Top

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Published in:

01-12-2009

Discrimination of Time-Reversed Harmonic Complexes by Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Authors: Amanda M. Lauer, Michelle Molis, Marjorie R. Leek

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 4/2009

Abstract

Normal-hearing (NH) listeners and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners detected and discriminated time-reversed harmonic complexes constructed of equal-amplitude harmonic components with fundamental frequencies (F0s) ranging from 50 to 800 Hz. Component starting phases were selected according to the positive and negative Schroeder-phase algorithms to produce within-period frequency sweeps with relatively flat temporal envelopes. Detection thresholds were not affected by component starting phases for either group of listeners. At presentation levels of 80 dB SPL, NH listeners could discriminate the two waveforms nearly perfectly when the F0s were less than 300–400 Hz but fell to chance performance for higher F0s. HI listeners performed significantly poorer, with reduced discrimination at several of the F0s. In contrast, at a lower presentation level meant to nearly equate sensation levels for the two groups, NH listeners’ discrimination was poorer than HI listeners at most F0s. Roving presentation levels had little effect on performance by NH listeners but reduced performance by HI listeners. The differential impact of roving level suggests a weaker perception of timbre differences and a greater susceptibility to the detrimental effects of experimental uncertainty in HI listeners.

ANSI. Specifications for audiometers. Washington, DC, ANSI, 2004, ANSI S3.6–2004.

Aitken M. Modeling variance heterogeneity in normal regressing using GLIM. Appl. Stat. 36:332–339, 1987.CrossRef

Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Kidd G, Jr. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117:2169–2180, 2005.CrossRefPubMed

Beck DL, Clark JL. Audition matters more as cognition declines: cognition matters more as audition declines. Audiology Today 21:48–59, 2009.

Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy Stat. Soc. Series B 57:289–300, 1995.

Buss E, Hall JW, Grose JH. Temporal fine-structure cues to speech and pure tone modulation in observers with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 25:242–250, 2004.CrossRefPubMed

Buus S, Florentine M. Gap detection in normal and impaired listeners: The effect of level and frequency. In: Michelson A (ed) Time resolution in the auditory system. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, pp. 159–179, 1985.

Carlyon RP, Datta AJ. Masking period patterns of Schroeder-phase complexes: Effects of level, number of components, and phase of flanking components. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:3648–3657, 1997.CrossRefPubMed

deBoer E. Auditory time constants: A paradox? In: Michelsen A (ed) Time Resolution in Auditory Systems. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1985.

Dooling RJ, Leek MR, Gleich O, Dent ML. Auditory temporal resolution in birds: Discrimination of harmonic complexes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112:748–759, 2002.CrossRefPubMed

Drennan WR, Longnion JK, Ruffin C, Rubinstein JT. Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 9:138–149, 2008.CrossRefPubMed

Duifhuis H. Consequences of peripheral frequency selectivity for nonsimultaneous masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54:1471–1488, 1973.CrossRefPubMed

Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Temporal gap resolution in listeners with high frequency hearing loss. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81:133–137, 1987.CrossRefPubMed

Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:3140–45, 1995.CrossRefPubMed

Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Aging and temporal discrimination in auditory sequences. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109:2955–2963, 2001.CrossRefPubMed

Fitzgibbons PJ, Wightman FL. Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:761–765, 1982.CrossRefPubMed

Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. Hoboken, Wiley, 2004.

Florentine M, Buus S. Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments. J. Speech Hear. Res. 27:449–455, 1984.PubMed

Frisina DR, Frisina RD. Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hear Res. 106:5–104, 1997.CrossRef

Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79:1020–1033, 1986.CrossRefPubMed

Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res. 47:103–138, 1990.CrossRefPubMed

Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ, Bacon S. Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81:1546–1556, 1987.CrossRefPubMed

Gordon-Salant S. Age-related differences in speech recognition performance as a function of test format and paradigm. Ear. Hear 8:277–282, 1987.PubMedCrossRef

Grant KW, Summers V, Leek MR. Modulation rate detection and discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104:1051–1060, 1998.CrossRefPubMed

Hopkins K, Moore BCJ. Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122:1055–1068, 2007.CrossRefPubMed

Hopkins K, Moore BCJ, Stone MA. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123:1140–1153, 2008.CrossRefPubMed

Humes LE. Do ‘auditory processing’ tests measure auditory processing in the elderly? Ear. Hear. 26:109–119, 2005.CrossRefPubMed

Irwin RJ, Purdy SC. The minimum detectable duration of auditory signals for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71:967–974, 1982.CrossRefPubMed

Irwin RJ, Hinchcliff LK, Kemp S. Temporal acuity in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology 20:234–243, 1981.CrossRefPubMed

Jesteadt W, Bilger RC, Green DM, Patterson JH. Temporal acuity in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J. Speech Hrg. Res. 19:357–370, 1976.

Kidd G, Jr, Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Walsh CM. Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3:107–199, 2002.CrossRefPubMed

Kidd G, Jr, Mason CR, Richards VM, Gallun FJ, Durlach N. Informational masking. In: Yost WA, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Auditory Perception of Sound Sources. New York, Springer-Verlag, 2008.

Kohlrausch A, Sander A. Phase effects in masking related to dispersion in the inner ear II. Masking period patterns of short targets. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97:1817–1829, 1995.CrossRefPubMed

Kubli L, Leek MR, Dreisbach LE. Acoustic reflexes to Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals. Hear. Res. 202:1–12, 2005.CrossRefPubMed

Lauer AM, Dooling RJ, Leek MR, Lentz JJ. Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes in three species of birds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119:1251–1259, 2006.CrossRefPubMed

Lauer AM, Dooling RJ, Leek MR, Poling K. Detection and discrimination of simple and complex sounds by hearing-impaired Belgian Waterslager canaries. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122:3615–3627, 2007.CrossRefPubMed

Leek MR, Dent ML, Dooling RJ. Masking by harmonic complexes in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107:1737–1744, 2000.CrossRefPubMed

Lentz JJ, Leek MR. Psychophysical estimates of cochlear phase response: Masking by harmonic complexes. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2:408–422, 2001.CrossRefPubMed

Lentz JJ, Leek MR. Decision strategies of hearing-impaired listeners in spectral shape discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111:1389–1398, 2002.CrossRefPubMed

Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49:467–477, 1971.CrossRefPubMed

Lorenzi C, Gilbert G, Carn H, Garnier S, Moore BCJ. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 103:18866–18869, 2006.CrossRefPubMed

Lorenzi C, Debruille L, Garnier S, Fleuriot P. Abnormal processing of temporal fine structure in speech for frequencies where absolute thresholds are normal (L). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125:27–30, 2009.CrossRefPubMed

Mauermann M, Hohmann V. Differences in loudness of positive and negative Schroeder-phase tone complexes as a function of the fundamental frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121:1028–1039, 2007.CrossRefPubMed

Moore BCJ. The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 9:399–406, 2008.CrossRefPubMed

Moore BCJ, Sek A. Development of a fast method for determining sensitivity to temporal fine structure. Int. J. Aud. 48:161–171, 2009.CrossRef

Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Hopkins K. Frequency discrimination of complex tones by hearing-impaired subjects: Evidence for loss of ability to use temporal fine structure. Hear. Res. 222:16–27, 2006.CrossRefPubMed

Oxenham AJ, Dau T. Towards a measure of auditory-filter phase response. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110:3169–3178, 2001.CrossRefPubMed

Oxenham AJ, Dau T. Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: Evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116:2248–2257, 2004.CrossRefPubMed

Pichora-Fuller MK, Schneider BA, MacDonald E, Pass HE, Brown S. Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: A simulation of auditory aging. Hear. Res. 223:114–121, 2007.CrossRefPubMed

Preece JP, Wilson RH. Detection, loudness, and discrimination of five-component tonal complexes differing in crest factor. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84:166–171, 1988.CrossRefPubMed

Recio A, Rhode WS. Basilar membrane responses to broadband stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108:2281–2298, 2000.CrossRefPubMed

Schroeder MR. Synthesis of low-peak-factor signals and binary sequences with low autocorrelation. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 16:85–89, 1970.CrossRef

Smith BK, Sieben UK, Kolrausch A, Schroeder MR. Phase effects in masking related to dispersion in the inner ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80:1631–1637, 1986.CrossRefPubMed

Sommers MS, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB. Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear Implant listeners. I: The effects of response format. Ear. Hear. 18:89–99, 1997.CrossRefPubMed

Summers V, Leek MR. Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Hear. Res. 118:139–150, 1998.CrossRefPubMed

Summers V, de Boer E, Nuttall AL. Basilar-membrane responses to multicomponent (Schroeder-phase) signals: Understanding intensity effects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:294–306, 2003.CrossRefPubMed

Trainor LJ, Trehub SE. Aging and auditory temporal sequencing: ordering the elements of repeating tone patterns. Percept. Psychophys 45:417–426, 1989.PubMed

Tyler RS, Summerfield Q, Wood EJ, Fernandes MA. Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:740–752, 1982.CrossRefPubMed

Uppenkamp S, Fobel S, Patterson RD. The effects of temporal asymmetry on the detection and perception of short chirps. Hear. Res. 158:71–83, 2001.CrossRefPubMed

Verhoeven K, Simonsen K, McIntyre L. Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos 108:643–647, 2005.CrossRef

Watson CS, Kelly WJ, Wroton HW. Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 60:1176–1186, 1976.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Discrimination of Time-Reversed Harmonic Complexes by Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners
Authors: Amanda M. Lauer
Michelle Molis
Marjorie R. Leek
Publication date: 01-12-2009
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-009-0182-y

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Discrimination of Time-Reversed Harmonic Complexes by Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Processing Temporal Modulations in Binaural and Monaural Auditory Stimuli by Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus and Auditory Cortex

Otoacoustic Emission Theories and Behavioral Estimates of Human Basilar Membrane Motion Are Mutually Consistent

On- and Off-Frequency Forward Masking by Schroeder-Phase Complexes

Anatomy of the Distal Incus in Humans

Acoustic Clicks Activate both the Canal and Otolith Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Pathways in Behaving Monkeys

Dynamic Displacement of Normal and Detached Semicircular Canal Cupula