Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Lasers in Medical Science 6/2021

Open Access 01-08-2021 | CO2 Laser | Original Article

Ablative laser surgery for allergic tattoo reactions: a retrospective study

Authors: S. A. S. van der Bent, Sanne Huisman, T. Rustemeyer, A. Wolkerstorfer

Published in: Lasers in Medical Science | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Patients with allergic tattoo reactions are burdened with itch and have a reduced quality of life. Conservative treatment is often insufficient and little is known about treatment options to remove the responsible allergen. We aimed to address the effectiveness and safety of ablative laser therapy including measurement of patient’s satisfaction, in patients with allergic reactions to tattoos. A retrospective study was conducted including patients with allergic tattoo reactions who were treated with a 10,600 nm ablative CO2 laser, either by full-surface ablation or fractional ablation. Clinical information originated from medical files and a 25-item questionnaire. Sixteen tattoo allergy patients were treated with a CO2 laser between January 2010 and January 2018. Fourteen patients completed the questionnaire. Ten patients were satisfied with laser treatment. On a visual analogue scale, pruritus and burning improved with a median of 5.5 and 4 points in the full surface ablation group and 3 points on both parameters in the fractional ablation group. Despite the relatively small group of patients, our results suggest that CO2 laser ablation improves itching, burning and impact on daily life in tattoo allergy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kluger N (2015) Epidemiology of tattoos in industrialized countries. Curr Probl Dermatol 48:6–20CrossRef Kluger N (2015) Epidemiology of tattoos in industrialized countries. Curr Probl Dermatol 48:6–20CrossRef
2.
go back to reference De Cuyper C (2009) Cosmetic and medical applications of tattooing. In: Cuyper CD, Pérez-Cotapos SML (eds) Dermatologic Complications with Body Art. Springer, Berlin De Cuyper C (2009) Cosmetic and medical applications of tattooing. In: Cuyper CD, Pérez-Cotapos SML (eds) Dermatologic Complications with Body Art. Springer, Berlin
3.
go back to reference Van der Bent SA, Wolkerstorfer A, Rustemeyer T (2016) Cutaneous adverse reactions to tattoos. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 160:A9808PubMed Van der Bent SA, Wolkerstorfer A, Rustemeyer T (2016) Cutaneous adverse reactions to tattoos. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 160:A9808PubMed
4.
go back to reference Hutton Carlsen K, Serup J (2014) Patients with tattoo reactions have reduced quality of life and suffer from itch. Skin Res Technol 21:101–107CrossRef Hutton Carlsen K, Serup J (2014) Patients with tattoo reactions have reduced quality of life and suffer from itch. Skin Res Technol 21:101–107CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Serup J, Carlsen KH, Sepehri M (2015) Tattoo complaints and complications: diagnosis and clinical spectrum. Curr Probl Dermatol 48:48–60CrossRef Serup J, Carlsen KH, Sepehri M (2015) Tattoo complaints and complications: diagnosis and clinical spectrum. Curr Probl Dermatol 48:48–60CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Van der Bent SAS, Maijer KI, Rustemeyer T (2017) Image gallery: hyperkeratotic hypersensitivity reaction to red pigment tattoo. Br J Dermatol 177:e350CrossRef Van der Bent SAS, Maijer KI, Rustemeyer T (2017) Image gallery: hyperkeratotic hypersensitivity reaction to red pigment tattoo. Br J Dermatol 177:e350CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Serup J, Hutton CK (2014) Patch test study of 90 patients with tattoo reactions: negative outcome of allergy patch test to baseline batteries and culprit inks suggests allergen(s) are generated in the skin through haptenization. Contact Dermatitis 71:255–263CrossRef Serup J, Hutton CK (2014) Patch test study of 90 patients with tattoo reactions: negative outcome of allergy patch test to baseline batteries and culprit inks suggests allergen(s) are generated in the skin through haptenization. Contact Dermatitis 71:255–263CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bil W, van der Bent SAS, Spiekstra SW, Nazmi K, Rustemeyer T, Gibbs S (2018) Comparison of the skin sensitization potential of 3 red and 2 black tattoo inks using interleukin-18 as a biomarker in a reconstructed human skin model. Contact Dermatitis 79:336–345CrossRef Bil W, van der Bent SAS, Spiekstra SW, Nazmi K, Rustemeyer T, Gibbs S (2018) Comparison of the skin sensitization potential of 3 red and 2 black tattoo inks using interleukin-18 as a biomarker in a reconstructed human skin model. Contact Dermatitis 79:336–345CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Van der Bent SAS, de Winter RW, Wolkerstorfer A, Rustemeyer T (2019) Red tattoo reactions, a prospective cohort on clinical aspects. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 33(10):e384–e386 Van der Bent SAS, de Winter RW, Wolkerstorfer A, Rustemeyer T (2019) Red tattoo reactions, a prospective cohort on clinical aspects. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 33(10):e384–e386
10.
go back to reference Wambier CG, Cappel MA, Wambier SPF (2017) Treatment of reaction to red tattoo ink with intralesional triamcinolone. An Bras Dermatol 95:748–750CrossRef Wambier CG, Cappel MA, Wambier SPF (2017) Treatment of reaction to red tattoo ink with intralesional triamcinolone. An Bras Dermatol 95:748–750CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Godinho MM, Aguinaga F, Grynszpan R, Lima VM, Azulay DR, Cuzzi T, Ramos-E-Silva M, Manela-Azulay M (2015) Granulomatous reaction to red tattoo pigment treated with allopurinol. J Cosmet Dermatol 14:241–245CrossRef Godinho MM, Aguinaga F, Grynszpan R, Lima VM, Azulay DR, Cuzzi T, Ramos-E-Silva M, Manela-Azulay M (2015) Granulomatous reaction to red tattoo pigment treated with allopurinol. J Cosmet Dermatol 14:241–245CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Patrizi A, Raone B, Savoia F, Bacci F, Pileri A, Gurioli C, Neri I (2009) Tattoo-associated pseudolymphomatous reaction and its successful treatment with hydroxychloroquine. Acta Derm Venereol 89(3):327–328CrossRef Patrizi A, Raone B, Savoia F, Bacci F, Pileri A, Gurioli C, Neri I (2009) Tattoo-associated pseudolymphomatous reaction and its successful treatment with hydroxychloroquine. Acta Derm Venereol 89(3):327–328CrossRef
13.
go back to reference De Winter RW, van der Bent SAS, van Esch M, Wolkerstorfer A, Rustemeyer T (2019) Allergic reaction to red cosmetic lip tattoo treated with hydroxychloroquine. Dermatitis. 30(1):82–83CrossRef De Winter RW, van der Bent SAS, van Esch M, Wolkerstorfer A, Rustemeyer T (2019) Allergic reaction to red cosmetic lip tattoo treated with hydroxychloroquine. Dermatitis. 30(1):82–83CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sepehri M, Jørgensen B, Serup J (2015) Introduction of dermatome shaving as first line treatment of chronic tattoo reactions. J Dermatolog Treat 26:451–455CrossRef Sepehri M, Jørgensen B, Serup J (2015) Introduction of dermatome shaving as first line treatment of chronic tattoo reactions. J Dermatolog Treat 26:451–455CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Forbat E, Al-Niaimi F (2016) Patterns of reactions to red pigment tattoo and treatment methods. Dermatol Ther 6:13–23CrossRef Forbat E, Al-Niaimi F (2016) Patterns of reactions to red pigment tattoo and treatment methods. Dermatol Ther 6:13–23CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Millán-Cayetano JF, Alegre-Sánchez A, Boixeda P (2017) Treatment of red tattoo reactions using CO2 laser. Lasers Med Sci 33(5):1171–1173 Millán-Cayetano JF, Alegre-Sánchez A, Boixeda P (2017) Treatment of red tattoo reactions using CO2 laser. Lasers Med Sci 33(5):1171–1173
17.
go back to reference Ibrahimi OA, Syed Z, Sakamoto FH, Avram MM, Anderson RR (2011) Treatment of tattoo allergy with ablative fractional resurfacing: a novel paradigm for tattoo removal. J Am Acad Dermatol 64:1111–1114CrossRef Ibrahimi OA, Syed Z, Sakamoto FH, Avram MM, Anderson RR (2011) Treatment of tattoo allergy with ablative fractional resurfacing: a novel paradigm for tattoo removal. J Am Acad Dermatol 64:1111–1114CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Meesters AA, De Rie MA, Wolkerstorfer A (2016) Generalized eczematous reaction after fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy for tattoo allergy. J Cosmet Laser Ther 18:456–458CrossRef Meesters AA, De Rie MA, Wolkerstorfer A (2016) Generalized eczematous reaction after fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy for tattoo allergy. J Cosmet Laser Ther 18:456–458CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB (2018) COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB (2018) COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res
20.
go back to reference Kluger N (2017) Cutaneous complications related to tattoos: 31 cases from Finland. Dermatology 233(1):100–109 Kluger N (2017) Cutaneous complications related to tattoos: 31 cases from Finland. Dermatology 233(1):100–109
21.
go back to reference Maijer KI, van der Bent SAS, Vercoutere W, Rustemeyer T (2018) Granulomatous tattoo reaction with associated uveitis successfully treated with methotrexate. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 32(9):e338–e339 Maijer KI, van der Bent SAS, Vercoutere W, Rustemeyer T (2018) Granulomatous tattoo reaction with associated uveitis successfully treated with methotrexate. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 32(9):e338–e339
22.
go back to reference Van der Bent SAS, Oyen EMM, Rustemeyer T, Jaspars EH, Hoekzema R. Histopathology of red tattoo reactions. Am J Dermatopathol Accepted Van der Bent SAS, Oyen EMM, Rustemeyer T, Jaspars EH, Hoekzema R. Histopathology of red tattoo reactions. Am J Dermatopathol Accepted
23.
go back to reference Zemtsov A, Wilson L (1997) CO2 laser treatment causes local tattoo allergic reaction to become generalized. Acta Derm Venereol 77:497PubMed Zemtsov A, Wilson L (1997) CO2 laser treatment causes local tattoo allergic reaction to become generalized. Acta Derm Venereol 77:497PubMed
24.
go back to reference Prinz BM, Vavricka SR, Graf P et al (2004) Efficacy of laser treatment of tattoos using lasers emitting wavelengths of 532 nm, 755 nm and 1064 nm. Br J Dermatol 150:245–251CrossRef Prinz BM, Vavricka SR, Graf P et al (2004) Efficacy of laser treatment of tattoos using lasers emitting wavelengths of 532 nm, 755 nm and 1064 nm. Br J Dermatol 150:245–251CrossRef
25.
go back to reference England RW, Vogel P, Hagan L (2002) Immediate cutaneous hypersensitivity after treatment of tattoo with Nd: YAG laser: a case report and review of the literature. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 89:215–217CrossRef England RW, Vogel P, Hagan L (2002) Immediate cutaneous hypersensitivity after treatment of tattoo with Nd: YAG laser: a case report and review of the literature. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 89:215–217CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Harper J, Losch AE, Otto SG, Zirwas M, Delaney KO, Wakelin JK 3rd. (2010) New insight into the pathophysiology of tattoo reactions following laser tattoo removal. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:313e–314eCrossRef Harper J, Losch AE, Otto SG, Zirwas M, Delaney KO, Wakelin JK 3rd. (2010) New insight into the pathophysiology of tattoo reactions following laser tattoo removal. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:313e–314eCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ashinoff R, Levine VJ, Soter NA (1995) Allergic reactions to tattoo pigment after laser treatment. Dermatol Surg 21:291–294PubMed Ashinoff R, Levine VJ, Soter NA (1995) Allergic reactions to tattoo pigment after laser treatment. Dermatol Surg 21:291–294PubMed
28.
go back to reference Yorulmaz A, Onan DT, Artuz F, Gunes R (2015) A case of generalized allergic contact dermatitis after laser tattoo removal. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 34:234–236CrossRef Yorulmaz A, Onan DT, Artuz F, Gunes R (2015) A case of generalized allergic contact dermatitis after laser tattoo removal. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 34:234–236CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ablative laser surgery for allergic tattoo reactions: a retrospective study
Authors
S. A. S. van der Bent
Sanne Huisman
T. Rustemeyer
A. Wolkerstorfer
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer London
Keywords
CO2 Laser
Laser
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0268-8921
Electronic ISSN: 1435-604X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03164-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Lasers in Medical Science 6/2021 Go to the issue