Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 8/2017

01-11-2017 | Original Article

The effect of veneering on the marginal fit of CAD/CAM-generated, copy-milled, and cast metal copings

Authors: Sabit Melih Ates, Zeynep Yesil Duymus, Ipek Caglar, Bilal Hologlu

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

This in vitro study investigated the marginal fit of metal and zirconia copings before and after veneering on dies with shoulder/chamfer (s/c) finish lines.

Materials and methods

Using CAD/CAM, ten (n = 10) each s/c zirconia (NZ) copings and ten (n = 10) each s/c metal (MM) copings were generated. As controls, ten (n = 10) each s/c zirconia copings were copy-milled (ZZ) and ten (n = 10) each s/c metal copings were cast (CC). The vertical marginal discrepancy of the copings was measured at 20 predefined spots of the circular shoulder and chamfer finish lines in microns (μm) before and after a first and a second veneering firing using a stereomicroscope at ×40 magnification. Data were statistically analyzed, and the comparisons of CAD/CAM-milled (NZ, MM), copy-milled (ZZ), and cast (CC) copings before and after veneering were made at a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

Gap width at s/c finish lines of ZZ was (91 ± 11/100 ± 28) and increased significantly (109 ± 21/141 ± 18) after the first firing (ZZ1). NZ showed significantly smaller gaps than ZZ (36 ± 6/46 ± 12) and (NZ1) after the first firing (61 ± 16/71 ± 29). Gap widths of CC groups (36 ± 8/25 ± 4) were not significantly different from NZ but were significantly lower after the (CC1) first veneering firing (40 ± 8/42 ± 7). MM copings showed gap values similar to NZ. Second firings did not significantly increase gaps in all groups except ZZ2 of chamfer finish line.

Conclusion

Veneering increased the marginal gap width of copings.

Clinical relevance

Within the limits of this in vitro study, aesthetic ceramic veneering of CAD/CAM-generated copings caused a statistically significant but tolerable loss of marginal fit precision.
Literature
1.
Tinschert J, Natt G, Hassenpflug S, Spiekermann H (2004) Status of current CAD/CAM technology in dental medicine. Int J Comput Dent 7:25–45PubMed
2.
Raigrodski AJ (2004) Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 92:557–562CrossRefPubMed
3.
Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H (2010) Current status of zirconia-based fixed restorations. J Oral Sci 52:531–539CrossRefPubMed
4.
Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M (2010) Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 37:866–876CrossRefPubMed
5.
Gavelis JR, Morency JD, Riley ED, Sozio RB (1981) The effect of various finish line preparations on the marginal seal and occlusal seat of full crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 45:138–145CrossRefPubMed
6.
Jacobs MS, Windeler AS (1991) An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent 65:436–442CrossRefPubMed
7.
Beschnidt SM, Strub JR (1999) Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 26:582–593CrossRefPubMed
8.
Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH (2000) Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 84:419–424CrossRefPubMed
9.
Grenade C, Mainjot A, Vanheusden A (2011) Fit of single zirconia copings: comparison between various manufacturing processes. J Prosthet Dent 105:249–255CrossRefPubMed
10.
McLean JW (1972) Polycarboxylate cements. Five years experience in general practice. Br Dent J 132:9–15CrossRefPubMed
11.
McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA (1971) The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131:107–111CrossRefPubMed
12.
Quintas AF, Oliveira F, Bottino MA (2004) Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 92:250–257CrossRefPubMed
13.
Probster L, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Kirchner E, Kanjantra P (1997) In vitro evaluation of a glass ceramic restorative material. J Oral Rehabil 24:636–645CrossRefPubMed
14.
Bindl A, Mormann WH (2005) Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 32:441–447CrossRefPubMed
15.
Gemalmaz D, Alkumru HN (1995) Marginal fit changes during porcelain firing cycles. J Prosthet Dent 73:49–54CrossRefPubMed
16.
Bridger DV, Nicholls JI (1981) Distortion of ceramometal fixed partial dentures during the firing cycle. J Prosthet Dent 45:507–514CrossRefPubMed
17.
Buchanan WT, Svare CW, Turner KA (1981) The effect of repeated firings and strength on marginal distortion in two ceramometal systems. J Prosthet Dent 45:502–506CrossRefPubMed
18.
Castellani D, Baccetti T, Clauser C, Bernardini UD (1994) Thermal distortion of different materials in crown construction. J Prosthet Dent 72:360–366CrossRefPubMed
19.
Balkaya MC, Cinar A, Pamuk S (2005) Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 93:346–355CrossRefPubMed
20.
El-Dessouky RA, Salama MM, Shakal MA, Korsel AM (2015) Marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM zirconia-based crown during fabrication steps. Tanta Dental Journal 12:81–88CrossRef
21.
Holmes JR, Sulik WD, Holland GA, Bayne SC (1992) Marginal fit of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 67:594–599CrossRefPubMed
22.
Sorensen JA (1990) A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent 64:18–24CrossRefPubMed
23.
Vigolo P, Fonzi F (2008) An in-vitro evaluation of fit of zircomnium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles. J Prosthodont 17:621–626CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Dittmer MP, Borchers L (2010) Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses. J Oral Rehabil 37:283–291CrossRefPubMed
25.
Mıura S, Inagakı R, Kasahara S, Yoda M (2014) Fit of zirconia all-ceramic crowns with different cervical margin designs, before and after porcelain firing and glazing. Dental Mater J 33(4):484–489CrossRef
26.
Baig MR, Tan KB, Nicholls JI (2010) Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system. J Prosthet Dent 104:216–227CrossRefPubMed
27.
Martinez-Rus F, Suarez MJ, Rivera B, Pradies G (2011) Evaluation of the absolute marginal discrepancy of zirconia based ceramic copings. J Prosthet Dent 105:108–114CrossRefPubMed
28.
Subası S, Oztürk N, Inan O, Bozogulları N (2012) Evaluation of marginal fit of two all ceramic copings with two different finish lines. Eur J Dent 6:163–168PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Kohorst P, Junghanns J, Dittmer MP, Borchers L, Stiesch M (2011) Different CAD/CAM processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy. Clin Oral Invest 15:527–536CrossRef
30.
Karataslı O, Kursoglu P, Capa N, Kazazoglu E (2011) Comparison of the marginal fit of different coping materials and designs produced by computer aided manufacturing systems. Dent Mater J 30:97–102CrossRefPubMed
31.
Euan R, Alvares OF, Termes JC, de Barbera MB, Azevedo SG (2012) Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparation with two different finish lines. J Prosthodont 21:291–295CrossRefPubMed
32.
Att W, Komine F, Gerds T, Strub JR (2009) Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three unit fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 101:239–247CrossRefPubMed
33.
Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ (1991) Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 66:747–753CrossRefPubMed
34.
Hamza TA, Ezzat HA, El-Hossary MM, Katamish HA, Shokry TE, Rosenstiel SF (2013) Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 109:83–87CrossRefPubMed
35.
Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M (2003) Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 16:587–592PubMed
36.
Groten M, Axmann D, Probster L, Weber H (2000) Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 83:40–49CrossRefPubMed
37.
Gassino G, Barone Monfrin S, Scanu M, Spina G, Preti G (2004) Marginal adaptation of fixed prosthodontics: a new 360-degree external examination procedure. Int J Prosthodont 17:218–223PubMed
38.
Shearer B, Gough MB, Setchell DJ (1996) Influence of marginal configuration and porcelain addition on the fit of In-Ceram crowns. Biomaterials 17:1891–1895CrossRefPubMed
39.
Chan C, Haraszthy G, Geis-Gerstofer J, Weber H (1985) The marginal fit of Cerestore full-ceramic crowns preliminary report. Quintessence Int 6:399–402
40.
Lin MT, Sy-Munoz J, Munoz CA, Goodacre CJ, Naylor WP (1998) The effect of tooth preparation form on the fit of Procera copings. Int J Prosthodont 11(6):580–590PubMed
41.
Bindl A, Mormann WH (2007) Fit of all-ceramic posterior fixed partial denture frameworks in vitro. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 27(6):567–575PubMed
42.
Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K (2003) Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 16(3):244–248PubMed
43.
Wöstmann B, Rehmann P, Trost D, Balkenhol M (2008) Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns. J Dent 36(7):508–551CrossRefPubMed
44.
Persson ASK, Oden A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Englund G (2009) Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater 25:929–936CrossRefPubMed
45.
46.
Kim EH, Lee DH, Kwon SM, Kwon TY (2016) A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems. J Prosthet Dent doi. doi:10.​1016/​j.​prosdent.​2016.​08.​002
47.
Shiratsuchi H, Komine F, Kakehashi Y, Matsumura H (2006) Influence of finish line design on marginal adaptation of electroformed metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 95(3):237–242CrossRefPubMed
48.
Bottino MA, Valandro LF, Buso L, Ozcan M (2007) The influence of cervical finish line, internal relief, and cement type on the cervical adaptation of metal crowns. Quintessence Int 38(7):425–432
49.
Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorenden J (2009) Marginal and internal fits of fixed dentalprostheses zirconia retainers. Dental Mater 25:94–102CrossRef
50.
51.
Suliman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT (1997) A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 10:478–484
52.
Torabi K, Vojdani M, Giti R, Taghva M, Pardis S (2015) The effect of various veneering techniques on the marginal fit of zirconia copings. J Adv Prosthodont 7(3):233–239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Isgrò G, Wang H, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ (2005) The effects of thermal mismatch and fabrication procedures on the deflection of layered all-ceramic discs. Dent Mater 21(7):649–655CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The effect of veneering on the marginal fit of CAD/CAM-generated, copy-milled, and cast metal copings
Authors
Sabit Melih Ates
Zeynep Yesil Duymus
Ipek Caglar
Bilal Hologlu
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2054-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

Clinical Oral Investigations 8/2017 Go to the issue

Original Article

Evaluation of ultrasonic and conventional surgical techniques for genioplasty combined with two different osteosynthesis plates: a cadaveric study

Original Article

Gingival recessions of lower incisors after proclination by orthodontics alone or in combination with anterior mandibular alveolar process distraction osteogenesis

Original Article

Multifactorial logistic regression analysis of factors associated with the incidence of erosive tooth wear among adults at different ages in Tokyo

Original Article

Symptomatic oral lesions may be associated with contact allergy to substances in oral hygiene products

Original Article

Inhibitory effect of saliva on osteoclastogenesis in vitro requires toll-like receptor 4 signaling

Original Article

Gene expression of miRNA-138 and cyclin D1 in oral lichen planus