Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Original Article

A cross-sectional study of autoantibody profiles in the Waikato systemic sclerosis cohort, New Zealand

Authors: Winston S. J. Chang, Joanna Schollum, Douglas H. N. White, Kamal K. Solanki

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The autoantibody profiles in New Zealand systemic sclerosis patients have not previously been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the autoantibody profiles of patients in the Waikato Hospital Systemic Sclerosis Clinic cohort. The EUROLINE (IgG) Systemic Sclerosis panel test kit (which tests for Scl-70, CENP-A, CENP-B, RP11, RP155, Fib, NOR90, Th/To, PM100, PM75, Ku, PDGFR and Ro-52) was selected for the purpose of this study. All patients attending the Waikato Hospital Systemic Sclerosis clinic were invited to participate. These patients were categorised by systemic sclerosis subtypes [1]. Results were compared with previously published data, including the EUSTAR database. Sixty patients (56 female) were recruited, with a median age of 61 years (range 29–81 years). Forty-one had limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc). Of these lcSSc patients, 31 (75.6 %) were positive for CENP-A and CENP-B (anti-centromere) antibodies, 12 (29.3 %) for Ro-52 antibodies, 5 (12.2 %) for RP11 and RP155, 4 (9.8 %) for Scl-70 and 1 (2.4 %) each for anti-Fib and Th/To antibodies. Fifteen patients had diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc), of which 7 patients (47.6 %) were positive for RP11 and RP155, 4 (26.7 %) for Scl-70. Three dcSSc patients did not have either of these two major antibodies, but of these 15 dcSSc patients, 4 patients (26.7 %) were positive also for Ro-52, 2 (13.3 %) for anti-Ku, and 1 (6.7 %) each for anti-Fib and NOR90. Four patients had overlap syndrome (OLS), 1 had CENP-A and CENP-B antibodies, 1 had Ro-52 autoantibodies 1 had anti-Ku antibodies. Three patients had no autoantibodies. This is the first study to look at the autoantibody profile of SSc patients in New Zealand. A higher prevalence of antibodies against centromere and RNA polymerase III was demonstrated in our group compared with the EUSTAR database suggesting that antibody prevalence may vary geographically.
Literature
1.
go back to reference LeRoy EC et al (1988) Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis. J Rheumatol 15(2):202–205PubMed LeRoy EC et al (1988) Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis. J Rheumatol 15(2):202–205PubMed
2.
go back to reference Nihtyanova SI, Denton CP (2010) Autoantibodies as predictive tools in systemic sclerosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 6(2):112–116CrossRefPubMed Nihtyanova SI, Denton CP (2010) Autoantibodies as predictive tools in systemic sclerosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 6(2):112–116CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ho KT, Reveille J (2003) The clinical relevance of autoantibodies in scleroderma. Arthritis Research and Therapy 5(2):80–93 Ho KT, Reveille J (2003) The clinical relevance of autoantibodies in scleroderma. Arthritis Research and Therapy 5(2):80–93
4.
5.
go back to reference van den Hoogen F et al (2013) 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 72(11):1747–1755CrossRefPubMed van den Hoogen F et al (2013) 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 72(11):1747–1755CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Reveille JD et al (2001) Systemic sclerosis in 3 US ethnic groups: a comparison of clinical, sociodemographic, serologic, and immunogenetic determinants. Semin Arthritis Rheum 30(5):332–346CrossRefPubMed Reveille JD et al (2001) Systemic sclerosis in 3 US ethnic groups: a comparison of clinical, sociodemographic, serologic, and immunogenetic determinants. Semin Arthritis Rheum 30(5):332–346CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Meier FM et al (2012) Update on the profile of the EUSTAR cohort: an analysis of the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group database. Ann Rheum Dis 71(8):1355–1360CrossRefPubMed Meier FM et al (2012) Update on the profile of the EUSTAR cohort: an analysis of the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group database. Ann Rheum Dis 71(8):1355–1360CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Okano Y, Steen VD, Medsger TA Jr (1993) Autoantibody reactive with RNA polymerase III in systemic sclerosis. Ann Intern Med 119(10):1005–1013CrossRefPubMed Okano Y, Steen VD, Medsger TA Jr (1993) Autoantibody reactive with RNA polymerase III in systemic sclerosis. Ann Intern Med 119(10):1005–1013CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Okano Y, Medsger TA Jr (1990) Autoantibody to Th ribonucleoprotein (nucleolar 7-2 RNA protein particle) in patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 33(12):1822–1828CrossRefPubMed Okano Y, Medsger TA Jr (1990) Autoantibody to Th ribonucleoprotein (nucleolar 7-2 RNA protein particle) in patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 33(12):1822–1828CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Oddis CV et al (1992) Serum autoantibody to the nucleolar antigen PM-Scl. Clinical and immunogenetic associations. Arthritis Rheum 35(10):1211–1217CrossRefPubMed Oddis CV et al (1992) Serum autoantibody to the nucleolar antigen PM-Scl. Clinical and immunogenetic associations. Arthritis Rheum 35(10):1211–1217CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mahler M et al (2011) Anti-centromere antibodies in a large cohort of systemic sclerosis patients: comparison between immunofluorescence, CENP-A and CENP-B ELISA. Clin Chim Acta 412(21–22):1937–1943CrossRefPubMed Mahler M et al (2011) Anti-centromere antibodies in a large cohort of systemic sclerosis patients: comparison between immunofluorescence, CENP-A and CENP-B ELISA. Clin Chim Acta 412(21–22):1937–1943CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Harvey GR et al (1999) Clinical and serological associations with anti-RNA polymerase antibodies in systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Immunol 117(2):395–402PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Harvey GR et al (1999) Clinical and serological associations with anti-RNA polymerase antibodies in systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Immunol 117(2):395–402PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Meyer OC et al (2007) Disease subsets, antinuclear antibody profile, and clinical features in 127 French and 247 US adult patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 34(1):104–109PubMed Meyer OC et al (2007) Disease subsets, antinuclear antibody profile, and clinical features in 127 French and 247 US adult patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 34(1):104–109PubMed
16.
go back to reference Shoenfeld Y et al (1996) Anti-topoisomerase-I and clinical findings in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Isr J Med Sci 32(7):537–542PubMed Shoenfeld Y et al (1996) Anti-topoisomerase-I and clinical findings in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Isr J Med Sci 32(7):537–542PubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Bardoni A et al (2003) Autoantibodies to RNA-polymerases in Italian patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 21(3):301–306PubMed Bardoni A et al (2003) Autoantibodies to RNA-polymerases in Italian patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 21(3):301–306PubMed
19.
go back to reference Meyer O et al (2010) Anti-RNA polymerase III antibody prevalence and associated clinical manifestations in a large series of French patients with systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional study. J Rheumatol 37(1):125–130CrossRefPubMed Meyer O et al (2010) Anti-RNA polymerase III antibody prevalence and associated clinical manifestations in a large series of French patients with systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional study. J Rheumatol 37(1):125–130CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hesselstrand R et al (2003) The association of antinuclear antibodies with organ involvement and survival in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 42(4):534–540CrossRef Hesselstrand R et al (2003) The association of antinuclear antibodies with organ involvement and survival in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 42(4):534–540CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Parker JC, Burlingame RW, Bunn CC (2009) Prevalence of antibodies to Ro-52 in a serologically defined population of patients with systemic sclerosis. J Autoimmune Dis 6:2PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Parker JC, Burlingame RW, Bunn CC (2009) Prevalence of antibodies to Ro-52 in a serologically defined population of patients with systemic sclerosis. J Autoimmune Dis 6:2PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Dick T et al (2002) Coexistence of antitopoisomerase I and anticentromere antibodies in patients with systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis 61(2):121–127PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Dick T et al (2002) Coexistence of antitopoisomerase I and anticentromere antibodies in patients with systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis 61(2):121–127PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kikuchi M, Inagaki T (2000) Bibliographical study of the concurrent existence of anticentromere and antitopoisomerase I antibodies. Clin Rheumatol 19(6):435–441CrossRefPubMed Kikuchi M, Inagaki T (2000) Bibliographical study of the concurrent existence of anticentromere and antitopoisomerase I antibodies. Clin Rheumatol 19(6):435–441CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Jablonska S et al (1991) Immunological markers of the subsets of systemic scleroderma and its overlap. Arch Immunol Ther Exp 39(4):381–390 Jablonska S et al (1991) Immunological markers of the subsets of systemic scleroderma and its overlap. Arch Immunol Ther Exp 39(4):381–390
25.
go back to reference Jarzabek-Chorzelska M et al (1990) Are ACA and Scl 70 antibodies mutually exclusive? Br J Dermatol 122(2):201–208CrossRefPubMed Jarzabek-Chorzelska M et al (1990) Are ACA and Scl 70 antibodies mutually exclusive? Br J Dermatol 122(2):201–208CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Feghali-Bostwick C, Medsger TA Jr, Wright TM (2003) Analysis of systemic sclerosis in twins reveals low concordance for disease and high concordance for the presence of antinuclear antibodies. Arthritis Rheum 48(7):1956–1963CrossRefPubMed Feghali-Bostwick C, Medsger TA Jr, Wright TM (2003) Analysis of systemic sclerosis in twins reveals low concordance for disease and high concordance for the presence of antinuclear antibodies. Arthritis Rheum 48(7):1956–1963CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Pauling JD, McHugh N (2012) The clinical aspects of autoantibodies. In: Varga J, et al. (ed) Scleroderma: from pathogenesis to comprehensive management. Springer Science+ Business Media. p. 209–225 Pauling JD, McHugh N (2012) The clinical aspects of autoantibodies. In: Varga J, et al. (ed) Scleroderma: from pathogenesis to comprehensive management. Springer Science+ Business Media. p. 209–225
Metadata
Title
A cross-sectional study of autoantibody profiles in the Waikato systemic sclerosis cohort, New Zealand
Authors
Winston S. J. Chang
Joanna Schollum
Douglas H. N. White
Kamal K. Solanki
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-015-2981-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Clinical Rheumatology 11/2015 Go to the issue