Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2006

01-12-2006 | Technique

Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients

Authors: A. D’Hoore, F. Penninckx

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The authors propose a new laparoscopic technique for correction of rectal prolapse. The unique feature of this technique is that it avoids any posterolateral dissection of the rectum. The mesh is sutured to the anterior aspect of the rectum to inhibit intussusception. The technique was applied in 109 consecutive patients to correct total rectal prolapse. Conversion was needed for four patients. No postoperative mortality or major morbidity occurred. Minor morbidity was noted for 7% of the patients, and a recurrence rate of 3.66% was observed. Because this technique limited the dissection and the subsequent risk of autonomic nerve damage, a cure comparable with that resulting from classical mesh rectopexy can be anticipated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brazzelli M, Bachoo P, Grant A (2004) Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults (Cochrane Review). From the Cochrane Library, Issue 2, Chichester, UK Brazzelli M, Bachoo P, Grant A (2004) Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults (Cochrane Review). From the Cochrane Library, Issue 2, Chichester, UK
2.
go back to reference Broden B, Snellman B (1968) Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography: a contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism. Dis Colon Rectum 11: 330–347PubMed Broden B, Snellman B (1968) Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography: a contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism. Dis Colon Rectum 11: 330–347PubMed
3.
go back to reference Brown AJ, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Finlay IG (2004) Strategy for selection of type of operation for rectal prolapse based on clinical criteria. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 103–107PubMedCrossRef Brown AJ, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Finlay IG (2004) Strategy for selection of type of operation for rectal prolapse based on clinical criteria. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 103–107PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. Roscoe Reid Graham 1890–1948 (1985) The operative repair of massive rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 28: 374–379 Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. Roscoe Reid Graham 1890–1948 (1985) The operative repair of massive rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 28: 374–379
5.
go back to reference D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91: 1500–1505PubMedCrossRef D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91: 1500–1505PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (1997) Functional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical management. Br J Surg 84: 904–911PubMedCrossRef Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (1997) Functional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical management. Br J Surg 84: 904–911PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Maliba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD (2005) Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 140: 63–73CrossRef Maliba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD (2005) Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 140: 63–73CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C, Dolk A, Uden R, Ahlback SO, Holmstrom B (1994) Defecography: results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1133–1141PubMedCrossRef Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C, Dolk A, Uden R, Ahlback SO, Holmstrom B (1994) Defecography: results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1133–1141PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mollen RM, Kuipers JH, Van Hoek F (2000) Effects of rectal mobilization and lateral ligaments division on colonic anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 1283–1287PubMedCrossRef Mollen RM, Kuipers JH, Van Hoek F (2000) Effects of rectal mobilization and lateral ligaments division on colonic anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 1283–1287PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Penninckx F, D’Hoore A, Sohier S, Kerremans R (1996) Abdominal rectopexy versus Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse: a predictable outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 12: 49–50CrossRef Penninckx F, D’Hoore A, Sohier S, Kerremans R (1996) Abdominal rectopexy versus Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse: a predictable outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 12: 49–50CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Salkeld G, Bagia M, Solomon M (2004) Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 91: 1188–1191PubMedCrossRef Salkeld G, Bagia M, Solomon M (2004) Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 91: 1188–1191PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Scaglia M, Fasth S, Hallgren T, Nordgren S, Oresland T, Hulten L (1994) Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: influence of surgical technique on functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 805–813PubMedCrossRef Scaglia M, Fasth S, Hallgren T, Nordgren S, Oresland T, Hulten L (1994) Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: influence of surgical technique on functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 805–813PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Senagore AJ (2003) Management of rectal prolapse: the role of laparoscopic approaches. Semin Laparosc Surg 10: 197–202PubMed Senagore AJ (2003) Management of rectal prolapse: the role of laparoscopic approaches. Semin Laparosc Surg 10: 197–202PubMed
14.
go back to reference Speakman CTM, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (1991) Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 78: 1431–1433PubMed Speakman CTM, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (1991) Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 78: 1431–1433PubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients
Authors
A. D’Hoore
F. Penninckx
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0485-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2006 Go to the issue

2006 Karl Storz Lecture in Innovative Technology

Surgeon responsibility in the era of “outrageous science”