Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 1/2012

01-02-2012

Influence of Task-Relevant and Task-Irrelevant Feature Continuity on Selective Auditory Attention

Authors: Ross K. Maddox, Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Past studies have explored the relative strengths of auditory features in a selective attention task by pitting features against one another and asking listeners to report the words perceived in a given sentence. While these studies show that the continuity of competing features affects streaming, they did not address whether the influence of specific features is modulated by volitionally directed attention. Here, we explored whether the continuity of a task-irrelevant feature affects the ability to selectively report one of two competing speech streams when attention is specifically directed to a different feature. Sequences of simultaneous pairs of spoken digits were presented in which exactly one digit of each pair matched a primer phrase in pitch and exactly one digit of each pair matched the primer location. Within a trial, location and pitch were randomly paired; they either were consistent with each other from digit to digit or were switched (e.g., the sequence from the primer's location changed pitch across digits). In otherwise identical blocks, listeners were instructed to report digits matching the primer either in location or in pitch. Listeners were told to ignore the irrelevant feature, if possible, in order to perform well. Listener responses depended on task instructions, proving that top–down attention alters how a subject performs the task. Performance improved when the separation of the target and masker in the task-relevant feature increased. Importantly, the values of the task-irrelevant feature also influenced performance in some cases. Specifically, when instructed to attend location, listeners performed worse as the separation between target and masker pitch increased, especially when the spatial separation between digits was small. These results indicate that task-relevant and task-irrelevant features are perceptually bound together: continuity of task-irrelevant features influences selective attention in an automatic, obligatory manner, consistent with the idea that auditory attention operates on objects.
Literature
go back to reference Best V, Ozmeral EJ et al (2007) Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8(2):294–304PubMedCrossRef Best V, Ozmeral EJ et al (2007) Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8(2):294–304PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Best V, Ozmeral EJ et al (2008) Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105(35):13174–13178PubMedCrossRef Best V, Ozmeral EJ et al (2008) Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105(35):13174–13178PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Blaser E, Pylyshyn ZW et al (2000) Tracking an object through feature space. Nature 408(6809):196–199PubMedCrossRef Blaser E, Pylyshyn ZW et al (2000) Tracking an object through feature space. Nature 408(6809):196–199PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bregman AS (1990) Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press, Cambridge Bregman AS (1990) Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Brungart DS, Simpson BD (2002) The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal. J Acoust Soc Am 112(2):664–676PubMedCrossRef Brungart DS, Simpson BD (2002) The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal. J Acoust Soc Am 112(2):664–676PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Brungart DS, Simpson BD (2007) Effect of target-masker similarity on across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task. J Acoust Soc Am 122(3):1724PubMedCrossRef Brungart DS, Simpson BD (2007) Effect of target-masker similarity on across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task. J Acoust Soc Am 122(3):1724PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Carlyon RP, Cusack R et al (2001) Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27(1):115–127PubMedCrossRef Carlyon RP, Cusack R et al (2001) Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27(1):115–127PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cusack R, Carlyon RP et al (2000) Neglect between but not within auditory objects. J Cogn Neurosci 12(6):1056–1065PubMedCrossRef Cusack R, Carlyon RP et al (2000) Neglect between but not within auditory objects. J Cogn Neurosci 12(6):1056–1065PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cusack R, Deeks J et al (2004) Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30(4):643–656PubMedCrossRef Cusack R, Deeks J et al (2004) Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30(4):643–656PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Darwin CJ, Carlyon RP (1995) Auditory grouping. In: Moore BCJ (ed) Hearing. Academic, San Diego, pp 387–424CrossRef Darwin CJ, Carlyon RP (1995) Auditory grouping. In: Moore BCJ (ed) Hearing. Academic, San Diego, pp 387–424CrossRef
go back to reference Darwin CJ, Hukin RW (1999) Auditory objects of attention: the role of interaural time differences. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25(3):617–629PubMedCrossRef Darwin CJ, Hukin RW (1999) Auditory objects of attention: the role of interaural time differences. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25(3):617–629PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Darwin CJ, Hukin RW (2000a) Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention. J Acoust Soc Am 107(2):970–977PubMedCrossRef Darwin CJ, Hukin RW (2000a) Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention. J Acoust Soc Am 107(2):970–977PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Darwin CJ, Hukin RW (2000b) Effects of reverberation on spatial, prosodic, and vocal-tract size cues to selective attention. J Acoust Soc Am 108(1):335–342PubMedCrossRef Darwin CJ, Hukin RW (2000b) Effects of reverberation on spatial, prosodic, and vocal-tract size cues to selective attention. J Acoust Soc Am 108(1):335–342PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Darwin CJ, Brungart DS et al (2003) Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers. J Acoust Soc Am 114(5):2913–2922PubMedCrossRef Darwin CJ, Brungart DS et al (2003) Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers. J Acoust Soc Am 114(5):2913–2922PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Desimone R, Duncan J (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 18:193–222PubMedCrossRef Desimone R, Duncan J (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 18:193–222PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Eramudugolla R, Irvine DR et al (2005) Directed attention eliminates ‘change deafness’ in complex auditory scenes. Curr Biol 15(12):1108–1113PubMedCrossRef Eramudugolla R, Irvine DR et al (2005) Directed attention eliminates ‘change deafness’ in complex auditory scenes. Curr Biol 15(12):1108–1113PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Freyman RL, Helfer KS et al (1999) The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. J Acoust Soc Am 106(6):3578–3588PubMedCrossRef Freyman RL, Helfer KS et al (1999) The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. J Acoust Soc Am 106(6):3578–3588PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Helfer KS, Freyman RL (2009) Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech. J Acoust Soc Am 125(1):447–456PubMedCrossRef Helfer KS, Freyman RL (2009) Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech. J Acoust Soc Am 125(1):447–456PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ihlefeld A, Shinn-Cunningham B (2008a) Disentangling the effects of spatial cues on selection and formation of auditory objects. J Acoust Soc Am 124(4):2224–2235PubMedCrossRef Ihlefeld A, Shinn-Cunningham B (2008a) Disentangling the effects of spatial cues on selection and formation of auditory objects. J Acoust Soc Am 124(4):2224–2235PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ihlefeld A, Shinn-Cunningham B (2008b) Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a selective speech identification task. J Acoust Soc Am 123(6):4369–4379PubMedCrossRef Ihlefeld A, Shinn-Cunningham B (2008b) Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a selective speech identification task. J Acoust Soc Am 123(6):4369–4379PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kidd G Jr, Arbogast TL et al (2005) The advantage of knowing where to listen. J Acoust Soc Am 118(6):3804–3815PubMedCrossRef Kidd G Jr, Arbogast TL et al (2005) The advantage of knowing where to listen. J Acoust Soc Am 118(6):3804–3815PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Macken WJ, Tremblay S et al (2003) Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29(1):43–51PubMedCrossRef Macken WJ, Tremblay S et al (2003) Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29(1):43–51PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Marrone N, Mason CR et al (2008) Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task. J Acoust Soc Am 124(2):1146–1158PubMedCrossRef Marrone N, Mason CR et al (2008) Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task. J Acoust Soc Am 124(2):1146–1158PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rakerd B, Aaronson NL et al (2006) Release from speech-on-speech masking by adding a delayed masker at a different location. J Acoust Soc Am 119(3):1597–1605PubMedCrossRef Rakerd B, Aaronson NL et al (2006) Release from speech-on-speech masking by adding a delayed masker at a different location. J Acoust Soc Am 119(3):1597–1605PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shinn-Cunningham BG (2008) Object-based auditory and visual attention. Trends Cogn Sci 12(5):182–186PubMedCrossRef Shinn-Cunningham BG (2008) Object-based auditory and visual attention. Trends Cogn Sci 12(5):182–186PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shinn-Cunningham BG, Best V (2008) Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing. Trends Amplif 12(4):283–299PubMedCrossRef Shinn-Cunningham BG, Best V (2008) Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing. Trends Amplif 12(4):283–299PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shinn-Cunningham BG, Kopco N et al (2005) Localizing nearby sound sources in a classroom: binaural room impulse responses. J Acoust Soc Am 117(5):3100–3115PubMedCrossRef Shinn-Cunningham BG, Kopco N et al (2005) Localizing nearby sound sources in a classroom: binaural room impulse responses. J Acoust Soc Am 117(5):3100–3115PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of Task-Relevant and Task-Irrelevant Feature Continuity on Selective Auditory Attention
Authors
Ross K. Maddox
Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-011-0299-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 1/2012 Go to the issue