Published in:
01-11-2017 | Original Article
Reliability of the nociceptive blink reflex evoked by electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve in humans
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 8/2017
Login to get accessAbstract
Objective
The nociceptive blink reflex (nBR) can be useful to investigate trigeminal nociceptive function. The aim of this study was to estimate the reliability of the nBR evoked by electrical stimulation of the three branches of the trigeminal nerve under the following conditions: over time (test-retest and intrarater reliability) and by two examiners (interrater reliability).
Materials and methods
Twenty-one healthy participants were evaluated in two sessions (24 h apart). The nBR was elicited by a so-called “nociceptive-specific” electrode placed over the entry zone of the right supraorbital (V1R), infraorbital (V2R), mental (V3R), and left infraorbital (V2L) nerve. The outcomes were individual electrical sensory (I
0) and pain thresholds (I
P); root mean square (RMS), area-under-the-curve (AUC), and onset latencies of R2 responses (determined twice after a recalibration session); and stimulus-evoked pain on a 0–10 numerical rating scale. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Kappa statistics were computed (α = 5%).
Results
ICCs were fair to excellent in 82% of the psychophysical measures (fair 21%, good 31%, excellent 30%) and in 86% of V1R, V2R, and V2L nBR parameters, whereas 52% of V3R showed poor reliability. ICCs for intrarater reliability were fair to good in 70% of measurements (fair 20%, good 50%) and in 75% of interrater measurements after the recalibration (fair 55%, good 20%). All kappa values showed at least fair agreement and the majority of the nBR measures (93%) presented moderate to excellent reliability.
Conclusion
The nBR and its associated psychophysical measures can be considered a sufficiently reliable test.
Clinical significance
The nBR can be recommended as an electrophysiological technique to assess trigeminal nociceptive function.