fastl H (2008) Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 123(2):1030–1042CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shannon RV (1983) Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear Res 11(2):157–189CrossRefPubMed Shannon RV (1983) Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear Res 11(2):157–189CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shepherd RK, Javel E (1997) Electric stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Hear Res 108:112–144CrossRefPubMed Shepherd RK, Javel E (1997) Electric stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Hear Res 108:112–144CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Smith ZM, Delgutte B (2007) Sensitivity to interaural time differences in the inferior colliculus with bilateral cochlear implants. J Neurosci 27(25):6740–6750PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Smith ZM, Delgutte B (2007) Sensitivity to interaural time differences in the inferior colliculus with bilateral cochlear implants. J Neurosci 27(25):6740–6750PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Takesian AE, Kotak VC, Sanes DH (2009) Developmental hearing loss disrupts synaptic inhibition: implications for auditory processing. Future Neurol 4(3):331–349PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Takesian AE, Kotak VC, Sanes DH (2009) Developmental hearing loss disrupts synaptic inhibition: implications for auditory processing. Future Neurol 4(3):331–349PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tong YC, Clark GM (1985) Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 77(5):1881–1888CrossRefPubMed Tong YC, Clark GM (1985) Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 77(5):1881–1888CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tong YC, Clark GM, Blamey PJ, Busby PA, Dowell RC (1982) Psychophysical studies for two multiple‐channel cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 71(1):153–160CrossRefPubMed Tong YC, Clark GM, Blamey PJ, Busby PA, Dowell RC (1982) Psychophysical studies for two multiple‐channel cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 71(1):153–160CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Townshend B, Cotter N, Van Compernolle D, White RL (1987) Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 82(1):106–115CrossRefPubMed Townshend B, Cotter N, Van Compernolle D, White RL (1987) Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 82(1):106–115CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Hoesel RJM (2007) Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 121:2192–2206CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJM (2007) Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 121:2192–2206CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Hoesel RJ (2008) Observer weighting of level and timing cues in bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 124(6):3861–3872CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJ (2008) Observer weighting of level and timing cues in bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 124(6):3861–3872CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Hoesel RJM, Tyler RS (2003) Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 113:1617–1630CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJM, Tyler RS (2003) Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 113:1617–1630CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Hoesel RJM, Ramsden R, Odriscoll M (2002) Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user. Ear Hear 23:137–149CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJM, Ramsden R, Odriscoll M (2002) Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user. Ear Hear 23:137–149CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Hoesel R, Böhm M, Pesch J, Vandali A, Battmer RD, Lenarz T (2008) Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies. J Acoust Soc Am 123:2249–2263CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel R, Böhm M, Pesch J, Vandali A, Battmer RD, Lenarz T (2008) Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies. J Acoust Soc Am 123:2249–2263CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Hoesel RJ, Jones GL, Litovsky RY (2009) Interaural time-delay sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users: effects of pulse rate, modulation rate, and place of stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 10(4):557–567PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJ, Jones GL, Litovsky RY (2009) Interaural time-delay sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users: effects of pulse rate, modulation rate, and place of stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 10(4):557–567PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Venter PJ, Hanekom JJ (2014) Is there a fundamental 300 Hz limit to pulse rate discrimination in cochlear implants? J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15:(849:866) Venter PJ, Hanekom JJ (2014) Is there a fundamental 300 Hz limit to pulse rate discrimination in cochlear implants? J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15:(849:866)
go back to reference Xu R (2003) Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Stat Med 22(22):3527–3541CrossRefPubMed Xu R (2003) Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Stat Med 22(22):3527–3541CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners
Authors
Antje Ihlefeld
Robert P. Carlyon
Alan Kan
Tyler H. Churchill
Ruth Y. Litovsky
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-015-0527-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 5/2015 Go to the issue