Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 4/2009

01-12-2009

Interaural Time-Delay Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Pulse Rate, Modulation Rate, and Place of Stimulation

Authors: Richard J.M. van Hoesel, Gary L. Jones, Ruth Y. Litovsky

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Electrical interaural time delay (ITD) discrimination was measured using 300-ms bursts applied to binaural pitch matched electrodes at basal, mid, and apical locations in each ear. Six bilateral implant users, who had previously shown good ITD sensitivity at a pulse rate of 100 pulses per second (pps), were assessed. Thresholds were measured as a function of pulse rate between 100 and 1,000 Hz, as well as modulation rate over that same range for high-rate pulse trains at 6,000 pps. Results were similar for all three places of stimulation and showed decreasing ITD sensitivity as either pulse rate or modulation rate increased, although the extent of that effect varied across subjects. The results support a model comprising a common ITD mechanism for high- and low-frequency places of stimulation, which, for electrical stimulation, is rate-limited in the same way across electrodes because peripheral temporal responses are largely place invariant. Overall, ITD sensitivity was somewhat better with unmodulated pulse trains than with high-rate pulse trains modulated at matched rates, although comparisons at individual rates showed that difference to be significant only at 300 Hz. Electrodes presenting with the lowest thresholds at 600 Hz were further assessed using bursts with a ramped onset of 10 ms. The slower rise time resulted in decreased performance in four of the listeners, but not in the two best performers, indicating that those two could use ongoing cues at 600 Hz. Performance at each place was also measured using single-pulse stimuli. Comparison of those data with the unmodulated 300-ms burst thresholds showed that on average, the addition of ongoing cues beyond the onset enhanced overall ITD sensitivity at 100 and 300 Hz, but not at 600 Hz. At 1,000 Hz, the added ongoing cues actually decreased performance. That result is attributed to the introduction of ambiguous cues within the physiologically relevant range and increased dichotic firing.
Literature
go back to reference Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C. Detection of interaural delay in high-frequency SAM tones, two-tone complexes, and bands of noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:3561–3567, 1994.CrossRefPubMed Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C. Detection of interaural delay in high-frequency SAM tones, two-tone complexes, and bands of noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:3561–3567, 1994.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C. Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using transposed stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112(3):1026–1036, 2002.CrossRefPubMed Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C. Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using transposed stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112(3):1026–1036, 2002.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Colurn HS, Equissaud P. An auditory-nerve model for interaural time discrimination of high-frequency complex stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 159:523, 1976. Colurn HS, Equissaud P. An auditory-nerve model for interaural time discrimination of high-frequency complex stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 159:523, 1976.
go back to reference Colburn HS, Chung Y, Zhou Y, Brughera A. Models of brainstem responses to bilateral electrical stimulation. JARO, 10:91–110, 2008.CrossRef Colburn HS, Chung Y, Zhou Y, Brughera A. Models of brainstem responses to bilateral electrical stimulation. JARO, 10:91–110, 2008.CrossRef
go back to reference Foster DH, Bischof WF. Thresholds from psychometric functions: superiority of bootstrap to incremental and probit variance estimators. Psychol. Bull. 109:152–159, 1991.CrossRef Foster DH, Bischof WF. Thresholds from psychometric functions: superiority of bootstrap to incremental and probit variance estimators. Psychol. Bull. 109:152–159, 1991.CrossRef
go back to reference Green DM, Swets JA. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York, Wiley, 1966. Green DM, Swets JA. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York, Wiley, 1966.
go back to reference Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 28:524–41, 2007.CrossRefPubMed Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 28:524–41, 2007.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hafter ER, Buell TN. Restarting the adapted binaural system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 88:806–812, 1990.CrossRefPubMed Hafter ER, Buell TN. Restarting the adapted binaural system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 88:806–812, 1990.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hafter ER, Dye RH, Jr. Detection of interaural differences of time in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 73(5):1708–1713, 1983.CrossRefPubMed Hafter ER, Dye RH, Jr. Detection of interaural differences of time in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 73(5):1708–1713, 1983.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Javel E, Shepherd RK. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hear. Res. 140:45–76, 2000.CrossRefPubMed Javel E, Shepherd RK. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hear. Res. 140:45–76, 2000.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jones GL, Litovsky RY, Agrawal SS, van Hoesel RJM. Effect of Stimulation Rate and Interaural Electrode Pairing on ITD Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users, Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Asilomar, USA, July 2005. Jones GL, Litovsky RY, Agrawal SS, van Hoesel RJM. Effect of Stimulation Rate and Interaural Electrode Pairing on ITD Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users, Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Asilomar, USA, July 2005.
go back to reference Jones GL, Litovsky RY, Agrawal SS, van Hoesel RJM. “Effect of Stimulation Rate and Modulation Rate on ITD Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users”, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 29th Midwinter Meeting, 2006. Jones GL, Litovsky RY, Agrawal SS, van Hoesel RJM. “Effect of Stimulation Rate and Modulation Rate on ITD Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users”, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 29th Midwinter Meeting, 2006.
go back to reference Jones G, van Hoesel R, Litovsky R. Effect of channel interactions on sensitivity to binaural timing cues in electrical hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123(5):3055, 2008.CrossRef Jones G, van Hoesel R, Litovsky R. Effect of channel interactions on sensitivity to binaural timing cues in electrical hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123(5):3055, 2008.CrossRef
go back to reference Klumpp RG, Eady HR. Some measurements of interaural time difference thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28:859–860, 1956.CrossRef Klumpp RG, Eady HR. Some measurements of interaural time difference thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28:859–860, 1956.CrossRef
go back to reference Laback B, Majdak P. Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates. PNAS 105(2):814–817, 2008.CrossRefPubMed Laback B, Majdak P. Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates. PNAS 105(2):814–817, 2008.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Laback B, Majdak P, Baumgartner W-D. Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 121:2182–2192, 2007.CrossRefPubMed Laback B, Majdak P, Baumgartner W-D. Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 121:2182–2192, 2007.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Levitt H, Rabiner LR. Predicting binaural gain in intelligibility and release form masking for speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42:820–829, 1962.CrossRef Levitt H, Rabiner LR. Predicting binaural gain in intelligibility and release form masking for speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42:820–829, 1962.CrossRef
go back to reference Litovsky RY, Agrawal SS, Jones GJ, Henry B, Van Hoesel RJM. Effect of interaural electrode pairing on binaural sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users. Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 28th Midwinter Meeting, 2005. Litovsky RY, Agrawal SS, Jones GJ, Henry B, Van Hoesel RJM. Effect of interaural electrode pairing on binaural sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users. Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 28th Midwinter Meeting, 2005.
go back to reference Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Sammeth C. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: A multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear. 27:714–731, 2006.CrossRefPubMed Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Sammeth C. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: A multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear. 27:714–731, 2006.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference MacMillan NA, Creelman CD. Detection Theory, A User’s Guide, 2nd Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey, USA, 2005. ISBN 0-8058-4231-4. MacMillan NA, Creelman CD. Detection Theory, A User’s Guide, 2nd Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey, USA, 2005. ISBN 0-8058-4231-4.
go back to reference Majdak P, Laback B, Baumgartner W-D. Effects of interaural time differences in fine-structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120:2190–2201, 2006.CrossRefPubMed Majdak P, Laback B, Baumgartner W-D. Effects of interaural time differences in fine-structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120:2190–2201, 2006.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McAlpine D, Grothe B. Sound localization and delay lines—Do mammals fit the model? Trends NeuroSci. 26:347–350, 2003.CrossRefPubMed McAlpine D, Grothe B. Sound localization and delay lines—Do mammals fit the model? Trends NeuroSci. 26:347–350, 2003.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Neumann AC, Haravon A, Sislian N, Waltzman SB. Sound-direction identification with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 28:73–82, 2007.CrossRef Neumann AC, Haravon A, Sislian N, Waltzman SB. Sound-direction identification with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 28:73–82, 2007.CrossRef
go back to reference Nopp P, Schleich P, D'Haese P. Sound localization in bilateral users of Med-El Combi 40/40+ cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 25:205–214, 2004.CrossRefPubMed Nopp P, Schleich P, D'Haese P. Sound localization in bilateral users of Med-El Combi 40/40+ cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 25:205–214, 2004.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Oxenham AJ, Bernstein JGW, Penagos H. Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. PNAS. 101:1421–1425, 2004.CrossRefPubMed Oxenham AJ, Bernstein JGW, Penagos H. Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. PNAS. 101:1421–1425, 2004.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Saberi K. Observer weighting of interaural delays in filtered impulses. Percept. Psychophys. 58:1037–1046, 1996.PubMed Saberi K. Observer weighting of interaural delays in filtered impulses. Percept. Psychophys. 58:1037–1046, 1996.PubMed
go back to reference Stakhovskaya O, Sridar D, Bonham BH, Leake PA. Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: Implications for cochlear implants. JARO. 8:220–233, 2007.CrossRefPubMed Stakhovskaya O, Sridar D, Bonham BH, Leake PA. Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: Implications for cochlear implants. JARO. 8:220–233, 2007.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Stecker GC, Hafter ER. Temporal weighting in sound localization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112:1046–1057, 2002.CrossRefPubMed Stecker GC, Hafter ER. Temporal weighting in sound localization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112:1046–1057, 2002.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van de Par S, Kohlrausch A. A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:1671–1680, 1997.CrossRefPubMed van de Par S, Kohlrausch A. A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:1671–1680, 1997.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Hoesel RJ. Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol. Neurootol 9:234–246, 2004.CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJ. Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol. Neurootol 9:234–246, 2004.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Hoesel RJM. Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121:2192–2206, 2007.CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJM. Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121:2192–2206, 2007.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Hoesel RJM. Observer weighting of level and timing cues in bilateral cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124:3861–3872, 2008.CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJM. Observer weighting of level and timing cues in bilateral cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124:3861–3872, 2008.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Hoesel RJM, Tyler RS. Speech perception and localization with bilateral cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:1617–1630, 2003.CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJM, Tyler RS. Speech perception and localization with bilateral cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:1617–1630, 2003.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Hoesel R, Böhm M, Pesch J, Vandali A, Battmer RD, Lenarz T. Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123:2249–2263, 2008.CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel R, Böhm M, Pesch J, Vandali A, Battmer RD, Lenarz T. Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123:2249–2263, 2008.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wightman F, Kistler DJ. The dominant role of low frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:1648–1661, 1992.CrossRefPubMed Wightman F, Kistler DJ. The dominant role of low frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:1648–1661, 1992.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Interaural Time-Delay Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Pulse Rate, Modulation Rate, and Place of Stimulation
Authors
Richard J.M. van Hoesel
Gary L. Jones
Ruth Y. Litovsky
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-009-0175-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 4/2009 Go to the issue