Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 2/2014

01-02-2014 | Original Article

Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications

Authors: J. Mäkelä-Kaikkonen, T. Rautio, K. Klintrup, H. Takala, M. Vierimaa, P. Ohtonen, J. Mäkelä

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy has been proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of rectal prolapse or intussusception. Robotic-assisted surgery may offer potential benefits to this operation. This study describes the comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in terms of clinical parameters, operative details, postoperative complications and short-term outcomes.

Methods

Twenty patients operated on for rectal prolapse or intussusception using the Da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale CA, USA) were prospectively followed for 3 months. The cases were pair-matched with laparoscopically operated controls from registry files.

Results

Mean operating time was 159 min (standard deviation; ±37 SD) and 153 min (±33 SD) and mean total time in the operating theatre 231 min (±39 SD) and 234 min (±41 SD) for robotic-assisted and laparoscopic operations, respectively. Mean blood loss was 25 ml (±49 SD) in robotic-assisted and 37 ml (±50 SD) in laparoscopic procedures. There was one (5 %) significant complication in each group. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.1 (±2 SD) and 3.3 (±1.3 SD) days for the robotic-assisted and laparoscopic groups, respectively. The subjective benefit rate was the same in both groups: 16/20 (80 %). One patient in the robotic-assisted group continued to have symptoms of obstructed defecation, and there was one recurrence of prolapse in the laparoscopic group.

Conclusions

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is safe, feasible and not more time consuming than the laparoscopic technique even at the beginning of the learning curve. The short-term results are comparable with those of laparoscopy. We found no arguments to support the routine use of robotic assistance in rectopexy operations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Penninckx F, D’Hoore A, Sohier S, Kerremans R (1997) Abdominal resection rectopexy versus Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse: a predictable outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:49–50PubMedCrossRef Penninckx F, D’Hoore A, Sohier S, Kerremans R (1997) Abdominal resection rectopexy versus Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse: a predictable outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:49–50PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Wong MT, Meurette G, Rigaud J, Regenet N, Lehur PA (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 54:342–346PubMedCrossRef Wong MT, Meurette G, Rigaud J, Regenet N, Lehur PA (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 54:342–346PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Heemskerk J, Zandbergen R, Maessen JG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2006) Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems. Surg Endosc 20:730–733PubMedCrossRef Heemskerk J, Zandbergen R, Maessen JG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2006) Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems. Surg Endosc 20:730–733PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Maeso S, Resa M, Mayol JA et al (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci Surgical System in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252:254–262PubMedCrossRef Maeso S, Resa M, Mayol JA et al (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci Surgical System in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252:254–262PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ayav A, Bresler L, Hubert J, Brunaud L, Boissel P (2005) Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Surg Endosc 19:1200–1203PubMedCrossRef Ayav A, Bresler L, Hubert J, Brunaud L, Boissel P (2005) Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Surg Endosc 19:1200–1203PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference de Hoog DE, Heemskerk J (2009) Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1201–1206PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef de Hoog DE, Heemskerk J (2009) Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1201–1206PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference D’Hoore A, Penninckx F (2006) Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 20:1919–1923PubMedCrossRef D’Hoore A, Penninckx F (2006) Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 20:1919–1923PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Heemskerk J, de Hoog D, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy MD (2007) Robot assisted vs conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1825–1830PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Heemskerk J, de Hoog D, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy MD (2007) Robot assisted vs conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1825–1830PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bokhari M, Patel C, Ramos-Valadez D, Ragupathi M, Haas E (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bokhari M, Patel C, Ramos-Valadez D, Ragupathi M, Haas E (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis P, Hanna GB (2012) Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4,852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1300–1310PubMedCrossRef Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis P, Hanna GB (2012) Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4,852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1300–1310PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lebeau T, Rouprêt M, Ferhi K et al (2011) The role of a well-trained team on the early learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures: the example of radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.1002/rcs435 PubMed Lebeau T, Rouprêt M, Ferhi K et al (2011) The role of a well-trained team on the early learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures: the example of radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.​1002/​rcs435 PubMed
15.
go back to reference Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:1–4PubMedCrossRef Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:1–4PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Chapman WH et al (2001) Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. Am Surg 234:475–484 Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Chapman WH et al (2001) Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. Am Surg 234:475–484
17.
go back to reference D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505PubMedCrossRef D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Slawik S, Soulsby R, Carter H, Payne H, Dixon AR (2008) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Colorectal Dis 10:138–143PubMed Slawik S, Soulsby R, Carter H, Payne H, Dixon AR (2008) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Colorectal Dis 10:138–143PubMed
19.
go back to reference Lauretta A, Bellomo RE, Galanti F, Tonizzo CA, Infantino A (2012) Laparoscopic low ventral rectocolpopexy (LLVR) for rectal and rectogenital prolapse: surgical technique and functional results. Tech Coloproctol 16:477–483PubMedCrossRef Lauretta A, Bellomo RE, Galanti F, Tonizzo CA, Infantino A (2012) Laparoscopic low ventral rectocolpopexy (LLVR) for rectal and rectogenital prolapse: surgical technique and functional results. Tech Coloproctol 16:477–483PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications
Authors
J. Mäkelä-Kaikkonen
T. Rautio
K. Klintrup
H. Takala
M. Vierimaa
P. Ohtonen
J. Mäkelä
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1042-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Techniques in Coloproctology 2/2014 Go to the issue